Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Med Sci Monit ; 22: 1843-9, 2016 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27243444

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been widely used to restore and maintain mobility and function of the treated and adjacent motion segments. Posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) resection has been shown to be efficient in anterior cervical decompression and fusion. However, less is known about the biomechanical effect of PLL removal versus preservation in cervical disc arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three motion segments of 24 ovine cervical spines (C2-C5) were evaluated in a robotic spine system with axial compressive loads of 50 N. These cervical spines were divided in three groups according to the following conditions: (1) intact spine, (2) C3/C4 CDR with the Prestige LP prosthesis and PLL preservation, and (3) C3/C4 CDR with the Prestige LP prosthesis and PLL removal. The ranges of motion (ROMs) were recorded and analyzed in each group. RESULTS The C3/C4 ROM in group 3 (CDR with PLL removed) increased significantly in flexion-extension and axial rotation compared with group 1 (intact spine). Moreover, in flexion-extension, the mean total ROM was significantly larger in group 3 than in group 1. All the ROM observed in group 2 (CDR with PLL preserved) did not significantly differ from the ROM observed in group 1. CONCLUSIONS Compared with intact spines, CDR with PLL removal partly increased ROM. Moreover, the ROM in CDR with PLL preservation did not significantly differ from the ROM observed in intact spines. The PLL appears to contribute to the balance and stability of the cervical spine and should thus be preserved in cervical disc replacement provided that the posterior longitudinal ligament is not degenerative and the compression can be removed without PLL takedown.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Ligamentos Longitudinales/fisiología , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Reeemplazo Total de Disco , Animales , Artroplastia/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/fisiología , Vértebras Cervicales/fisiología , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Disco Intervertebral/fisiología , Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Modelos Animales , Implantación de Prótesis , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Ovinos
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(47): e36312, 2023 Nov 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013341

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To introduce a novel transverse connecting screw system, and to evaluate the biomechanical stability of the novel screw system using human cadaveric specimens. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper cervical spines were used in our study. Every specimen was tested under 5 conditions: intact group; unstable group; C1 to C2 screw rod system group; C1 to C2 + crosslink system group; atlas polyaxial transverse connecting screw (APTCS) system. RESULTS: Compared with the intact state, C1 to C2 screw rod system, C1 to C2 + CL system and APTCS showed statistically decrease range of motion in all directions except for the unstable group under posterior extension direction (P < .05). APTCS group has the least range of motion in all directions (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The APTCS system was able to restore stability to the atlantoaxial joint. APTCS system has the advantages of easy installation, convenient bone grafting, and strong biomechanical strength.


Asunto(s)
Articulación Atlantoaxoidea , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Tornillos Óseos , Articulación Atlantoaxoidea/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Cadáver
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda