Metadata for Data dIscoverability aNd Study rEplicability in obseRVAtional Studies (MINERVA): Development and Pilot of a Metadata List and Catalogue in Europe.

PURPOSE: Metadata for data dIscoverability aNd study rEplicability in obseRVAtional studies (MINERVA), a European Medicines Agency-funded project (EUPAS39322), defined a set of metadata to describe real-world data sources (RWDSs) and piloted metadata collection in a prototype catalogue to assist investigators from data source discoverability through study conduct. METHODS: A list of metadata was created from a review of existing metadata catalogues and recommendations, structured interviews, a stakeholder survey, and a technical workshop. The prototype was designed to comply with the FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable), using MOLGENIS software. Metadata collection was piloted by 15 data access partners (DAPs) from across Europe. RESULTS: A total of 442 metadata variables were defined in six domains: institutions (organizations connected to a data source); data banks (data collections sustained by an organization); data sources (collections of linkable data banks covering a common underlying population); studies; networks (of institutions); and common data models (CDMs). A total of 26 institutions were recorded in the prototype. Each DAP populated the metadata of one data source and its selected data banks. The number of data banks varied by data source; the most common data banks were hospital administrative records and pharmacy dispensation records (10 data sources each). Quantitative metadata were successfully extracted from three data sources conforming to different CDMs and entered into the prototype. CONCLUSIONS: A metadata list was finalized, a prototype was successfully populated, and a good practice guide was developed. Setting up and maintaining a metadata catalogue on RWDSs will require substantial effort to support discoverability of data sources and reproducibility of studies in Europe.

Clinical pharmacology facing the real-world setting: Pharmacovigilance, pharmacoepidemiology and the economic evaluation of drugs.

Traditionally, clinical pharmacology has focused its activities on drug-organism interaction, from an individual or collective perspective. Drug efficacy assessment by performing randomized clinical trials and analysis of drug use in clinical practice by carrying out drug utilization studies have also been other areas of interest. From now on, Clinical pharmacology should move from the analysis of the drug-individual interaction to the analysis of the drug-individual-society interaction. It should also analyze the clinical and economic consequences of the use of drugs in the conditions of normal clinical practice, beyond clinical trials. The current exponential technological development that facilitates the analysis of real-life data offers us a golden opportunity to move to all these other areas of interest. This review describes the role that clinical pharmacology has played at the beginning and during the evolution of pharmacovigilance, pharmacoepidemiology and economic drug evaluations in Spain. In addition, the challenges that clinical pharmacology is going to face in the following years in these three areas are going to be outlined too.

A European multicentre drug utilisation study of the impact of regulatory measures on prescribing of codeine for pain in children.

PURPOSE: In June 2013, following recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency agreed updates to the codeine product information regarding use for pain in children younger than 12 years and children undergoing tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy (TA) for obstructive sleep apnoea. This study was conducted to (a) assess effectiveness of these measures on codeine prescribing in the "real-world" setting and (b) test feasibility of a study using a common protocol by regulators with access to databases. METHODS: The study was performed using BIFAP (Spain), CPRD (UK), and IMS® Disease Analyzer (France and Germany) databases. Prescribers included general practitioners (GPs) (France and UK), GPs and paediatricians together (Spain), and GPs, paediatricians, and ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialists separately (Germany). Between January 2010 and June 2015, prevalence of codeine prescribing was obtained every 6 months, and a time series analysis (joinpoint) was performed. Codeine prescribing within ±30 days of TA was also identified. Furthermore, doses, durations, and prior prescribing of other analgesics were investigated. RESULTS: Over the 5-year period, codeine prescribing decreased in children younger than 12 years (by 84% in France and Spain, 44% in GP practices in Germany, and 33% in the United Kingdom). The temporal pattern was compatible with the regulatory intervention in France and the United Kingdom, whereas a decrease throughout the study period was seen in Germany and Spain. Decreased prescribing associated with TA was suggested in ENT practices in Germany. CONCLUSIONS: Codeine prescribing for children decreased in line with introduced regulatory measures. Multidatabase studies assessing impact of measures by EU regulators are feasible.

Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a comparative study of quality control adherence at two cancer hospitals in Spain and Poland.

BACKGROUND: We performed a clinical audit of preoperative rectal cancer treatment at two European radiotherapy centres (Poland and Spain). The aim was to independently verify adherence to a selection of indicators of treatment quality and to identify any notable inter-institutional differences. METHODS: A total of 162 patients, in Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) 68 and in Greater Poland Cancer Centre (GPCC) 94, diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer and treated with preoperative radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy were included in retrospective study. A total of 7 quality control measures were evaluated: waiting time, multidisciplinary treatment approach, portal verification, in vivo dosimetry, informed consent, guidelines for diagnostics and therapy, and patient monitoring during treatment. RESULTS: Several differences were observed. Waiting time from pathomorphological diagnosis to initial consultation was 31 (ICO) vs. 8 (GPCC) days. Waiting time from the first visit to the beginning of the treatment was twice as long at the ICO. At the ICO, 82% of patient experienced treatment interruptions. The protocol for portal verification was the same at both institutions. In vivo dosimetry is not used for this treatment localization at the ICO. The ICO utilizes locally-developed guidelines for diagnostics and therapy, while the GPCC is currently developing its own guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: An independent external clinical audit is an excellent approach to identifying and resolving deficiencies in quality control procedures. We identified several procedures amenable to improvement. Both institutions have since implemented changes to improve quality standards. We believe that all radiotherapy centres should perform a comprehensive clinical audit to identify and rectify deficiencies.

Risk of meningioma among users of high doses of cyproterone acetate as compared with the general population: evidence from a population-based cohort study.

AIM: Information from the spontaneous reporting system raised the hypothesis of an increased risk of meningioma in patients treated with high doses of cyproterone acetate (CPA). The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis of an increased risk of meningioma among users of high dose CPA as compared with non-users in a medical records computerized database. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a Spanish primary care database (BIFAP). Meningioma incidence rates were compared in patients exposed to high dose CPA (users) with those non-exposed and with those exposed to low dose CPA. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate the incidence rate ratios after adjusting for age and gender. RESULTS: Among 2474 users of high dose cyproterone (6663 person-years) four meningioma cases were identified, resulting in an incidence rate (IR) of 60.0 (95% CI 16.4, 153.7) per 100,000 person-years, which was significantly higher than that observed among the non-users (IR 6.6; 95% CI 6.0, 7.3) and among women users of low dose cyproterone (IR 0.0, 95% CI upper limit 5.5). After adjusting for age and gender, patients exposed to high dose CPA showed an increased risk of meningioma of 11.4 (95% CI 4.3, 30.8) as compared with non-users. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the hypothesis that the exposure to high dose CPA increases the risk of meningioma.

A randomized, double-blind study to assess the optimal duration of doxycycline treatment for human brucellosis.

BACKGROUND: Human brucellosis is usually treated with a combination of tetracyclines and aminoglycosides. However, the optimal duration of therapy has not been clearly determined. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study comparing treatment with doxycycline (100 mg po b.i.d.) for 30 days (30-day group) with the same dosage of doxycycline for 45 days (45-day group) in patients with brucellosis without endocarditis, spondylitis, or neurobrucellosis. All patients were treated with gentamicin (240 mg im once daily) for the first 7 days. Therapeutic outcome was evaluated by measuring relapse rates and drug safety. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included in each group. During the first 45 days after treatment, the percentage of patients with relapse was significantly higher in the 30-day group than in the 45-day group (12.3% vs. 1.37%; relative risk, 9.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-69.2; P=.017). Between day 45 after treatment and 12 months after treatment, no further significant differences were found in relapse rates between groups (9.38% in the 30-day group vs. 11.11% in the 45-day group; relative risk, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.31-2.30; P=.78). Overall, relapses occurred in 15 (20.55%) of 73 patients in the 30-day group and in 9 (12.33%) of 73 patients in the 45-day group (relative risk, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.78-3.56; P=.264). Compliance and adverse effects were comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Doxycycline treatment for 45 days significantly decreased early relapse rates among adults with brucellosis without increasing adverse effects.

Uso de olmesartán en la prevención o retraso de la nefropatía diabética: algunas consideraciones / Olmesartan for the prevention or delay of diabetic nephropathy: some considerations

No disponible

Evaluación de dos pautas de quimioprofilaxis tuberculosa en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana / Assessment of two chemoprophylaxis regimens for tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients

Objetivo: Evaluar la cumplimentación, tolerancia y eficacia de una pauta corta de quimioprofilaxis para tuberculosis con isoniacida y rifampicina durante 3 meses frente a una pauta estándar de isoniacida durante 12 meses en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). Pacientes y métodos: Ensayo clínico prospectivo, comparativo, aleatorizado y abierto realizado en cuatro hospitales generales y un centro penitenciario de Castilla-La Mancha. La profilaxis se administró en pacientes PPD positivos y pacientes anérgicos de acuerdo con las normas de los Centers for Diseases Control (CDC) de 1991. Los pacientes se distribuyeron de forma aleatoria en dos pautas: pauta de rifampicina a los que se les administraron 300 mg/día de isoniacida y 600 mg/día de rifampicina durante 3 meses, y pauta de isoniacida a los que se les administraron 300 mg/día de isoniacida durante 12 meses. Resultados: Se incluyeron 133 pacientes: 64 en la pauta isoniacida y 69 en la pauta rifampicina. Se toleró mejor la pauta de rifampicina, con un 28 por ciento de efectos adversos frente a un 55 por ciento en la pauta de isoniacida. La hepatotoxicidad fue más frecuente en la pauta de isoniacida, con un riesgo relativo (RR) de 2,2 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95 por ciento, 1,23-4,01). La hepatotoxicidad grave, que obligó a suspender el tratamiento, se relacionó con el tiempo de administración del fármaco, siendo más frecuente en la pauta de 12 meses. Se cumplimentó mejor la pauta corta, pero sin diferencias valorables. La incidencia de tuberculosis fue de 4,23 casos por 100 personas-año para la pauta de isoniacida y 2,08 para la pauta de rifampicina, con un riesgo relativo para desarrollar tuberculosis con la pauta de rifampicina de 0,51 (IC del 95 por ciento, 0,09-2,8) frente a la pauta de isoniacida, no estadísticamente significativo. La estancia en prisión se asoció con un riesgo significativo de tuberculosis, independientemente de la pauta de tratamiento (RR = 9,2; IC del 95 por ciento; 1,06-80,2). Conclusiones: En pacientes con infección por el VIH con PPD positivo o anérgicos, la pauta de rifampicina es al menos igual de eficaz para prevenir el desarrollo de tuberculosis que la pauta de isoniacida, y presenta menos efectos adversos (AU)