Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care Med ; 38(11): 2095-102, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20711070

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The antimetabolite drug, 5-fluorouracil, inhibits microbial growth. Coating of central venous catheters with 5-fluorouracil may reduce the risk of catheter infection. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of central venous catheters externally coated with 5-fluorouracil with those coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine. DESIGN: Prospective, single-blind, randomized, active-controlled, multicentered, noninferiority trial. SETTING: Twenty-five US medical center intensive care units. PATIENTS: A total of 960 adult patients requiring central venous catheterization for up to 28 days. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive a central venous catheter externally coated with either 5-fluorouracil (n = 480) or chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (n = 480). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary antimicrobial outcome was a dichotomous measure (<15 colony-forming units or ≥ 15 colony-forming units) for catheter colonization determined by the roll plate method. Secondary antimicrobial outcomes included local site infection and catheter-related bloodstream infection. Central venous catheters coated with 5-fluorouracil were noninferior to chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine coated central venous catheters with respect to the incidence of catheter colonization (2.9% vs. 5.3%, respectively). Local site infection occurred in 1.4% of the 5-fluorouracil group and 0.9% of the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine group. No episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection occurred in the 5-fluorouracil group, whereas two episodes were noted in the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine group. Only Gram-positive organisms were cultured from 5-fluorouracil catheters, whereas Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida were cultured from the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine central venous catheters. Adverse events were comparable between the two central venous catheter coatings. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that central venous catheters externally coated with 5-fluorouracil are a safe and effective alternative to catheters externally coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine when used in critically ill patients.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Antimetabolitos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Sulfadiazina de Plata/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/instrumentación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(8): 888-895, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27267310

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Healthcare provider hands are an important source of intraoperative bacterial transmission events associated with postoperative infection development. OBJECTIVE To explore the efficacy of a novel hand hygiene improvement system leveraging provider proximity and individual and group performance feedback in reducing 30-day postoperative healthcare-associated infections via increased provider hourly hand decontamination events. DESIGN Randomized, prospective study. SETTING Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in New Hampshire and UMass Memorial Medical Center in Massachusetts. PATIENTS Patients undergoing surgery. METHODS Operating room environments were randomly assigned to usual intraoperative hand hygiene or to a personalized, body-worn hand hygiene system. Anesthesia and circulating nurse provider hourly hand decontamination events were continuously monitored and reported. All patients were followed prospectively for the development of 30-day postoperative healthcare-associated infections. RESULTS A total of 3,256 operating room environments and patients (1,620 control and 1,636 treatment) were enrolled. The mean (SD) provider hand decontamination event rate achieved was 4.3 (2.9) events per hour, an approximate 8-fold increase in hand decontamination events above that of conventional wall-mounted devices (0.57 events/hour); P<.001. Use of the hand hygiene system was not associated with a reduction in healthcare-associated infections (odds ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.82-1.40], P=.626). CONCLUSIONS The hand hygiene system evaluated in this study increased the frequency of hand decontamination events without reducing 30-day postoperative healthcare-associated infections. Future work is indicated to optimize the efficacy of this hand hygiene improvement strategy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:888-895.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Higiene de las Manos/métodos , Mano/microbiología , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quirófanos , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(3): 295-7, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20100086

RESUMEN

We compared the duration of antimicrobial effectiveness of 2 different antimicrobial catheters. The baseline activity of minocycline-rifampin catheters was greater than that of silver-platinum-carbon catheters against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Enterococcus faecalis. The antimicrobial activity of the minocycline-rifampin catheters against these pathogens persisted for up to 12 days, while that of the silver-platinum-carbon catheters was depleted by day 10 (P < .05).


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Adhesión Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Bacterias Grampositivas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Massachusetts , Minociclina/farmacología , Rifampin/farmacología
4.
Vaccine ; 26(35): 4420-4, 2008 Aug 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18588934

RESUMEN

This report describes the safety observations following administration of a polyvalent DNA prime-protein boost HIV-1 vaccine formulated with adjuvant QS21. Local injection site reactions were the most common (65% of subjects), and included type IV delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions at prior DNA inoculation sites in 12 of 28 (43%) subjects following protein vaccination. Systemic reactions revealed two cases of vasculitis temporally related to inoculation with recombinant Env protein+QS21 adjuvant. Questions remain regarding the cause of the vasculitis, but the unique DTH observation may have contributed to the high level of immune responses previously reported for this vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el SIDA/efectos adversos , Inmunización Secundaria/efectos adversos , Vacunas de ADN/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra el SIDA/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Femenino , Experimentación Humana , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/etiología , Masculino , Saponinas/administración & dosificación , Piel/patología , Vacunas de ADN/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Subunidad/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Subunidad/efectos adversos , Vasculitis/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda