Geriatric assessment of glioblastoma patients is feasible and may provide useful prognostic information.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and most lethal primary brain tumor in adults. Clinical trials in older patients with GBM have explored the use of single and multimodality treatment regimens with modest survival benefits; however, trial criteria are commonly based on chronological age and do not reflect the heterogeneity of this cohort. Geriatric assessment (GA) techniques predict survival and treatment tolerance in other tumor sites and thus may objectively guide the decision-making process, but data are lacking in the neuro-oncology cohort. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter feasibility study involving patients age 65 years or older with newly diagnosed GBM. A modified GA was undertaken in the outpatient setting prior to starting treatment. Feasibility was determined primarily by recruitment rate, alongside data completeness, impact on clinic time, and acceptability to patients and staff. Factors associated with survival were explored using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Fifty patients were recruited within a prespecified time period with a recruitment rate of 82% (target 80%). Data completeness was greater than 80% in all except one assessment. Median overall survival was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-14.0 months). Among the GA screening factors analyzed, a baseline impaired Montreal Cognitive Assessment (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.7, 95% CI 1.128-6.530) and impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (HR = 2.9 95% CI 0.983-8.541) were associated with poorer survival. CONCLUSION: In the first study of this kind among elderly GBM patients, we have shown that undertaking a neurologically focused GA screen is feasible and may provide useful prognostic information.

An audit of the management of elderly patients with glioblastoma in the UK: have recent trial results changed treatment?

Aim: We investigated uptake of short-course chemo-radiotherapy and compared outcomes with other treatment schedules in elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Methods: Patients aged 65 or over with a diagnosis of GBM were identified from an 18-month period from three centers in the UK. The primary end point of this study was overall survival from the date of diagnosis. Results: The analysis included 210 patients. Overall median survival was 5.0 months. Approximately 31.9% of patients received combined chemoradiation; multivariate analysis showed that patients who received standard chemoradiation were at a reduced risk of death than those receiving hypofractionated chemoradiation. Discussion: In this retrospective study, patients treated with standard chemoradiation experienced better outcomes than patients receiving hypofractionated chemoradiation. Patient selection likely contributed to these findings.

Glioblastoma in the elderly - How do we choose who to treat?

OBJECTIVE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the commonest primary malignant brain tumour amongst the adult population. Incidence peaks in the 7th and 8th decades of life and as our global population ages, rates are increasing. GBM is an almost universally fatal disease with life expectancy in the range of 3-5months amongst the elderly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The assessment of elderly GBM patients prior to treatment decisions is poorly researched and unstandardised. In order to begin tackling this issue we performed a cross-sectional survey across all UK based consultant neuro-oncologists to review their current practice in assessing elderly GBM patients. RESULTS: There were 56 respondents from a total of 93 recipients (60% response rate). All respondents confirmed that at least some patients aged 70 or over were referred to their clinics from the local multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT). Only 18% of consultants routinely performed a cognitive or frailty screening test at initial consultation. Of those who performed a screening test, the majority reported that the results of the test changed their treatment decision in approximately 50% of cases. Participants ranked performance status as the most important factor in determining treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the heterogeneity of this patient population, we argue that performance status is a crude measure of vulnerability within this cohort. Elderly GBM patients represent a unique clinical scenario because of the complexity of distinguishing neuro-oncology related symptoms from general frailty. There is a need for specific geriatric assessment models tailored to the elderly neuro-oncology population in order to facilitate treatment decisions.