Detection of small- and large-for-gestational age using different combinations of prenatal and postnatal charts.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which the detection rate of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) at birth is influenced by the use of different combinations of estimated-fetal-weight (EFW) and birth-weight (BW) charts. METHODS: This was a cohort study of all pregnant women with a singleton term birth receiving care in a university hospital during a 3-year period. All participants underwent a universal 36-week ultrasound scan for EFW measurement and had BW recorded at delivery. Five different reference charts were used for EFW and BW centile calculation. Two-by-two contingency tables were constructed using EFW as the screening test variable and BW as the outcome variable in order to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value for all possible chart combinations. RESULTS: The cohort included 17 678 pregnancies. The sensitivity of EFW < 10th centile for the detection of BW < 10th centile ranged from 10.8% to 66.8% and the sensitivity of EFW < 3rd centile for the detection of BW < 3rd centile ranged from 4.1% to 66.8%, depending on the charts used. The sensitivity of EFW > 90th centile for BW > 90th centile ranged between 22.9% and 68.3%. When locally derived charts for EFW and BW were used, the sensitivity of detection of BW < 10th centile using EFW < 10th centile was 43.7% (PPV, 45.5%); for the detection of BW < 3rd centile using EFW < 3rd centile, the sensitivity was 25.6% (PPV, 26.7%) and, for the detection of BW > 90th centile using EFW > 90th centile, it was 49.6% (PPV, 49.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Different combinations of EFW and BW charts can yield vastly different detection rates (sensitivity) in the same population cohort and time period. If SGA and LGA detection rates are to be used as a meaningful performance indicator, healthcare systems should follow a clear and predefined methodology that includes explicit definitions of common reference standards. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Volume and vascularity: Using ultrasound to unlock the secrets of the first trimester placenta.

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Identifying which pregnancies are at risk of FGR facilitates enhanced surveillance and early delivery before fetal demise can ensue. However, existing risk stratification strategies yield an unacceptably low detection rate. A robust and reliable first trimester screening test for FGR would not only enable high-risk women to be appropriately monitored but would facilitate future trials for possible interventions to enhance fetal growth. Both the volume and vascularity of the first trimester placenta has been demonstrated to be linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes including FGR and pre-eclampsia. The investigation of novel ultrasound markers for FGR are discussed along with the development of methods for fully automatic placental volume estimation which has the potential for use as part of a multi-variable population-based screening test.