RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Digital phenotyping (DP) enables objective measurements of patient behavior and may be a useful tool in assessments of quality-of-life and functional status in neuro-oncology patients. We aimed to identify trends in mobility among patients with glioblastoma (GBM) using DP. METHODS: A total of 15 patients with GBM enrolled in a DP study were included. The Beiwe application was used to passively collect patient smartphone global positioning system data during the study period. We estimated step count, time spent at home, total distance traveled, and number of places visited in the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and late postoperative periods. Mobility trends for patients with GBM after surgery were calculated by using local regression and were compared with preoperative values and with values derived from a nonoperative spine disease group. RESULTS: One month postoperatively, median values for time spent at home and number of locations visited by patients with GBM decreased by 1.48 h and 2.79 locations, respectively. Two months postoperatively, these values further decreased by 0.38 h and 1.17 locations, respectively. Compared with the nonoperative spine group, values for time spent at home and the number of locations visited by patients with GBM 1 month postoperatively were less than control values by 0.71 h and 2.79 locations, respectively. Two months postoperatively, time spent at home for patients with GBM was higher by 1.21 h and locations visited were less than nonoperative spine group values by 1.17. Immediate postoperative values for distance traveled, maximum distance from home, and radius of gyration for patients with GBM increased by 0.346 km, 2.24 km, and 1.814 km, respectively, compared with preoperative values. CONCLUSIONS: :Trends in patients with GBM mobility throughout treatment were quantified through the use of DP in this study. DP has the potential to quantify patient behavior and recovery objectively and with minimal patient burden.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are emerging to improve accuracy in 4 primary domains: classification, grading, outcome prediction, and segmentation. Such algorithms include both traditional approaches that rely on hand-crafted features and deep learning (DL) techniques that utilize automatic feature extraction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of published traditional ML versus DL algorithms in classification, grading, outcome prediction, and segmentation of meningiomas. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Major databases were searched through September 2021 for publications evaluating traditional ML versus DL models on meningioma management. Performance measures including pooled sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-) along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were derived using random-effects models. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-four records were screened, and 43 articles were included, regarding classification (3 articles), grading (29), outcome prediction (7), and segmentation (6) of meningiomas. Of the 29 studies that reported on grading, 10 could be meta-analyzed with 2 DL models (sensitivity 0.89, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96; specificity 0.91, 95% CI: 0.45-0.99; LR+ 10.1, 95% CI: 1.33-137; LR- 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.59) and 8 traditional ML (sensitivity 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.83; specificity 0.93, 95% CI: 0.79-0.98; LR+ 10.5, 95% CI: 2.91-39.5; and LR- 0.28, 95% CI: 0.17-0.49). The insufficient performance metrics reported precluded further statistical analysis of other performance metrics. CONCLUSIONS: ML on meningiomas is mostly carried out with traditional methods. For meningioma grading, traditional ML methods generally had a higher LR+, while DL models a lower LR-.