Patterns of inflammatory activation associated with precipitants of acute coronary syndromes: a case-crossover study.

AIMS: We sought to assess a broad array of possible precipitants of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and evaluate their association with detectable inflammatory activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a case-crossover design, using a standardised questionnaire, interviews among 348 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (44%) or high-risk non-ST-elevation ACS patients (56%), explored potential precipitants, including: infection (INF)-temperature >38°C and/or respiratory tract, urinary or skin infection; inflammation (INFL)-exacerbation of inflammatory conditions; exercise (EX)-moderate to heavy exercise; fast food (FF)-consumption of a meal purchased from a fast food company. Risk and control periods were: weekly over 8 weeks for INF and INFL; 24 hourly over 4 days for FF and 4 hourly over 48 h for EX. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed at admission. These precipitants were identified in 203/348 (58.3%) patients. An increased temporal risk was observed for: INF (0-7 days vs 7-8 weeks odds ratio (OR): 7.5, confidence interval (CI): 1.7-67.6, P = 0.002); INFL (0-7 days vs 7-8 weeks OR: 14.0, CI: 2.13-591.9, P = 0.001); EX (0-4 h vs 24-28 h OR: 2.2, CI: 1.3-3.5, P = 0.001) and FF (0-24 h vs 72-96 h OR: 5.67, CI: 1.6-30.2, P = 0.003). CRP levels were significantly elevated among patients reporting infective and inflammatory potential precipitants, but not among those reporting fast food consumption and unaccustomed moderate-heavy exercise. CONCLUSION: Infection, inflammatory conditions, moderate-heavy exercise and potentially fast food consumption appear to precipitate high-risk ACS. Increased inflammation as measured by CRP was not consistently detected despite the identification of an ACS precipitant. Strategies that target improved overall health may also lead to fewer ACS events through a reduction in triggers.

Clinical effectiveness in everyday practice: improving outcomes for all patients through a national acute coronary syndrome data collaborative.

The management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has an extensive and impressive evidence-base with which to guide clinical practice. Despite this, translation to the clinical environment has proved to be challenging and incomplete and can be attributed to patient, provider and system factors. Causes of suboptimal guideline adherence relate to diverse issues, including patient complexity, barriers in knowledge translation of guideline recommendations and a limited capacity within health services. Addressing these factors may enable more effective guideline implementation. In Australia, the infrastructure for clinical data management is fragmented, uncoordinated and often administratively driven, compromising access to important information, which might improve clinical effectiveness. An integrated approach is required to improve clinical effectiveness in ACS care in Australia. Greater access to information both to assist in clinical decision-making and monitoring outcomes may help direct the focus towards understudied populations and improve performance and clinically relevant outcomes. A peer-led initiative based on common datasets, providing rapid feedback, while developing and disseminating a 'toolbox' of proven and sustainable interventions, could improve clinical effectiveness in the Australian management of ACS and provides a rationale for a national ACS registry.