RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Introduction and objective Indwelling double J ureteral stents are used routinely in the resolution of ureteral obstruction caused by different etiologies. Evaluation of urinary symptoms related to double-J stent, indicate that these affect 73-90% of patients. We conducted a prospective, randomized study, to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin, oxybutinin and combination therapy in improving the urinary symptoms. Methods Patients who underwent ureteral stent placement after ureterolithotripsy (total 51), were randomized into three groups: Group I: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg. once per day(17 patients), Group II: Oxybutinin 5 mg. once per day (17 patients), Group III: Tamsulosin+ oxybutynin once per day (17 patients). All the groups received the drugs for three weeks and completed a Spanish validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at day 7 and 21. Results Repeated measures ANOVA showed mean urinary symptom index score was 22.3 vs. 15.5 in group three (p<0.001) at day 7 and 21 respectively. The mean work performance index was 6.6 vs 8.1 (p=0.049) favoring tamsulosin group, the mean sexual score was 0.5 vs 1.5 (p=0.03). Among additional problems the mean was 7.2 vs 6.2 (p=0.03). No significant difference was noted among pain and general health index. No side effects were reported. Conclusions Combination therapy with tamsulosin and oxybutynin improved irritative symptoms and work performance as well as sexual matters. Combination therapy should be considered for patients who complained of stent related symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Stents/efectos adversos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Mandélicos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Tiempo , Uréter , Obstrucción Ureteral , Obstrucción Ureteral/complicaciones , Obstrucción Ureteral/terapia , Método Simple Ciego , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Análisis de Varianza , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
La microlitiasis testicular (MT) es un padecimiento urológico poco frecuente que se diagnostica de forma incidental mediante ltrasonografía escrotal. Ha sido asociado a diversas enfermedades como síndrome de Klinefelter, atrofia testicular, criptorquidia, torsión testicular e infertilidad. Sin embargo, también se puede encontrar en varones sanos sin factores de riesgo asociados. La microlitiasis testicular es detectada con mayor frecuencia en la actualidad, debido a la resolución superior de los equipos de ultrasonido actuales en comparación a los anteriores. En la década de los noventa la MT fue considerada una condición benigna sin gran relevancia clínica. Sin embargo, reportes posteriores asociaron este padecimiento al desarrollo de neoplasias testiculares e infertilidad. Por tal motivo muchos autores recomendaban la vigilancia periódica con marcadores tumorales y ultrasonido, e incluso algunos preconizaban el uso de la biopsia testicular. El objetivo del presente articulo de revisión es exponer de manera clara y especifica la evidencia actual de la microlitiasis testicular para así establecer las pautas tanto diagnósticas como de seguimiento
Testicular microlithiasis (TM) is an uncommon urologic condition incidentally diagnosed by scrotal ultrasound. It has been associated with different diseases, such as Klinefelter's syndrome, testicular atrophy, cryptorchidism, testicular torsion, and infertility. However, it can also present in healthy males that have no associated risk factors. Currently, TM is most often detected thanks to the superior resolution of todays ultrasound equipment, compared with former models. In the 1990s, TM was considered a benign condition with no important clinical relevance, but later reports associated it with the development of testicular neoplasias and infertility. Thus, many authors recommended periodic surveillance with tumor markers and ultrasound imaging, with some even promoting the use of testicular biopsy. The aim of this article is to clearly and specifically present current information about testicular microlithiasis, toestablish both diagnostic and follow-up indications