Ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser improves quality of life in patients with extensive burn scars: A nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser (CO2 -AFL) for small-area burn scar management shows encouraging outcomes. Few studies, however, focused on comprehensive outcomes following CO2 -AFL treatment for extensive burn scars. This study evaluated whether CO2 -AFL surgery improved the quality of life (QoL) for burn survivors with extensive hypertrophic scars. METHODS: A retrospective nested case-control study was initiated to analyze the efficacy of CO2 -AFL treatment for patients with large-area burn scars. Patients with extensive burn scars (≥30% total body surface area [TBSA]) were registered in our hospital from March 2016 to October 2018. Patients undergoing CO2 -AFL surgery were divided into CO2 -AFL group, and patients undergoing conventional surgery were matched in a 1:1 ratio as the conventional surgery group according to the burned area. The questionnaires were collected and followed up. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Burns Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) were the primary parameters. Secondary parameters included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), University of North Carolina "4P" Scars Scale (UNC4P), Patient Scars Assessment Scale for Patient (POSAS-P), and Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions (DN4). RESULTS: 23 patients (55.96 ± 21.59% TBSA) were included in CO2 -AFL group and 23 patients (57.87 ± 18.21% TBSA) in conventional surgery group. Both the BSHS-B total score (CO2 -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 115.35 ± 29.24 vs. 85.43 ± 33.19, p = 0.002) and the SF-36 total score (CO2 -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 427.79 ± 118.27 vs. 265.65 ± 81.66, p < 0.001) for the CO2 -AFL group were higher than those for the conventional surgery group. Parameters for the CO2 -AFL group were lower than those for the conventional surgery group in all of the following comparisons: PSQI total score (CO2 -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 7.70 ± 3.74 vs. 12.26 ± 4.61, p = 0.001), POSAS-P total score (CO2 -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 26.48 ± 6.60 vs. 33.04 ± 4.56, p < 0.001), UNC4P total score (CO2 -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 5.57 ± 1.97 vs. 7.26 ± 1.81, p = 0.004), and DN4 score (CO2 -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 3 [2-5] vs. 5 [4-8], p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional surgery, whole scar CO2 -AFL surgery dramatically improved physical and mental health as well as QoL for people with extensive burn scars. Additionally, CO2 -AFL enhanced the evaluation of scars including their appearance, pain, itching, and a host of other symptoms.

Analysis of the predictors of hypertrophic scarring pain and neuropathic pain after burn.

INTRODUCTION: Burn hypertrophic scarring pain is a common and perennial complaint which not only affects patients' quality of life, but also their recovery and reintegration. Physical therapy and medicine regimens are all available for the treatment of hypertrophic scarring pain. Unfortunately, the efficacy of clinical practice is not very satisfactory and the management of hypertrophic scarring pain remains challenging. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to explore the risk factors for hypertrophic scarring pain and further identify whether it is neuropathic pain, aiming to guide the clinical therapy and help patients live a pain-free life. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients with postburn hypertrophic scarring pain between 2017 and 2020 in a burn center in Shanghai. Research objects were included strictly according to the inclusion criteria and every enrolled patient was included in the study only once. Demographic information, burn and scar characteristics, and pain scores were collected through the Changhai Hospital Medical Information System, patient questionnaire and physician assessment. Using SPSS 26.0 software, the data were first processed by descriptive statistics, and linear and logistic regression analyses were further employed to explore the significant factors. RESULTS: The sample involving 123 patients was consisted of 56.9% males, 79.7% caused by fire with a median age 40.5 years, total body surface burn-area (TBSA) 44.4%, wound healing time of target scar 57.9 days, hyperplasia time 9.3 months and the scar location mainly in the limbs (55.3%). Of all the included objects, the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) total, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, brief pain inventory (BPI) total and the percentage of neuropathic pain were 9.6, 3.3, 36.0 and 74.8%, respectively. Integrating covariates with a P value of <0.10 through preliminary univariate analysis, multivariable linear regression showed sex (P = 0.049), age (P = 0.020), target scar location (P = 0.017, P = 0.254), and pliability (P = 0.016) were linked with severe VAS score; and burn depth of target scar (P = 0.023), hyperplasia time (P = 0.027, P = 0.001), vascularity (P = 0.028), and pliability (P = 0.001) were associated with higher BPI score. Adjusting for potential confounders, hyperplasia time (P = 0.005, P = 0.039) was found to be the only independent risk factor for hypertrophic scarring neuropathic pain in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, with mVSS total of P = 0.062. CONCLUSIONS: The model in our study has clarified that sex, age, target scar location, burn depth of target scar, hyperplasia time, and vascularity, especially pliability, may provide excellent prediction of hypertrophic scarring pain outcome; for neuropathic pain, only hyperplasia time has further prospects, with mVSS total as a potential forecast. In an era increasingly aware of life quality, this work may contribute to the elaboration of strategies to hypertrophic scarring pain management, provide an individualized therapy, and help patients live a pain-free life.

Ablative fractional CO2 laser surgery improving sleep quality, pain and pruritus in adult hypertrophic scar patients: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep quality is associated with a decrease in quality of life in patients with major burn scars, combined with pruritus and pain. Few interventions have been reported to improve the sleep quality of patients with scars. In the current prospective cohort study, we investigated the efficacy of CO2-ablative fractional laser (AFL) surgery vs conventional surgery in post-burn patients with hypertrophic scars with sleep quality as the primary study outcome. METHODS: In total 68 consecutive patients undergoing scar surgical treatment were recruited, including a CO2-AFL surgery cohort (n = 35) and a conventional surgery cohort (n = 33). A subgroup from the AFL cohort was selected. Sleep quality, pain and pruritus were evaluated. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to reveal the effect of CO2-AFL surgery. RESULTS: The CO2-AFL surgery cohort had significantly lower Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) global scores than the conventional surgery cohort after the last surgical treatment. In the subgroup of patients receiving hardware sleep monitoring, CO2-AFL markedly increased deep sleep time, deep sleep efficiency and reduced initial sleep latency. Compared to the conventional surgery cohort, the CO2-AFL cohort presented significantly lower pain and pruritus scores. Correlation analysis showed pain and pruritus were significantly associated with PSQI scores, and there were also significant correlations between pain and pruritus scores. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that surgery method was negatively linearly correlated with visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, brief pain inventory (BPI) total, VAS pruritus score, 5-D itch scale total, four-item itch questionnaire (FIIQ) total and PSQI total. CONCLUSIONS: CO2-AFL surgery significantly improved sleep quality and reduced pain and pruritus of hypertrophic scar patients. The alleviation of sleep disorder was associated with improvement of deep sleep quality including deep sleep time and deep sleep deficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR200035268) approved retrospectively registration on 5 May 2020.

Combination of ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser and platelet-rich plasma treatment to improve hypertrophic scars: a retrospective clinical observational study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic scars are one of the main complications that affect the quality of life of patients after burns. Many methods have been shown to be effective in the treatment of hypertrophic scars, such as ablative fractional CO2 laser (AFCL) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). However, there are few studies on the effect of the combined application of these measures. The purpose of this study was to explore the therapeutic effect of AFCL combined with PRP on hypertrophic burn scars. METHODS: A retrospective clinical observation study was conducted on 50 patients with hypertrophic burn scars. The AFCL+PRP group included 31 patients who received AFCL combined with PRP treatment; the AFCL group included 19 patients who received AFCL treatment only. The University of North Carolina 4P Scar Scale (UNC4P) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores that were collected before each treatment were used as indicators of the effectiveness of the previous treatment. The scores recorded at the second, fourth and seventh months were analysed. RESULTS: The demographic data of the 2 groups were not significantly different. Before treatment, there was no difference in the UNC4P and VSS scores between the 2 groups. There was a significant decline in the UNC4P and VSS total scores over 6 months in both groups (p < 0.05) and scores in the 2 groups were comparable after 3 and 6 months (p < 0.05). UNC4P scores in the AFCL+PRP group decreased from a mean of 8.26 to 2.61 (p < 0.05) with a concomitant drop in VSS scores from a mean of 11.74 to 6.06 (p < 0.01). In the AFCL group UNC4P and VSS scores decreased from 7.68 to 4.63 (p < 0.05) and from 10.89 to 8.16 (p < 0.05), respectively. The sub-items of these 2 assessments were analysed and the results suggest that AFCL combined with PRP can comprehensively improve scarring. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that PRP is an effective adjunct for AFCL in the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars and that the combination of PRP and AFCL proved to be more useful than AFCL alone. This combination may be a new and effective clinical practice for the treatment of scars. However, larger and higher-level clinical studies are still needed to determine its efficacy and possible mechanisms.