Prognostic stratification ability of the CPS+EG scoring system in HER2-low and HER2-zero early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The CPS+EG scoring system was initially described in unselected early breast cancer (eBC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), leading to refined prognostic stratification, and thus helping to select patients for additional post-NAC treatments. It remains unknown whether the performance is the same in new biological breast cancer entities such as the HER2-low subtype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outcomes (disease-free (DFS) and overall survival OS)) of 608 patients with HER2-non amplified eBC and treated with NAC were retrospectively analyzed according to CPS-EG score. We compared the prognostic stratification abilities of the CPS+EG in HER2-low and HER2-0 eBC, analyzing ER+ and ER- tumors separately. RESULTS: In ER+ eBC, the CPS+EG scoring system seems to retain a prognostic value, both in HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors, by distinguishing populations with significantly different outcomes (good: score 0-1, poor: score 2-3, and very poor: score 4-5). Using C-indices for DFS and OS, CPS+EG provided the highest prognostic information in ER+ eBC, especially in HER2-0 tumors. In contrast, in ER- eBC, the CPS+EG does not appear to be able to distinguish different outcome groups, either in HER2-low or HER2-0 tumors. In ER- eBC, C-indices for DFS and OS were highest for pathological stage, reflecting the predominant prognostic importance of residual disease in this subtype. CONCLUSIONS: HER2-low status does not influence the prognostic performance of the CPS+EG score. Our results confirm the usefulness of the CPS+EG score in stratifying the prognosis of ER+ eBC after NAC, for both HER2-0 and HER2-low tumors. For ER- eBC, HER2-low status does not influence the performance of the CPS+EG score, which was lower than that of the pathological stage alone.

Axillary pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery according to breast cancers subtypes and survival impact.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the rate of pathologic complete response in the axilla according to breast cancer biologic subtypes, and to study the impact of nodal response on survival. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were all T-stage breast cancers with initial lymph node involvement, non-metastatic, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with axillary lymph node dissection, managed at the George-François Leclerc Cancer Center in Dijon, France, between 2000 and 2018. RESULTS: Among 437 patients included, the rate of complete nodal response rate varied according to tumor subtypes: 69.4% in Hormone Receptors (HR)-/HER2-positive, 47.4% in HR-/HER2-negative, 46.7% in HR+/HER2-positive, 8.5% in HR+/HER2-negative. By multivariate analysis, the factors significantly associated with complete nodal response were HER2-positive profile (OR 4.48 [2.14-9.65], P<0.001 if HR+; OR 8.02 [3.54-18.74], P<0.001 if HR-), triple negative tumors (OR 3.01 [1.40-6.58], P=0.005), SBRIII grade (OR 6.85 [2.28-29.58], P=0.002) and breast complete response (OR 18.69 [9.67-38.53], P<0.001). Five-year recurrence rates were 15.7% in ypN0, 23% in ypN1, 41.2% in ypN2, 50% in ypN3 patients (P<0.001). Five-year overall survival rates were 92.2% in ypN0, 85.7% in ypN1, 72.2% in ypN2, 65.4% in ypN3 patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The impact of nodal response on survival was significant. Pathologic complete response in the axilla appears to be a good surrogate marker of long-term outcome in patients treated for these cancers.

Impact of complete surgical staging on survival of patients with early-stage (FIGO I or II) ovarian cancer: Data from the Cote d'Or Registry of Gynecological Cancers from 1998 to 2015.

INTRODUCTION: Early-stage ovarian cancer represents 20 to 33% of all ovarian cancers and is thus quite rare in France, with around 1200 new cases per year. No study to date has convincingly demonstrated the utility of lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian cancer. We sought to evaluate the impact on overall survival of complete surgical staging in patients management for FIGO stage I and II ovarian cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study using data from the Cote d'Or Registry of Gynecological Cancers. We included patients with invasive early stage epithelial ovarian cancer (FIGO stages I and II), diagnosed between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2015. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were included in the study. Patients who had lymphadenectomy were younger on average (P<0.001) and had fewer comorbidities (P=0.03). Lymphadenectomy was performed during the first surgery in 59.2% of cases (58 patients) and during a second, re-staging surgery in 40.8% (n=40). When complete surgical staging was performed, the rate of up-staging (to at least FIGO stage III) was 11.2% (11/98). The median follow-up was 8.4 years. At the study, 31.6% patients with complete surgical staging had died and 48.4% patients also died in the group without lymphadenectomy, HR 0.59 CI [0.36-0.97] P<0.04. CONCLUSION: In patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, complete surgical staging appears to yield a benefit in terms of overall survival. In 10 to 15% of cases, it leads to upstaging, with the resultant indication for maintenance therapy, which has also shown a survival benefit.