Long-term outcome of minimally invasive staging surgery for clinical stage I endometrial cancer: A single institute experience in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. With recent advances in equipment and knowledge, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is widely accepted for the treatment of endometrial cancer. This study had the largest number of cases to date in Taiwan, comparing outcomes between MIS and laparotomy staging surgery using real-world data with long-term follow-up. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with clinical stage 1 endometrial cancer from 2009 to 2020 in our institute. All patients underwent comprehensive surgical staging procedures by MIS or laparotomy. The safety, morbidity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates of the two groups were compared. Clinical and pathologic factors were compared with Chi-square and Fisher Exact test. PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between survival curves were analyzed using the log-rank test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Using Cox proportional hazards models, all factors found to be significantly associated with risk of recurrence on univariate analyses were then assessed together through multivariable models, resulting in a final oncologic outcome between MIS and laparotomy. RESULTS: A total of 665 cases (412 cases in MIS group and 253 cases in laparotomy group) were enrolled for data analysis. Median operation time was shorter in MIS group (244 and 265 minutes, p < 0.001). Median blood loss was also less (75 and 430 mL, p < 0.001). Median postoperative hospitalization duration was longer in the laparotomy group (2 and 7 days, p = 0.001). After adjusting presurgery risk factors, the PFS and OS were no significant difference in MIS and laparotomy groups. CONCLUSION: Using real-world data with long-term follow-up, we could confirm excellent PFS and OS in selective patients with clinical stage 1 endometrial carcinoma who received MIS, and the surgical time, hospital day, and blood loss were also less.

Case report: Malignant transformation of ovarian endometrioma during long term use of dienogest in a young lady.

Endometriosis is a benign disease, which is also regarded as a precursor to ovarian malignancy. Dienogest is a progestin treatment for endometriosis with efficacy and tolerability. A 35-year-old Taiwanese lady with ovarian endometrioma had taken dienogest for the last 5 years. During sonographic follow-up, surgery was suggested owing to suspicious of malignant transformation of ovarian endometrioma. While she hesitated and turned to receive two cycles of oocyte retrieval because of nulliparity. Meanwhile, more papillary growth in the ovarian endometrioma with intratumor flow was found during follow-up. Laparoscopic enucleation was performed later, and pathology revealed clear cell carcinoma with peritoneal involvement, at least FIGO stage IIB. She then underwent debulking surgery to grossly no residual tumor and received adjuvant chemotherapy with no tumor recurrence in post-operative 17-months follow-up. Considering fertility preservation, conservative treatment of ovarian endometrioma is typically indicated for those women who have not yet completed childbearing. However, malignant transformation may still occur despite long-term progestin treatment. Therefore, careful image follow-up is still indispensable.

Maintenance Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer after Second-Line Chemotherapy.

(1) Background: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of maintenance chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer after second-line chemotherapy. (2) Methods: A total of 72 patients from a single institute who had been diagnosed with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer and had experienced either complete or partial response after six cycles of second-line chemotherapy were divided into a standard group (n = 31) with six cycles or a maintenance group (n = 41) with more than six cycles. We then compared patient characteristics and survival outcomes between these two groups. (3) Results: In all patients, after primary management for the first recurrence, the maintenance group showed worse survival outcomes. Patients who had not undergone either surgery or radiotherapy were divided into complete response and partial response groups after six cycles of chemotherapy. In patients with partial response, maintenance chemotherapy led to a significant improvement in PFS (median, 3.6 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.007), but no significant change in in OS. The median cycle number of maintenance chemotherapy was four. (4) Conclusions: Maintenance chemotherapy may still play an important role in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, particularly in selected patient groups.

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab versus Doxorubicin for Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer with Short Treatment-Free Intervals Following First-Line Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel.

Background: The treatment-free interval is a significant predictor of worse prognosis and poor response rates of the second-line treatment in patients with carboplatin and paclitaxel (PT)-pretreated, advanced, or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). Whether lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab still confers a survival benefit compared with doxorubicin in patients with platinum-free intervals of <6 months remains unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional retrospective analysis was performed using de-identified electronic health records from the TriNetX Research Network. Patients with advanced or recurrent ECs who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or doxorubicin within six months of first-line PT were identified. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to control for potential confounding variables. Overall survival (OS) and adverse event profile were the primary and secondary outcomes. Results: Between January 2018 and February 2024, 130 patients with PT-treated, advanced, or recurrent ECs who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 122 patients who received doxorubicin at a platinum-free interval of <6 months were identified across 31 healthcare organizations. In the balanced cohort following PSM with 117 patients in each group, treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was associated with improved OS compared with treatment with doxorubicin (12.8 vs. 8.2 months, p = 0.012, hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.91). Regarding adverse event analysis, a higher incidence of hypothyroidism and proteinuria was observed with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, and more hematological toxicities were observed with doxorubicin. Conclusions: in patients with treatment-free intervals of <6 months, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab still confers improved survival compared with doxorubicin in PT-treated, advanced, or recurrent ECs.

Disparities in medical recommendations from AI-based chatbots across different countries/regions.

This study explores disparities and opportunities in healthcare information provided by AI chatbots. We focused on recommendations for adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer, analyzing responses across four regions (Indonesia, Nigeria, Taiwan, USA) and three platforms (Bard, Bing, ChatGPT-3.5). Utilizing previously published cases, we asked identical questions to chatbots from each location within a 24-h window. Responses were evaluated in a double-blinded manner on relevance, clarity, depth, focus, and coherence by ten experts in endometrial cancer. Our analysis revealed significant variations across different countries/regions (p < 0.001). Interestingly, Bing's responses in Nigeria consistently outperformed others (p < 0.05), excelling in all evaluation criteria (p < 0.001). Bard also performed better in Nigeria compared to other regions (p < 0.05), consistently surpassing them across all categories (p < 0.001, with relevance reaching p < 0.01). Notably, Bard's overall scores were significantly higher than those of ChatGPT-3.5 and Bing in all locations (p < 0.001). These findings highlight disparities and opportunities in the quality of AI-powered healthcare information based on user location and platform. This emphasizes the necessity for more research and development to guarantee equal access to trustworthy medical information through AI technologies.

Efficacy and toxicities of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in the second-line treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Purpose: Uterine leiomyosarcoma is a rare and aggressive tumor known for its drug resistance and metastatic potential. The standard first-line treatment typically involves anthracycline-based chemotherapy or a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel; however, there is currently no established second-line treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide as a potential second-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective, single-center, single-arm study. We reviewed the tumor registry data from January 2010 to December 2022 and identified patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma who had previously received first-line salvage or adjuvant treatment involving gemcitabine and taxotere, and later experienced tumor recurrence. Patients who met these criteria were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of doxorubicin and ifosfamide as a second-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma, as measured by progression-free survival, 1-year overall survival, and response rate. The secondary endpoint was the adverse events associated with this regimen. Results: Fifty-two patients were diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma during the study period, nine of whom were included in the data analysis. All patients had previously received gemcitabine-docetaxel as first-line adjuvant therapy, with a median progression-free survival period of 8.4 months. Doxorubicin-ifosfamide was administered as second-line treatment, with a median progression-free survival of 6.0 months (range: 2.7-79.9 months). The clinical benefit rate of the second-line treatment was 66.7%, with a median overall survival of 33.0 months, and a 1-year overall survival rate of 83.3%. Previous reports have shown that the median progression-free survival for second-line treatments using other regimens ranged from 1.4-5.6 months. The most common adverse event was myelosuppression, with five patients requiring granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and one patient requiring a blood transfusion. No patient discontinued treatment due to unmanageable adverse events. Conclusion: Use of doxorubicin with ifosfamide may be a promising and reasonable second-line treatment with manageable adverse events for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.

A new fertility-preserving treatment modality for life-threatening bleeding caused by acquired uterine arteriovenous malformation (AVM): Combination laparoscopic ligation of uterine arteries and AVM suture.

OBJECTIVE: Symptomatic Uterine arteriovenous malformation (AVM) can result in sudden and massive vaginal bleeding that can be life-threatening. We report a new fertility-preserving treatment modality for disastrous bleeding caused by acquired uterine AVM: Combination laparoscopic ligation of uterine arteries and AVM suture. CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old female received Dilatation and Curettage due to missed abortion. However, she experienced heavy vaginal bleeding after surgery. Uterine arteriovenous malformation (AVM) was diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasonography, hysteroscopy, and angiography. She was successfully treated using laparoscopy bilateral uterine arteries ligation followed by application of uterine AVM suture with absorbable barbed wound closure device. After the laparoscopic surgery, vaginal bleeding stopped immediately. Complete regression of the AVM lesion on sonography was noted 8 months after laparoscopic surgery. Besides, this patient had normal menstruation after the operation. CONCLUSION: This case report describes for the first time a successful combination of bilateral uterine artery ligation and AVM suture to treat a patient with uterine arteriovenous malformation. We demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this fertility preserving method.