RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm efficacy and safety of a single-branch Castor stent graft in the treatment of thoracic aortic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 106 patients with thoracic aortic disease treated with Castor single-branch stent graft at 3 centers were collected between May 2018 and June 2023. The indicators included technical success, stent-related complication, reintervention, retrograde dissection, endoleak, distal stent graft-induced entry (dSINE), branch patency, and mortality. The outcomes of the Castor stent graft for multibranch reconstruction above the arch was also analyzed. RESULTS: The technical success was 98.1% (104/106), while the surgical success was 93.4% (99/106). The reintervention was 2.8% (3/106), consisting of a case of retrograde type A dissection, an endoleak, and a dSINE. The retrograde dissection was 1.9% (2/106), while type I endoleak was 1.9% (2/106). The new dSINE was 2.8% (3/106), and the branch patency rate was 100%. The mortality was 1.9% (2/106). The mean follow-up time was 29.1±17.7 months. The 2-year post-surgery cumulative survival rate was 91.0%±3.1%, while the cumulative branch patency rate was 96.2%±2.2%. In addition, the cumulative freedom from stent-related reintervention rate was 93.2%±2.8%. A comparison showed no significant difference in the stent-related complication, branch patency, endoleak, reintervention, and mortality when the proximal end of the Castor stent graft was anchored to zones 1 or 2 of the aorta. CONCLUSION: Castor single-branch stent graft showed favorable early and midterm outcomes in the treatment of thoracic aortic disease. In addition, it was feasible to combine Castor stent graft with other advanced techniques for multibranch aortic arch reconstruction. CLINICAL IMPACT: The Castor single-branch stent graft was approval by the Chinese Food and Drug Administration in 2017. However, there were few studies on the mid-term outcomes for thoracic aortic disease after launching, which mainly focused on small single-center retrospective study. In the study, we assessed the mid-term outcomes of Castor stent graft through multi-center cases, Castor stent graft combined with other advanced techniques (such as fenestration and hybrid) for multi-branch reconstruction of aortic arch were also conducted. We found Castor single-branch stent graft showed favorable early and mid-term outcomes in the treatment of thoracic aortic disease. Additionally, it was feasible to combine Castor stent graft with other advanced technique for multi-branch aortic arch reconstruction. As an off-the-shelf branched stent graft with a wide range of models, it could be also used in most emergent situation. The Castor stent graft was expected to become more widely used in the future.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the short-term and mid-term safety and efficacy of stent-graft compared with bare stents for treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). METHODS: One hundred eighty three patients diagnosed with AIOD who received stent implantation at 3 vascular centers in north China between January 2019 and December 2021 were enrolled. Patients were divided into those undergoing stent-graft (Group A; n = 67) or bare stent (Group B; n = 116) implantation for retrospective cohort analysis. Efficacy was assessed as surgical success rate and rate of freedom from clinically driven target lesion reintervention at each follow-up time point. Safety was assessed by the rate of perioperative complication, major limb amputation, and aortoiliac artery-related mortality. RESULTS: There were no preoperative baseline differences between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The surgical success was 91.04% for Group A, significantly higher than that for Group B (79.31%; P < 0.05). Incidence of perioperative complications was 2.98% for Group A, significantly lower than that for Group B (9.48%, P < 0.05), as was the rate of major limb amputation (A: 1.49% vs. B: 5.17%) and aortoiliac artery-related mortality (A: 1.49% vs. B: 4.31%), although these 2 indicators were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Follow-up rates were 91.8% for the total follow-up time of 3 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis gave significantly higher 1-year and 2-year freedom from clinically driven target lesion reintervention for Group A (98.51% and 95.52%) than for Group B (95.69% and 89.66%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Stent-graft is more effective and safer than bare stent in the treatment of AIOD.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Enfermedades de la Aorta , Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Ilíaca , Stents , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Anciano , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Aorta/mortalidad , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/mortalidad , China , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Recuperación del Miembro , Diseño de Prótesis , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify independent predictors of thoracic aortic growth in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD or intramural hematoma (IMH) from April 2014 to April 2023 was performed. The baseline morphological data of TBAD was established through computed tomography angiography (CTA) before discharge. Patients were divided into two groups based on aortic growth: growth and no growth. Aortic growth defined as an increase ≥5 mm in thoracic maximal aortic diameter during any serial follow-up CTA measurement. Logistic regression following propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify independent predictors for aortic growth. Receiver operating characteristic curve and cutoff value of independent predictors were calculated. Linear regression was used to establish a correlation between anatomical variables and follow-up aortic diameter. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients with TBAD (n = 122) or IMH (n = 23) undergoing TEVAR were included, with a male of 83.4% and a mean age of 56 ± 14.1 years. Patients in growth group and no growth group was 26 (17.9%) and 119 (80.1%), respectively. After using PSM method, matched regression analysis showed residual maximal tear diameter (OR = 0.889, 95% CI 0.830-0.952, p = 0.001) and follow-up aortic diameter (OR = 0.977, 95% CI 0.965-0.989, p < 0.001) were independent predictors for aortic growth. The cutoff value was 8.55 mm for residual tear diameter and 40.65 mm for follow-up maximal aortic diameter. The residual maximal tear diameter showed a linear correlation with follow-up aortic diameter (DW = 1.74, R2 = 6.2%, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that residual maximal tear diameter >8.55 mm and follow-up aortic diameter >40.65 mm could predict aortic growth in patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of t-Branch off-the-shelf multibranched endograft for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS: Online databases were searched from June 2012 to March 2023. The data were pooled together using a random-effects model of proportions. The outcomes overall included technical success, spinal cord ischemia, target vessel occlusion, type I or III endoleak, reintervention, early mortality (30-day), and mid-term outcomes. Subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore variation among studies. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies containing 1238 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall study quality assessment was found to be moderate to good. The pooled technical success was 97.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]=95.5-98.6, I2=53.01%, 1185/1238 cases, 15 studies). Overall, early mortality was 7.3% (95% CI=4.4-10.1, I2=74.48%, 124/1238 cases, 15 studies). Early spinal cord ischemia was 13.4% (95% CI=9.6-17.2, I2=67.24%, 160/1238 cases, 15 studies), and early type I or III endoleak was 6.0% (95% CI=3.4-8.5, I2=53.71%, 68/1032 cases, 9 studies). Mid-term outcomes showed target vessel occlusion was 4% (95% CI=1.4-6.5, I2=65.18%, 28/528 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), type I or III endoleak was 4.7% (95% CI=2-7.5, I2=49.74%, 38/512 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), reintervention was 11.2% (95% CI=8.1-14.3, I2=31.06%, 85/650 cases, 10 studies, 5-21.2 months), and pooled mortality was 13.9% (95% CI=7.2-20.7, I2=76.32%, 84/550 cases, 11 studies, 5-21.2 months). Meta-regression found a significant linear association between higher technical success and earlier publication year (p=0.014) and studies with anatomic inclusion criteria (p=0.037). Urgent patients (p=0.021) and later publication year (p=0.048) were significantly associated with higher early mortality. CONCLUSION: The use of the off-the-shelf t-Branch multibranched endograft for elective or urgent endovascular TAAA repair is associated with high technical success rates and proved to be safe and effective at early and mid-term follow-up. However, the heterogeneity between the included studies is high, and prospective, randomized studies along with future larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed. CLINICAL IMPACT: The Zenith t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) was approved as a commercially available device in Europe in June 2012. Although a decade has past, the outcomes of t-Branch have rarely been synthesized at the global level. This meta-analysis included 15 studies containing 1238 patients. The meta-analyses included technical success, major adverse events, reintervention, early mortality, and mid-term outcomes. The outcome was very meaningful and representative for the use of t-Branch. It is helpful for endovascular surgeons to make decisions on the treatment of TAAA patients.
RESUMEN
Lithium-ion battery (LIB) is the key technology for climate change mitigation. The sustainability of LIB supply chain has caused widespread concern since the material utilization efficiency of LIB supply chain has not been well investigated. This study aims to fill this research gap by conducting a dynamic material flow analysis of lithium in China from 2015 to 2021. Results indicate that within the temporal boundary, lithium flow and in-use stock grew significantly in China due to the rapid development of the EV market, with lithium flow in domestic production of basic chemicals increasing by 614% to 100 kt, end-use consumption increasing by 160% to 35 kt, and in-use stock increasing by 62% to 195 kt. China has been a net importer of lithium, of which cumulative imports and exports were 343 kt and 169 kt, respectively. In addition, 103 kt of lithium was converted to inventories or was lost during the processing from 2015 to 2021. By optimizing inventory and processing, developing substitutes for lithium for non-battery applications, and improving lithium recycling, China's net import dependency of lithium could be reduced from 27%-86% to 0%-16%. Our study demonstrates that it is urgent to improve material utilization efficiency so that the lithium resource supply can be secured.
RESUMEN
The tripartite motif-containing (TRIM) protein family has steadily become a hotspot in tumor-related research. As a member of the E3 ubiquitin ligase family, TRIM is working on many crucial biological processes, including the regulation of tumor cell proliferation, metastasis, apoptosis, and autophagy. Among the diverse TRIM superfamily members, TRIM3 operates via different mechanisms in various types of tumors. This review primarily focuses on the current state of research regarding the antitumor mechanisms of TRIM3 in different cancers. A more in-depth study of TRIM3 may provide new directions for future antitumor treatments. Our review focuses on TRIM3 proteins and cancer. We searched for relevant articles on the mechanisms by which TRIM3 affects tumorigenesis and development from 1997 to 2023 and summarized the latest progress and future directions. Triad-containing motif protein 3 (TRIM3) is an important protein, which plays a key role in the process of tumorigenesis and development. The comprehensive exploration of TRIM3 is anticipated to pave the way for future advancements in antitumor therapy, which is expected to be a new hallmark for cancer detection and a novel target for drug action. TRIM3 is poised to become a significant milestone in cancer detection and a promising focal point for drug intervention. Recent years have witnessed notable progress in research aimed at unraveling the antitumor mechanism of TRIM3, with far-reaching implications for practical tumor diagnosis, treatment protocols, efficacy evaluation, economics, and pharmaceutical utilization.
Asunto(s)
Carcinogénesis , Transformación Celular Neoplásica , Humanos , Apoptosis , Autofagia , Proliferación Celular , Proteínas de Motivos Tripartitos , Proteínas PortadorasRESUMEN
Objective: The study aimed to explore the changes in the electrical power spectrum of the brain and its correlation with neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with cognitively impaired cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and to explore its clinical application. Methods: A total of 61 patients with CSVD who attended the People's Hospital of Shaanxi Province from September 2021 to September 2022 were divided into the group with cognitive impairment (cerebral small vascular with cognitive impairment, CSVCI group, n = 29) and the group without cognitive impairment (CSVD group, n = 32) based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) score, while 20 healthy subjects were recruited as the control group (healthy control, HC group). EEG was performed in the three groups, and the difference in whole brain quantitative EEG power spectral density (PSD) was calculated and compared between the three groups. Results: The PSD values in the δ and θ bands of the CSVCI group were higher than those of the CSVD group, while the PSD values in the α band were lower than those of the CSVD and HC groups. In addition, PSD values in the δ-band in the CSVD group were lower than those in the HC group (all p < 0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression showed that reduced α-band global average PSD and low years of education were independent risk factors for cognitive impairment in patients with CSVD (p < 0.05). In patients with cerebral small-vessel disease, α-band PSD was positively and δ-band PSD negatively correlated with MoCA score, and paraventricular, deep white matter, and total Fazekas scores were negatively correlated with MoCA score. Furthermore, θ-band PSD is positively correlated with NLR (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: EEG activity was slowed down in patients with CSVD with cognitive impairment. The α-band global mean PSD values independently affected the occurrence of cognitive impairment in CSVD patients beyond the Fazekas score. NLR may be one of the mechanisms leading to the slowing down of the EEG, which can be used as an objective indicator for the early prediction of cognitive impairment but still needs to be clarified by further studies.