Efficacy and safety of intraoperative controlled hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative controlled hypotension improves surgical field visibility by reducing blood loss (efficacy) but poses potential risks linked to organ hypoperfusion (safety). The use of controlled hypotension persists despite increasing evidence of associations between intraoperative inadvertent hypotension and adverse outcomes. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the focus and results of intraoperative controlled hypertension research differ across anaesthesia and surgery investigators because of differing priorities. METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomised trials comparing controlled hypotension with usual care with trials categorised by investigators' affiliation. RESULTS: We identified 48 eligible trials, of which 37 were conducted by anaesthesia investigators and 11 by surgery investigators. For the primary outcome, 54% of the anaesthesia-led trials focused on safety, whereas all (100%) surgery-led trials focused on efficacy (P=0.004). Compared with usual care, mean arterial pressure in controlled hypotension was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-29%) lower in anaesthesia trials and 30% (95% CI 14-37%) lower in surgery trials; estimated blood loss was 44% (95% CI 30-55%) less in anaesthesia trials and 38% (95% CI 30-49%) less in surgery trials. Overall, blood loss was reduced by 43% (95% CI 32-53%), and trial sequential analysis supported an efficacy conclusion. Mean arterial pressure and estimated blood loss reductions were associated (R2=0.41, P=0.002). All trials were underpowered for safety outcomes, and none adequately evaluated myocardial or renal injury. CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthesia researchers prioritised safety outcomes, whereas surgery researchers emphasised efficacy in controlled hypotension trials. Controlled hypotension significantly reduces blood loss. In contrast, safety outcomes were poorly studied. Given increasing observational evidence linking inadvertent hypotension to myocardial and renal injury, the safety of controlled hypotension remains to be addressed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023450397).

Characteristics associated with effectiveness in postoperative delirium research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-regression and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium remains prevalent despite extensive research through randomised trials aimed at reducing its incidence. Understanding trial characteristics associated with interventions' effectiveness facilitates data interpretation. METHODS: Trial characteristics were extracted from eligible trials identified through two systematic literature searches. Multivariable meta-regression was used to investigate trial characteristics associated with effectiveness estimated using odds ratios. Meta-analysis was used to investigate pooled effectiveness. RESULTS: We identified 201 eligible trials. Compared with China, trials from the USA/Canada (ratio of odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.45) and Europe/Australia/New Zealand (1.67; 1.29-2.18) had an 89% and 67% higher odds ratio, respectively, suggesting reduced effectiveness. The effectiveness was enhanced when the incidence of postoperative delirium increased (0.85; 0.79-0.92, per 10% increase). Trials with concerns related to deviations from intended interventions reported increased effectiveness compared with those at low risk (0.69; 0.53-0.90). Compared with usual care, certain interventions appeared to have reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium in low-risk trials with low-to-moderate certainty of evidence. However, these findings should be considered inconclusive because of challenges in grouping heterogeneous interventions, the limited number of eligible trials, the prevalence of small-scale studies, and potential publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of postoperative delirium trials varied based on the region of trial origin, the incidence of delirium, and the risk of bias. The limitations caution against drawing definitive conclusions from different bodies of evidence. These findings highlight the imperative need to improve the quality of research on a global scale. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023413984).

Integrated Feedforward and Feedback Mechanisms in Neurovascular Coupling.

Neurovascular coupling (NVC) is the mechanism that drives the neurovascular response to neural activation, and NVC dysfunction has been implicated in various neurologic diseases. NVC is driven by (1) nonmetabolic feedforward mechanisms that are mediated by various signaling pathways and (2) metabolic feedback mechanisms that involve metabolic factors. However, the interplay between these feedback and feedforward mechanisms remains unresolved. We propose that feedforward mechanisms normally drive a swift, neural activation-induced regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) overshoot, which floods the tissue beds, leading to local hypocapnia and hyperoxia. The feedback mechanisms are triggered by the resultant hypocapnia (not hyperoxia), which causes cerebral vasoconstriction in the neurovascular unit that counterbalances the rCBF overshoot and returns rCBF to a level that matches the metabolic activity. If feedforward mechanisms function improperly (eg, in a disease state), the rCBF overshoot, tissue-bed flooding, and local hypocapnia fail to occur or occur on a smaller scale. Consequently, the neural activation-related increase in metabolic activity results in local hypercapnia and hypoxia, both of which drive cerebral vasodilation and increase rCBF. Thus, feedback mechanisms ensure the brain milieu's stability when feedforward mechanisms are impaired. Our proposal integrates the feedforward and feedback mechanisms underlying NVC and suggests that these 2 mechanisms work like a fail-safe system, to a certain degree. We also discussed the difference between NVC and cerebral metabolic rate-CBF coupling and the clinical implications of our proposed framework.

Noradrenaline-induced changes in cerebral blood flow in health, traumatic brain injury and critical illness: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Noradrenaline is a standard treatment for hypotension in acute care. The precise effects of noradrenaline on cerebral blood flow in health and disease remain unclear. METHODS: We systematically reviewed and synthesised data from studies examining changes in cerebral blood flow in healthy participants and patients with traumatic brain injury and critical illness. RESULTS: Twenty-eight eligible studies were included. In healthy subjects and patients without critical illness or traumatic brain injury, noradrenaline did not significantly change cerebral blood flow velocity (-1.7%, 95%CI -4.7-1.3%) despite a 24.1% (95%CI 19.4-28.7%) increase in mean arterial pressure. In patients with traumatic brain injury, noradrenaline significantly increased cerebral blood flow velocity (21.5%, 95%CI 11.0-32.0%), along with a 33.8% (95%CI 14.7-52.9%) increase in mean arterial pressure. In patients who were critically ill, noradrenaline significantly increased cerebral blood flow velocity (20.0%, 95%CI 9.7-30.3%), along with a 32.4% (95%CI 25.0-39.9%) increase in mean arterial pressure. Our analyses suggest intact cerebral autoregulation in healthy subjects and patients without critical illness or traumatic brain injury., and impaired cerebral autoregulation in patients with traumatic brain injury and who were critically ill. The extent of mean arterial pressure changes and the pre-treatment blood pressure levels may affect the magnitude of cerebral blood flow changes. Studies assessing cerebral blood flow using non-transcranial Doppler methods were inadequate and heterogeneous in enabling meaningful meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Noradrenaline significantly increases cerebral blood flow in humans with impaired, not intact, cerebral autoregulation, with the extent of changes related to the severity of functional impairment, the extent of mean arterial pressure changes and pre-treatment blood pressure levels.

Evaluation of a modified ultrasound-assisted technique for mid-thoracic epidural placement: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Although mid-thoracic epidural analgesia benefits patients undergoing major surgery, technical difficulties often discourage its use. Improvements in technology are warranted to improve the success rate on first pass and patient comfort. The previously reported ultrasound-assisted technique using a generic needle insertion site failed to demonstrate superiority over conventional landmark techniques. A stratified needle insertion site based on sonoanatomic features may improve the technique. METHODS: Patients who presented for elective abdominal or thoracic surgery requesting thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control were included in this observational study. A modified ultrasound-assisted technique using a stratified needle insertion site based on ultrasound images was adopted. The number of needle passes, needle skin punctures, procedure time, overall success rate, and incidence of procedure complications were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight subjects were included. The first-pass success and overall success rates were 75% (96/128) and 98% (126/128), respectively. In 95% (122/128) of patients, only one needle skin puncture was needed to access the epidural space. The median [IQR] time needed from needle insertion to access the epidural space was 59 [47-122] seconds. No complications were observed during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This modified ultrasound-assisted mid-thoracic epidural technique has the potential to improve success rates and reduce the needling time. The data shown in our study may be a feasible basis for a prospective study comparing our ultrasound-assisted epidural placements to conventional landmark-based techniques.

AcumenTM hypotension prediction index guidance for prevention and treatment of hypotension in noncardiac surgery: a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension is common during noncardiac surgery and is associated with postoperative myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, stroke, and severe infection. The Hypotension Prediction Index software is an algorithm based on arterial waveform analysis that alerts clinicians of the patient's likelihood of experiencing a future hypotensive event, defined as mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg for at least 1 min. METHODS: Two analyses included (1) a prospective, single-arm trial, with continuous blood pressure measurements from study monitors, compared to a historical comparison cohort. (2) A post hoc analysis of a subset of trial participants versus a propensity score-weighted contemporaneous comparison group, using external data from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG). The trial included 485 subjects in 11 sites; 406 were in the final effectiveness analysis. The post hoc analysis included 457 trial participants and 15,796 comparison patients. Patients were eligible if aged 18 years or older, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 3 or 4, and scheduled for moderate- to high-risk noncardiac surgery expected to last at least 3 h. MEASUREMENTS: minutes of mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 65 mmHg and area under MAP < 65 mmHg. RESULTS: Analysis 1: Trial subjects (n = 406) experienced a mean of 9 ± 13 min of MAP below 65 mmHg, compared with the MPOG historical control mean of 25 ± 41 min, a 65% reduction (p < 0.001). Subjects with at least one episode of hypotension (n = 293) had a mean of 12 ± 14 min of MAP below 65 mmHg compared with the MPOG historical control mean of 28 ± 43 min, a 58% reduction (p< 0.001). Analysis 2: In the post hoc inverse probability treatment weighting model, patients in the trial demonstrated a 35% reduction in minutes of hypotension compared to a contemporaneous comparison group [exponentiated coefficient: - 0.35 (95%CI - 0.43, - 0.27); p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The use of prediction software for blood pressure management was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in the duration of intraoperative hypotension. Further studies must investigate whether predictive algorithms to prevent hypotension can reduce adverse outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: NCT03805217. Registry URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03805217 . Principal investigator: Xiaodong Bao, MD, PhD. Date of registration: January 15, 2019.

Esketamine vs. placebo combined with erector spinae plane block vs. intercostal nerve block on quality of recovery following thoracoscopic lung resection: A randomized controlled factorial trial.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal analgesic strategy is pivotal for enhanced recovery after surgery. The objective of this trial was to assess the effect of subanesthetic esketamine vs. placebo combined with erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs. intercostal nerve block (ICNB) on postoperative recovery following thoracoscopic lung resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, controlled, 2×2 factorial trial was conducted at a university hospital in Suzhou, China. One hundred adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery were randomized to one of four groups (esketamine-ESPB, esketamine-ICNB, placebo-ESPB, and placebo-ICNB) to receive i.v. esketamine 0.3 mg/kg or normal saline placebo combined with ESPB or ICNB using 0.375% ropivacaine 20 mL. All patients received flurbiprofen axetil and patient-controlled fentanyl. The primary outcome was quality of recovery (QoR) at 24 h postoperatively, assessed using the QoR-15 scale, with a minimal clinically important difference of 6.0. RESULTS: The median age was 57 years and 52% were female. No significant interaction effect was found between esketamine and regional blocks on QoR (P=0.215). The QoR-15 score at 24 h was 111.5±5.8 in the esketamine group vs. 105.4±4.5 in the placebo group (difference=6.1, 95% CI, 4.0-8.1; P<0.001); 109.7±6.2 in the ESPB group vs. 107.2±5.6 in the ICNB group (difference=2.5, 95% CI, 0.2-4.9; P=0.033; not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction). Additionally, esketamine resulted in higher QoR-15 scores at 48 h (difference=4.6) and hospital discharge (difference=1.6), while ESPB led to a higher QoR-15 score at 48 h (difference=3.0). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection, subanesthetic esketamine improved QoR after surgery, while ICNB can be used interchangeably with ESPB as a component of multimodal analgesia.

Effect of Esketamine Added to Propofol Sedation on Desaturation and Hypotension in Bidirectional Endoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Propofol sedation is widely used for endoscopic procedures, but it poses risks of hemodynamic and respiratory depression. The addition of esketamine as an adjuvant may reduce propofol requirements and associated adverse events. Objective: To evaluate the effects of low-dose esketamine added to propofol-based sedation on desaturation and hypotension during same-visit bidirectional endoscopy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial assessed patients from 3 teaching hospitals in China who were scheduled for same-visit bidirectional endoscopy between February 8 and November 30, 2022, and randomly assigned to receive esketamine or normal saline (placebo). Interventions: After induction of sedation with 0.1 µg/kg of sufentanil and 0.5 mg/kg of propofol, patients in the esketamine group received 0.15 mg/kg of intravenous esketamine, whereas patients in the placebo group received an equivalent volume of saline. Sedation was achieved through propofol titration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the composite of desaturation and hypotension during the procedures. Secondary outcomes included desaturation, hypotension, propofol requirements, postprocedure pain and fatigue, nausea or vomiting, dizziness or headache, hallucination or nightmare, endoscopist satisfaction, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among the 663 initially enrolled patients, 660 completed the study (median [IQR] age, 48 [36-57] years; 355 [53.8%] female), with 331 randomized to the esketamine group and 329 to the placebo group. The administration of esketamine compared with placebo significantly reduced the incidence of the composite outcome of desaturation and hypotension (8.2% vs 21.0%; difference, -12.8 percentage points; odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.54; P < .001). Additionally, esketamine led to significantly lower incidences of desaturation (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.72; false discovery rate q = .01) and hypotension (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.60; q < .001) and reduced propofol requirements (difference, -58.9 mg; 95% CI, -65.7 to -52.2 mg; q < .001), without significant effects on other secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing same-visit bidirectional endoscopy, the administration of low-dose esketamine resulted in an approximately 61% reduction in the incidence of desaturation and hypotension, accompanied by decreased propofol requirements. These findings support the use of esketamine as an adjuvant to propofol-based sedation in endoscopic procedures. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200055938.

Oximetría cerebral: tres preguntas esenciales / Cerebral oximetry: Three questions to ask

Cerebral oximetry based on near-infrared spectroscopy can non-invasively measure hemoglobin oxygen saturation in mixed arterial, venous and capillary blood in the brain. In order to determine if this is a clinically desirable monitor, we need to answer three questions in order. The first question is if cerebral oximetry monitors an important aspect of physiology. The second question is if the physiology can be optimized based on this monitor. The third question is if the outcome can be improved based on cerebral oximetry-guided clinical care. In this review, we share our answers to these three questions.

La oximetría cerebral basada en la espectroscopia cercana al infrarrojo puede medir demanera no invasiva la saturación de oxígeno de la hemoglobina en la sangre mixta arterial, venosa y capilar en el cerebro. A fin de determinar si este monitor es deseable en la clínica, es preciso responder 3 preguntas, en su orden. La primera es si la oximetría cerebral monitorea un aspecto importante de la fisiología. La segunda es si se puede optimizar la fisiología con base en este monitor. La tercera es si se puede mejorar el desenlace mediante una intervención clínica basada en la oximetría cerebral. En esta revisión presentamos nuestras respuestas a estas 3 preguntas.