Mid-Term Results of Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature suggests that sagittal imbalance is a risk factor for adjacent segment disease following fusion surgery. This study explored the influence of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch on the mid-term results and reoperation rate after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). METHODS: The participants of this study included 253 patients (80 men and 173 women; mean age 68.2 years) who underwent L4-5 single-segment PLIF. Preoperative PI-LL mismatch was defined as a PI-LL of 30° or greater. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL mismatch group; group M, Control group; group C), and the clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters were compared. RESULTS: Of the 253 cases, 25 were classified in group M and 228 in group C. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 5 years postoperatively was 23.0 ± 3.6 in group M and 23.5 ± 5.1 in group C, and the recovery rate was 66.2 ± 32.6% in group M and 64.6 ± 21.4% in group C and there was no significant difference in the recovery rate between the 2 groups. All radiographic parameters except sacral slope were significantly worse in group M. One patient (4.3%) in Group M and 18 patients (7.8%) in Group C required revision surgery at 2.4 years (range 0.0-5.0) and there was no significant difference in the revision rate between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-term results of L4-5 single-level PLIF were compared with and without PI-LL mismatch, with the threshold defined as 30°; however, there were no significant differences in both the Japanese Orthopaedic Association recovery and reoperation rates between the 2 groups.

Development of patient-reported outcome for adult spinal deformity: validation study.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a complex condition that combines scoliosis, kyphosis, pain, and postoperative range of motion limitation. The lack of a scale that can successfully capture this complex condition is a clinical challenge. We aimed to develop a disease-specific scale for ASD. The study included 106 patients (mean age; 68 years, 89 women) with ASD. We selected 29 questions that could be useful in assessing ASD and asked the patients to answer them. The factor analysis found two factors: the main symptom and the collateral symptom. The main symptom consisted of 10 questions and assessed activity of daily living (ADL), pain, and appearance. The collateral symptom consisted of five questions to assess ADL due to range of motion limitation. Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 and 0.84, respectively. The Spearman's correlation coefficient between the change of main symptom and satisfaction was 0.48 (p < 0.001). The effect size of Cohen's d for comparison between preoperative and postoperative scores was 1.09 in the main symptom and 0.65 in the collateral symptom. In conclusion, we have developed a validated disease-specific scale for ASD that can simultaneously evaluate the benefits and limitations of ASD surgery with enough responsiveness in clinical practice.