Researcher Experience and Comfort With Telemedicine and Remote Patient Monitoring in Cancer Treatment Trials.

BACKGROUND: Since the onset of COVID-19, oncology practices across the US have integrated telemedicine (TM) and remote patient monitoring (RPM) into routine care and clinical trials. The extent of provider experience and comfort with TM/RPM in treatment trials, however, is unknown. We surveyed oncology researchers to assess experience and comfort with TM/RPM. METHODS: Between April 10 and June 1, 2022, we distributed email surveys to US-based members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) whose member records indicated interest or specialization in clinical research. We collected respondent demographic data, clinical trial experience, workplace characteristics, and comfort and experience with TM/RPM use across trial components in phase I and phase II/III trials. TM/RPM was defined as clinical trial-related healthcare and monitoring for patients geographically separated from trial site. RESULTS: There were 141 surveys analyzed (5.1% response rate). Ninety percent of respondents had been Principal Investigators, 98% practiced in a norural site. Most respondents had enrolled patients in phase I (82%) and phase II/III trials (99%). Across all phases and trial components, there was a higher frequency of researcher comfort compared to experience. Regarding remote care in treatment trials, 75% reported using TM, RPM, or both. Among these individuals, 62% had never provided remote care to trial patients before the pandemic. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 spurred the rise of TM/RPM in cancer treatment trials, and some TM/RPM use continues in this context. Among oncology researchers, higher levels of comfort compared with real-world experience with TM/RPM reveal opportunities for expanding TM/RPM policies and guidelines in oncology research.

Group-based physical activity as a means to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older adults.

Social isolation and loneliness are critical health epidemics among older adults. The present manuscript aimed to underscore group-based physical activity (GBPA) as an approach to prevent and/or reduce social isolation and loneliness among older adults and, therefore, avoid its negative health consequences. We compiled evidence from the literature to answer the following question: would GBPA be a better approach to prevent/reduce social isolation and loneliness among older adults compared to individual physical activity? There is evidence demonstrating that older adults participating in GBPA not only acquire the well-known physical benefits of physical activity but also experience improvements in social connectedness, due to the fact that individuals exercising with others. To this end, beyond providing physical health benefits, GBPA for older adults may have the potential to help prevent social isolation and loneliness by improving levels of social connectedness in this age group. Further research is much needed, as the literature seems to be scarce. This would help devise tailored exercise programs for those reporting to be isolated or feeling lonely.