Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Geophys Res Atmos ; 124(4): 2148-2173, 2019 Feb 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32676260

RESUMEN

Since aerosols are important to our climate system, we seek to observe the variability of aerosol properties within cloud systems. When applied to the satellite-borne Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), the Dark Target (DT) retrieval algorithm provides global aerosol optical depth (AOD at 0.55 µm) in cloud-free scenes. Since MODIS' resolution (500 m pixels, 3 km or 10 km product) is too coarse for studying near-cloud aerosol, we ported the DT algorithm to the high-resolution (~50 m pixels) enhanced-MODIS Airborne Simulator (eMAS), which flew on the high-altitude ER-2 during the Studies of Emissions, Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) Airborne Science Campaign over the U.S. in 2013. We find that even with aggressive cloud screening, the ~0.5 km eMAS retrievals show enhanced AOD, especially within 6 km of a detected cloud. To determine the cause of the enhanced AOD, we analyze additional eMAS products (cloud retrievals and degraded-resolution AOD), co-registered Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL) profiles, MODIS aerosol retrievals, and ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations. We also define spatial metrics to indicate local cloud distributions near each retrieval, and then separate into near-cloud and far-from-cloud environments. The comparisons show that low cloud masking is robust, and unscreened thin cirrus would have only a small impact on retrieved AOD. Some of the enhancement is consistent with clear-cloud transition zone microphysics such as aerosol swelling. However, 3D radiation interaction between clouds and the surrounding clear air appears to be the primary cause of the high AOD near clouds.

2.
Atmos Meas Tech ; 11(7): 4073-4092, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32676129

RESUMEN

Long-term measurements of global aerosol loading and optical properties are essential for assessing climate-related questions. Using observations of spectral reflectance and radiance, the dark-target (DT) aerosol retrieval algorithm is applied to Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer sensors on both Terra (MODIS-T) and Aqua (MODIS-A) satellites, deriving products (known as MOD04 and MYD04, respectively) of global aerosol optical depth (AOD at 0.55 µm) over both land and ocean, and Angstrom Exponent (AE derived from 0.55 and 0.86 µm) over ocean. Here, we analyse the overlapping time series (since mid-2002) of the Collection 6 (C6) aerosol products. Global monthly mean AOD from MOD04 (Terra with morning overpass) is consistently higher than MYD04 (Aqua with afternoon overpass) by ~13% (~0.02 over land and ~0.015 over ocean), and this offset (MOD04 - MYD04), has seasonal as well as long-term variability. Focusing on 2008, and deriving yearly gridded mean AOD and AE, we find that over ocean, the MOD04 (morning) AOD is higher and the AE is lower. Over land, there is more variability, but only biomass-burning regions tend to have AOD lower for MOD04. Using simulated aerosol fields from the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS-5) Earth system model, and sampling separately (in time and space) along each MODIS-observed swath during 2008, the magnitudes of morning versus afternoon offsets of AOD and AE are smaller than those in the C6 products. Since the differences are not easily attributed to either aerosol diurnal cycles or sampling issues, we test additional corrections to the input reflectance data. The first, known as C6+, corrects for long-term changes to each sensors' polarization sensitivity, response-versus-scan angle, and to cross-calibration from MODIS-T to MODIS-A. A second convolves the de-trending and cross-calibration into scaling factors. Each method was applied upstream of the aerosol retrieval, using 2008 data. While both methods reduced the overall AOD offset over land from 0.02 to 0.01, neither significantly reduced the AOD offset over ocean. The overall negative AE offset was reduced. A Collection (C6.1) of all MODIS-atmosphere products was released, but we expect that the C6.1 aerosol products will maintain similar overall AOD and AE offsets. We conclude that: a) users should not interpret global differences between Terra and Aqua aerosol products as representing a true diurnal signal in the aerosol. b) Because the MODIS-A product appears to have overall smaller bias compared to ground-truth, it may be more suitable for some applications, however c) since the AOD offset is only ~0.02 and within noise level for single retrievals, both MODIS products may be adequate for most applications.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda