Reliability and validity of the Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Index (aBCCdex).

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires were recently developed specifically for use with patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC) and basal cell carcinoma naevus syndrome (BCCNS). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the measurement properties of PRO questionnaires for use in patients with aBCC or BCCNS. METHODS: In total 129 patients from 10 clinical sites in the U.S.A. and the BCCNS Support Network completed the two newly developed questionnaires multiple times over 3 months. Patients also completed the Skindex-16 and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey as collateral measures. Psychometric properties of the questionnaires were evaluated, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, construct and known-groups validity, and responsiveness. RESULTS: Based on the results of exploratory factor analysis and clinical input, the two newly developed questionnaires were combined into a single questionnaire, called the aBCCdex, which is relevant for patients with both aBCC and BCCNS. The internal consistency reliability was acceptable, and all aBCCdex scale scores correlated significantly with conceptually similar scales. When divided into groups that differed based on scores from collateral measures, aBCCdex scale scores differentiated between groups (known-groups validity) and were responsive to change. CONCLUSIONS: The aBCCdex is a brief and comprehensive questionnaire appropriate for use with patients with aBCC and BCCNS. Its reliability and validity have been confirmed. Further research is necessary to estimate the minimally important difference in a larger patient population.

Relationships between symptoms, symptom bother, and health-related quality of life in patients with overactive bladder taking solifenacin or placebo in the VIBRANT study.

AIMS: Studies of antimuscarinics for overactive bladder (OAB) typically use objective and subjective measures to assess efficacy, as each provides unique information about patient outcome. We evaluated the relationships between changes in diary-documented OAB symptoms and other patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. METHODS: In VIBRANT, OAB patients received solifenacin (5/10 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. During the study, patients completed 3-day bladder diaries and other generic and disease-specific PRO measures. Data from both treatment groups were combined (n=738). Categorical changes in diary variables were compared with changes in PRO measures. Partial correlations controlling for treatment and Spearman correlations were also calculated. RESULTS: Categorical improvements in diary variables were significantly associated with greater improvements in PRO measures. Pair-wise comparisons showed that patients with major symptomatic improvements had significantly greater improvements on PROs vs. those with some or no improvement. Odds ratios ranged from 1.52 to 4.09 (p≤0.002). Linear relationships between changes in PRO measures and diary variables were low to moderate but statistically significant (p<0.001). Partial correlations were highest for diary variables and OAB-Questionnaire Symptom Bother. Spearman correlations ranged from 0.170 to 0.450 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with OAB, changes in objectively measured symptoms of urgency, incontinence and frequency showed low-to-moderate correlations to changes in PRO measures. While providing evidence for similar change patterns in symptoms and patient perceptions, correlations were not high, lending support to the concept that in OAB clinical trials, both bladder diaries and PRO measures are important independent measures of efficacy.

Patient experience in systemic lupus erythematosus: development of novel patient-reported symptom and patient-reported impact measures.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and its treatment requires patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to capture impacts and fluctuating symptoms. The objective of this study was to develop PROs, in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) PRO Guidance, to assess fluctuations in SLE symptoms and its impact. METHODS: Following independent review board approval, six US rheumatology practices recruited patients with SLE to participate in concept elicitation (CE) interviews, in order to identify important SLE symptoms and their impacts. The SLE Symptom Severity Diary (SSD) and SLE Impact Questionnaire (SIQ) were drafted based on CE interview results and clinician input. The PROs were revised based on patient feedback from cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews, clinician feedback, and a translatability assessment. RESULTS: Forty-one patients completed CE interviews. Commonly-reported symptoms included fatigue (98%), joint pain (93%), and rash (88%). The most frequently reported impact was difficulty with chores/housework (61%). Eighteen patients completed CD interviews. The PROs were considered comprehensive, clear, and relevant.The SSD contains 17 items assessing energy/vitality, joint and muscle pain/stiffness/swelling, flu-like symptoms, cognition, numbness/tingling, skin symptoms and hair loss using an 11-point numeric response scale and a 24-h recall period (with the exception of hair loss). It also evaluates steroid status and dose. The SIQ contains 50 items, uses a 5-point Likert scale and a 7-day recall period, to assess disease impacts including patients' ability to make plans, work, and physical/social/emotional functioning. CONCLUSION: The SSD and SIQ are comprehensive SLE-specific PROs developed in accordance with the FDA PRO Guidance. Following assessment of their measurement properties, they may be useful in clinical studies and clinical practice to measure fluctuations in, and the impact of, symptoms in patients with SLE.

Quality of life and cancer pain: satisfaction and side effects with transdermal fentanyl versus oral morphine.

PURPOSE: To compare pain-related treatment satisfaction, patient-perceived side effects, functioning, and well-being in patients with advanced cancer who were receiving either transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ) or sustained-release oral forms of morphine (MS Contin, Perdue Frederick Co, Norwalk, CT, or Oramorph SR, Roxanne Laboratories, Columbus, OH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 504 assessable cancer patients participated in this cross-sectional, quality-of-life study. Relevant elements of four validated scales were used--the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) questionnaire, and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS)--as well as original scales that were developed and validated for this study. RESULTS: The majority of patients in both treatment groups had late-stage (IV/D) cancer. Patients who received transdermal fentanyl were more satisfied overall with their pain medication than those who received sustained-release oral forms of morphine (P = .035). Fentanyl patients also experienced a significantly lower frequency (P < .002) and impact (P < .001) of pain medication side effects. These results occurred despite the fact that cancer patients who received fentanyl were significantly older (P < .001) and had significantly lower functioning and well-being scores (P = .001). Measures of pain intensity, sleep adequacy, and symptoms demonstrated no significant differences between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that patients are more satisfied with transdermal fentanyl compared with sustained-release oral forms of morphine. A lower frequency and reduced impact of side effects with transdermal fentanyl may be one reason cancer patients who receive fentanyl are more satisfied with their pain management.

Untreated anxiety among adult primary care patients in a Health Maintenance Organization.

BACKGROUND: Untreated anxiety may be particularly difficult for primary care physicians to recognize and diagnose because there are no reliable demographic or medical profiles for patients with this condition and because these patients present with a high rate of comorbid psychological conditions that complicate selection of treatment. METHOD: A prospective assessment of untreated anxiety symptoms and disorders among primary care patients. RESULTS: Approximately 10% of eligible patients screened in clinic waiting rooms of a mixed-model health maintenance organization reported elevated symptoms and/or disorders of anxiety that were unrecognized and untreated. These patients with untreated anxiety reported significantly worse functioning on both physical and emotional measures than "not anxious" comparison patients; in fact these patients reported reduced functioning levels within ranges that would be expected for patients with chronic physical diseases, such as diabetes and congestive heart failure. The most severe reductions in functioning were reported by untreated patients whose anxiety was mixed with depression symptoms or disorders. CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians may benefit from screening tools and consultations by mental health specialists to assist in recognition and diagnosis of anxiety symptoms and disorders alone and mixed with depression.

Health-related quality-of-life results from multinational clinical trials of insulin lispro. Assessing benefits of a new diabetes therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with diabetes receiving insulin lispro with patients receiving regular human insulin (Humulin R). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed two randomized comparative studies over a 6-month period (3 months per treatment). Primary analyses used crossover baseline to 3-month changes in HRQOL scores. Ninety-three principal investigators in Canada, France, Germany, and the U.S. participated in these studies. One HRQOL crossover study included 468 patients with type I diabetes; the other HRQOL crossover study included 474 patients with type II diabetes. In both studies, patients were taking insulin at least 2 months before enrollment. Primary outcomes included two generic HRQOL domains, energy/fatigue and health distress, and two diabetes-specific domains, treatment satisfaction and treatment flexibility. Thirty secondary outcomes included both generic and diabetes-specific measures. Secondary outcome domains were controlled for multiplicity in the analyses. RESULTS: Primary analyses showed that treatment satisfaction scores (P < 0.001) and treatment flexibility scores (P = 0.001) were higher for insulin lispro in type I diabetic patients. No other significant treatment differences were detected using the data from these 6-month crossover studies. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment satisfaction and treatment flexibility were significantly improved in patients with type I diabetes using insulin lispro. Other HRQOL findings were comparable for insulin lispro and regular human insulin. Insulin lispro appears to have a measurable impact on lifestyle benefits in patients with type I diabetes, as demonstrated by increased treatment satisfaction and treatment flexibility.

Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in U.S. women aged 18-50 years, and to examine its association with health-related quality of life, work productivity, and health care utilization. METHODS: In April and May 1994, the Gallup Organization telephoned 17,927 U.S. households to identify women aged 18-50 years who experienced chronic pelvic pain, ie, of at least 6 months' duration. Those who reported chronic pelvic pain were surveyed on severity, frequency, and diagnosis; quality of life; work loss and productivity; and health care utilization. RESULTS: Among 5263 eligible women who agreed to participate, 773 (14.7%) reported chronic pelvic pain within the past 3 months. Those who reported chronic pelvic pain had significantly lower mean scores for general health than those who did not (70.5 versus 78.8,P<.05), and 61% of those with chronic pelvic pain reported that the etiology was unknown. Women diagnosed with endometriosis reported the most health distress, pain during or after intercourse, and interference with activities because of pain. Estimated direct medical costs for outpatient visits for chronic pelvic pain for the U.S population of women aged 18-50 years are $881.5 million per year. Among 548 employed respondents, 15% reported time lost from paid work and 45% reported reduced work productivity. CONCLUSION: Frequently, the cause of chronic pain is undiagnosed, although it affects approximately one in seven U.S. women. Increased awareness of its cost and impact on quality of life should promote increased medical attention to this problem.

Health-related quality of life and functional status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis randomly assigned to receive etanercept or placebo.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional status and well-being of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were randomly assigned to receive placebo, etanercept 10 mg, or etanercept 25 mg during a 26-week, phase III, double-blind clinical trial. BACKGROUND: No single indicator of disease activity, severity, or therapeutic efficacy has been established for RA. During the past decade, health-related quality of life, a multidimensional way to assess physical, emotional, and social aspects of a disease or its treatment, has become an important outcome in RA studies and in assessments of RA drug therapies. METHODS: A total of 234 patients completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) (n = 48 patients), items assessing energy and mental health from the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS), and a single-item rating scale assessing current health (feeling thermometer) at baseline and several times during 6 months. RESULTS: Significant improvements from baseline to last assessment were reported with etanercept versus placebo and in the HAQ Disability Index score (ie, the total HAQ score) and all 8 HAQ categories (P < 0.05), with the exception of grip. Significant improvements with etanercept in the MOS energy and mental health subscales, current health (from the feeling thermometer), and mental and physical function components of the SF-36 were reported (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving 10- or 25-mg doses of etanercept reported significantly better functional status and well-being than did patients receiving placebo.

The impact on unemployment of an intervention to increase recognition of previously untreated anxiety among primary care physicians.

Anxiety is a common, though often unrecognized, problem in primary care settings. This study examines the effect on employment of an intervention designed to attune primary care physicians to previously unrecognized and untreated anxiety. Primary care physicians in a mixed-model health maintenance organization (HMO) were randomized by practice site to groups with (intervention) and without (usual care) intensive one-on-one education about anxiety and periodic feedback about their patients with anxiety. All persons 21-65 years of age presenting to the offices of these primary care providers were screened for anxiety with the SCL-90-R on two occasions. Those meeting the SCL-90-R cutpoints for anxiety and whose medical records provided no evidence of recognition or treatment for a mental health condition within the last 6 months were eligible for the study (n = 637). Of these, 573 (90%) completed two follow-up assessments. The present study evaluates the impact of the intervention aimed at the primary care physicians on the labor force participation rate of the persons with anxiety after 5 months of follow-up. The study also evaluates the impact of the intervention on hours of work and the presence of days spent in bed among the persons with anxiety working at the baseline interview and after 5 months. At baseline, the patients of intervention and usual care physicians with previously unrecognized and untreated anxiety did not differ in labor force participation rates. At the conclusion of the study, the patients of the intervention group physicians had significantly lower rates of labor force participation than those of the usual care group physicians. Among those working both at the beginning and conclusion of the study, the intervention had no impact on hours of work or the presence of days spent in bed. We conclude that attuning physicians may reduce labor force participation rates.

An instrument to measure patient satisfaction with healthcare in an observational database: results of a validation study using data from CaPSURE.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a satisfaction measure for use in longitudinal, prospective studies of patient care. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer (n = 228) who were enrolled in CaPSURE (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor) completed a self-administered questionnaire that included a health-related quality-of-life and satisfaction measure. A subset of patients completed the questionnaire again within 30 days. METHODS: The satisfaction measure contained 6 individual subscales: overall satisfaction with care, contact with providers, confidence in providers, communication skills, humaneness, and a summary scale. Six items surveyed patients' willingness to participate in decision making (participatory style), and these were averaged into a single score. Variability, reliability, stability, and validity were evaluated. RESULTS: Responses to the items varied substantially. The overall satisfaction scale demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.82) and moderate test-retest reliability (0.62), and it could discriminate between groups of individuals expected to differ with regard to satisfaction (by age and disease stage). Subscale internal consistency reliability (0.37-0.54) and stability (0.38-0.63) were weaker, suggesting that only a single scale should be reported. The participatory scale performed poorly and could not be recommended for future use. CONCLUSION: The overall satisfaction measure developed for this study demonstrated good reliability and validity and should be useful in other population-based studies in conjunction with other outcome measures.

Gout Assessment Questionnaire: Initial results of reliability, validity and responsiveness.

We evaluated the psychometric properties of a new gout-specific patient reported outcomes questionnaire. The Gout Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) and the SF-36 were administered to 126 subjects in a multicenter Phase II program of febuxostat, an investigational treatment for hyperuricemia (serum uric acid >8.0 mg/dl) in patients with chronic gout. The questionnaire was administered at baseline and 1, 6 and 12 months later. The majority of subjects, mean age 54 years, were male, Caucasian and had experienced a gout flare within the last year. Seven domains were identified, all met criteria for reliability and validity. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.78 to 0.97. Pearson correlations between GAQ and SF-36 scales were generally low to moderate, with the highest correlation between Gout Pain and Severity and SF-36 Bodily Pain, r = 0.45. Guyatt's statistic (measure of responsiveness) ranged from 0.24 to 1.00 at 12 months. Minimal clinically important differences ranged from 2 (Gout Concern) to 10 points (Productivity). The GAQ has acceptable psychometric properties. Further research is required to confirm results, which may provide more information to improve the GAQ for use in clinical trials.

The ORTHO BC-SAT--a satisfaction questionnaire for women using hormonal contraceptives.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the ORTHO Birth Control Satisfaction Assessment Tool (ORTHO BC-SAT). DESIGN: 339 women using 1 of 4 hormonal birth control methods (oral contraceptives, transdermal patch, vaginal ring, injections), completed the questionnaire 1-2 times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The questionnaire was developed based on findings from the literature, focus groups, and interviews. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and known groups validity were evaluated. RESULTS: Based on variable clustering, 8 domains were identified (Ease of Use/Convenience, Compliance, Lifestyle Impact, Symptom/Side Effect Bother, Menstrual Impact, Future Fertility Concerns, Assurance/Confidence, Overall Satisfaction). Internal consistency reliability was demonstrated with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.70 to 0.89. All multi-item scales reported acceptable test-retest reliability (0.79-0.87). Construct validity was demonstrated by support of a hypothesized pattern of correlations. Known groups validity was confirmed by examining scale scores of women categorized by levels of symptom bother. As expected, women with the least amount of bother reported higher scores on all satisfaction scales than those with higher bother (p < 0.0001), except on Future Fertility Concerns (p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Our results support the reliability and validity of the ORTHO BC-SAT. It may be used in future studies to evaluate satisfaction among hormonal contraceptive users.

Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach.

There is a growing demand for tools to assess outcomes multinationally for use in international clinical trials. This has been accompanied by the need to produce valid and reliable questionnaires in a multiplicity of languages within a short time frame. We present an eight-step protocol for rapidly translating a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire into multiple languages, and demonstrate the protocol's utility and effectiveness by evaluating the translations for reliability and validity. The rapid translation protocol represents a minimalist approach to QOL questionnaire translation. Although this minimalist approach is not considered a recommended methodology, it may represent a feasible mechanism for questionnaire translation under certain circumstances. Most of the steps were completed in the USA, including a translation and back-translation by bilingual translators who were native speakers in the target-language, a test-retest of the translated instrument on five bilingual respondents to establish language and cultural equivalence and review of the translation by and editorial review board. The translated instrument was performance tested in the target language country on a pilot population of patients to determine its reliability and validity. Based on the findings, the instrument was further refined for use in the clinical trial.

Health-related quality of life of patients with acute erosive reflux esophagitis.

One thousand one hundred forty-five patients with acute erosive reflux esophagitis participating in an eight-week double-blind, multicenter study of lansoprazole 15 mg daily, lansoprazole 30 mg daily, omeprazole 20 mg daily, and placebo responded to a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire at baseline and at two, four, and eight weeks. At baseline, there were no HRQoL differences among the four study groups. However, all three active treatment groups improved statistically significantly more than placebo on most HRQoL scales at each follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences among the three active treatment groups at week 2, although in most instances lansoprazole 30 mg showed slightly more improvement. After week 2, benefits in all the study groups leveled off and remained constant. Greater acid suppression appeared to result in greater improvement in terms of HRQoL.

A new treatment satisfaction measure for asthmatics: a validation study.

The Patient Satisfaction with Asthma Medication (PSAM) questionnaire was developed because no treatment satisfaction questionnaire could be identified that was comprehensive yet brief enough for use in clinical trials. Adult moderate asthmatics residing in Canada using an inhaled medication (either salmeterol, formoterol, or albuterol) self-administered the questionnaire, which also included the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). A total of 53 asthmatics (70% female, 45% married, mean age: 47 years) completed the questionnaire. Using variable clustering, four PSAM scales were identified: Inhaler Properties, Comparison with Other Medications, Overall Perception of Medication, and Relief. Internal-consistency reliability provided evidence of reliability and lack of redundancy (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.82-0.88). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC values at or near 0.70). As expected, interscale PSAM correlations were moderate to high; correlations between the PSAM and the AQLQ were low to moderate. To assess known groups validity, respondents were categorized by self-reported degree of asthma control: 'very well controlled', 'somewhat controlled', and 'not well controlled'. Significant between-groups differences were found on all PSAM scales except Inhaler Properties. Patients categorized as 'very well controlled' tended to report highest PSAM scale scores. The PSAM questionnaire demonstrated reliability and validity in moderate asthmatics. Responsiveness should be assessed in future, prospective studies.

Health-related quality of life in venous leg ulcer patients successfully treated with Apligraf: a pilot study.

Apligraf (Graftskin) is a bilayered, living human skin construct that is indicated for use with standard therapeutic compression for the treatment of noninfected partial- and full-thickness skin ulcers due to venous insufficiency of greater than 1-month duration that have not adequately responded to conventional ulcer therapy. A pilot study was conducted to assess the health-related quality of life impact of patients with venous leg ulcers treated with Apligraf. A 2-part questionnaire was administered over the telephone to patients treated with Apligraf whose ulcers had healed within the past 12 weeks. The patients were asked to respond to questions when thinking about the past week and when thinking about the time immediately prior to treatment. A total of 14 participants completed the questionnaire. All patients reported improvement in health-related quality of life after successful treatment of Apligraf. Compared with the time before treatment, 79% of respondents said their health was "much better" now. The greatest improvement was reported in pain and in other physical health dimensions. Despite the small sample size and cross-sectional design of the study, statistically significant differences were observed on a number of scales.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis improves health-related quality of life.

PURPOSE: Treatment designed to eliminate thrombus in patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is theoretically attractive; however, its benefits, compared with those of anticoagulation, have not been definitively demonstrated. Although not previously analyzed, an effective measure of treatment success is likely to be the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study evaluated whether catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral DVT is associated with improved HRQOL, compared with standard anticoagulation, and whether HRQOL outcome in the thrombolysis group is related to lytic success. METHODS: An 80-item self-administered HRQOL questionnaire was developed. It contained the Health Utilities Index, Short Form-12, and disease-targeted scales, including health distress, stigma, health interference, physical functioning, and symptoms (eg, leg swelling, pain, ulcers). The HRQOL questionnaire was confirmed to be reliable and valid by means of psychometric testing. Questionnaires were administered to 98 retrospectively identified patients who had had iliofemoral DVT treated at least 6 months earlier. Sixty-eight patients who were identified through a DVT registry were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis with urokinase (UK), and 30 patients who were identified by means of a medical record review were treated with anticoagulation alone. The treatment decision was made by the attending physician, and all patients were candidates for both thrombolysis and anticoagulation. RESULTS: Most patients were women (61%), white (95%), married (65%), and had a mean interval since initial DVT of 16 months. The group treated with UK was younger (53 +/- 17 years) than the group treated with heparin (61 +/- 6 years; P =.039). After treatment, patients treated with UK reported better overall physical functioning (P =.046), less stigma (P =.033), less health distress (P =.022), and fewer post-thrombotic symptoms (P =. 006), compared with the patients treated with anticoagulation alone. Within the UK group, phlebographically successful lysis correlated with improved HRQOL (P =.038). Patients classified as lytic failures had similar outcomes to patients treated with heparin. CONCLUSION: Patients with iliofemoral DVT treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis have better functioning and well-being, compared with patients treated with anticoagulation alone. Successful lysis was directly correlated with improved HRQOL, with patients who were classified as lytic failures having similar outcomes to patients treated with heparin. These data support the need for a future randomized trial, which should include an HRQOL measure as part of the outcome analysis.

Necessary but not sufficient: the effect of screening and feedback on outcomes of primary care patients with untreated anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: To consider the impact on primary care patient outcomes of using both a screener to determine elevated anxiety levels among patients with previously undetected anxiety and a physician intervention to inform physicians of their patients' conditions. DESIGN: Participating physicians were randomized to either the demonstration or the control arm, and patients were assigned to a study arm based on the randomization of their physicians. The patients were followed for change in outcome measures during the five-month study period. SETTING: A mixed-model health maintenance organization serving approximately 110,000 enrollees in central Colorado. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 573 patients who had unrecognized and untreated anxiety identified from the approximately 8,000 patients who completed the waiting room screening questionnaire. INTERVENTIONS: A physician intervention served the dual function of 1) providing an educational demonstration of anxiety in the primary care setting and 2) providing a reporting system for summarizing the anxiety symptom levels and functioning status of the patients enrolled in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient outcomes were measured as changes in global anxiety scores, functioning and well-being, and patients' reports of global improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that this method of reporting symptoms and functioning status to primary care physicians did not significantly change patient outcomes. Improvement in outcomes appeared to be more closely associated with the patient's severity of psychological distress.

Development of a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a validation study.

This study was conducted to test the psychometric properties of a newly developed health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) questionnaire. A total of 172 symptomatic GERD patients completed a 57-item questionnaire (containing the SF-12; symptom frequency/bothersomeness; problems related to activities, sleep, work disability; overall HRQoL; and treatment satisfaction) at baseline, week 1 [retest (N = 25)], and week 4 [follow-up (N = 100)]. Internal-consistency reliability was acceptable for most scales (range: 0.74-0.92). Test-retest reliability was acceptable for most scales (ICC: 0.74-0.85). Construct validity was demonstrated based on observed correlations. Known-groups validity was upheld, as patients who experienced more symptom days and patients who reported higher pain reported worse HRQoL than those with less symptoms or less severe pain. When categorized according to change in pain severity, Guyatt's statistic for the "improved" and "worse" groups demonstrated responsiveness, although many of the scales for the "stable" group were also responsive. In conclusion, the HRQoL questionnaire was found to be reliable, valid, and responsive.

A comparison of patient and partner responses to a brief sexual function questionnaire.

PURPOSE: Patient self-administered questionnaires have recently been developed to assess sexual function in men with erectile dysfunction. However, it may also be important to assess satisfaction with and any improvements in sexual function from the perspective of the female partner. We report the results of a brief 3-item questionnaire developed for the female partner and its association with an 11-item questionnaire developed for men with erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men and their female partners each self-administered a brief sexual function questionnaire several times during a clinical trial of an experimental treatment for erectile dysfunction. Items addressed the frequency and firmness of erection, and satisfaction with sex life on a 5-point Likert scale with responses ranging from 0 to 4. We compared mean values of the 3 items common to each questionnaire by respondent, and also analyzed item and scale correlations using weighted kappa statistics and/or the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Data from 389 pairs were available. Generally patient results were fairly consistent with those of partners. Men reported slightly more frequent erection (1.6 versus 1.5), identical firmness of erection (1.2) and less satisfaction (1.2 versus 1.4) than partners. Weighted kappas of the 3 items ranged from 0.47 to 0.61, representing good agreement. The Pearson correlations were slightly higher. Internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha of the 3-item scale was 0.69 (0.77 for patient and 0.81 for partner). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of patient and partner assessments of sexual function in clinical trials of erectile dysfunction.