Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Simple Versus Comminuted Radial Head Fractures: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Current teaching suggests that modified Mason type III and IV fractures of the radial head involving more than 3 fragments should be treated with radial head arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of simple (2 or fewer intra-articular pieces) versus comminuted (3 or more intra-articular pieces) radial head fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 35 patients with modified Mason type III and IV fractures treated with ORIF. For the purpose of our study, simple fractures were defined as having 2 or fewer intra-articular fragments. Comminuted fractures were defined as having 3 or more intra-articular fragments. The primary outcomes were Broberg and Morrey rating system and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. Reoperation rates and complications were also noted. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 39.3 months. Thirteen patients had radial head fractures consisting of 2 or fewer intra-articular fragments. Twenty-two patients had radial head fractures consisting of 3 or more intra-articular fragments. Ages and follow-up times were similar in the 2 groups. Similar QuickDASH and Broberg and Morrey scores were seen when evaluating subgroups of 2, 3, and 4 fragment fractures. One patient from each group underwent revision surgery for symptomatic hardware. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, we found similar clinical outcome scores and reoperation rates between simple and comminuted radial head fractures treated with ORIF. Fractures with more than 3 intra-articular fragments can be considered for ORIF. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Elbow Contracture Release: Improvement for Severe Prosupination and Flexion Contracture.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes following arthroscopic elbow contracture release to describe the use of arthroscopy for improvement in extension/flexion and pronation/supination arcs of motion at a single institution for degenerative and posttraumatic etiologies. METHODS: Consecutive arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis performed between 2003 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Basic patient demographics, indications for surgery, preoperative and postoperative elbow range of motion, postoperative patient outcome score, and all complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included with an average follow-up of 5.1 years (range 1.4 to 9.4). Severe contractures made up 50% of cases, followed by 23% moderate, and 27% mild. Average extension/flexion for the post-traumatic group (n = 30) increased by 63° ± 31 and by 29° ± 24 for the degenerative group (n = 22). Average gain in pronosupination was 38° ± 62 in the post-traumatic group and 13°±23 in the degenerative group. Postoperative DASH scores were 17.5 ± 18.4 for post-traumatic cases and 12.8 ± 19.3 for degenerative cases. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic elbow contracture release is an effective intervention for degenerative and post-traumatic elbow contracture for both flexion/extension and pronosupination contracture. Furthermore, a two-stage release should be considered when both flexion and pronosupinaton contractures are present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series, treatment study.

Optimizing Volar Tilt Restoration and Plate Position in Distal Radius Fractures.

PURPOSE: Distal radius fractures are common and often treated surgically with a volar plate. A complication of volar plating includes tendonitis or rupture of the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon. We hypothesize that failure to restore the volar tilt of the distal radius results in increased pressure on the FPL tendon. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric wrists were assessed for this study. During testing, weights were suspended from the FPL tendon to stimulate muscle contraction. Reproducible fractures were created and fixed via volar plating. The contact force between FPL and the bone or plate edge was measured with a force transducer in 5 surgical conditions. These were assessed to evaluate whether failure to restore the volar tilt increases the pressure with a plate proximal or distal to the watershed line. RESULTS: Significant increases in contact forces were observed between the control and both conditions in which volar tilt was not restored, with mean increases of 1.9 N and 3.0 N. A significant increase in the contact force was found when placing the plate distal to the watershed line with a mean increase of 2.03 N comparing the failure to restore volar tilt and after restoring the volar tilt. Significant increases in contact force were also observed between the dorsal plate condition, which failed to restore the volar tilt, and both plate conditions with placement distal to the watershed line, with mean differences of 0.94 N and 1.09 N, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to restore the volar tilt in surgically treated distal radius fractures causes increased pressure on the FPL tendon. Plate placement distal to the watershed line also causes increased FPL tendon pressure over the plate edge. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates the importance of restoring the volar tilt of the distal radius in surgically treated distal radius fractures and confirms that plate placement distal to the watershed line will increase pressure on the FPL tendon.