Inhibitors of apolipoprotein C3, triglyceride levels, and risk of pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

In recent years, novel apoC3 inhibitor therapies for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia have been developed and assessed through phase II and III clinical trials. The objective of this study was to perform an updated meta-analysis on the impact of new apoC3 inhibitor drugs on triglyceride and apoC3 levels, as well as on the incidence of pancreatitis. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled studies assessing the effects of apoC3 inhibitors therapy (antisense oligonucleotides and small interfering RNA) on triglyceride levels, apoC3 levels, and the occurrence of acute pancreatitis. This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The random-effects model was performed. Nine randomized clinical trials (n = 717 patients) were considered eligible for this systematic review. ApoC3 inhibitor drugs were consistently associated with decreased triglyceride levels (MD -57.0%; 95% CI -61.9 to -52.1, I2 82%) and lowered apoC3 values (MD -76; 95% CI -80.1 to -71.8, I2 77%) when compared to placebo. Furthermore, the use of apoC3 inhibitor drugs demonstrated a reduction in the risk of acute pancreatitis (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.27, I2 0%). The present updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials demonstrated that the utilization of apoC3 inhibitors in patients with hypertriglyceridemia correlated with reduced apoC3 and triglyceride levels, along with a decreased risk of acute pancreatitis compared to the placebo.

Dyslipidemia in adults with congenital heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Several particular characteristics of patients with congenital heart disease could affect lipid levels. The objectives of this study were: a) to analyze the prevalence of dyslipidemia in congenital heart disease patients; 2) to compare lipid levels between congenital heart disease patients and a control group. DATA SYNTHESIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42023432041). A literature search was performed to detect studies that have reported lipid levels or the prevalence of dyslipidemia in congenital heart disease patients. We performed a qualitative analysis (studies that reported dyslipidemia prevalence) and quantitative analysis (studies that compared lipid values between congenital heart disease patients and controls). In total, 29 observational studies involving 22,914 patients with congenital heart disease and 641,086 controls were eligible for this review. The reported presence of "hyperlipidemia" or "dyslipidemia" ranged from 14.3% to 69.9%. When studies analyzed lipid variables dichotomously between congenital heart disease patients and controls, the results were conflicting. The quantitative analysis showed that patients with congenital heart disease have lower levels of total cholesterol (MD: -18.9 [95% CI: -22.2 to -15.7]; I2 = 93%), LDL-C (MD: -10.7 [95% CI: -13.1 to -8.3]; I2 = 90%) and HDL-C (MD: -6.3 [95% CI: -7.7 to -4.9]; I2 = 95%) compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative analysis showed some concerns, but the quantitative analysis indicates that congenital heart disease patients showed lower levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C compared to controls. New research should be developed to clarify this relevant topic.

Association between elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a potential risk factor for atherosclerotic arterial disease has been extensively studied. However, the available data regarding its association with the vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is limited. The main objective of the present systematic review was to assess the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and carotid vulnerable plaque features. METHODS: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, conducting a comprehensive literature search to identify studies examining the association between Lp(a) levels and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Experimental or observational studies were eligible, without language, country, or publication type restrictions. RESULTS: Nine studies including 2058 patients were eligible for this systematic review. Five cross-sectional studies, 3 prospective/retrospective cohorts, and 1 subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial were analyzed. Two cross-sectional studies that compared Lp(a) levels between patients with and without vulnerable carotid plaque showed discordant results. Nevertheless, all the studies that evaluated the prevalence or incidence of vulnerable carotid plaque according to Lp(a) levels showed a positive association. Similarly, one study found a significant correlation between vulnerability of carotid plaque and Lp(a) levels. CONCLUSION: Almost all studies analyzed in the present review showed a positive association between elevated Lp(a) levels and carotid vulnerable plaque features. However, further research is needed to clarify this issue.

Cardiovascular Events, Malignancies, and Efficacy Outcomes in Latin American Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib or Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ORAL Surveillance Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To assess safety/efficacy of tofacitinib and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients from Latin America (LATAM) in ORAL Surveillance. METHODS: In ORAL Surveillance, 4362 patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or TNFi. This post hoc analysis stratified patients by geographical location (LATAM, n = 1202; non-LATAM, n = 3160). Incidence rates (IRs; patients with first event/100 patient-years) and hazard ratios for adverse events of special interest were reported. Efficacy outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index and American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 responses. RESULTS: Risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease and malignancies were less prevalent in the LATAM cohort compared with the non-LATAM cohort. IRs for patients receiving tofacitinib (combined doses) versus TNFi were 0.54 versus 0.28 (LATAM) and 1.14 versus 0.92 (non-LATAM) for major adverse cardiovascular events; 0.58 versus 0.27 (LATAM) and 1.33 versus 0.95 (non-LATAM) for malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer; and 0.69 versus 0.35 (LATAM) and 0.63 versus 0.33 (non-LATAM) for all-cause death. IRs for nonmelanoma skin cancer and venous thromboembolism were also numerically higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi and in the non-LATAM cohort versus LATAM. Efficacy was similar across treatment groups within each cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events of special interest were generally less frequent in LATAM versus non-LATAM patients, reflecting differences in baseline characteristics, and higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi in both cohorts, consistent with the overall findings of ORAL Surveillance. Our findings emphasize the importance of assessing individual risk factors to guide benefit/risk assessment and treatment decisions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02092467.

Lipoprotein(a) and heart failure: a systematic review.

The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a possible causal risk factor for atherosclerotic artery disease and aortic valve stenosis has been well established. However, the information on the association between Lp(a) levels and heart failure (HF) is limited and controversial. The main objective of the present study was to assess the association between Lp(a) levels and HF. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect studies that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and HF. Eight studies, including 73,410 patients, were eligible for this research. Seven prospective or retrospective cohorts and one cross-sectional study were analyzed. Five studies analyzed populations without HF; another three included patients with HF or left ventricular dysfunction. The endpoints evaluated varied according to the study analyzed, including incident HF, HF hospitalizations, and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. Lp(a) levels were also analyzed in different ways, including analysis of Lp(a) as a continuous or categorical variable (distinct cut-off points or percentiles). Globally, the studies included in this review found predominantly positive results. Data on some relevant subgroups, such as HF of ischemic or non-ischemic etiology or HF with or without left ventricular dysfunction, was poorly reported. This systematic review suggests that there would be a positive relationship between Lp(a) levels and HF. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of HF, new studies should be developed to clarify this topic.

High lipoprotein(a) levels and mitral valve disease: A systematic review.

AIMS: The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a possibly causal risk factor for atherosclerotic artery disease and aortic valve stenosis has been well established. However, the information available on the association between Lp(a) levels and mitral valve disease is limited and controversial. The main objective of the present study was to assess the association between Lp(a) levels and mitral valve disease. DATA SYNTHESIS: This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42022379044). A literature search was performed to detect studies that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to high levels of Lp(a) and mitral valve disease, including mitral valve calcification and valve dysfunction. Eight studies including 1,011,520 individuals were considered eligible for this research. The studies that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and prevalent mitral valve calcification found predominantly positive results. Similar findings were reported in two studies that evaluated the SNPs related to high levels of Lp(a). Only two studies evaluated the association of Lp(a) and mitral valve dysfunction, showing contradictory results. CONCLUSIONS: This research showed disparate results regarding the association between Lp(a) levels and mitral valve disease. The association between Lp(a) levels and mitral valve calcification seems more robust and is in line with the findings already demonstrated in aortic valve disease. New studies should be developed to clarify this topic.

Association between maternal epicardial adipose tissue, gestational diabetes mellitus, and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Several small studies have evaluated the association between epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and pregnancy-related cardiovascular risk factors such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or hypertensive disorders. The objective of this study was to quantitatively compare EAT thickening between patients with GDM or pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders and healthy controls. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect studies that have quantified EAT in women with GDM and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders compared to a control group. The primary outcome was EAT thickening estimated by ultrasound expressed in millimeters. Random or fixed effects models were used. Nine observational studies including 3146 patients were identified and considered eligible for this systematic review. The quantitative analysis showed that patients with GDM have a higher EAT thickness (mean difference: 1.1 mm [95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.2]; I2 = 24%) compared to the control group. Moreover, patients with pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders showed higher EAT thickness (mean difference: 1.0 mm [95% confidence interval: 0.6-1.4]; I2 = 83%) compared to the control group. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that EAT thickening is increased in patients with GDM and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders compared with healthy controls. Whether or not this association is causal should be evaluated in prospective studies.

Elevated lipoprotein (a) levels and risk of peripheral artery disease outcomes: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Despite strong association of elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) levels with incident coronary and cerebrovascular disease, data for incident peripheral artery disease (PAD) are less robust. The main objective of the present systematic review was to analyze the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and PAD outcomes. METHODS: This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomized clinical trials or observational studies with a cohort design that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and PAD outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen studies including 493,650 subjects were identified and considered eligible for this systematic review. This systematic review showed that the vast majority of the studies reported a significant association between elevated Lp(a) levels and the risk of PAD outcomes. The elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with a higher risk of incident claudication (RR: 1.20), PAD progression (HR: 1.41), restenosis (HR: 6.10), death and hospitalization related to PAD (HR: 1.37), limb amputation (HR: 22.75), and lower limb revascularization (HR: 1.29 and 2.90). In addition, the presence of elevated Lp(a) values were associated with a higher risk of combined PAD outcomes, with HRs in a range between 1.14 and 2.80, despite adjusting for traditional risk factors. Heterogeneity of results can be explained by different patient populations studied and varying Lp(a) cut-off points of Lp(a) analyzed. CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that evidence is available to support an independent positive association between Lp(a) levels and the risk of future PAD outcomes. PROSPERO Registration No.: 289253.

Effects of lipid-lowering therapy on major adverse limb events in patients with peripheral arterial disease: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at increased risk of major adverse limb events (MALE). Furthermore, MALE have several clinical implications and a poor prognosis, so prevention is a fundamental issue. The main objective of the present meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials is to evaluate the effect of different lipid-lowering therapies on MALE incidence in patients with PAD. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized studies that evaluated the use of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with PAD and reported MALE was performed, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, ScieLO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. A fixed- or random-effects model was used. RESULTS: Five randomized clinical trials including 11,603 patients were identified and considered eligible for the analyses (5903 subjects were allocated to receive lipid-lowering therapy, while 5700 subjects were allocated to the respective placebo/control arms). The present meta-analysis revealed that lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a lower incidence of MALE (OR: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.87; I2: 28%) compared to placebo/control groups. The sensitivity analysis shows that the results are robust. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the use of lipid-lowering therapy compared with the placebo/control arms was associated with a marked reduction in the risk of MALE. Physicians involved in the monitoring and treatment of patients with PAD must work hard to ensure adequate lipid-lowering medication in these patients.

Effect of Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) on Lipid Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Several studies have evaluated the lipid-lowering properties of yerba mate, although the results were conflicting. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effect of yerba mate consumption on lipid levels. A literature search was performed to detect observational and experimental studies that evaluated the association between yerba mate consumption and lipid levels. A quantitative analysis was performed with the subgroup of experimental studies. A meta-regression was performed considering the difference in baseline lipid values between the intervention and control groups as a covariate. Thirteen studies were considered eligible for this systematic review and seven studies (378 patients) were selected for quantitative analysis. In the qualitative analysis, the results were conflicting, both in the observational and in the experimental studies. In quantitative analysis, we found no differences in total cholesterol [mean difference 6.4 (CI 95% -2.2 to 15.0)], LDL-C [mean difference 5.5 (CI 95% - 1.5 to 12.6)], HDL-C [mean difference 0.4 (CI 95% -2.8 to 3.7)] and triglycerides [mean difference 5.7 (CI 95% 0.0 to 11.4)] levels when comparing the yerba mate and control groups. According to meta-regression, differences between baseline levels could influence the findings on total cholesterol and LDL-C but not on HDL-C or triglycerides. In conclusion, this research showed that yerba mate consumption was not associated with a significant change in lipid levels. Since the results are based on small inconclusive studies, more research is needed to confirm these findings.

Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise test after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has not been extensively studied yet in heart transplantation (HTX) patients. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive value of the CPET on hospitalizations and mortality in HTX recipients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was performed from a secondary database. Patients > 18 years with HTX who underwent a CPET between 3 and 12 months after transplantation were included. Time to the first primary endpoint (HTX-related hospitalization) was analyzed and adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients (mean age 50.1 years, 77.0% men) were included. Fifty-seven patients (46.7%) had the primary endpoint. Peak VO2 (HR .95; CI 95% .90-.99, P = .03), oxygen pulse (HR .57; CI 95% .34-.96, P = .03) and predicted VO2 (HR .97; CI 95% .96-.99, P = .002) were associated with the endpoint. We did not find a significant association between the other variables and the outcome. CONCLUSION: In HTX recipients, peak VO2 , oxygen pulse, and predicted VO2 were independently associated with hospitalizations at follow up.

Statin use in patients with elevated serum hepatic transaminases at baseline: A meta-analysis.

AIMS: Clinical trials showed that statin therapy decreased cardiovascular events without significantly raising the level of transaminases. However, the information in subjects with altered liver test at baseline is more limited. The objectives of this meta-analysis were to analyze the liver safety and cardiovascular benefit when using a statin-based lipid-lowering treatment compared to a less intensive treatment or placebo, in subjects with abnormal liver tests at baseline. DATA SYNTHESIS: We performed a meta-analysis including randomized trials of statin-based lipid-lowering therapy versus less intensive lipid-lowering therapy or placebo, reporting worsening hepatic test (>3 ULN) and cardiovascular events in patients with abnormal liver tests at baseline. The random-effects model was performed. This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Five eligible trials, including 2548 patients were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. A more intensive statin-based lipid-lowering therapy were associated with a similar occurrence of serious alteration of liver tests (OR: 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.21-3.99; I2: 64%) compared to less intensive or placebo treatments. Likewise, more intensive lipid-lowering strategies were associated with a significant reduction in major cardiovascular events (OR: 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.70; I2: 66%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a more intensive statin-based lipid-lowering treatment, compared with less intensive treatment or placebo, showed a similar incidence of worsening transaminases levels in patients with abnormal liver tests at baseline. Also, a reduction in cardiovascular events was observed when a more intensive lipid-lowering therapy was used.

LDL-C Levels Below 55 mg/dl and Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of very low levels of LDL-C (< 55 mg/dl) achieved with lipid-lowering therapy on hemorrhagic stroke incidence. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis including randomized trials that achieved LDL-C levels under 55 mg/dl in more intensive lipid-lowering arms, regardless of the lipid-lowering drug used. A fixed-effects model was used. This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Eight eligible trials including 122.802 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. A total of 62.526 subjects were allocated to receive more intensive lipid-lowering therapy while 60.276 subjects were allocated to the respective control arms. There were no differences in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke between the group that received a more intensive lipid-lowering therapy (achieved LDL-C level <55 mg/dl), and the group that received a less intense scheme (OR, 1.05; 95%CI, 0.85-1.31). The statistical heterogeneity was low (I2 = 2%). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. CONCLUSIONS: The use of more intensive lipid-lowering therapy that achieved an LDL-C level lower than 55 mg/dl in patients with high cardiovascular risk, is not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Considering the cardiovascular benefit and safety observed with the achievement of very low LDL-C values, the challenging lipid goals recommended by the new guidelines seem consistent.

Role of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy in coronary atherosclerosis regression: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the association between non-statin lipid-lowering therapy and regression of atherosclerosis. However, these studies were mostly small and their results were not always robust. The objectives were: (1) to define if a dual lipid-lowering therapy (statin + non-statin drugs) is associated with coronary atherosclerosis regression, estimated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS); (2) to assess the association between dual lipid-lowering-induced changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels and atherosclerosis regression. METHODS: A meta-analysis including trials of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy, reporting LDL-C, non-HDL-C and total atheroma volume (TAV) with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up was performed. The primary endpoint was defined as the change in TAV measured from baseline to follow-up, comparing groups of subjects on statins alone versus combination of statin and non-statin drugs. The random-effects model and meta-regression were performed. RESULTS: Eight eligible trials of non-statin lipid-lowering drugs (1759 patients) were included. Overall, the dual lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a significant reduction in TAV [- 4.0 mm3 (CI 95% -5.4 to - 2.6)]; I2 = 0%]. The findings were similar in the stratified analysis according to the lipid-lowering drug class (ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors). In the meta-regression, a 10% decrease in LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels, was associated, respectively, with 1.0 mm3 and 1.1 mm3 regressions in TAV. CONCLUSION: These data suggests the addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors to statin therapy results in a significant regression of TAV. Reduction of coronary atherosclerosis observed with non-statin lipid-lowering therapy is associated to the degree of LDL-C and non-HDL-C lowering. Therefore, it seems reasonable to achieve lipid goals according to cardiovascular risk and regardless of the lipid-lowering strategy used (statin monotherapy or dual treatment).

Latin American Association for the study of the liver (ALEH) practice guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) currently represents an epidemic worldwide. NAFLD is the most frequently diagnosed chronic liver disease, affecting 20-30% of the general population. Furthermore, its prevalence is predicted to increase exponentially in the next decades, concomitantly with the global epidemic of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and sedentary lifestyle. NAFLD is a clinical syndrome that encompasses a wide spectrum of associated diseases and hepatic complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Moreover, this disease is believed to become the main indication for liver transplantation in the near future. Since NAFLD management represents a growing challenge for primary care physicians, the Asociación Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Hígado (ALEH) has decided to organize this Practice Guidance for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, written by Latin-American specialists in different clinical areas, and destined to general practitioners, internal medicine specialists, endocrinologists, diabetologists, gastroenterologists, and hepatologists. The main purpose of this document is to improve patient care and awareness of NAFLD. The information provided in this guidance may also be useful in assisting stakeholders in the decision-making process related to NAFLD. Since new evidence is constantly emerging on different aspects of the disease, updates to this guideline will be required in future.

Role of Colchicine in Stroke Prevention: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colchicine is a microtubule inhibitor with anti-inflammatory properties. As the body and quality of evidence regarding the efficacy of colchicine for cardiovascular prevention is controversial, the aims of this study was to evaluate the effect of colchicine therapy on vascular events. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed of randomized controlled clinical trials of colchicine on high cardiovascular risk populations, reporting data from stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. A random-effects meta-analysis model was then applied. RESULTS: Nine eligible trials of colchicine therapy, involving a total of 6630 patients, were considered eligible for analysis (3359 subjects were allocated to receive colchicine while 3271 subjects were allocated to the respective control arms). The stroke incidence was lower in the colchicine group compared with placebo arm (OR, .33; 95%CI, .15-.70; 6 studies evaluated). We did not find a significant reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that in a population with high cardiovascular risk, the use of colchicine results in significant reduction on stroke risk. Colchicine is an accessible drug that could be successfully utilized for the prevention of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease. The tolerability and benefits should be confirmed in ongoing clinical trials.

Association between lipid markers in childhood/adolescence and cardiovascular events in adulthood: A systematic review. / Asociación entre los marcadores lipídicos en la infancia/adolescencia y los eventos cardiovasculares en la adultez: una revisión sistemática.

Introduction. The association between lipid markers in childhood/adolescence and the incidence of clinical cardiovascular events in adulthood has been little explored in the bibliography. The objective of this systematic review was to analyze available evidence on this topic. Population and methods. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive bibliographic search was done to find studies assessing the association between lipid levels in childhood and the incidence of cardiovascular events in adulthood. There were no language or geographic restrictions. Results. A total of 5 observational studies (all prospective cohorts) including 43 540 patients were identified and considered eligible for this study. Four studies assessed triglyceride levels; all reported a significant association between this lipid marker in childhood and cardiovascular events in adulthood. A study reported the same association with total cholesterol level, while another showed the predictive value of lipoprotein (a) for the same clinical outcome. Only one study assessed high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), but it did not find an association with the endpoint of interest. The analysis of lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) showed contradictory results, although the association was significant in the studies with a larger sample size and a higher number of events during follow-up. Conclusion. According to this review, alterations in lipid markers in childhood and adolescence are associated with a higher cardiovascular risk in early and middle adulthood.

Introducción. La asociación entre los marcadores lipídicos en la infancia/adolescencia y la incidencia de eventos clínicos cardiovasculares en la adultez está poco explorada en la literatura. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue analizar la evidencia disponible sobre este tema. Población y métodos. Esta revisión sistemática se realizó de acuerdo con las guías PRISMA. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica para detectar los estudios que evaluaron la asociación entre los niveles lipídicos en la edad pediátrica y la incidencia de eventos cardiovasculares en la edad adulta. No hubo restricciones idiomáticas ni geográficas en la búsqueda. Resultados. En total, cinco estudios observacionales (todas cohortes prospectivas) que incluyeron 43 540 pacientes fueron identificados y considerados elegibles para este estudio. Cuatro estudios evaluaron el nivel de triglicéridos; todos reportaron una asociación significativa entre este marcador en la edad pediátrica y los eventos cardiovasculares en la adultez. Un estudio reportó la misma asociación con el nivel de colesterol total, mientras que otro evidenció el valor predictivo de la lipoproteína (a) para el mismo desenlace clínico. Un solo estudio evaluó el colesterol asociado a lipoproteínas de alta densidad (C-HDL), sin encontrar una relación con el punto final de interés. El análisis del colesterol asociado a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (C-LDL) arrojó resultados contradictorios, aunque la asociación fue significativa en los estudios con un tamaño muestral más grande y con un mayor número de eventos durante el seguimiento. Conclusión. Los datos de esta revisión sugieren que las alteraciones de los marcadores lipídicos en la infancia y la adolescencia se asocian con un mayor riesgo cardiovascular en la adultez temprana y media.

Statins and new-onset diabetes in primary prevention setting: an updated meta-analysis stratified by baseline diabetes risk.

AIMS: The use of statins has been associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes. The characteristics of the population could influence this association. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of new-onset diabetes with the use of statins in patients in primary prevention, with an assessment of the results according to the baseline risk of developing diabetes of the included population. METHODS: We performed an updated meta-analysis including randomized trials of statin therapy in primary prevention settings that report new-onset diabetes. The rate of new cases of diabetes in the control arms was estimated for each study. The studies were classified into two groups (low rate: < 7.5 events per 1000 patients-year; high rate; ≥ 7.5 events per 1000 patients-year). The fixed-effects model was performed. RESULTS: Eight studies (70,453 patients) were included. Globally, statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2, I2 35%). When we analyzed the studies according to the baseline diabetes risk in the control groups, the results showed that there was a greater risk only in the studies with a high baseline rate (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3, I2 0%; interaction p value = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Globally, the use of statins in patients in primary prevention was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes. In the stratified analysis, this association was observed only in the group of studies with a high baseline rate of events.