Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 45(2): e215-e224, 2023 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36309802

RESUMEN

In 2021, during a drug-related death crisis in the UK, the Government published its ten-year drugs strategy. This article, written in collaboration with the Faculty of Public Health and the Association of Directors of Public Health, assesses whether this Strategy is evidence-based and consistent with international calls to promote public health approaches to drugs, which put 'people, health and human rights at the centre'. Elements of the Strategy are welcome, including the promise of significant funding for drug treatment services, the effects of which will depend on how it is utilized by services and local commissioners and whether it is sustained. However, unevidenced and harmful measures to deter drug use by means of punishment continue to be promoted, which will have deleterious impacts on people who use drugs. An effective public health approach to drugs should tackle population-level risk factors, which may predispose to harmful patterns of drug use, including adverse childhood experiences and socioeconomic deprivation, and institute evidence-based measures to mitigate drug-related harm. This would likely be more effective, and just, than the continuation of policies rooted in enforcement. A more dramatic re-orientation of UK drug policy than that offered by the Strategy is overdue.


Asunto(s)
Política Pública , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , Salud Pública , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & control , Gobierno , Reino Unido
2.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 43(3): e425-e426, 2021 09 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32249304
4.
Perspect Public Health ; 144(3): 130-131, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757940
10.
South Med J ; 99(6): 665-70, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16800438

RESUMEN

This document discusses training for hospital and healthcare chaplains in the light of different UK standards applied by various interested parties. It considers the different standards and concludes that there is no single applied standard for training for National Health Service (NHS) hospital chaplains across the UK. Those models that do exist take differing approaches, with some basing their systems on normatively defined views of what a chaplain needs to be effective on functional (NHS managerial) or interpersonal (clinical pastoral) levels, while others take a more hybrid approach blending these approaches with doctrinal concerns. Equally, there is wide variation across different denominations and employers. This document seeks to identify where there is common ground on domains of competence for chaplaincy training and suggest some progress for training which fits into NHS structures and systems.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Capellanía en Hospital/normas , Clero/normas , Educación Profesional/normas , Cuidado Pastoral/educación , Humanos , Modelos Educacionales , Competencia Profesional , Medicina Estatal/normas , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda