Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 17(3): 277-81, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17570769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the results of incisional hernia laparoscopic and open surgery, focusing on the morbidity and postoperative implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of 106 (42 men, 64 women) patients suffering from incisional hernias were treated with either a laparoscopic (30) or an open (76) placement of a prosthetic mesh between January 1997 and December 2004. The age and gender of the patients, the size and type of the mesh, operation note, the length of postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity were recorded. RESULTS: An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh was used in 103 patients, whereas a polypropylene mesh was used in 3 patients. In the open technique, 3 patients with the ePTFE prosthetic material developed a mesh infection and required a mesh removal, which was easily performed under local anesthesia. Moreover, 2 patients from the same group developed a hernia recurrence. As for the laparoscopic approach, the only complication observed was one hernia recurrence. Finally, it should be mentioned that 1 patient with a polypropylene mesh developed a colocutaneous fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of the laparoscopic mesh technique, compared to the open technique, include a shorter hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and possibly, a reduction in wound and mesh complications. Regarding the recurrence rate, the two techniques show similar results.


Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Laparotomía , Politetrafluoroetileno , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades del Colon/etiología , Fístula Cutánea/etiología , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Laparotomía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polipropilenos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Hormones (Athens) ; 4(2): 111-6, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16613814

RESUMEN

We report a case of an insulinoma that was not identified on either Computerized Tomography (CT) scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) revealed a small insulinoma located at the body of the pancreas, which was histologically confirmed. The patient underwent a laparotomy but no tumour was identified either on palpation or with intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS). Subsequently, a further EUS was performed and after the tumour was identified was injected with blue dye. The patient then underwent a second exploratory laparotomy and a tumour at the posterior aspect of the pancreas close to the left side of the portal vein was identified and was successfully excised. Histology confirmed the presence of an endocrine tumour staining for chromogranin A and insulin. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and has developed no further episodes of hypoglycemia 3 years after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Endosonografía , Insulinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Cromogranina A , Cromograninas/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Insulina/análisis , Insulinoma/patología , Insulinoma/cirugía , Azul de Metileno , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda