Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Fertil Steril ; 116(3): 633-643, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33992421

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vaginal progesterone for programmed endometrial preparation is noninferior to intramuscular progesterone in terms of live birth rates from frozen embryo transfer (FET). DESIGN: Three-armed, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial. SETTING: Multicenter fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): A total of 1,346 volunteer subjects planning vitrified-warmed transfer of high-quality nonbiopsied blastocysts were screened, of whom 1,125 subjects were ultimately enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment. INTERVENTION(S): The subjects were randomly assigned to receive, in preparation for FET, 50 mg daily of intramuscular progesterone (control group), 200 mg twice daily of vaginal micronized progesterone plus 50 mg of intramuscular progesterone every third day (combination treatment), or 200 mg twice daily of vaginal micronized progesterone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was live birth rate per vitrified-warmed embryo transfer. The secondary outcomes were a positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin test 2 weeks after FET, biochemical pregnancy loss, clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy loss, total pregnancy loss, serum luteal progesterone concentration 2 weeks after FET, and patient's experience and attitudes regarding the route of progesterone administration, on the basis of a survey administered to the subjects between FET and pregnancy test. RESULT(S): A total of 1,060 FETs were completed. The live birth rate was significantly lower in women receiving only vaginal progesterone (27%) than in women receiving intramuscular progesterone (44%) or combination treatment (46%). Fifty percent of pregnancies in women receiving only vaginal progesterone ended in miscarriage. CONCLUSION(S): The live birth rate after vaginal-only progesterone replacement was significantly reduced, due primarily to an increased rate of miscarriage. Vaginal progesterone supplemented with intramuscular progesterone every third day was noninferior to daily intramuscular progesterone, offering an effective alternative regimen with fewer injections. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02254577.


Asunto(s)
Criopreservación , Transferencia de Embrión , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/administración & dosificación , Fertilidad/efectos de los fármacos , Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad/terapia , Progesterona/administración & dosificación , Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Administración Intravaginal , Adulto , Esquema de Medicación , Transferencia de Embrión/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/efectos adversos , Fertilización In Vitro/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Nacimiento Vivo , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Progesterona/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
2.
Fertil Steril ; 109(2): 266-275, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29338855

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the noninferiority of vaginal P (Endometrin) compared with daily intramuscular P for replacement in programmed vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles and to assess the noninferiority of vaginal P in combination with intramuscular progesterone every third day compared with daily intramuscular P. DESIGN: Three-arm randomized controlled noninferiority study. To enable early recognition of inferiority if present, an a priori interim analysis was planned and completed once ongoing pregnancy data were available for 50% of the total enrollment goal. The results of this interim analysis are presented here. SETTING: Assisted reproduction technology practice. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing transfer of nonbiopsied high quality vitrified-warmed blastocyst(s) in a programmed cycle. INTERVENTION(S): Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer with mode of P replacement determined by randomization to either: (1) 50 mg daily intramuscular P only; (2) 200 mg twice daily vaginal Endometrin; or (3) 200 mg twice daily Endometrin plus 50 mg intramuscular P every 3rd day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth. The primary outcome of this interim analysis was ongoing pregnancy. RESULT(S): A total of 645 cycles were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment arms, received at least one dose of P replacement therapy according to this assignment and underwent vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. These cycles were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The study team, including the statistician, were blinded to the identity of the treatment arms, which were randomly labeled "A," "B," and "C" in the dataset. Ongoing pregnancy occurred in 50%, 47%, and 31% of cycles in arms A, B, and C respectively. Although arm C had an rate of positive hCG equivalent to the other two arms, the rate of pregnancy loss for arm C was significantly higher than for either of the two arms, resulting in a more than one-third lower rate of ongoing pregnancy. There were no statistically significant differences for any outcome tested between arms A and B. Results of a per-protocol analysis were nearly identical to those of the intention-to-treat analysis. On completion of these analyses, arm C was revealed to be the vaginal P only arm. CONCLUSION(S): Relative to regimens inclusive of intramuscular P, vaginal-only P replacement for vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer results in decreased ongoing pregnancy, due to increased miscarriage, and should be avoided. Randomization to the vaginal-only arm was terminated with these findings. This trial is ongoing to assess the noninferiority of the vaginal plus every 3rd day intramuscular P arm compared with daily intramuscular P in terms of live birth. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NLM identifier NCT02254577.


Asunto(s)
Blastocisto/efectos de los fármacos , Transferencia de Embrión , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/administración & dosificación , Fertilidad/efectos de los fármacos , Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad/terapia , Progesterona/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravaginal , Adolescente , Adulto , Esquema de Medicación , Implantación del Embrión/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infertilidad/diagnóstico , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Nacimiento Vivo , Mid-Atlantic Region , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Progesterona/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitrificación , Adulto Joven
3.
Fertil Steril ; 83(1): 235-7, 2005 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15652920

RESUMEN

This retrospective study examined the association of endometrial pattern and pregnancy after a day 5 ET. The pregnancy rate of women with a triple-line ultrasound endometrial pattern on the day of hCG administration was significantly higher than the pregnancy rate of women with the other ultrasound patterns. This observation suggests that, in a subset of patients, a suboptimal endometrial lining may interfere with assisted reproductive technology success.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión , Endometrio/diagnóstico por imagen , Índice de Embarazo , Adulto , Gonadotropina Coriónica/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía
4.
Fertil Steril ; 83(3): 710-4, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15749502

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Given the importance of ET technique during assisted reproductive technology cycles, we evaluated the effect of embryo afterloading subsequent to placement of the ET catheter on pregnancy rates vs. a standard direct ET. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: University-based assisted reproductive technology program. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing a fresh nondonor day 3 ET by a single provider over a 1-year period. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy. RESULT(S): One hundred twenty-seven patients met inclusion criteria, and the overall pregnancy rate was 46.5%. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to age, basal FSH, or number of embryos transferred. The ET method used was at the discretion of the provider. There was no difference between the two groups in the presence of blood on the transfer catheter. However, there were significantly more transfer catheters with mucus contamination in the direct transfer group (25.58% vs. 5.95%). The clinical pregnancy rate in the group with ET using the afterloading technique was higher than in the direct ET group (52.4% vs. 34.9%). CONCLUSION(S): There was a trend toward an increase in pregnancy rate when an embryo afterloading technique was used. A prospective randomized trial is needed to examine this issue.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/métodos , Transferencia de Embrión , Índice de Embarazo , Adulto , Cuello del Útero , Estudios de Cohortes , Implantación del Embrión , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda