Early IL-1 receptor blockade in severe inflammatory respiratory failure complicating COVID-19.

Around the tenth day after diagnosis, ∼20% of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated pneumonia evolve toward severe oxygen dependence (stage 2b) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (stage 3) associated with systemic inflammation often termed a "cytokine storm." Because interleukin-1 (IL-1) blocks the production of IL-6 and other proinflammatory cytokines, we treated COVID-19 patients early in the disease with the IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra. We retrospectively compared 22 patients from three different centers in France with stages 2b and 3 COVID-19-associated pneumonia presenting with acute severe respiratory failure and systemic inflammation who received either standard-of-care treatment alone (10 patients) or combined with intravenous anakinra (12 patients). Treatment started at 300 mg⋅d-1 for 5 d, then tapered with lower dosing over 3 d. Both populations were comparable for age, comorbidities, clinical stage, and elevated biomarkers of systemic inflammation. All of the patients treated with anakinra improved clinically (P < 0.01), with no deaths, significant decreases in oxygen requirements (P < 0.05), and more days without invasive mechanical ventilation (P < 0.06), compared with the control group. The effect of anakinra was rapid, as judged by significant decrease of fever and C-reactive protein at day 3. A mean total dose of 1,950 mg was infused with no adverse side effects or bacterial infection. We conclude that early blockade of the IL-1 receptor is therapeutic in acute hyperinflammatory respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients.

Importance of temporality and context in relation to life habit restrictions among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A psychosocial qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Life habits (LH) encompass an individual's engagement in daily activities such as nutrition, fitness, personal care, communication, housing, and mobility, along with his/her social role (responsibility, interpersonal relationships, community life, education, employment, and recreation). This qualitative study explores the nature and context of LH restrictions in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) individuals across their SLE journey. METHODS: Narrative interviews were conducted with adult SLE patients. Interview transcripts were subjected to a thematic content analysis, using the Disability Creation Process model as a framework. RESULTS: Forty participants were interviewed. Three major themes were highlighted: (1) Temporality, capabilities, and environmental contexts: although all participants experienced LH restrictions at some point, the expression of these limitations depended on the individual's and SLE disease characteristics as well as on temporal (time of life and lupus course) and environmental (material, social, and societal) contexts. (2) Identity issues, illness stigma, and (fear of) discriminations: LH were discussed through the lens of participants' social roles and identities. While illness stigma can influence social relations, it is also expressed at a societal level. (3) Masking and minimizing strategies: due to illness stigma and fear of discrimination, participants developed strategies to manage their relationships, including masking and minimization. Their use was both advantageous and disadvantageous regarding LH. CONCLUSIONS: For individuals with SLE, LH restrictions must be considered as an ongoing process that takes place within specific contexts. Our findings provide many opportunities for interventions that can benefit patients and their families, as well as healthcare providers.