RESUMEN
PURPOSE: to describe nurses' perceptions of using play in a pediatric onco-hematology setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in the pediatric onco-hematology department of a tertiary hospital in northern Italy. Eleven nurses working in the involved department were recruited via convenience sampling. Data were gathered through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured guide. Data were analyzed using a descriptive qualitative approach. RESULTS: Four major themes emerged from the analysis: 1) The different purposes in using play, 2) A matter of time, 3) Choosing the most suitable game, and 4) Sharing celebrative moments as moments of interprofessional development. Nurses described play as a means to build trust, relieve parents, serve as an educational tool, and address children's needs. Although nurses recognized the limited time available, they wanted to manage their workload to accommodate play. They emphasized the importance of choosing suitable games and using playful moments as opportunities for fun and professional growth. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic play should be systematically integrated into pediatric oncology care as it fosters trust, provides joy and relief, and supports the child and their parents. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Play should be incorporated into routine practice, ensuring children can access peer interaction and age-appropriate games. A multidisciplinary approach, with the involvement of trained professionals, should be fostered to support play-based care in pediatric oncology settings.
RESUMEN
AIM: To summarize the evidence available on Nurse Manager Intentional Rounding (NMIR) describing the main characteristics and methodological quality of studies available, the features of rounding and the outcomes as measured to date. DESIGN: A systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE-EBSCHOST, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane, Clinicalkey, ScienceDirect, OVID, Sage Journals and Web of Science, were searched up to June 2021. REVIEW METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guideline was used to summarize methods and report findings. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools were used to evaluate the methodology quality of the studies included. RESULTS: Seven studies were included with pre-post-test (n = 3), longitudinal, two-group post-tests, quasi-experimental, and retrospective study designs (n = 1, respectively). In five studies, the nurse managers were trained to conduct the rounding, which was shaped according to three main features: a structured (n = 4), a semi-structured (n = 1) and an unstructured rounding (n = 2) delivered from high (twice a day 7/7) to low intensity (once a day, 5/7). Two main outcomes have been measured to date, the patient satisfaction and some aspects related to the care quality. Five studies reported that the satisfaction scores of patients who received rounding were significantly higher than that perceived by patients not receiving rounding. About the other aspects of the quality of care, two studies documented significant improvements as a consequence of the NMIR (e.g. information accessibility, discharge instructions, coordination of care after discharge). CONCLUSION: Studies available report in general a low methodological quality, mainly due to their pragmatic nature as quality improvement projects. Therefore, transforming this field of research by establishing a methodological rigour and a theoretical foundation in both interventions and outcomes and by designing experimental approaches, might expand the evidence available on the effects of nurse managers intentional rounding.
Asunto(s)
Enfermeras Administradoras , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alta del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Satisfacción PersonalRESUMEN
AIMS: In pandemics, infection exposure and quarantine represent critical occupational risks for healthcare workers (HCWs). However, while the psychological consequences of HCWs' quarantine have been reviewed, other potential implications of quarantine on HCWs, such as those that are work-, professional-, social- and private-related, have not been summarised to date. Summarising quarantined HCWs' experiences in the current and past pandemics, as investigated with qualitative studies, might improve awareness of their needs, concerns, and the consequences of quarantine on their personal lives. Therefore, the lived experience of quarantined HCWs was reviewed and subjected to meta-synthesis and -summary. METHODS: A systematic review of qualitative studies followed by a meta-synthesis and -summary allowing an interpretative integration of the findings of qualitative studies, was performed. PubMed, CINHAL and Scopus databases were explored up to 31 January, 2021, without any limitation in time. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Methods and findings are reported according to the Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research statement. RESULTS: A total of 635 records were retrieved and five studies were included. Overall, five themes summarised the lived experience of quarantined HCWs: 1) Being emotionally challenged; 2) Living the quarantine limitations; 3) Losing freedom; 4) Accepting the quarantine; and 5) Staying away from me. The most frequent categories across studies were 'Feeling stressed' and 'Being constrained' (both 100%). The least frequent were 'Feeling sad' (20%), 'Enjoying my family' (20%) and 'Being refused as a family member' (20%). CONCLUSIONS: The lived experience of HCWs is multidimensional, the implications of which also affect private spheres of life: the immediate family and wider relatives. Understanding and learning from HCWs' lived experiences might support policymakers, public health authorities and managers with the goal of maintaining the highest physical and mental health of staff during outbreaks. Timely services supporting HCWs, both during and after episode(s) of quarantine, are suggested to prevent additional burdens on frontline professionals.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Digitalization is not fully implemented in clinical practice, and several factors have been identified as possible barriers, including the competencies of health care professionals. However, no summary of the available evidence has been provided to date to depict digital health competencies that have been investigated among health care professionals, the tools used in assessing such competencies, and the effective interventions to improve them. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize digital health competencies investigated to date and the tools used to assess them among health care professionals. METHODS: A systematic review based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist was performed. The MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases were accessed up to September 4, 2021. Studies assessing digital health competencies with quantitative designs, targeting health care professionals, and written in English were included. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies, published from 1999 to 2021, met the inclusion criteria, and the majority were cross sectional in design, while only 2 were experimental study designs. Most studies were assessed with moderate to low methodological quality; 4 categories and 9 subcategories of investigated digital health competencies have been identified. The most investigated category was "Self-rated competencies," followed by "Psychological and emotional aspects toward digital technologies," "Use of digital technologies," and "Knowledge about digital technologies." In 35% (9/26) of the studies, a previously validated tool was used to measure the competencies assessed, while others developed ad hoc questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Mainly descriptive studies with issues regarding methodology quality have been produced to date investigating 4 main categories of digital health competencies mostly with nonvalidated tools. Competencies investigated might be considered while designing curricula for undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education processes, whereas the methodological lacks detected might be addressed with future research. There is a need to expand research on psychological and emotional elements and the ability to use digital technology to self-learn and teach others. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021282775; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=282775.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Aprendizaje , HumanosRESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/36414.].
RESUMEN
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify the profile of time restrictions and their justifications as reported on a set of published reviews. BACKGROUND: There is a body of methodological knowledge addressing how to design and perform reviews in their different designs. However, how the time restrictions should be set and the justifications that should be provided have received limited attention to date. DESIGN: A Focused Mapping Review and Synthesis following three steps (Focus, Mapping and Synthesis) was performed on 2021. The ENTREQ checklist was followed to report methods and findings. METHODS: All Journal of Clinical Nursing reviews published in online or printed version on 2020 (n = 85). Time limits imposed in the literature search, and justifications provided were mapped and synthetised with quantitative and a qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Time restrictions in reviews are not always reported and, when available, reflect three different profiles: (a) including all studies, to provide a comprehensive review; (b) selecting a period, to provide reviews for a contemporary practice; and (b) including only recent studies for reviews reflecting current practice. Reasons justifying time restrictions are not always reported; when documented, justifications regard changes in the practice, in the research or in the theory occurred over time, recent or ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: In exploring the date restrictions applied in reviews published over the course of a year, it emerged that the time of access to the sources and the justifications are not always indicated. The attributes of the emerging concepts of "comprehensive reviews," "contemporary practice reviews" and "current practice reviews" might be further developed to support researchers in selecting an appropriate time frame. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Reviews require improvements regarding the time restrictions and their justifications. Methodological efforts to standardise the approach ensuring transparency in review protocols and in the following review publication are recommended.
Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Unfinished Nursing Care (UNC) concept, that express the condition when nurses are forced to delay or omit required nursing care, has been largely investigated as tasks left undone, missed care, and implicit rationing of nursing care. However, no summary of the available evidence regarding UNC antecedents has been published. The aim of this study is to identify and summarise antecedents of UNC as documented in primary studies to date. METHODS: A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PROSPERO databases were searched for quantitative studies reporting the relationships between antecedents and UNC published after 2004 up to 21 January 2020. The reference lists of secondary studies have been scrutinised to identify additional studies. Two reviewers independently identified studies and evaluated them for their eligibility and disagreements were resolved by the research team. The quality appraisal was based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools, according to the study designs. A data extraction grid was piloted and then used to extract data. The antecedents that emerged were thematically categorised with an inductive approach. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies were included; among them, 54 were cross-sectional, three were cohort studies, and one was a quasi-experimental study. They were conducted mainly in the United States and in hospital settings. The UNC antecedents have been investigated to date at the (a) unit (e.g., workloads, non-nursing tasks), (b) nurse (e.g., age, gender), and (c) patient levels (clinical instability). CONCLUSIONS: At the unit level, it is highly recommended to provide an adequate staff level, strategies to deal with unpredictable workloads, and to promote good practice environments to reduce or minimise UNC. By contrast, at the nurse and patient levels, there were no clear trends regarding modifiable factors that could decrease the occurrence of UNC. The map of antecedents that emerged can be used to design interventional studies aimed at changing research from merely descriptive to that which evaluates the effectiveness of interventions.
RESUMEN
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To establish whether, and to what extent, tools measuring Unfinished Nursing Care (UNC) that have been validated to date have the ability to detect the discrete elements of the 'Integration of care' dimension of The Fundamentals of Care Framework (The Framework). BACKGROUND: UNC and The Framework have been established as two separate research lines, focused on (a) omitted care and related tools, and (b) on how to improve patient care, respectively. However, no attempts have been made to date to establish whether, and to what extent, tools measuring UNC have the ability to represent the discrete elements of The Framework. DESIGN: A two-step study: (a) a secondary analysis of a systematic review up to June 2018 later updated in May 2020, followed by (b) a comparative analysis. METHODS: A systematic review of studies on validated tools measuring UNC was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Then, researchers independently performed a comparative analysis between the extracted (a) discrete elements of The Framework and (b) items of the UNC tools retrieved. RESULTS: A total of 14 tools were analysed. The physical dimension of The Framework was the one mostly covered by UNC tools (up to 87.5% with the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care). The Norwegian Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care showed the highest level of representation (41.6%) for the psychosocial dimension. Only the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care and the Unfinished Care tool measure the relational dimension (22.2%, respectively). By considering all elements of the 'Integration of care' dimension, the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Care had the highest percentage of convergence (41%). CONCLUSION: Not all UNC tools have the same ability to represent the discrete elements of The Framework. Moreover, physical needs are more often detected in UNC tools compared to the relational and psychological ones. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Unfinished care tools validated to date can represent a body of knowledge on which to build The Framework metrics, especially for the physical dimensions.
Asunto(s)
Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , Atención de Enfermería , Humanos , NoruegaRESUMEN
AIM: To identify the strategies to prevent missed nursing care (MNC) that can be implemented by nurse managers/directors on a daily basis. BACKGROUND: Only few recommendations have been established to date aiming at supporting nurse managers/ directors in preventing MNC. However, several strategies are implemented on a daily basis, suggesting that a body of tacit, practical and wise knowledge is already in place. METHOD(S): An international qualitative descriptive study based on the positive deviance approach conducted in 2019-2020 and reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. A purposeful sample of 35 nurse managers/directors working in hospitals in Cyprus, Italy, Germany and Switzerland was involved. Codes were extracted from each country, and a thematic analysis was performed at the transnational level to identify strategies and interventions preformed to prevent MNC. RESULTS: Eight strategies and 22 interventions, mainly with preventive intent and designed at the hospital level, affecting both the processes and the structural dimensions, have been reported as effective in preventing MNC. CONCLUSION: Nurse leaders are involved daily in implementing strategies to minimise MNC at the nursing and at the hospital system levels, integrated with each other. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Preventing MNC should be a core value of the entire hospital, and not merely a nursing issue. Therefore, complex interventions at the system level are required.
Asunto(s)
Atención de Enfermería , Chipre , Alemania , Humanos , Italia , Investigación Cualitativa , SuizaRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study is to describe the prevalence and reasons for non-nursing tasks as perceived by nurses. BACKGROUND: Four types of non-nursing tasks have been identified to date: (a) auxiliary; (b) administrative, (c) expected by allied health care professionals; and (d) medical. However, no studies on a large scale have been performed with the aim of identifying the prevalence of all of these non-nursing tasks, and factors promoting or hindering their occurrence, given that they represent a clear waste of nurses' time. METHODS: A cross-sectional study in 2017, following The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies. All active nurses registered in an Italian provincial Nursing Board (=1331) willing to participate were involved. A questionnaire survey exploring the nature of the nursing tasks performed in daily practice and the underlying reasons was administered via paper/pencil and e-mail. RESULTS: A total of 733 nurses participated of which 94.5% performed at least one type of non-nursing task, mainly administrative and auxiliary. Auxiliary tasks are less likely among nurses working in a community (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.63, p < .01) or in a residential (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.72, p < .01) setting, in critical (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.54, p < .01) or surgical (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.75, p < .01) hospital settings, and when they deal with unexpected clinical events (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p < .01). Greater adequacy of nursing resources decreases the occurrence of auxiliary tasks (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p < .01), whereas the need to compensate for a lack of resources (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07-1.93, p < .01) increases it. CONCLUSIONS: Around one-third of shift time is devoted to non-nursing tasks; working in a hospital, in medical units, with lack of resources and with patients with predictable clinical conditions might increase the occurrence of auxiliary tasks. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Strategies to increase the time available for nursing care should consider the type of tasks performed by nurses, their antecedents and the value added to care in terms of patient' benefits.
Asunto(s)
Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Atención de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Prevalencia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIM: To map the main characteristics of massive open online courses, and their effectiveness, facilitators and barriers in continuing education among nurses and other healthcare professionals. BACKGROUND: Online continuous education attracted new attention among educators and managers with regard to how to best design, implement it and evaluate its effectiveness. INTRODUCTION: No studies to date have mapped the state of research on massive open online courses and the facilitators promoting their effectiveness in continuing education. METHODS: A scoping review performed in 2020 by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis extension-Scoping Reviews. Electronic databases were searched for primary and secondary studies, written in English. Identified barriers/facilitators were categorized using a content analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1149 studies, 31 were included, and the majority had an explorative research design. Massive open online courses documented to date are characterized by their (a) developers' countries and providers, mainly the United Stated and universities, respectively; (b) variety of teaching methods and contents, including infectious diseases; (c) using both qualitative and quantitative assessment methods; and (d) multidisciplinary target audience ranging from 40 to 83 000 participants, including nurses. Facilitators of and barriers to effectiveness depend on their pedagogical background, appropriate course design, delivery and implementation as well as on the learners' profile. DISCUSSION: Studies available to date are mainly based on experiential projects. A variety of strategies promoting massive online courses' effectiveness have emerged. CONCLUSION: Some public health issues may benefit from massive education, as a unique system promoting a quick and effective continuous education. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING/HEALTH/SOCIAL POLICY: Clinical nurses, nurse managers and educators should consider available evidence on massive online courses' when making decisions on which strategy to use to maintain competencies. Moreover, as a public health tool, massive online courses should be derived from a strong cooperation between political, scientific and professional bodies.
Asunto(s)
Educación a Distancia , Enfermeras Administradoras , Competencia Clínica , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , UniversidadesRESUMEN
AIM: To investigate the experience of Italian nurses during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak by analysing professional social media posts. BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak has overwhelmed health care institutions; as a consequence, nurses' lives and psycho-physical health have been affected. INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic forced nurses to work in physically and psychologically stressful conditions impacting on their life. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study. All narratives (texts and videos) posted by nurses from the 23rd of February 2020 to the 3rd of May (from the start of the outbreak to the end of the first lockdown) were analysed and published on the five most popular Italian professional social media platforms. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from the 380 narratives explored: 'Sharing what is happening within myself'; 'Experiencing unprecedented working conditions'; 'Experiencing a deep change'; 'Failing to rehabilitate the image of nurses in society'; and 'Do not abandon us'. Even though nurses appreciated the recognition of their communities, they still felt devalued and not recognized as professionals. DISCUSSION: Several psychological, physical, social and professional implications emerged from nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite being highly praised, nurses perceived they had failed in rehabilitating the image of nurses in society. CONCLUSION: The experience of working during the COVID-19 pandemic represented a traumatic event for nurses but it offered them personal and professional growth opportunities. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE, NURSING POLICY AND HEALTH POLICY: Supporting nurses' mental health is highly recommended, together with a cultural investment on nurses' role recognition, and a zero-tolerance policy towards violence and aggression towards nurses.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , COVID-19/enfermería , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Neumonía Viral/enfermería , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/virología , Investigación Cualitativa , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Missed Nursing Care is widely recognized as affecting patient safety and healthcare outcomes. Theoretical frameworks, antecedents and consequences have been extensively studied while interventions aimed at preventing the Missed Nursing Care remain little investigated to date. Nurse Managers and Nurse Directors play a main role in promoting interventions at the unit, hospital and at the policy levels. However, few evidences are available to date, thus limiting an evidence-based approach. The aim of this study was to emerge interventions used on a daily basis by Nurse Managers and Directors to prevent and/or minimize Missed Nursing Care. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study design based upon a positive deviance approach was adopted. Twelve Nurse Managers and Nurse Directors were purposefully selected, working at Hospital, Healthcare Trust or Nursing Home levels, in Italy. Participants were interviewed in two focus group sessions. A thematic analysis of the audio-recorded interviews was performed by two researchers. RESULTS: The following interventions have been reported as effective in preventing and/or minimizing the Missed Nursing Care: (a) Expanding the nursing care capacity; (b) Ensuring the standard of care and an early detection of failures; (c) Monitoring the processes of care; (d) Promoting a shared decision-making; (e) Redesigning the layout of the hospital systems; (f) Promoting a culture towards the Missed Nursing Care prevention, and (g) Realigning the nurse management to the care of patients. DISCUSSION: Several interventions based mainly on process dimension and with preventive intents are daily enacted by Nurse Managers and Directors to prevent and/or minimize Missed Nursing Care. Measuring the effect of these interventions through rigorous studies could help in expanding the evidence available to contrast a phenomenon that threatens patient safety.
Asunto(s)
Enfermeras Administradoras/psicología , Supervisión de Enfermería/organización & administración , Flujo de Trabajo , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Italia , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Introduction: In recent decades, nurses' and healthcare professionals' digital health competencies have emerged as key factors in enabling the digital healthcare transformation. Therefore, this review aims to describe the level of digital health competencies among nurses and healthcare professionals and the factors affecting them. Methods: We performed an additional analysis of a database populated in our original systematic review by identifying the data set, evaluating its appropriateness to the research questions, and performing the data analysis. Four areas of digital health competencies among nurses and healthcare professionals emerged: 'self-rated competencies', 'psychological and emotional aspects toward the use of digital technologies', 'knowledge about digital technologies' and 'use of digital technologies'. Item scores and affecting factors have been extracted and classified into poor, moderate and good levels of digital health competencies; factors have been categorised and then summarised. Results: 'Use of digital technologies' was the area with the highest prevalence of poor-level scores, whereas the 'knowledge about digital technologies' had a good level of competence. Across categories, most of the items' scores reflected a moderate level of competence. The main factors affecting digital health competencies in nursing were being younger, more educated, having positive collegial nurse-physician relationships and participating in hospital business. Discussion: Digital health competence might be further improved. Educators, policymakers and nurse managers should develop educational nursing programmes and opportunities by acting on the modifiable factors to develop digital health competencies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nurses play a crucial role in caring for families of ill individuals in care, requiring high-quality relational and communication skills to care for them. Yet these skills remain underutilized, leading to reported issues of inadequate inclusion and communication. Education is crucial to enhance nurses' competencies in caring for families and informal caregivers. AIM: To explore the learning process of undergraduate nursing students to care for families and informal caregivers. DESIGN: Qualitative study with a grounded theory approach. SETTINGS: Bachelor's degree in nursing from two off-sites of a university and four local health units collaborating with the university in North Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 15 undergraduate nursing students, 10 nurse preceptors, and 10 nurse clinical teachers. METHODS: We adopted initial and theoretical sampling and conducted semi-structured interviews from December 2023 to January 2024, lasting 16 to 62 min. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed through open, selective, and theoretical coding. RESULTS: We developed a theory of learning for undergraduate nursing students in caring for families and informal caregivers, comprising two themes, "Learning areas" and "Learning antecedents," and nine categories. Learning areas involve five stages of learning to care for families and informal caregivers and the most frequent opportunities to interact with families and informal caregivers. The five stages are "Seeing and considering families and informal caregivers", "Assessing the families' and informal caregivers' needs and resources", "Preparing for and planning intervention with families and informal caregivers", "Acting with families and informal caregivers", "Reflecting on the intervention with families and informal caregivers". Learning antecedents encompass student characteristics, interpersonal relationships, and the clinical training setting. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we delineate a five-stage learning process for undergraduate nursing students to care for families and informal caregivers, influenced by individual, interpersonal, and contextual factors. We emphasised the importance of relational skill development, tailored learning experiences, and supportive mentorship in enhancing students' preparedness to engage with and support families in healthcare settings. The developed theory provides a foundational framework for designing educational interventions to optimise nursing students' capacities in this domain.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Bachillerato en Enfermería , Teoría Fundamentada , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Humanos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Bachillerato en Enfermería/métodos , Cuidadores/psicología , Cuidadores/educación , Femenino , Masculino , Italia , Adulto , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Aprendizaje , Preceptoría/métodosRESUMEN
Background and aims: Postoperative ileus is a frequent condition, leading to complications and a longer hospital stay. Few studies have demonstrated the benefit of early oral feeding in preventing ileus after gastrointestinal surgery. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of early versus delayed oral feeding on the recovery of intestinal motility, length of hospital stay, and complications. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials, searching PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClincalTrials.gov until 31 December 2022. We evaluated the first passage of the stool, the first flatus, complications, length of postoperative stay, and vomiting. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (version 2) for randomized trials and the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Results: We included 34 studies with a median sample size of 102 participants. With a moderate certainty of the evidence, the early oral feeding may reduce the time taken for the first passage of the stool (MD -0.99 days; CI 95% -1.25, -0.72), the first flatus (MD -0.70 days; CI 95% -0.87, -0.53), and the risk of complications (RR 0.69; CI 95% 0.59-0.80), while with a low certainty of evidence, it may reduce the length of stay (MD -1.31 days; CI 95% -1.59, -1.03). However, early feeding likely does not affect the risk of vomiting (RR 0.90; CI 95% 0.68, 1.18). Conclusion: This review suggests that early oral feeding after gastrointestinal surgery may lead to a faster intestinal recovery, shorter postoperative stays, and fewer complications. However, careful interpretation is needed due to high heterogeneity and the moderate-to-low quality of evidence. Future studies should focus on the type and starting time of early oral feeding.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several systematic reviews (SRs), with and without meta-analyses, have investigated the use of wearable devices to improve physical activity, and there is a need for frequent and updated syntheses on the topic. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate whether using wearable devices increased physical activity and reduced sedentary behaviour in adults. METHODS: We conducted an umbrella review searching PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Library, MedRxiv, Rxiv and bioRxiv databases up to February 5th, 2023. We included all SRs that evaluated the efficacy of interventions when wearable devices were used to measure physical activity in adults aged over 18 years. The primary outcomes were physical activity and sedentary behaviour measured as the number of steps per day, minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per week, and minutes of sedentary behaviour (SB) per day. We assessed the methodological quality of each SR using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews, version 2 (AMSTAR 2) and the certainty of evidence of each outcome measure using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations). We interpreted the results using a decision-making framework examining the clinical relevance and the concordances or discordances of the SR effect size. RESULTS: Fifty-one SRs were included, of which 38 included meta-analyses (302 unique primary studies). Of the included SRs, 72.5% were rated as 'critically low methodological quality'. Overall, with a slight overlap of primary studies (corrected cover area: 3.87% for steps per day, 3.12% for MVPA, 4.06% for SB) and low-to-moderate certainty of the evidence, the use of WDs may increase PA by a median of 1,312.23 (IQR 627-1854) steps per day and 57.8 (IQR 37.7 to 107.3) minutes per week of MVPA. Uncertainty is present for PA in pathologies and older adults subgroups and for SB in mixed and older adults subgroups (large confidence intervals). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the use of WDs may increase physical activity in middle-aged adults. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of using WDs on specific subgroups (such as pathologies and older adults) in different follow-up lengths, and the role of other intervention components.
RESUMEN
AIM: The aim of the present study is to perform a longitudinal Italian validation of the scale and to adapt it to the nursing education contest. BACKGROUND: Research on emotional labor has shown that the roles played by surface acting and deep acting are still uncertain. To overcome this gap, scholars suggest observing emotional labor through the lens of the emotional regulation theory. Andela and her colleagues developed a fine grained instrument, which differentiates attentional deployment, cognitive re-evaluation and expressive suppression, emotional amplification and emotional dissonance. DESIGN: To fulfill our aim, a longitudinal study was performed in an Italian University. METHOD: The adapted scale was administered to 168 nursing students across the three years of attendance in the course. RESULTS: Our results confirm the five-factor structure, and the instrument shows good psychometrical properties. CONCLUSION: Having shown satisfactory psychometric properties, this scale can be considered a useful instrument to assess those emotional elements of clinical practice, which are important for the assurance of education quality to the under graduated nursing students.
Asunto(s)
Bachillerato en Enfermería , Regulación Emocional , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Femenino , Humanos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Estudios Longitudinales , Italia , Psicometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
. Identifying population needs: methods of analysis and stratification. In this article, examples of population stratification models used at the national level to identify different levels of needs and interventions are reported. Most models are based primarily on health data, diseases, clinical complexity, use of health services, hospitalizations, emergency room access, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and exemption codes. The limitations of these models relate to the availability and integration of data, as well as generalizability in different contexts. Moreover, to address the difficulty of implementing effective local interventions, the co-production or integration of social and health services is strongly suggested. Some survey techniques are presented to detect the needs, expectations, and resources of specific communities or populations.