COVID-19: clinical course and outcomes of 36 hemodialysis patients in Spain.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Unfortunately, there is a lack of evidence about the optimal management of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and even less is available in patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy than in the general population. In this retrospective, observational, single-center study, we analyzed the clinical course and outcomes of all maintenance hemodialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from March 12th to April 10th, 2020 as confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Baseline features, clinical course, laboratory data, and different therapies were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors to identify risk factors associated with mortality. Among the 36 patients, 11 (30.5%) died, and 7 were able to be discharged within the observation period. Clinical and radiological evolution during the first week of admission were predictive of mortality. Among the 36 patients, 18 had worsening of their clinical status, as defined by severe hypoxia with oxygen therapy requirements greater than 4 L/min and radiological worsening. Significantly, 11 of those 18 patients (61.1%) died. None of the classical cardiovascular risk factors in the general population were associated with higher mortality. Compared to survivors, nonsurvivors had significantly longer dialysis vintage, increased lactate dehydrogenase (490 U/l ± 120 U/l vs. 281 U/l ± 151 U/l, P = 0.008) and C-reactive protein levels (18.3 mg/dl ± 13.7 mg/dl vs. 8.1 mg/dl ± 8.1 mg/dl, P = 0.021), and a lower lymphocyte count (0.38 ×103/µl ± 0.14 ×103/µl vs. 0.76 ×103/µl ± 0.48 ×103/µl, P = 0.04) 1 week after clinical onset. Thus, the mortality among hospitalized hemodialysis patients diagnosed with COVID-19 is high. Certain laboratory tests can be used to predict a worsening clinical course.

Efficacy of Evolocumab vs low-density lipoprotein cholesterol apheresis in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and high cardiovascular risk (EVOLAFER01).

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has been considered the last option to treat refractory hyperlipidemia in patients with familiar hypercholesterolemia (FH). Evolocumab is a monoclonal antibody which has shown significant reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) serum levels and cardiovascular events. The aim of the study was to examine the comparative impact of LDL-apheresis vs Evolocumab vs the combination of both LDL-apheresis and Evolocumab on lipid and lipoprotein parameters, and other metabolic/inflammatory measures. DESIGN OF THE STUDY: Non-randomized open case series study of 10 adult patients diagnosed with FH already on long-term LDL-apheresis therapy. The study was developed in three consecutive phases to compare LDL-apheresis, Evolocumab treatment and the combination of both. Laboratory parameters were collected pre and post LDL-apheresis and before Evolocumab administration. The primary endpoint was the reduction of LDL-C during the three phases. RESULTS: Reduction of LDL-C levels with Evolocumab were 31.4% vs LDL-apheresis from 153 ± 35 mg/dL to 105 ± 56 mg/dL (P < .001). Reduction of Lp(a) was also significantly higher with Evolocumab (45.5%) than LDL-apheresis from 36 (6-119) to 20 (3-41) mg/dL, P = .027. In addition, HDL-C and apo-A increased after Evolocumab treatment, from 41 ± 6 to 46 ± 8 mg/dL (P = .003) and from 124 ± 13 to 144 ± 25 mg/dL (P = .001), respectively. No changes in immunological or inflammatory parameters were observed and no serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Evolocumab reduces LDL-C and Lp(a) more effectively than LDL-apheresis and combination of Evolocumab plus LDL-apheresis could be a therapeutic alternative to get lower LDL-C and Lp(a) levels in patients with very high cardiovascular risk.

Histologic Tumor Grade and Preoperative Bilary Drainage are the Unique Independent Prognostic Factors of Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal types of cancer; most patients die during the first 6 months after diagnosis. With a 5% 5-year survival rate, is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in developed countries. In this regard, several clinical, histopathologic and biological characteristics of the disease favoring long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy have been reported to be significant prognostic factors. Despite the availability of this information, there is no consensus about the different prognostic factors reported in the literature, probably due to variations in patient selection, methods, and sample size studied. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical and pathologic features associated to prognosis of the disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical and pathologic data from 78 patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for PDAC at our institution between 2003 and 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Overall, high-grade PDAC cases showed larger tumor size (P=0.009) and a higher frequency of deaths in association with a nonsignificantly shortened patient overall survival (median of 12.5 vs. 21.7 mo; P=0.065) as compared with low-grade PDAC patients. High histologic grade (P=0.013), preoperative drainage on the main bile duct (P=0.014) and absence of adjuvant therapy (P=0.035) were associated with a significantly poorer outcome. Overall survival multivariate analysis showed histologic grade (P=0.019) and bile duct preoperative drainage (P=0.016) as the sole independent variables predicting an adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that histologic tumor grade and preoperative biliary drainage are the only significant independent prognostic factors in PDAC patients after pancreatectomy.

Universal Sustained Viral Response to the Combination of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir with/without Ribavirin in Patients on Hemodialysis Infected with Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes 1 and 4.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent among patients on hemodialysis (HD) and is associated with poor prognosis. Treatment with interferon and ribavirin is poorly tolerated, and few data are available on the impact of new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). This study was intended to analyze the efficacy and safety of treatment with a combination of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with/without ribavirin in HCV-infected patients on HD from 3 hospitals. METHODS: This is a multicentric study. We analyze the clinical course of all patients on HD with HCV infection who had been treated with the combination of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir in 3 hospitals in Madrid, Spain. All patients under treatment had undergone Transient elastography (FibroScan®) and HCV RNA (PCR) and HCV genotype were determined simultaneously. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients aged 53.3 ± 8.9 years (68.6% males) and with genotypes 1 and 4 were treated with the DAA regimen, and 17 were also given ribavirin. The most common etiology was glomerular disease. Sustained viral response was achieved in 100% of patients. Adverse effects were negligible, and no patient had to discontinue treatment. The most significant side effect was anemia, which led to a significant increase in the dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Anemia was more marked in patients receiving ribavirin. No patients required transfusions. CONCLUSION: A combination of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir with/without ribavirin for the treatment of HCV in patients on HD is highly effective and causes minimal side effects. This regimen represents a major advance in disease management. A considerable improvement in prognosis seems likely.

Allopurinol and progression of CKD and cardiovascular events: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic hyperuricemia increases renal and cardiovascular (CV) risk. We previously conducted a 2-year, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of allopurinol treatment that showed improved estimated glomerular filtration rate and reduced CV risk. STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a long-term follow-up after completion of the 2-year trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 113 participants (57 in the allopurinol group and 56 in the control group) initially followed up for 2 years and 107 participants followed up to 5 additional years. INTERVENTION: Continuation of allopurinol treatment, 100mg/d, or standard treatment. OUTCOME: Renal event (defined as starting dialysis therapy and/or doubling serum creatinine and/or ≥50% decrease in estimated estimated glomerular filtration rate) and CV events (defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization or angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease). RESULTS: During initial follow-up, there were 2 renal and 7 CV events in the allopurinol group compared with 6 renal and 15 CV events in the control group. In the long-term follow-up period, 12 of 56 participants taking allopurinol stopped treatment and 10 of 51 control participants received allopurinol. During long-term follow-up, an additional 7 and 9 participants in the allopurinol group experienced a renal or CV event, respectively, and an additional 18 and 8 participants in the control group experienced a renal or CV event, respectively. Thus, during the initial and long-term follow-up (median, 84 months), 9 patients in the allopurinol group had a renal event compared with 24 patients in the control group (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.69; P=0.004; adjusted for age, sex, baseline kidney function, uric acid level, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers). Overall, 16 patients treated with allopurinol experienced CV events compared with 23 in the control group (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.88; P=0.02; adjusted for age, sex, and baseline kidney function). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, single center, not double blind, post hoc follow-up and analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with allopurinol may slow the rate of progression of kidney disease and reduce CV risk.

Management of resistant hypertension: aldosterone antagonists or intensification of diuretic therapy?

OBJECTIVE: No consensus has been established as to which is the best fourth-line agent in patients with resistant hypertension (RHT). The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of intensifying diuretic treatment with loop diuretic (furosemide) or aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone) on blood pressure (BP) control in RHT. METHODS: The study population comprised 30 patients with RHT who were divided into two treatment arms. Fifteen patients received furosemide 40 mg/day and 15 patients received spironolactone 25 mg/day. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed baseline, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Baseline BP was 162 ± 8/90 ± 6 mmHg, 70% men, mean age 63.3 ± 9.1 years 56.1% diabetic and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 55.8 ± 16.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) . There were no significant differences between groups at baseline in age, gender, percentage diabetics, eGFR, BP, number of antihypertensive drugs, or aldosterone levels. At 6 months, systolic BP decreased by 24 ± 9.2 mmHg (from 163.6 ± 8.6 to 139.6 ± 8.1 mmHg) in the spironolactone group, compared with 13.8 ± 2.8 mmHg (from 162 ± 7.9 to 148 ± 6.4 mmHg) in the furosemide group (P < 0.01). Diastolic BP fell 11 ± 8.1 mmHg in the spironolactone group compared with 5.2 ± 2.2 mmHg in the furosemide group (P < 0.01). Significant reduction in urinary albumin creatinine ratio (from 173 ± 268 to 14 ± 24 mg/g, P < 0.01) was observed in the spironolactone group at 6 months. Multiple regression analysis showed that only treatment with spironolactone was associated with control of BP < 140/90 mmHg at 6 months. No severe adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Spironolactone is more effective than furosemide for control of BP in RHT patients, with a positive added effect on albuminuria. Spironolactone is safe in patients with mild kidney impairment, although serum potassium should be closely monitored, especially in diabetics.

Urate reduction and renal preservation: what is the evidence?

Hyperuricemia is common among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Experimental evidence suggests that uric acid itself may harm patients with CKD by contributing to CKD progression. Although controversial, these observations are supported by many large observational studies indicating that increased serum uric acid level predicts the development and progression of CKD in a variety of populations. Interventional studies also suggest that reducing uric acid levels in asymptomatic hyperuricemic patients with CKD is safe and might slow CKD progression. However, these studies are limited in scope and have included a relatively small number of participants. Thus, although these data suggest treating asymptomatic hyperuricemia, further studies are needed before we can advise reducing uric acid levels in patients with CKD.

Epidemiology of Fabry disease in patients in hemodialysis in the Madrid community.

This study screened for Fabry disease (FD) in patients in hemodialysis (HD) in the region of Madrid (CAM) with a cross-sectional design to evaluate HD-prevalent patients, followed by a three-year period prospective design to analyze HD-incident patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients older than 18 years on HD in the CAM, excluding patients diagnosed with any other hereditary disease with renal involvement different from FD, that sign the Informed Consent (IC). EXCLUSION CRITERIA: underaged patients or not agreeing or not being capable of signing the IC. RESULTS: 3470 patients were included, 63% males and with an average age of 67.9±9.7 years. 2357 were HD-prevalent patients and 1113 HD-incident patients. For HD-prevalent patients, average time in HD was 45.2 months (SD 51.3), in HD-incident patients proteinuria was present in 28.4%. There were no statistical differences in plasmatic alpha-galactosidase A (α-GAL-A) activity or Lyso-GL-3 values when comparing HD-prevalent and HD-incident populations and neither between males and females. A genetic study was performed in 87 patients (2.5% of patients): 60 male patients with decreased enzymatic activity and 27 female patients either with a decreased GLA activity, increased Lyso-Gl3 levels or both. The genetic variants identified were: p.Asp313Tyr (4 patients), p.Arg220Gln (3 patients) and M290I (1 patient). None of the identified variants is pathogenic. CONCLUSIONS: 76% of HD Centers of the CAM participated in the study. This is the first publication to describe the prevalence of FD in the HD-population of a region of Spain as well as its average α-GAL-A-activity and plasmatic Lyso-Gl3 levels. It is also the first study that combines a cross-sectional design with a prospective follow-up design. This study has not identified any FD patient.

Intraindividual interleukin-6 variations on the cardiovascular prognosis of patients with chronic renal disease.

In chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on dialysis, plasma interleukin (IL)-6 levels predict mortality better than other markers. Impact of intraindividual changes of inflammatory markers on cardiovascular (CV) events in CKD patients is unknown. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the relation between CV outcomes and variations of C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, IL-1ß, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in CKD. Ninety patients (mean age: 68.5 ± 12.8 years) at different stages (1-4) of CKD were evaluated. Serum CRP, IL-6, IL-1ß, and TNF-α were measured basally and after taking statins or angiotensin II receptor blockers. Three patterns were defined for each marker (baseline, mean of two measurements, and variation of the marker: increase or decrease after 6 months). During follow-up (mean time: 72.7 ± 19.8 months), 14 patients died, 11 were included on dialysis program, and 29 suffered a CV event. Patients with persistently elevated IL-6 values had higher risk to develop CV events [OR = 1.21 (1.11-1.32), p = 0.001]. Mean of two measurements of IL-6 was a better predictor for events than a single measurement of IL-6, CRP, TNF-α, and IL-1ß. A mean of two determinations of plasma IL-6 greater than 6 pg/mL and previous peripheral vascular disease was related to an increased risk for CV events [2.34 (1.05-5.22), p = 0.037 and 2.95 (1.27-6.93), p = 0.011, respectively] in an adjusted Cox regression model. IL-6 is a better inflammatory marker than CRP, TNF-α, and IL1ß at predicting CV events in CKD nondialysis patients. Mean of two measurements is better than simple determinations at predicting CV outcome.

Expanded hemodialysis: Is anticoagulation of the dialysis circuit different from online hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis?

Expanded hemodialysis (HDx) has a high capacity for removing medium and medium-large molecules; however, there are no specific recommendations during HDx for anticoagulation of the dialysis circuit. We aimed to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of anticoagulation procedures using the venous port and 40 mg enoxaparin in HDx compared to high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) and postdilution online hemodiafiltration (HDF). We compared anticoagulant activity in 11 patients in HDx, HF-HD, and HDF under similar dialysis conditions. In the 33 dialysis sessions, 40 mg enoxaparin was administered through the venous port, and pre- and postdialysis antifactor Xa activity (aXa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), postdialysis clotting time of the vascular access, visual clotting score of the dialyzer, and any complications with the extracorporeal circuit or bleeding were registered. APTT postdialysis in HDx was not significantly different from that in HF-HD and HDF. Postdialysis aXa in HDx was not significantly different from that in HF-HD and HDF. We found no significant differences in visual clotting score of the dialyzer. Enoxaparin administered through the venous port was sufficient for anticoagulation within the extracorporeal circuit in HDx, HF-HD, and HDF. There were no differences in postdialysis aXa or APTT, most likely because when low molecular-weight heparin is applied through venous port, lesser enoxaparin concentration reaches the dialyzer. Thus, we conclude that the dose of enoxaparin administered through the venous port should not be adjusted according to dialysis technique.

Efficacy of enoxaparin in preventing coagulation during high-flux haemodialysis, expanded haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are easily dialysable with high-flow membranes; however, it is not clear whether the LMWH dose should be adjusted according to the membrane type and dialysis technique. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the dialyser on anticoagulation of the extracorporeal dialysis circuit. METHODS: Thirteen patients received the same dose of LMWH through the arterial port via three dialysis techniques: high-flux haemodialysis (HF-HD), online haemodiafiltration (HDF) and expanded haemodialysis (HDx). All dialysis was performed under similar conditions: duration, 4 h; blood flow, 400 mL/min; and dialysate flow, 500 mL/min. Antifactor Xa (aXa) activity and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were measured before and after the dialysis. Clotting time of the vascular access site after haemodialysis, visual clotting score of the dialyser and any complications with the extracorporeal circuit or bleeding were registered. RESULTS: Post-dialysis aXa activity in HF-HD (0.26 ± 0.02 U/mL) was significantly different from that in HDF (0.21 ± 0.02 U/mL, P = 0.024), and there was a trend in HDx (0.22 ± 0.01 U/mL, P = 0.05). APTT post-dialysis in HF-HD (30.5 ± 0.7 s) was significantly different from that in HDx (28.2 ± 0.64 s, P = 0.009) and HDF (28.8 ± 0.73 s, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: AXa activity in HDF was significantly lower than that in HF-HD, possibly because of more losses of LMWH through the dialyser. Given the higher anticoagulant loss in HDF and probably in HDx than in HF-HD, the enoxaparin dose administered may be adjusted according to the dialysis technique.

Intradialytic hypotension and relationship with cognitive function and brain morphometry.

BACKGROUND: The haemodynamic stress brought about by dialysis could justify the loss of structural and functional integrity of the central nervous system (CNS). The main objective of this study was to analyse the relationship between intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and cognitive function and brain morphometry. METHODS: The cross-sectional KIDBRAIN study (Cohort Study of Morphological Changes of the Brain by MRI in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients) included 68 prevalent patients with no history of neurological disorders (cerebrovascular disease and cognitive impairment) undergoing haemodialysis (HD). We analysed 18 non-consecutive dialysis sessions (first three of each month over a 6-month period) and various definitions of IDH were recorded. Global cognitive function (GCF) was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and parameters of structural integrity of the CNS were obtained using volume morphometry magnetic resonance imaging analysis [grey matter (GM), white matter (WM) and hippocampus). RESULTS: A greater number of sessions with IDH were associated with less volume of WM (r = -0.359,P = 0.003) and hippocampus (r = -0.395, P = 0.001) independent of cardiovascular risk factors according to multivariable linear regression models (ß = -0.198, P = 0.046 for WM; ß = -0.253, P = 0.017 for hippocampus). The GCF by the MMSE was 27.3 ± 7.3.1 and was associated with WM volume (ß = 0.403, P = 0.001) independent of GM and hippocampus volume. Symptomatic IDH was associated with GCF (r = -0.420, P < 0.001) in adjusted analysis (ß = -0.339, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Even when asymptomatic, IDH is associated with a lower WM and hippocampus volume and reduced GCF in patients undergoing HD, thus suggesting greater vulnerability of the brain to the haemodynamic stress that may be generated by a dialysis session.

Effect of preoperative exercise on vascular caliber and maturation of arteriovenous fistula: the physicalfav trial, a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the best vascular access for hemodialysis. Distal forearm radiocephalic fistula is the best option, although the primary failure rate ranges from 20% to 50%. The main objective of the PHYSICALFAV trial was to evaluate the effect of preoperative isometric exercise on vascular caliber, percentage of distal arteriovenous fistula, and primary failure rate. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: The PHYSICALFAV trial (NCT03213756) is an open-label, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT). A total of 138 patients were randomized 1:1 to the exercise group (exercises combining a handgrip device and an elastic band for 8 weeks) or the control group (no exercise) and followed up with periodic Doppler ultrasound (DU) examinations. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of preoperative isometric exercise, in the exercise group, significant increases were detected in venous caliber (2.80 ± 0.95 mm vs 3.52 ± 0.93 mm [p < 0.001]), arterial caliber (2.61 ± 0.82 mm vs 2.74 ± 0.80 mm [p = 0.008]), arterial peak systolic velocity (66.34 ± 19.2 cm/s vs 71.03 ± 21.5 cm/s [p 0.043]), and maximum strength (28.35 ± 9.16 kg vs 32.68 ± 10.8 kg [p < 0.001]). Distal radiocephalic fistulas were performed in 75% of the exercise group patients compared with 50.8% in the control group (p = 0.030). The global primary failure rate was very low in both groups (7% exercise group vs 14% control group [p = 0.373]). CONCLUSION: Isometric preoperative exercise can improve vascular caliber and increase the possibility of performing distal arteriovenous fistula, with no significant differences in primary failure rate.

Thrombotic Microangiopathy in a Kidney Transplant Patient With COVID-19.

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk for infection, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), given ongoing immunosuppression. In individuals with COVID-19, complications including thrombosis and endothelial dysfunction portend worse outcomes. In this report, we describe a kidney transplant recipient who developed severe thrombotic microangiopathy with a low platelet count (12 ×109/L), anemia (hemoglobin, 7.5 g/dL with 7% schistocytes on peripheral-blood smear), and severe acute kidney injury concurrent with COVID-19. The clinical course improved after plasma exchange. Given this presentation, we hypothesize that COVID-19 triggered thrombotic microangiopathy.

Intradialytic hypotension definitions with mortality prediction capacity in a cohort of haemodialysis patients. / Definiciones de hipotensión intradiálisis con poder predictivo de mortalidad en una cohorte de hemodiálisis.

INTRODUCTION: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication and is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in patients on haemodialysis. However, there is a lack of uniformity in definitions of IDH. The main objective of this study is to analyse clinical and dialysis related factors with several IDH definitions, and its relationship with morbidity and mortality in a cohort of haemodialysis patients. METHODOLOGY: Observational study with a 30-month follow-up period that includes 68 prevalent patients on haemodialysis with at least six months of treatment. We analysed 18 non-consecutive dialysis sessions (first three of each month of a six-month period), and different definitions of IDH were recorded. A positive event of IDH was defined if any definition occurred in more than 25% of the sessions studied. Using survival analysis, we analysed the prediction capacity of each IDH definition (Nadir90, Nadir100, Fall20, Fall30, Fall20Nadir90, Fall30Nadir90, KDOQI, HEMO). The relationship with non-fatal cardiovascular disease and global mortality was estimated using different Cox proportional models. RESULTS: We found IDH definitions that occurred significantly more frequently (Nadir100: 339.8/1,000 sessions, Nadir90: 172.3/1,000 sessions) than others (KDOQI: 98/1,000 sessions, HEMO 129.9/1,000 sessions). We registered 13 fatal events with a mean follow-up of 27.12±6.84 months. A greater number of sessions with IDH according to the Nadir90 definition was a predictive factor of mortality (Log rank 5.02, p=0.025), independent according to adjusted models (HR: 3.23 [95% CI: 1.08-9.6], p=0.035). The definitions Nadir100 (HR: 4.54 [95% CI: 1.25-16.4], p=0.02) and Fall30Nadir90 (HR: 3.08 [95% CI: 1.07-8.8], p=0.03) were independent predictors of non-fatal cardiovascular disease in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Intradialytic hypotension, even asymptomatic, is a predictor of mortality and non-fatal cardiovascular disease in prevalent patients on haemodialysis.

Exercise training during hemodialysis sessions: Physical and biochemical benefits.

Chronic inflammation, protein-energy wasting, and poor physical functioning are highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). These factors are associated with disability and increase of cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of exercise training during hemodialysis (HD) sessions on physical functioning, body composition, and nutritional and inflammatory status. We performed a prospective intervention study including patients on prevalent HD therapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline visit by Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy specialists and the exercise program was adapted to each patient's physical capacity. In addition to demographic, clinical, body composition and functional ability data, serum markers regarding nutritional and inflammatory status were collected at baseline and after 3 months of exercise training. We observed a significant improvement after 3-month follow-up in functional ability (6 minute walk test [6MWT] [403.15 ± 105.4 vs 431.81 ± 115.5 m, P < .001], sit-to-stand repetitions in 30 seconds [12.2 ± 4.2 vs 14.1 ± 5.0 repetitions, P = .003] and dynamometry [24.5 ± 11.9 vs 29.5 ± 12.5 kg, P < 0.001]), body composition with increase of body mass index (BMI) (23.7 ± 4.4 vs 24.1 ± 4.7 kg/m2 , P = 0.01) at the expense of lean tissue index (LTI) (14.9 ± 3.7 vs 16.2 ± 2.9 kg/m2 , P = 0.038) and lipid parameters with LDL-cholesterol decrease (70.2 ± 17.9 vs 64.9 ± 21.3 mg/dL, P = .03) and lower serum triglyceride levels (125.8 ± 54.0 vs 108.2 ± 44.6 mg/dL, P = .006). In addition, we found a decrease in iron (155.6 ± 148.2 vs 116.7 ± 110.8 mg, P = .029) and erythropoietin (117.5 ± 84.2 vs 99.2 ± 74.5 µg, P = .023) requirements. The implementation of exercise training programs during HD can improve physical functioning, body composition and lipid and anemia profile. Supervised exercise programs could be included as part of HD patient care to improve physical capacity in these patients.

The new marker YKL-40, a molecule related to inflammation, is associated with cardiovascular events in stable haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: YKL-40 is a glycoprotein associated with inflammatory conditions, including atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction. The objective was to analyse serum YKL-40 levels in a haemodialysis population and explore their association with dialysis dosing measures, inflammation, body composition and development of cardiovascular (CV) events. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 78 chronic haemodialysis patients enrolled in 2013 and followed up until 2018. At baseline, serum YKL-40, inflammatory and nutrition markers and body composition were assessed. During a median follow-up of 43 (interquartile range 24-66) months, CV events were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 62 ± 16 years and 66% were men. The mean YKL-40 was 207 ± 106 ng/dL. Higher YKL-40 levels were associated with lower Kt/V urea, convective volume, serum albumin and prealbumin and with higher troponin T. During follow-up, 50% developed CV events. Cox analysis showed an association between CV events and YKL-40, diabetes, hypertension, C-reactive protein, lower prealbumin, ß2-microglobulin, glycosylated haemoglobin and troponin T values. The multivariate Cox analysis confirmed an independent association between CV events and YKL-40 {hazard ratio [HR] 1.067 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.009-1.211]; P: 0.042}, troponin T [HR 1.037 (95% CI 1.009-1.683); P: 0.007], lower prealbumin [HR 0.827 (95% CI 0.224-0.988); P: 0.009] and diabetes [HR 2.103 (95% CI 1.554-3.172); P: 0.008]. Kaplan-Meier confirmed the association between CV events and YKL-40 (log rank 7.28; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: YKL-40 is associated with CV events in haemodialysis patients. Higher dialysis dose and convective volume are associated with lower serum YKL-40 levels.

Middle molecule elimination in expanded haemodialysis: only convective transport?

BACKGROUND: New high-retention onset dialysers have shown improved efficacy in the elimination of uraemic toxins, and their depurative capacity has been compared with high convective volumes of online haemodiafiltration. Haemodialysis (HD) using high-flux membranes leads to convective transport by internal filtration [direct filtration (DF)/backfiltration (BF)] and allows the removal of middle molecules (MMs). The aim of this study was to assess solute transport mechanisms in expanded HD (HDx). METHODS: In 14 4-h HDx sessions with Theranova-500 dialysers under similar dialysis conditions (blood flow 400 mL/min, dialysate flow 700 mL/min, dialysate temperature 35.5°C), pressures at the inlet and outlet of both dialyser compartments (P bi, P bo, P di and P do) were collected hourly to estimate DF/BF volumes by semi-empirical methods. Uraemic toxins with various molecular weights were measured pre-dialysis, at 1 h (pre-filter and post-filter) and post-dialysis to calculate molecules' reduction over time and dialyser in vivo clearances. RESULTS: Ultrafiltration was 1.47 ± 0.9 L and Kt/V 1.74 ± 0.3. Hydrodynamic data (P bi: 259 ± 39, P bo: 155 ± 27, P di: 271 ± 30, P do: 145 ± 29 mmHg and oncotic pressure 22.0 ± 3.5 mmHg) allowed the estimation of DF/BF rates. DF flow ranged from 29.5 ± 4.2 to 31.3 ± 3.9 mL/min and BF flow ranged from 25.1 ± 2.3 to 23.4 ± 2.6 mL/min. The highest calculated DF volume was 7506.8 ± 935.3 mL/session. Diffusive clearances (K d) of all solutes were higher than their convective transport (all P < 0.001) except for prolactin (23 kDa) clearances, which showed no differences. Total clearances of all solutes were correlated with their K d (ρ = 0.899-0.987, all P < 0.001) and Kt/V correlated with all reduction rates (ρ = 0.661-0.941, P = 0.010 to <0.001). DF flow was only associated with urea (ρ = -0.793, P = 0.001), creatinine (ρ = -0.675, P = 0.008) and myoglobin clearance (ρ = 0.653, P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that diffusive transport is a main mechanism of MM elimination in HDx. HDx offers an efficient depuration of MM without the need for high convective volumes.

High convective volumes are associated with improvement in metabolic profile in diabetic patients on online haemodiafiltration. / Los altos volúmenes convectivos se asocian a la mejoría del perfil metabólico en los pacientes diabéticos en hemodiafiltración online.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) with high convective transport volumes improves patient survival in haemodialysis. Limiting the amount of convective volume has been proposed in patients with diabetes mellitus due to glucose load that is administered with replacement fluid. The objective of the study was to analyse the influence of substitution volume on the evolution of the metabolic profile and body composition of incident diabetic patients on OL-HDF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study in 29 incident diabetic patients on postdilution OL-HDF. Baseline data included clinical and demographic data, laboratory parameters (metabolic, nutritional and inflammatory profile) and body composition with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Laboratory parameters and mean substitution volume per session were collected every 4 months, and in 23 patients a further BIS was performed after a minimum of one year. Variations in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-c, HDL-c, albumin, prealbumin and C reactive protein (CRP) were calculated at one year, 2 years, 3 years, and at the end of follow-up. Quarterly and annual variations were calculated as independent periods, and changes in body composition were analysed. RESULTS: Age at baseline was 69.7±13.6 years, 62.1% were male, 72.3±13.9kg, 1.78±0.16m2, with 48 (35.5-76) months on dialysis. Approximately 81.5% received insulin, 7.4% antidiabetic drugs and 51.9% statins. Mean substitution volume was 26.9±2.9L/session and follow-up period (time on OL-HDF) was 40.4±26 months. A significant correlation was observed between mean substitution volume and the increase in HDL-c (r=0.385, p=0.039) and prealbumin levels (r=0.404, p=0.003) throughout follow-up. Moreover, substitution volume was correlated with a reduction in CRP levels at one year (r=-0.531, p=0.005), 2 years (r=-0.463, p=0.046), and at the end of follow-up (r=-0.498, p=0.007). Patients with mean substitution volume >26.9L/session had a higher reduction in triglycerides and CRP, and an increase in HDL-c levels. These patients with >26.9L/session finished the study with higher HDL-c (48.1±9.4mg/dL vs. 41.2±11.6mg/dL, p=0.025) and lower CRP levels (0.21 [0.1-2.22] mg/dL vs. 1.01 [0.15-6.96] mg/dL, p=0.001), with no differences at baseline. Quarterly comparisons between substitution volume and laboratory changes [n=271] showed a significant correlation with a reduction in HbA1c (r=-0.146, p=0.021). Similar findings were obtained with annual comparisons [n=72] (r=-0.237, p=0.045). An annual mean substitution volume over 26.6L/session (29.3±1.7L/session vs. 23.9±1.9L/session) was associated with a reduction in HbA1c (-0.51±1.24% vs. 0.01±0.88%, p=0.043). No correlation was observed between substitution volume and changes in weight, body mass index or BIS parameters. CONCLUSION: There is not enough evidence to restrict convective transport in diabetic patients on OL-HDF due to the glucose content of the replacement fluid.

On-line hemodiafiltration at home.

Survival with online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is higher than with hemodialysis; frequent hemodialysis has also improved survival and quality of life. Home hemodialysis facilitates frequent therapy. We report our experience with 2 patients with stage 5 CKD who started home hemodialysis with OL-HDF in November 2016. After a training period at the hospital, they started home hemodialysis with OL-HDF after learning how to manage dialysis monitors and how to administer water treatment. We used the "5008-home" (FMC© ) monitor, and the Acqua C© (Fresenius Medical Care) for water treatment. Water conductivity was always checked before and during dialysis sessions and was always 2.5 to 3 mS/cm. Water cultures always fulfilled the criteria for ultrapurity. As far as we know, this is the first report on patients receiving OL-HDF at home. The technique proved to be safe and valid for renal replacement therapy and transfers the benefits of hospital convective therapy to the home setting. Future data will enable us to determine whether survival has also improved.