Use of a surgical referral algorithm within a standardized shoulder physical therapy program to assist clinical decision-making.

PURPOSE: Determine (a) utility of a shoulder referral algorithm, (b) patients improving ≥15% on the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff(WORC) score with standardized Physical Therapy(PT) +home exercises, and (c) presenting characteristics among PT-Only, PT + Surgical Consult and Surgery participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study of patients 30-65 years old with shoulder pain. A standardized PT program assessed pain, ROM, strength and exercise tolerance (i.e., referral algorithm) at 2-, 6- and 12-weeks to determine if a surgical consultation might be beneficial. A blinded research assessor evaluated pain, ROM, strength and WORC score at 6-, 12-weeks and 6-months. The proportion improving WORC scores ≥15% and group differences were also evaluated. RESULTS: 32/128 (25%) participants underwent consultation with 16 (12.5%) undergoing surgery. WORC scores improved ≥15% by 12-weeks in most PT-Only/PT + Surgical Consult participants (n = 77[70%]) and was maintained at 6-months. Surgery participants used more NSAIDs (p = 0.01), injections (p = 0.002) and trended to higher opioid use (p = 0.06). PT + Surgical Consult/Surgery participants (n = 16/32; 50%) knew diagnostic imaging results more than PT-Only (n = 26; 31%) (p = 0.02). Surgery participants presented with worse pain, ROM, strength and WORC scores than PT-Only (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm identified those with worse symptomology (25%), 50% of whom underwent surgery. WORC scores improved ≥15% in most participants (70%). Presenting characteristics were significantly worse between PT-Only and Surgery participants.

Patients presenting with rotator-cuff related shoulder pain are likely to report reduced pain, and improved range of motion, strength and health-related quality of life within 3-months of starting a physical therapy program that includes home exercises.A surgical referral algorithm based on patient symptomology and response to treatment may assist physical therapists in determining when patients with shoulder pain might benefit from a surgical consult, often in advance of 3-months.Patients who required surgery tended to present with more pain, loss of range of motion and strength than those who received physical therapy only, as well as a history of more injections and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use.

An evaluation of the responsiveness and discriminant validity of shoulder questionnaires among patients receiving surgical correction of shoulder instability.

Health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) measures must detect clinically important changes over time and between different patient subgroups. Forty-three patients (32 M, 13 F; mean age = 26.00 ± 8.19 years) undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair completed three validated shoulder questionnaires (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment form (ASES), Constant score) preoperatively, and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Responsiveness and discriminant validity was assessed between those with a satisfactory outcome and those with (1) a major recurrence of instability, (2) a single episode of subluxation, (3) any postoperative episode of instability. Eight (20%) patients reported recurrent instability. Compared to baseline, the WOSI detected improvement at the 6- (P < 0.001) and 12-month (P = 0.011) evaluations. The ASES showed improvement at 6 months (P = 0.003), while the Constant score did not report significant improvement until 12 months postoperatively (P = 0.001). Only the WOSI detected differential shoulder function related to shoulder instability. Those experiencing even a single episode of subluxation reported a 10% drop in their WOSI score, attaining the previously established minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Those experiencing a frank dislocation or multiple episodes of subluxation reported a 20% decline. The WOSI allows better discrimination of the severity of postoperative instability symptoms following arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Rehabilitation after arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic scoping review identifying important evidence gaps.

BACKGROUND: Evidence to develop best rehabilitation practices after Arthroscopic Bankart Repair (ABR) is lacking, leading to heterogeneity in rehabilitation approaches. OBJECTIVES: This systematic scoping review investigated current evidence for rehabilitation and associated outcomes following ABR, including rehabilitation parameters, evaluative approaches (outcomes/outcome measures, follow-up timing/duration). DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed of CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Embase databases in May 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective studies detailing rehabilitation protocols following ABR reporting at least one postoperative assessment within 1 year of surgery (to measure impact of rehabilitation) were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two blinded reviewers independently selected studies using standardized criteria and extracted study characteristics and outcomes of interest. Quality of evidence was assessed using Joanna Brigg's quality assessment tool. A narrative analysis was conducted and evidence gaps were identified. RESULTS: Nine studies evaluating 11 rehabilitation protocols with a total of 384 participants were included. Considerable variability was seen in rehabilitation protocols and evaluation parameters. Return to sports/activity was frequently measured, but not well-defined. Strengthening was an important component of rehabilitation protocols, but rarely reported as an outcome. Follow-up was variable, with 4 studies ending follow-up before 24-months postoperatively. Overall, patient outcomes improved postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of evidence investigating the impact of rehabilitation approaches following ABR. Although patient outcomes improve after ABR, selected outcomes/measures are highly variable with limited evidence on those important to measure rehabilitation success, particularly strength and return to activity. Identified evidence gaps should be addressed in future research.

Functional outcome and health-related quality of life after surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tear using a mini-open technique.

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tear, a common shoulder injury, can lead to shoulder pain and functional loss. HYPOTHESIS: Surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears using the mini-open surgical technique will improve shoulder function and health-related quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear who underwent a mini-open repair were evaluated for (1) active shoulder range of motion preoperatively, and 6 months and 12 months postoperatively and (2) health-related quality of life preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and annually up to 5 years postoperatively. Satisfaction with the repair and return to work status were ascertained 1 year postoperatively. A subgroup analysis of tear size and patient age was also undertaken. RESULTS: Of the subjects, 61 (73%) were men, and the average age was 53.2 ( +/- 9.9) years. According to repeated-measures analysis of variance, shoulder range of motion (flexion and external rotation) improved significantly from before surgery to 1 year after surgery (P <.001). The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores improved from 53.3 ( +/- 20.6) preoperatively to 90.6 ( +/- 11.7) 1 year postoperatively (P <.001). The mean Western Ontario Rotator Cuff scores also improved from 43.2 ( +/- 20.2) preoperatively to 87.2 ( +/- 14.3) 1 year postoperatively (P <.001). No differences were seen in either the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores or Western Ontario Rotator Cuff scores between the 1-year examination and the last follow-up assessment undertaken at a median of 5 years postoperatively (P >.05). Ninety-six percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the results of their repair; 78% of patients who were working before surgery returned to work without modification by 1 year postoperatively. For the most part, patient age and size of tear did not influence postoperative range of motion or health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: Mini-open rotator cuff repair led to improved shoulder function and health-related quality of life up to 5 years postoperatively.

Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life After Surgical Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Using a Mini-Open Technique: A Concise 10-Year Follow-up of a Previous Report.

BACKGROUND: Although good short-term and midterm outcomes are reported for mini-open rotator cuff repair, few prospective studies have investigated long-term results. HYPOTHESIS: Function and health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes would be maintained 10 years after mini-open rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients with a confirmed full-thickness rotator cuff tear who underwent mini-open repair between April 1997 and July 2000 were evaluated preoperatively as well as 1 year and 10 years postoperatively for (1) pain, function, and HRQL using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score; (2) active shoulder range of motion (ROM) using goniometry; and (3) satisfaction by an independent evaluator. Changes in function, HRQL, and ROM over time were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled, of which 61 (73%) were men; the mean (±SD) age was 53.0 ± 9.9 years. At 10 years, 4 (5%) patients were deceased, and 4 (5%) had symptomatic retears. Fifty-nine (74%) patients were evaluated, composed of 43 (73%) men; 26 (44%) were younger than 60 years. Function and HRQL significantly improved over the course of follow-up (P < .001), primarily within the first postoperative year. At 10 years, the mean ASES score was 90.4 ± 19.4, similar to the 1-year score of 91.1 ± 12.0 (P = .83). The mean WORC score at 10 years was 88.7 ± 17.8, with no change from the 1-year score of 88.4 ± 13.6 (P = .93). This relationship did not change after adjusting for age and tear size. Shoulder ROM was also maintained over 10 years. Flexion ROM improved in the first postoperative year, and this improvement was sustained at 10 years after surgery (P ≥ .30). External rotation ROM was slower to improve postoperatively, and significant improvements were seen between 1 and 10 years (P < .01). Fifty-three patients (90%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their results. Tear size, workers' compensation board claimant status, sex, and smoking status did not influence HRQL or shoulder ROM (P > .06). CONCLUSION: Postoperative improvements in function and HRQL after mini-open rotator cuff repair were retained at 10 years.