Evaluation of Different Surgical Techniques for Revision Cubital Tunnel Release: A Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Symptoms.

PURPOSE: Controversy exists regarding the best option for revision surgery in refractory cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of revision surgery and determine the optimal surgical approach for patients requiring revision surgery for CuTS. METHODS: A literature search was conducted. Characteristics of the included studies were summarized descriptively. The risk ratio between patient-reported preoperative and postoperative outcomes relating to pain, motor, and sensory deficits was calculated. A meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the postoperative symptom improvements based on the type of secondary surgery. Random-effects meta-analysis and descriptive statistics were used when appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 471 patients were evaluated in 20 studies. In total, 254 (53.9%) male and 217 (46.1%) female patients, with an average age of 49.2 ± 14.1 years, were included in this study. Pain was the most common symptom (n = 346, 81.6%), followed by sensory and motor dysfunction in 342 (80.6%) and 223 (52.6%) patients, respectively. Meta-analysis comparing preoperative and postoperative symptoms between patients who had submuscular transposition (SMT), subcutaneous transposition (SCT), and neurolysis showed that a significant subgroup difference exists between the types of revision surgery in sensory and motor improvements. Meta-regression showed that SMT was associated with better outcomes compared with SCT in motor and sensory improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Revision surgery for CuTS can be useful for addressing recurrent and persistent symptoms. Compared with neurolysis and SCT, SMT seems to be the superior option for revision surgery, demonstrating substantial improvement in all symptom domains. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Allergy identification for neurosurgical patients: updates for management.

Allergic reactions in neurosurgical procedures are uncommon, but they are detrimental to a patient's prognosis and recovery. By synthesizing data collected from other surgical fields, possible triggers and alternatives have been identified. Current treatment guidelines involve stabilizing the patient in emergency situations, symptom management, and identification of causative allergens. Preoperative allergy screening is uncommon due to the low prevalence of perioperative hypersensitivity reactions. However, preoperative questionnaire screening can identify when preoperative allergy screening, premedication, or use of a material alternative is necessary. Greater emphasis on material alternatives, increased preoperative screening, and more data can improve the prognosis of neurosurgical patients at risk of perioperative allergic complications.

Nutritional Optimization for Post-Spinal Surgery Recovery.

Adequate nutritional intake is a key component of uncomplicated recovery from spinal surgery. Though much in the literature exists regarding its importance, specific dietary regimens for spinal surgery remain understudied, and little is available in compiling both preoperative and postoperative nutritional recommendations for patients. The complexity that may exist with these recommendations -- especially in the context of patients with diabetes or those who use substances -- has led in recent years to the development of protocols such as Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), which gives providers a guideline upon which to base their nutritional counselling. More innovative regimens, such as the use of bioelectrical impedance analyses to assess nutritional status, have also emerged, resulting in a vast array of dietary recommendations and protocols for spinal surgery. In the following paper, we aim to compile a few of these guidelines, comparing various preoperative and postoperative nutritional strategies as well as making note of special considerations, like patients with diabetes or those who use substances. We also work to overview several such dietary "protocols" available in the literature, with a special focus on ERAS and more recent regimens like the Northwestern High-Risk Spine Protocol. We briefly mentioned preclinical work on novel nutritional recommendations as well. Ultimately, we hope to highlight the importance of nutrition in spinal surgery and address the need for greater cohesion of dietary strategies already in existence.

Vertebral Primary Bone Lesions: Review of Management Options.

The assessment and treatment of vertebral primary bone lesions continue to pose a unique yet significant challenge. Indeed, there exists little in the literature in the way of compiling and overviewing the various types of vertebral lesions, which can often have complicated intervention strategies. Given the severe consequences of mismanaged vertebral bone tumors-including the extreme loss of motor function-it is clear that such an overview of spinal lesion care is needed. Thus, in the following paper, we aim to address the assessment of various vertebral primary bone lesions, outlining the relevant nonsurgical and surgical interventional methods. We describe examples of primary benign and malignant tumors, comparing and contrasting their differences. We also highlight emerging treatments and approaches for these tumors, like cryoablation and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Ultimately, we aim to emphasize the need for further guidelines in regard to correlating lesion type with proper therapy, underscoring the innate diversity of vertebral primary bone lesions in the literature.