RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is recommended as a first-tier genetic investigation for intellectual disability (ID), developmental delay, or autism spectrum disorder due to its higher diagnostic yield with respect to conventional karyotyping. The aim of the present study was to investigate the genetic profile and diagnostic yield of CMA in children with moderate, severe and profound ID. METHODS: A pilot cross-sectional study was performed by the Child Assessment Service and the Clinical Genetic Service in Hong Kong from July 2016 to June 2017. Children with unexplained ID were recruited for CMA testing by an expedited referral pathway. Children who were existing clients of the Clinical Genetic Service were also recruited. RESULTS: Of 225 children included in this study, 68 (30.2%) had genetic diagnoses. Among the 138 children who underwent CMA testing, 53 (38%) children were referred to the Clinical Genetic Service by the expedited referral pathway. The respective diagnostic yields of CMA in moderate, severe, and profound ID were 8.7%, 17.6%, and 23.5% (P<0.05). Children with dysmorphic features demonstrated a much higher yield from CMA (45.8% vs 4.4%, P<0.05). CONCLUSTION. The overall diagnostic yield (11.6%) of CMA in this cohort is comparable with that of other international cohorts. This further supports the use of CMA as a first-tier genetic investigation for children with ID, developmental delay, or autism spectrum disorder, particularly for those with severe disease.
Asunto(s)
Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Discapacidad Intelectual/genética , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/genética , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Perfil Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Hong Kong , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Proyectos Piloto , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the molecular pathogenetic mechanisms, (epi)genotype-phenotype correlation, and the performance of the three clinical scoring systems-namely Netchine et al, Bartholdi et al, and Birmingham scores-for patients with Silver-Russell syndrome in Hong Kong. METHODS: This retrospective case series was conducted at two tertiary genetic clinics, the Clinical Genetic Service, Department of Health, and clinical genetic clinic in Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong. All records of patients with suspected Silver-Russell syndrome under the care of the two genetic clinics between January 2010 and September 2015 were retrieved from the computer database. RESULTS: Of the 28 live-birth patients with Silver-Russell syndrome, 35.7% had H19 loss of DNA methylation, 21.4% had maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7, 3.6% had mosaic maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 11, and the remaining 39.3% were Silver-Russell syndrome of unexplained molecular origin. No significant correlation between (epi)genotype and phenotype could be identified between H19 loss of DNA methylation and maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7. Comparison of molecularly confirmed patients and patients with Silver-Russell syndrome of unexplained origin revealed that postnatal microcephaly and café-au-lait spots were more common in the latter group, and body and limb asymmetry was more common in the former group. Performance analysis showed the Netchine et al and Birmingham scoring systems had similar sensitivity in identifying Hong Kong Chinese subjects with Silver-Russell syndrome. CONCLUSION: This is the first territory-wide study of Silver-Russell syndrome in Hong Kong. The clinical features and the spectrum of underlying epigenetic defects were comparable to those reported in western populations.