Immune Inhibitor A Metalloproteases Contribute to Virulence in Bacillus Endophthalmitis.

Endophthalmitis is a devastating infection that can cause blindness. Over half of Bacillus endophthalmitis cases result in significant loss of useful vision. Bacillus produces many virulence factors that may contribute to retinal damage and robust inflammation. We analyzed Bacillus immune inhibitor A (InhA) metalloproteases in the context of this disease, hypothesizing that InhAs contribute to Bacillus intraocular virulence and inflammation. We analyzed phenotypes and infectivity of wild-type (WT), InhA1-deficient (ΔinhA1), InhA2-deficient (ΔinhA2), or InhA1, A2, and A3-deficient (ΔinhA1-3) Bacillus thuringiensis. In vitro analysis of growth, proteolysis, and cytotoxicity were compared. WT and InhA mutants were similarly cytotoxic to retinal cells. The ΔinhA1 and ΔinhA2 mutants entered log-phase growth earlier than WT B. thuringiensis. Proteolysis by the ΔinhA1-3 mutant was decreased, but this strain grew similar to WT in vitro. Experimental endophthalmitis was initiated by intravitreally infecting C57BL/6J mice with 200 CFU of WT B. thuringiensis or InhA mutants. Eyes were analyzed for intraocular Bacillus and myeloperoxidase concentrations, retinal function loss, and gross histological changes. Eyes infected with the ΔinhA1 or ΔinhA2 mutant strains contained greater numbers of bacteria than eyes infected with WT throughout the infection course. Eyes infected with single mutants had inflammation and retinal function loss similar to eyes infected with the WT strain. Eyes infected with the ΔinhA1-3 mutant cleared the infection. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) results suggested that there may be compensatory expression of the other InhAs in the single InhA mutant. These results indicate that together, the InhA metalloproteases contribute to the severity of infection and inflammation in Bacillus endophthalmitis.

The cereus matter of Bacillus endophthalmitis.

Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) endophthalmitis is a devastating intraocular infection primarily associated with post-traumatic injuries. The majority of these infections result in substantial vision loss, if not loss of the eye itself, within 12-48 h. Multifactorial mechanisms that lead to the innate intraocular inflammatory response during this disease include the combination of robust bacterial replication, migration of the organism throughout the eye, and toxin production by the organism. Therefore, the window of therapeutic intervention in B. cereus endophthalmitis is quite narrow compared to that of other pathogens which cause this disease. Understanding the interaction of bacterial and host factors is critical in understanding the disease and formulating more rational therapeutics for salvaging vision. In this review, we will discuss clinical and research findings related to B. cereus endophthalmitis in terms of the organism's virulence and inflammogenic potential, and strategies for improving of current therapeutic regimens for this blinding disease.

Ocular Bacterial Infections: A Ten-Year Survey and Review of Causative Organisms Based on the Oklahoma Experience.

Ocular infections can be medical emergencies that result in permanent visual impairment or blindness and loss of quality of life. Bacteria are a major cause of ocular infections. Effective treatment of ocular infections requires knowledge of which bacteria are the likely cause of the infection. This survey of ocular bacterial isolates and review of ocular pathogens is based on a survey of a collection of isolates banked over a ten-year span at the Dean McGee Eye Institute in Oklahoma. These findings illustrate the diversity of bacteria isolated from the eye, ranging from common species to rare and unique species. At all sampled sites, staphylococci were the predominant bacteria isolated. Pseudomonads were the most common Gram-negative bacterial isolate, except in vitreous, where Serratia was the most common Gram-negative bacterial isolate. Here, we discuss the range of ocular infections that these species have been documented to cause and treatment options for these infections. Although a highly diverse spectrum of species has been isolated from the eye, the majority of infections are caused by Gram-positive species, and in most infections, empiric treatments are effective.

C-X-C Chemokines Influence Intraocular Inflammation During Bacillus Endophthalmitis.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the C-X-C chemokines CXCL2 and CXCL10 as potential anti-inflammatory targets for Bacillus endophthalmitis. Methods: Bacillus endophthalmitis was induced in C57BL/6J, CXCL2-/-, and CXCL10-/- mice. At specific times postinfection, eyes were analyzed for Bacillus, retinal function, and inflammation. The efficacies of intravitreal anti-CXCL2 and anti-CXCL10 with or without gatifloxacin in B. cereus endophthalmitis were also assessed using the same techniques. Results: Despite similar Bacillus growth in eyes of C57BL/6J, CXCL2-/-, and CXCL10-/- mice, retinal function retention was greater in eyes of CXCL2-/- and CXCL10-/- mice compared to that of C57BL/6J mice. Neutrophil migration into eyes of CXCL2-/- and CXCL10-/- mice was reduced to a greater degree compared to that of eyes of C57BL/6J mice. Infected CXCL2-/- and CXCL10-/- mouse eyes had significantly less inflammation compared to that of C57BL/6J eyes. Retinal structures in infected eyes of CXCL2-/- mice were preserved for a longer time than in CXCL10-/- eyes. Compared to untreated eyes, there was less inflammation and significant retention of retinal function in eyes treated with anti-CXCL2 and anti-CXCL10 with or without gatifloxacin. Conclusions: For Bacillus endophthalmitis, the absence of CXCL2 or CXCL10 in mice resulted in retained retinal function and less inflammation. The absence of CXCL2 led to a better clinical outcome than the absence of CXCL10. The use of anti-CXCL2 and anti-CXCL10 limited inflammation during B. cereus endophthalmitis. These results highlight the utility of CXCL2 and CXCL10 as potential targets for anti-inflammatory therapy that can be tested in conjunction with antibiotics for improving treating Bacillus endophthalmitis.

Innate Immune Interference Attenuates Inflammation In Bacillus Endophthalmitis.

Purpose: To explore the consequences of innate interference on intraocular inflammatory responses during Bacillus endophthalmitis. Methods: Bacillus endophthalmitis was induced in mice. Innate immune pathway activation was interfered by injecting S layer protein-deficient (∆slpA) B. thuringiensis or by treating wild-type (WT)-infected mice with a TLR2/4 inhibitor (WT+OxPAPC). At 10 hours postinfection, eyes were harvested and RNA was purified. A NanoString murine inflammation panel was used to compare gene expression in WT-infected, WT+OxPAPC, ∆slpA-infected, and uninfected eyes. Results: In WT-infected eyes, 56% of genes were significantly upregulated compared to uninfected controls. Compared to WT-infected eyes, the expression of 27% and 50% of genes were significantly reduced in WT+OxPAPC and ∆slpA-infected eyes, respectively. Expression of 61 genes that were upregulated in WT-infected eyes was decreased in WT+OxPAPC and ∆slpA-infected eyes. Innate interference resulted in blunted expression of complement factors (C3, Cfb, and C6) and several innate pathway genes (TLRs 2, 4, 6, and 8, MyD88, Nod2, Nlrp3, NF-κB, STAT3, RelA, RelB, and Ptgs2). Innate interference also reduced the expression of several inflammatory cytokines (CSF2, CSF3, IL-6, IL-1ß, IL-1α, TNFα, IL-23α, TGFß1, and IL-12ß) and chemokines (CCL2, CCL3, and CXCLs 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, and 10). All of the aforementioned genes were significantly upregulated in WT-infected eyes. Conclusions: These results suggest that interfering with innate activation significantly reduced the intraocular inflammatory response in Bacillus endophthalmitis. This positive clinical outcome could be a strategy for anti-inflammatory therapy of an infection typically refractory to corticosteroid treatment.

A Pyrrhic Victory: The PMN Response to Ocular Bacterial Infections.

Some tissues of the eye are susceptible to damage due to their exposure to the outside environment and inability to regenerate. Immune privilege, although beneficial to the eye in terms of homeostasis and protection, can be harmful when breached or when an aberrant response occurs in the face of challenge. In this review, we highlight the role of the PMN (polymorphonuclear leukocyte) in different bacterial ocular infections that invade the immune privileged eye at the anterior and posterior segments: keratitis, conjunctivitis, uveitis, and endophthalmitis. Interestingly, the PMN response from the host seems to be necessary for pathogen clearance in ocular disease, but the inflammatory response can also be detrimental to vision retention. This "Pyrrhic Victory" scenario is explored in each type of ocular infection, with details on PMN recruitment and response at the site of ocular infection. In addition, we emphasize the differences in PMN responses between each ocular disease and its most common corresponding bacterial pathogen. The in vitro and animal models used to identify PMN responses, such as recruitment, phagocytosis, degranulation, and NETosis, are also outlined in each ocular infection. This detailed study of the ocular acute immune response to infection could provide novel therapeutic strategies for blinding diseases, provide more general information on ocular PMN responses, and reveal areas of bacterial ocular infection research that lack PMN response studies.