RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The existence of contraindications to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is considered a criterion for direct transfer of patients with suspected acute stroke to thrombectomy-capable centers in the prehospital setting. Our aim was to assess the utility of this criterion in a setting where routing protocols are defined by the Madrid - Direct Referral to Endovascular Center (M-DIRECT) prehospital scale. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the M-DIRECT study. Reported contraindications to IVT were retrospectively collected from emergency medical services reports and categorized into late window, anticoagulant treatment and other contraindications. Final diagnosis and treatment rates were compared between patients with and without reported IVT contraindications and according to anticoagulant treatment or late window categories. RESULTS: The M-DIRECT study included 541 patients. Reported IVT contraindications were present in 227 (42.0%) patients. Regarding final diagnosis no significant differences were found between patients with or without reported IVT contraindications: ischaemic stroke (any) 65.6% vs. 62.1%, ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) 32.2% vs. 28.3%, hemorrhagic stroke 15.4% vs. 15.6%, stroke mimic 18.9% vs. 22.3% respectively. Amongst patients with LVO, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was performed less often in the presence of IVT contraindications (56.2% vs. 74.2%). M-DIRECT-positive patients had higher rates of LVO and EVT compared with M-DIRECT-negative patients independent of reported IVT contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: Reported IVT contraindications alone do not increase EVT likelihood and should not be considered to determine routing in urban stroke networks.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Contraindicaciones , Fibrinolíticos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombectomía , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado del Tratamiento , TriajeRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The benefit of intravenous alteplase is well established for patients with disabling stroke symptoms regardless of age, although data on outcomes in centenarian patients are scarce. We present our experience in patients beyond 100 years. METHODS: Descriptive study including centenarians from our single-centre prospective registry who underwent intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke in our tertiary university hospital. Clinical variables and functional outcome at 3 months were collected. RESULTS: Four patients, all women, functionally independent (mRS ≤ 2) were included. Treatment with alteplase was applied within 4.5 h of stroke onset. One patient complicated with pneumonia and died. Two patients were functionally independent (mRS ≤ 2) at discharge, while the third was partially dependent (mRS of 3 at discharge), improving after 3 months, (mRS 2). No serious hemorrhagic or systemic adverse events were registered. CONCLUSION: In our experience, intravenous thrombolysis may be beneficial and should be considered in patients over 100 years old with no previous disability.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To make a retrospective study of the clinical, etiological, diagnostic and prognostic features of cerebral vein and sinus thrombosis (CVST) diagnosed at our University Hospital. METHODS: We performed a systematic research of the clinical records of our University Hospital's electronic database (1977-2009) using the key words <