[CPAP vs oxygen therapy in infants being transported due to acute respiratory failure]. / CPAP vs oxigenoterapia convencional en lactantes trasladados por insuficiencia respiratoria.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of our study are to evaluate the effectiveness and security of CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) in infants transferred with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and to compare their evolution in PICU between CPAP vs oxygen therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational and analytical study by reviewing the health records of infants with ARF aged 0 to 12months that required interhospital transfer to the PICU. RESULTS: We included 110 patients: 71 transported with CPAP and 39 with oxygen therapy. The main cause of ARF was acute bronchiolitis (81.8%). The median level of CPAP was 7cmH2O (interquartile range, 6-7). Controlling by the previous values in specific multivariable models, CPAP produced a significant decrease in the Wood-Downes score (beta = -1.08; 95% CI = -1.76 to -0.40; P = .002) and the heart rate (beta = -19.64, 95% CI = -28.46 to -10.81; P < .001). No patients required endotracheal intubation during transport. During the PICU stay, the intubation rate was similar in the CPAP group (7%) and the oxygen therapy group (5.1%) (P=.689). The proportion of patients that required bilevel positive airway pressure within 6hours of admission to the PICU was higher in the oxygen therapy group: 100% (11/11) vs 69.2% (18/26), P=.04. CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of CPAP to infants with ARF was a safe respiratory support intervention during interhospital transport. During patient transport, the use of CPAP achieved greater decreases in the Wood-Downes score and heart rate compared to oxygen therapy.

CPAP vs oxigenoterapia convencional en lactantes trasladados por insuficiencia respiratoria / CPAP vs oxygen therapy in infants being transported due to acute respiratory failure

OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la efectividad y la seguridad de la presión continua en la vía aérea (CPAP) en lactantes trasladados por insuficiencia respiratoria aguda (IRA) y comparar el curso clínico y la evolución en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos (UCIP) de los pacientes trasladados con dicha terapia vs la oxigenoterapia convencional. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional y analítico de una cohorte retrospectiva. Se revisaron las historias de los lactantes de 0 a 12meses con IRA que precisaron traslado interhospitalario a la UCIP. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 110 pacientes: 71 trasladados con CPAP y 39 con oxigenoterapia. La causa principal de IRA fue la bronquiolitis (81,8%). La mediana del nivel de CPAP fue de 7cmH2O (rango intercuartílico, 6-7). Controlando en análisis multivariables específicos por los valores previos, se obtuvo que la CPAP durante el traslado produjo una disminución significativa en el score de Wood-Downes (beta=−1,08; IC95%: −1,76 a 0,40; p = 0,002) y en la frecuencia cardiaca (beta=−19,64, IC95%: −28,46 a −10,81; p < 0,001). Ningún paciente precisó intubación endotraqueal durante el transporte. En la UCIP, la tasa de intubación fue similar en el grupo CPAP (7%) y en el de oxigenoterapia (5,1%) (p = 0,689). El porcentaje de pacientes que precisaron ventilación no invasiva con dos niveles de presión en las primeras 6h de ingreso en la UCIP fue mayor en el grupo de oxigenoterapia: 100% (11/11) vs 69,2% (18/26), p = 0,04. CONCLUSIONES: La administración precoz de CPAP en lactantes es segura durante el traslado interhospitalario. Durante el transporte, la CPAP comparada con la oxigenoterapia disminuye el score de Wood-Downes y la frecuencia cardiaca

OBJECTIVE: The aims of our study are to evaluate the effectiveness and security of CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) in infants transferred with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and to compare their evolution in PICU between CPAP vs oxygen therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational and analytical study by reviewing the health records of infants with ARF aged 0 to 12months that required interhospital transfer to the PICU. RESULTS: We included 110 patients: 71 transported with CPAP and 39 with oxygen therapy. The main cause of ARF was acute bronchiolitis (81.8%). The median level of CPAP was 7cmH2O (interquartile range, 6-7). Controlling by the previous values in specific multivariable models, CPAP produced a significant decrease in the Wood-Downes score (beta = −1.08; 95% CI = −1.76 to −0.40; P = .002) and the heart rate (beta = −19.64, 95% CI = −28.46 to −10.81; P < .001). No patients required endotracheal intubation during transport. During the PICU stay, the intubation rate was similar in the CPAP group (7%) and the oxygen therapy group (5.1%) (P=.689). The proportion of patients that required bilevel positive airway pressure within 6hours of admission to the PICU was higher in the oxygen therapy group: 100% (11/11) vs 69.2% (18/26), P=.04. CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of CPAP to infants with ARF was a safe respiratory support intervention during interhospital transport. During patient transport, the use of CPAP achieved greater decreases in the Wood-Downes score and heart rate compared to oxygen therapy

Dispositivo de presión positiva continua en la vía aérea de Boussignac durante el transporte interhospitalario en lactantes menores de tres meses / Boussignac continuous positive airway pressure device during inter-hospital transportation in infants aged less than three months

Fundamento: El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar la seguridad y efectividad del dispositivo de generación de presión positiva continua en la vía aérea de Boussignac(R) (CPAPB) durante su uso en el transporte en lactantes menores de tres meses con bronquiolitis. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional analítico transversal de cuatro años de duración. Se recogieron datos de 25 lactantes que precisaron trasladado interhospitalario a la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátrica (UCIP) de referencia con CPAPB e interfase tipo Helmet. Se registraron las caracteristicas epidemiológicas, del traslado y de la evolución en UCIP, además de los parámetros cardiorrespiratorios y gasométricos previos al traslado y a su llegada a UCIP. Resultados: La mediana del nivel de presión contínua en la vía aérea (CPAP) utilizada durante el traslado fue de 7 cm H2O (6-7,25). Ningún paciente precisó de intubación endotraqueal durante el traslado y un paciente la precisó durante las primeras seis horas de ingreso en UCIP. Los siguientes parámetros cardiorrespiratorios presentaron una mejoría estadisticamente significativa a su llegada a UCIP: score de Wood-Downes modificado [8,40 (2,1) vs 5,29 (1,68)], frecuencia respiratoria [60,72 (12,73) vs 47,28 (10,31)], frecuencia cardiaca [167,28 (22,60) vs 154,48 (24,83)] y saturación de oxígeno [92,08 (5,63) vs 97,64 (2,27)]. Conclusiones: La aplicación de CPAPB resultó ser un método de soporte respiratorio seguro en lactantes menores de tres meses. Su uso durante el transporte suposo una mejoría en los parámetros cardiorrespiratoriosl

Background: The present study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Boussignac continuous positive airway pressure device (CPAPB) when used during the transportation of infants under three months of age with bronchiolitis. Methods: Transversal analytical observational study of four years duration. Data was collected on 25 infants who needed inter-hospital transportation to the reference Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), with CPAPB and Helmet interface. The epidemiological characteristics of the transportation and evolution in the PICU were registered, as well as the cardiorespiratory gastronomic parameters prior to transfer and on arrival at the PICU. Results: The median level of continuous airway pressure (CPAP) used during the transfer was 7 cm H2O (6-7.25). No patient required endotracheal intubation during transportation, while one patient required this during the first six hours of admission in the PICU. The following cardiorespiratory parameters presented a statistically significant improvement on arrival at the PICU: modified Wood-Downes score [8.40 (2.1) vs 5.29 (1.68)], respiratory frequency [60.72 (12.73) vs 47.28 (10.31)], cardiac frequency [167.28 (22.60) vs 154.48 (24.83)] and oxygen saturation [92.08 (5.63) vs 97.64 (2.27)]. Conclusions: Application of CPAPB proved to be a safe method of respiratory support in infants under three months of age. Its use during transportation brought an improvement in cardiorespiratory parameters