Impact of Prior Abdominal Procedures on Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Outcomes: Findings From the North American Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Registry.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: A history of prior abdominal procedures may influence the likelihood of referral for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion. To guide clinical decision making in this population, this study examined the association between prior abdominal procedures and outcomes in patients undergoing PD catheter insertion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing their first PD catheter insertion between November 1, 2011, and November 1, 2020, at 11 institutions in Canada and the United States participating in the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis North American Catheter Registry. EXPOSURE: Prior abdominal procedure(s) defined as any procedure that enters the peritoneal cavity. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was time to the first of (1) abandonment of the PD catheter or (2) interruption/termination of PD. Secondary outcomes were rates of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and procedures. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cumulative incidence curves were used to describe the risk over time, and an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between the exposure and primary outcome. Models for count data were used to estimate the associations between the exposure and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 855 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 31% had a history of a prior abdominal procedure and 20% experienced at least 1 PD catheter-related complication that led to the primary outcome. Prior abdominal procedures were not associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.68-1.84). Upper-abdominal procedures were associated with a higher adjusted hazard of the primary outcome, but there was no dose-response relationship concerning the number of procedures. There was no association between prior abdominal procedures and other secondary outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Observational study and cohort limited to a sample of patients believed to be potential candidates for PD catheter insertion. CONCLUSION: A history of prior abdominal procedure(s) does not appear to influence catheter outcomes following PD catheter insertion. Such a history should not be a contraindication to PD. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a life-saving therapy for individuals with kidney failure that can be done at home. PD requires the placement of a tube, or catheter, into the abdomen to allow the exchange of dialysis fluid during treatment. There is concern that individuals who have undergone prior abdominal procedures and are referred for a catheter might have scarring that could affect catheter function. In some institutions, they might not even be offered PD therapy as an option. In this study, we found that a history of prior abdominal procedures did not increase the risk of PD catheter complications and should not dissuade patients from choosing PD or providers from recommending it.

Safety and Efficacy of Tinzaparin Anticoagulation during Nocturnal Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin in the prevention of extracorporeal dialysis circuit clotting among in-center extended duration nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) patients are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of tinzaparin, among INHD patients receiving 6-8 h hemodialysis, 3 times per week. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine antifactor Xa levels at time 0, 2 h, 4 h mid-hemodialysis (mid-HD), 6 h, and at end of each INHD session for 4 weeks and to determine extracorporeal dialysis circuit clotting and bleeding events after switching from unfractionated heparin to tinzaparin, using a standard protocol of tinzaparin delivery at the initiation and midpoint of HD. RESULTS: All 16 patients in The Ottawa Hospital INHD program were converted to tinzaparin and followed for 177 INHD sessions. Mean antifactor Xa level at 2 h of HD was 0.41 ± 0.21 (SD) IU/mL, at 4 h (mid-HD) 0.19 ± 0.17 IU/mL, at 6 h 0.44 ± 0.21 IU/mL, and at dialysis end 0.26 ± 0.14 IU/mL. Antifactor Xa levels were undetectable at the start of INHD, suggesting no tinzaparin accumulation. Five patients required an increase in tinzaparin due to extracorporeal dialysis circuit clotting. There were no bleeding events. One patient required a switch to fondaparinux due to an adverse reaction. CONCLUSION: Tinzaparin was safe and efficacious for most INHD patients without accumulation or bleeding. The conversion from unfractionated heparin to tinzaparin required an increased tinzaparin dose for 31% of INHD patients.

Abdominal visceral perforation by buried peritoneal dialysis catheters: Cause or coincidence?

Delayed visceral organ perforations after PD catheter insertions are extremely rare. We report two patients who presented with asymptomatic visceral perforation from their buried PD catheters. Five months after a laparoscopic buried PD catheter insertion in a 92-year-old man PD was initiated; bile and bowel contents were noted in the PD effluent. He subsequently expired (from pneumonia) to autopsy revealed the PD catheter within the small bowel. Despite this perforation, there was no evidence of peritonitis, inflammation, nor any bowel content within the peritoneal cavity. A second case was observed 2.5 months after an uncomplicated laparoscopic buried PD catheter insertion in a 60-year-old woman. PD was attempted; the patient had an immediate urge to void. MRI revealed the presence of the PD catheter within her bladder. She underwent PD catheter revision the next day with repair of bladder perforation and ultimately successfully initiated PD. Since the perforations did not occur at the time of catheter placement, we believe that the catheter eroded into a viscus, perhaps related to the lack of a fluid at the catheter - viscus interface. The diagnosis of delayed visceral organ perforation following buried PD catheter insertion may be delayed because the catheter is not immediately used.

Lower serum magnesium is associated with vascular calcification in peritoneal dialysis patients: a cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is highly prevalent among dialysis patients and is associated with increased cardiovascular and all cause mortality. Magnesium (Mg) inhibits vascular calcification in animal and in-vitro studies but whether the same effect occurs in humans is uncertain. METHODS: A single centre cross-sectional study of 80 prevalent peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients; on PD only for a minimum of 3 months. A radiologist blinded to patient status calculated their abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) scores on lateral lumbar spine radiographs, a validated surrogate for CAC. RESULTS: Eighty patients provided informed consent and underwent lumbar spine radiography. The mean serum Mg was 0.8 mmol/L (standard deviation 0.2) and mean AAC score 8.9 (minimum 0, maximum 24). A higher serum Mg level was associated with a lower AAC score (R 2 = 0.06, unstandardized coefficient [B] = -7.81, p = 0.03), and remained after adjustment for age, serum phosphate, serum parathyroid hormone, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking history, and diabetes (model adjusted R 2 = 0.36, serum Mg and AAC score B = -11.44, p = 0.00). This translates to a 0.1 mmol/L increase in serum Mg being independently associated with a 1.1-point decrease in AAC score. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that Mg may inhibit vascular calcification. If this association is replicated across larger studies with serial Mg and vascular calcification measurements, interventions that increase serum Mg and their effect on vascular calcification warrant further investigation in the PD population.

Peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation by nephrologists is associated with higher rates of peritoneal dialysis utilization: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The likelihood of peritoneal dialysis (PD) utilization following a PD catheter insertion attempt is poorly described. We explored the risk factors for PD nonuse, focusing on the method of PD catheter implantation. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study employed Ontario administrative health data to identify 3886 predialysis adults who had an incident PD catheter implantation between 2002 and 2010. The impact of the method of catheter implantation including open-surgical (open, n = 1884), surgical-laparoscopic (laparoscopic, n = 1154), nephrology-percutaneous (nephrology, n = 498) and radiology-percutaneous (radiology, n = 350) on rates of PD utilization (defined as four consecutive weeks of PD) was examined. RESULTS: Eighty-three percent of study patients received PD. After adjustment, relative to patients with openly inserted catheters, PD utilization was greater for those with nephrology-inserted catheters [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-1.95] and similar for radiology-inserted catheters [aHR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94-1.43] or laparoscopic-inserted catheters [aHR 0.97 (95% CI 0.86-1.09)]. Among PD nonusers, death occurred in 10% of the open group, 6% of the laparoscopic group, 27% of the radiology group and in fewer than 3% of the nephrology group. Sixty-nine percent received hemodialysis in the open group, 63% in the laparoscopic group, 61% in the radiology group and 88% in the nephrology group. Those remaining predialysis comprised 12% of the open group, 22% of the laparoscopic group, 11% of the radiology group and <3% of the nephrology group. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrology insertion resulted in lower overall rates of PD nonuse, particularly due to death or remaining predialysis. Greater use may be related to insertion timing, technique or greater commitment on the part of nephrologists to the success of PD.

Meal phosphate variability does not support fixed dose phosphate binder schedules for patients treated with peritoneal dialysis: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Removal of phosphate by peritoneal dialysis is insufficient to maintain normal serum phosphate levels such that most patients must take phosphate binders with their meals. However, phosphate 'counting' is complicated and many patients are simply prescribed a specific dose of phosphate binders with each meal. Therefore, our primary objective was to assess the variability in meal phosphate content to determine the appropriateness of this approach. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, adult patients with ESRD treated with peritoneal dialysis and prescribed phosphate binder therapy were eligible to participate. Participants were excluded from the study if they were unable to give consent, had hypercalcemia, were visually or hearing impaired or were expected to receive a renal transplant during the time of the study. After providing informed consent, patients kept a 3-day diet diary that included all foods and beverages consumed in addition to portion sizes. At the same time, patients documented the amount of phosphate binders taken with each meal. The phosphate content of the each meal was estimated using ESHA Food Processor SQL Software by a registered dietitian. Meal phosphate and binder variability were estimated by the Intra Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) where 0 indicates maximal variability and 1 indicates no variability. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients consented to participate in the study; 18 did not complete the study protocol. The patients were 60 (± 17) years, predominately male (38/60) and Caucasian (51/60). Diabetic nephropathy was the most common cause of end stage kidney disease. The daily phosphate intake including snacks ranged from 959 ± 249 to 1144 ± 362 mg. The phosphate ICC by meal: breakfast 0.63, lunch 0.16; supper 0.27. The phosphate binder ICC by meal: breakfast 0.68, lunch 0.73, supper 0.67. CONCLUSION: The standard prescription of a set number of phosphate binders with each meal is not supported by the data; patients do not appear to be adjusting their binders to match the meal phosphate content. An easy to use phosphate counting program that assists the patient in determining the appropriate amount of phosphate binder to take may enhance phosphate control.

Canadian Society of Nephrology commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in CKD.

The KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) 2012 clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure (BP) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) provides the structural and evidence base for the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) commentary on this guideline's relevancy and application to the Canadian health care system. While in general agreement, we provide commentary on 13 of the 21 KDIGO guideline statements. Specifically, we agreed that nonpharmacological interventions should play a significant role in the management of hypertension in patients with CKD. We also agreed that the approach to the management of hypertension in elderly patients with CKD should be individualized and take into account comorbid conditions to avoid adverse outcomes from excessive BP lowering. In contrast to KDIGO, the CSN Work Group believes there is insufficient evidence to target a lower BP for nondiabetic CKD patients based on the presence and severity of albuminuria. The CSN Work Group concurs with the Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) recommendation of a target BP for all non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients without diabetes of ≤140 mm Hg systolic and ≤90 mm Hg diastolic. Similarly, it is our position that in diabetic patients with CKD and normal urinary albumin excretion, raising the threshold for treatment from <130 mm Hg systolic BP to <140 mm Hg systolic BP could increase stroke risk and the risk of worsening kidney disease. The CSN Work Group concurs with the CHEP and the Canadian Diabetic Association recommendation for diabetic patients with CKD with or without albuminuria to continue to be treated to a BP target similar to that of the overall diabetes population, aiming for BP levels < 130/80 mm Hg. Consistent with this, the CSN Work Group endorses a BP target of <130/80 mm Hg for diabetic patients with a kidney transplant. Finally, in the absence of evidence for a lower BP target, the CSN Work Group concurs with the CHEP recommendation to target BP<140/90 mm Hg for nondiabetic patients with a kidney transplant.

Patients' quality of life after stopping plasma exchange: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Plasma exchange is being widely used to treat various serious medical conditions. There has been very little follow-up data to describe the quality of life (QOL) of plasma exchange-recipients after active plasma exchange has stopped. OBJECTIVE: To assess the QOL of plasma exchange recipients after stopping plasma exchange. METHODS: A pilot study, based on responses to a postal questionnaire and clinical data obtained from the patients' charts, was carried out. The scores were computed from questionnaire responses and analyzed. RESULTS: The response rate was 59% with 58 patients completing a questionnaire three months after their final plasma exchange therapy. We identified significant heterogeneity in the quality of life of plasma exchange recipients after stopping plasma exchange therapy. This could be driven by different patient co-morbidities. We recommend that during follow up visits, a multi-disciplinary approach including consultation with a social worker might be considered for patients who may continue to have some limitations in their psychosocial activities post-discontinuation of plasma exchange. The high response rate to the questionnaire indicates that PLEX patients are interested in being involved in QOL studies, which suggests potential support for a prospective study of QOL with pre and post questionnaires and more detailed tracking of baseline co-morbidities.

The Association of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions with Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter-Related Complications.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the association of intra-abdominal adhesions with the risk of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter complications. METHODS: Individuals undergoing laparoscopic PD catheter insertion were prospectively enrolled from eight centers in Canada and the United States. Patients were grouped based on the presence of adhesions observed during catheter insertion. The primary outcome was the composite of PD never starting, termination of PD, or the need for an invasive procedure caused by flow restriction or abdominal pain. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-eight individuals were enrolled, of whom 201 (27%) had adhesions during laparoscopic PD catheter insertion. The risk of the primary outcome occurred in 35 (17%) in the adhesion group compared with 58 (10%) in the no adhesion group (adjusted HR, 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 2.55) within 6 months of insertion. Lower abdominal or pelvic adhesions had an adjusted HR of 1.80 (95% CI, 1.09 to 2.98) compared with the no adhesion group. Invasive procedures were required in 26 (13%) and 47 (8%) of the adhesion and no adhesion groups, respectively (unadjusted HR, 1.60: 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.47) within 6 months of insertion. The adjusted odds ratio for adhesions for women was 1.65 (95% CI, 1.12 to 2.41), for body mass index per 5 kg/m 2 was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.003 to 1.34), and for prior abdominal surgery was 8.34 (95% CI, 5.5 to 12.34). Common abnormalities found during invasive procedures included PD catheter tip migration, occlusion of the lumen with fibrin, omental wrapping, adherence to the bowel, and the development of new adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: People with intra-abdominal adhesions undergoing PD catheter insertion were at higher risk for abdominal pain or flow restriction preventing PD from starting, PD termination, or requiring an invasive procedure. However, most patients, with or without adhesions, did not experience complications, and most complications did not lead to the termination of PD therapy.

Pre-Peritoneal Dialysis Peritonitis After Saline Infusion Sonohysterogram in a Patient With an Embedded Catheter: A Case Report.

Rationale: Clear guidelines currently exist regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) prior to common diagnostic procedures. However, these guidelines do not include patients with subcutaneously embedded PD catheters who are awaiting PD initiation although both these populations share a great deal of risk factors for infections. Issues regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and avoidable infections are bound to keep occurring if physicians are not conscious of the risks of infections shared by all patients suffering from renal failure. Presenting concerns: Two weeks after a saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS), a 48-year-old woman with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G5 ND, type 2 diabetes, a subcutaneously embedded PD catheter, and prior abnormal uterine bleeding presented to the emergency department complaining of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness, and abdominal pain. The patient received no antibiotic prophylaxis prior to her SIS. Diagnoses: The final diagnosis of peritonitis was established after acute kidney injury, gastroenteritis, and small bowel obstruction were considered and ruled out. A delay in the final diagnosis occurred because of the complex presentation, the fact that the patient had not yet initiated PD, and the presence of concomitant anion gap metabolic acidosis and an acute elevation of the patient's creatinine. Interventions: The patient was started on broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics when the diagnosis of peritonitis was established. Insulin and intravenous bicarbonate infusions were used to correct the patient's anion gap metabolic acidosis. Surgical debridement of the necrotic subcutaneous tissue and removal of the embedded PD catheter were necessary. Outcomes: The patient's infection resolved completely as did her anion gap metabolic acidosis. The patient had to transfer permanently from PD to hemodialysis for her renal replacement therapy. Teaching points: This case report serves as a good reminder that physicians should keep in mind the possibility of peritonitis in patients with embedded PD catheters. As these patients are also at risk of infections, antibiotic prophylaxis should be used in patients with embedded catheters in the same way it is used for PD patients prior to obstetrical, gynecological, or gastrointestinal procedures.

Justification: Il existe des directives claires quant à la prophylaxie antibiotique à utiliser préalablement aux procédures de diagnostic courantes chez les patients sous dialyse péritonéale (DP). Les patients disposant d'un cathéter de DP implanté sous-cutané en attendant le début de la dialyse ne sont pas inclus dans ces recommandations, même si cette population partage plusieurs facteurs de risque d'infections avec les patients déjà sous DP. Des enjeux liés à la prophylaxie antibiotique et aux infections évitables continueront de se poser si les médecins ignorent les risques d'infections partagés par tous les patients souffrant d'insuffisance rénale. Présentation du cas: Une femme âgée de 48 ans atteinte d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) G5 ND et de diabète de type 2 s'étant présentée aux urgences deux semaines après une sono-hystérographie (SHG) avec infusion intra-utérine de solution saline. La patiente portait un cathéter de PD implanté sous-cutané et avait déjà eu des saignements utérins anormaux dans le passé. Elle se plaignait de nausées, de vomissements, de diarrhées, de faiblesse générale et de douleurs abdominales. Elle n'avait reçu aucune prophylaxie antibiotique avant la SHG. Diagnostic: Le diagnostic final de péritonite a été établi après que l'insuffisance rénale aiguë, la gastro-entérite et une obstruction de l'intestin grêle aient été envisagées et écartées. Le diagnostic final a été retardé en raison de la présentation complexe, du fait que la patiente n'avait pas encore amorcé la DP et de la présence concomitante d'une acidose métabolique à trou anionique et d'une élévation subite de la créatinine. Interventions: La patiente a reçu des antibiotiques à large specter par voie intraveineuse lorsque le diagnostic de péritonite a été établi. Des infusions d'insuline et de bicarbonate par voie intraveineuse ont été utilisées pour corriger l'acidose métabolique à trou anionique. Un débridement chirurgical des tissus sous-cutanés nécrosés et l'ablation du cathéter PD se sont avérés nécessaires. Résultats: L'infection a guéri complètement, tout comme l'acidose métabolique à trou anionique. La patiente a dû passer définitivement de la DP à l'hémodialyse pour son traitement de suppléance rénale. Enseignements tirés: Ce cas illustre bien que les médecins devraient toujours garder les risques de péritonite à l'esprit lorsqu'ils traitent des patients portant un cathéter de PD implanté sous-cutané. Puisque ces patients présentent eux aussi un risque d'infection, la prophylaxie antibiotique devrait leur être administrée avant les procédures obstétricales, gynécologiques ou gastro-intestinales, comme c'est le cas pour les patients sous DP.

A Diagnostic Dilemma "Cured" by Dialysis: An Educational Case Report.

Rationale: The differential diagnosis for a patient with high-anion-gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA) is broad; lactic acidosis is an important entity to screen for and treat. An elevated serum lactate is often used as a marker of inadequate tissue perfusion in critically ill patients but can also be indicative of decreased lactate utilization or poor hepatic clearance. Investigating for the underlying cause such as diabetic ketoacidosis, malignancy, or culprit medications is essential to establish the diagnosis and treatment plan. Presenting concerns of the patient: A 60-year-old man with a history of substance use and end-stage kidney disease treated with hemodialysis presented to hospital with confusion, altered level of consciousness, and hypothermia. Initial laboratory investigations were significant for a severe HAGMA with elevated serum lactate and ß-hydroxybutyrate levels, but toxicology screen was negative, and there was no clear underlying precipitant. Urgent hemodialysis was arranged to mitigate his severe acidosis. Diagnoses: He had an initial single dialysis treatment for 4 hours, with posthemodialysis labs showing significant improvement in his acidosis, serum lactate level, and clinical status (cognition, hypothermia). Given this rapid resolution, a sample from his predialysis blood work was sent for analysis of plasma metformin and returned significantly elevated at 60 mcg/mL (therapeutic range 1-2 mcg/mL). Interventions and outcomes: On careful medication reconciliation in the dialysis unit, the patient stated he had never heard of the medication metformin, and there was no record of a filled prescription at his pharmacy. Given his living situation with shared accommodations, it was presumed that he had taken medications that were prescribed to a roommate. Several of his other medications including his antihypertensives were subsequently given after dialysis on dialysis days to improve adherence. Teaching points: Maintain a broad differential diagnosis for patients presenting with a clinical syndrome consistent with an acute toxicity even if no culprit medications are identifiable on history, especially in patients with a suggestive social history.Anion-gap metabolic acidosis (AGMA) is common in hospitalized patients but sometimes requires further history and/or confirmatory testing to elucidate the root cause underlying typical causes of AGMA such as lactic acidosis or ketoacidosis.The main treatment of metformin toxicity is resuscitation and supportive care; however, metformin's biochemical properties make it readily dialyzable via either diffusion or convection.The Extracorporeal Treatments In Poisoning group recommends hemodialysis for metformin toxicity when there is a serum lactate >20 mmol/L, a blood pH <7.0, a failure of standard therapy, end-organ damage (hepatic or renal insufficiency), or a decreased level of consciousness.

Justification: Le diagnostic différentiel d'un patient présentant une acidose métabolique à trou anionique élevé (AMTAE) est large. L'acidose lactique est une entité importante à dépister et à traiter. Un taux élevé de lactate sérique est fréquemment utilisé comme marqueur d'une perfusion tissulaire inadéquate chez les patients gravement malades, mais il peut également indiquer une utilization réduite du lactate ou une insuffisance hépatique. La recherche de la cause sous-jacente (acidocétose diabétique, malignité ou médicaments responsables) est essentielle pour établir le diagnostic et décider du plan de traitement. Présentation du cas: Un homme de 60 ans atteint d'insuffisance rénale terminale traitée par hémodialyse et ayant des antécédents de toxicomanie qui s'était présenté à l'hôpital confus, avec une altération de l'état de conscience et souffrant d'hypothermie. Les premières analyses de laboratoire ont révélé une grave acidose métabolique à trou anionique élevé et une concentration élevée de lactate sérique et de ß-hydroxybutyrate. Cependant, le bilan toxicologique était négatif et aucun facteur déclenchant sous-jacent clair n'avait été identifié. Une hémodialyse d'urgence a été organisée afin d'atténuer l'acidose. Diagnostic: Le patient a reçu un traitement initial de dialyze pendant quatre heures; les analyses de laboratoire post-hémodialyse ont montré une amélioration significative de l'acidose, du taux de lactate sérique et de l'état clinique (cognition, hypothermie). Vu cette résolution rapide, un échantillon de sang prédialyse a été envoyé pour analyze du taux de metformine plasmatique; cette analyze a révélé un taux significativement élevé de 60 µg/ml (plage thérapeutique: 1-2 µg/ml). Interventions et résultats: Au cours d'une vérification minutieuse de la médication du patient à l'unité de dialyze, ce dernier a déclaré n'avoir jamais entendu parler de metformine; il n'y avait par ailleurs aucune trace d'ordonnance remplie à sa pharmacie pour ce médicament. Étant donné son mode de vie en logements partagés, on a présumé que le patient avait pris des médicaments qui avaient été prescrits à un colocataire. Afin d'améliorer l'observance du traitement, plusieurs des autres médicaments du patient, notamment ses antihypertenseurs, ont par la suite été administrés les jours de dialyze, après la séance. Enseignements tirés: Maintenir un diagnostic différentiel large pour les patients présentant un syndrome clinique compatible avec une intoxication aiguë, et ce, même si aucun médicament responsable n'est identifiable à l'anamnèse, en particulier chez les patients qui ont des antécédents sociaux évocateurs.L'acidose métabolique à trou anionique (AMTA) est fréquente chez les patients hospitalisés, mais nécessite parfois une analyze plus approfondie des antécédents et/ou des tests de confirmations pour parvenir à déterminer la cause fondamentale sous-tendant les causes habituelles de l'AMTA comme l'acidose lactique ou l'acidocétose.Le principal traitement pour contrer la toxicité de la metformine est la réanimation et les traitements de soutien. Les propriétés biochimiques de la metformine la rendent cependant facilement dialysable par diffusion ou convection.Le groupe de travail EXTRIP (EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning) recommande l'hémodialyse pour gérer la toxicité de la metformine en présence d'un taux de lactate sérique supérieur à 20 mmol/L, d'un pH sanguin inférieur à 7, d'un échec du traitement standard, de dommages aux organes cibles (insuffisance hépatique ou rénale) ou d'une altération de l'état de conscience.

Predictors of serum vancomycin levels in peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal (IP) vancomycin is often first-line empiric therapy for peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis; however, whether dosing should be adjusted for patient-specific characteristics remains unclear. We sought to identify factors associated with the day 3 vancomycin serum level in patients receiving vancomycin for PD peritonitis. METHODS: Retrospective single-centre adult cohort of 58 patients with PD peritonitis treated with IP vancomycin between January 2016 and May 2022. Linear regression was used to examine the association between day 3 vancomycin level and candidate predictors including age, sex, weight, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urea and creatinine clearance (total, residual, dialysate), PD modality, peritoneal solute transfer rate and initial vancomycin dose. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the likelihood of achieving a level (≥15 mg/L) associated with these predictor variables. RESULTS: A 2-g loading dose was given in 51 cases, and 38 patients (66%) had a therapeutic day 3 level. Each 5 mg/kg increase in initial vancomycin dose was associated with a 1.38 mg/L (95% confidence interval 0.52, 2.23) increase in day 3 level. Each 1 mL/min increase in GFR was associated with a 0.29 mg/L decrease (95% confidence interval 0.05, 0.52) in day 3 level. The likelihood of achieving a therapeutic level was approximately four times higher with an initial dose of ≥25 mg/kg compared to <25 mg/kg (odds ratio 3.75, 95% confidence interval 1.05, 13.46). CONCLUSIONS: Following an average 2-g vancomycin loading dose for suspected PD peritonitis, one-third of patients were subtherapeutic on day 3. GFR and weight-based dosing were independently associated with day 3 vancomycin level, and their consideration could improve the likelihood of achieving an early therapeutic level.

The Association Between Serum Vancomycin Level and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Peritoneal Dialysis Associated Peritonitis.

Introduction: Intraperitoneal (IP) vancomycin is often first-line empiric therapy and then maintenance therapy for peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis. However, how vancomycin serum levels correlate with clinical outcomes remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center adult cohort study of 98 patients with PD peritonitis treated with IP vancomycin between January 2016 and May 2022. The association between nadir vancomycin level and cure was evaluated in a logistic regression model, first unadjusted and then adjusted for age, sex, weight, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and total number of days on PD. Vancomycin was assessed both as a continuous exposure (per 1 mg/l increase) and as a categorical exposure (<15 mg/l vs. ≥15 mg/l). A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was created to explore nadir vancomycin level thresholds in an attempt to identify an optimal target level during treatment. Results: Of the patients, 81% achieved cure, and patients with nadir vancomycin level ≥15 mg/l were 7.5 times more likely to experience cure compared to those with a nadir level <15 mg/l (odds ratio [OR] 7.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-33.57, P = 0.008). Weight, GFR, days on PD, sex, and age were not independently associated with outcome. The vancomycin level with the greatest discriminatory capacity for cure on the ROC analysis was 14.4 mg/l. Conclusion: Increasing IP vancomycin serum levels are associated with increased odds of cure; and maintaining vancomycin serum levels above 14-15 mg/l throughout the course of PD peritonitis treatment is likely to improve clinical outcomes.

Severe hypocalcemia following denosumab injection in a hemodialysis patient.

Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against RANKL (receptor activator of NF-κB ligand) and is a novel treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, although its safety and efficacy in end-stage renal disease is unclear. We report the case of a 61-year-old female hemodialysis patient who developed severe hypocalcemia (total serum calcium, 5.37 mg/dL [1.34 mmol/L]) after receiving a single subcutaneous injection of denosumab. We review this medication's mechanism of action and the very limited data regarding its use in stage 5 chronic kidney disease. We advise against the use of denosumab in those treated with hemodialysis due to the risk of severe hypocalcemia and lack of evidence supporting its efficacy in treating osteoporosis in this population.

Tinzaparin versus dalteparin for periprocedure prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in hemodialysis patients: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is cleared predominantly by the kidneys and hence there is uncertainty about the safety of its use in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Our primary objective was to compare whether tinzaparin and dalteparin differentially accumulate in HD patients. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label randomized controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: HD patients undergoing periprocedure bridging anticoagulation. INTERVENTION: After warfarin therapy was discontinued, participants were randomly assigned to either 3 daily doses of tinzaparin (175 IU/kg) or dalteparin (200 IU/kg), with 2 intervening HD treatments between the first dose of study drug and their procedure. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was predialysis anti-Xa levels 20 to 24 hours after the third LMWH dose (therapeutic target, <0.2 IU/mL). Secondary outcomes included thromboembolic events and major bleeding. RESULTS: Of 29 eligible and consenting patients, 17 patients received tinzaparin and 12 patients received dalteparin. Mean predialysis anti-Xa level 20-24 hours after the third LMWH dose was 0.37 ± 0.23 (SD) IU/mL for tinzaparin and 0.62 ± 0.41 IU/mL for dalteparin (P = 0.1), indicating clinically important accumulation for both drugs. No invasive procedures were canceled due to study drug accumulation. 4 patients experienced serious adverse events (1 major bleed after traumatic arteriovenous fistula puncture in the tinzaparin arm, 2 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarctions [1 in each group], and 1 upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis [dalteparin group]). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Dalteparin and tinzaparin significantly accumulate in HD patients at therapeutic doses. "Bridging therapy" with LMWHs at therapeutic doses in HD patients who require temporary interruption of warfarin therapy has the potential for complications and is of uncertain benefit. Other anticoagulation strategies, including no bridging therapy or intravenous heparin, need comparative evaluation in this unique patient population.

Neobladder creation is still a conduit to peritoneal dialysis - Successful use of peritoneal dialysis after invasive bladder cancer.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is as safe and more cost-effective than haemodialysis (HD). It also allows patients to undergo renal replacement therapy (RRT) from home. However, PD remains underutilised in many parts of the world. This is true in part because of many perceived relative contraindications to PD, including a history of prior major abdominal surgery. Prior major abdominal surgery is a concern for standard bedside or surgical catheter placement since these patients are at risk of having adhesions, which can complicate catheter placement. However, with laparoscopic advancements, prior major abdominal surgery is no longer even a relative contraindication to PD for skilled and experienced surgeons. We report the case of a male in his 70s with a history of cystoprostatectomy which was curative for a muscle invasive bladder carcinoma 5 years prior to his RRT. The patient had longstanding chronic kidney disease which worsened gradually. After receiving RRT education, the patient favoured PD. The catheter was placed despite the surgeon noting abdominal adhesions and the patient successfully underwent 12 months of PD which had a positive impact on his quality of life. He transferred to HD after contracting a complex PD-associated peritonitis. Thus, new research should be conducted to better understand the real impact of prior abdominal surgeries as a contraindication to PD, especially in centres where the surgeons have experience with advanced laparoscopy.

Multidisciplinary Team versus a "Phosphate-Counting" App for Serum Phosphate Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Hyperphosphatemia is almost universal in well-nourished patients with ESKD treated with dialysis due to an imbalance between dietary intake and phosphate removal via residual kidney function and dialysis. Although food phosphate content can vary dramatically between meals, the current standard is to prescribe a fixed dose of phosphate binder that may not match meal phosphate intake. The primary objective of our study was to determine if the use of an app that matches phosphate binder dose with food phosphate content would be associated with an improvement in serum phosphate and a reduction in calcium carbonate intake compared with the multidisciplinary renal team. Methods: Eighty patients with ESKD treated with peritoneal dialysis at a tertiary care hospital in Canada were randomized to the standard of care for serum phosphate management (multidisciplinary renal team) versus the OkKidney app. Serum phosphate was measured at baseline and then monthly for 3 months with adjustments to phosphate management as deemed necessary by the multidisciplinary team (control) or the phosphate binder multiplier in the OkKidney app (intervention) on the basis of the laboratory values. The primary analysis was an unpaired t test of the serum phosphate at study completion. Results: The participants were 56 (±14) years old, and 54% were men; the most common cause of ESKD was diabetes mellitus. The serum phosphate values were 1.96 (0.41) and 1.85 (0.44) mmol/L in the control and intervention groups, respectively, at the end of 3 months (P=0.30). The median elemental daily dose of calcium carbonate did not differ between the groups at study completion (587 mg [309-928] versus 799 mg [567-1183], P=0.29). Conclusions: The OkKidney app was associated with similar but not superior serum phosphate control to the standard of care, which included renal dietician support. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: US National Library Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01643486.

Growing home dialysis: The Ontario Renal Network Home Dialysis Initiative 2012-2019.

The Ontario Renal Network (ORN), a provincial government agency in Ontario, Canada, launched an initiative in 2012 to increase home dialysis use province-wide. The initiative included a new modality-based funding formula, a standard mandatory informatics system, targets for prevalent home dialysis rates, the development of a 'network' of renal programmes with commitment to home dialysis and a culture of accountability with frequent meetings between ORN and each renal programme leadership to review their results. It also included funding of home dialysis coordinators, encouragement and funding of assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD), and support for catheter insertion and urgent start PD. Between 2012 and 2017, home dialysis use rose from 21.9% to 26.5% and then between 2017 and 2019 stabilised at 26% to 26.5%. Over 7 years, the absolute number of people on home dialysis increased 40% from 2222 to 3105, while the number on facility haemodialysis grew 11% from 7935 to 8767. PD prevalence rose from 16.6% to 20.9%, a relative increase of 25%. The initiative showed that a sustained multifaceted approach can increase home dialysis utilisation.

Canadian Association of Paediatric Nephrologists COVID-19 Rapid Response: Home and In-Center Dialysis Guidance.

PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM: This article provides guidance on optimizing the management of pediatric patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who will be or are being treated with any form of home or in-center dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. The goals are to provide the best possible care for pediatric patients with ESKD during the pandemic and ensure the health care team's safety. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The core of these rapid guidelines is derived from the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN) consensus recommendations for adult patients recently published in the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD). We also consulted specific documents from other national and international agencies focused on pediatric kidney health. Additional information was obtained by formal review of the published academic literature relevant to pediatric home or in-center hemodialysis. METHODS: The Leadership of the Canadian Association of Paediatric Nephrologists (CAPN), which is affiliated with the CSN, solicited a team of clinicians and researchers with expertise in pediatric home and in-center dialysis. The goal was to adapt the guidelines recently adopted for Canadian adult dialysis patients for pediatric-specific settings. These included specific COVID-19-related themes that apply to dialysis in a Canadian environment, as determined by a group of senior renal leaders. Expert clinicians and nurses with deep expertise in pediatric home and in-center dialysis reviewed the revised pediatric guidelines. KEY FINDINGS: We identified 7 broad areas of home dialysis practice management that may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) peritoneal dialysis catheter placement, (2) home dialysis training, (3) home dialysis management, (4) personal protective equipment, (5) product delivery, (6) minimizing direct health care providers and patient contact, and (7) caregivers support in the community. In addition, we identified 8 broad areas of in-center dialysis practice management that may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) identification of patients with COVID-19, (2) hemodialysis of patients with confirmed COVID-19, (3) hemodialysis of patients not yet known to have COVID-19, (4) management of visitors to the dialysis unit, (5) handling COVID-19 testing of patients and staff, (6) safe practices during resuscitation procedures in a pandemic, (7) routine hemodialysis care, and (8) hemodialysis care under fixed dialysis resources. We make specific suggestions and recommendations for each of these areas. LIMITATIONS: At the time when we started this work, we knew that evidence on the topic of pediatric dialysis and COVID-19 would be severely limited, and our resources were also limited. We did not, therefore, do formal systematic review or meta-analysis. We did not evaluate our specific suggestions in the clinical environment. Thus, this article's advice and recommendations are primarily expert opinions and subject to the biases associated with this level of evidence. To expedite the publication of this work, we created a parallel review process that may not be as robust as standard arms' length peer-review processes. IMPLICATIONS: We intend these recommendations to help provide the best care possible for pediatric patients prescribed in-center or home dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of altered priorities and reduced resources.