Co-expression of S100A14 and S100A16 correlates with a poor prognosis in human breast cancer and promotes cancer cell invasion.

BACKGROUND: S100 family proteins have recently been identified as biomarkers in various cancers. Of this protein family, S100A14 and S100A16 are also believed to play an important role in tumor progression. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical significance and functional role of these molecules in breast cancer. METHODS: In a clinical study, an immunohistochemical analysis of S100A14 and S100A16 expression in archival specimens of primary tumors of 167 breast cancer patients was performed. The relationship of S100A14 and S100A16 expression to patient survival and clinicopathological variables was statistically analyzed. In an experimental study, the subcellular localization and function of these molecules was examined by using the human breast cancer cell lines MCF7 and SK-BR-3, both of which highly express S100A14 and S100A16 proteins. Cells transfected with expression vectors and siRNA for these genes were characterized using in vitro assays for cancer invasion and metastasis. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis of 167 breast cancer cases showed strong cell membrane staining of S100A14 (53% of cases) and S100A16 (31% of cases) with a significant number of cases with co-expression (p < 0.001). Higher expression levels of these proteins were significantly associated with a younger age (<60 years), ER-negative status, HER2-positive status and a poorer prognosis. Co-expression of the two proteins showed more aggressive features with poorer prognosis. In the human breast cancer cell lines MCF7 and SK-BR-3, both proteins were colocalized on the cell membrane mainly at cell-cell attachment sites. Immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence analyses demonstrated that the 100A14 protein can bind to actin localized on the cell membrane in a calcium-independent manner. A Boyden chamber assay showed that S100A14 and S100A16 knockdown substantially suppressed the invasive activity of both cell lines. Cell motility was also inhibited by S100A14 knockdown in a modified dual color wound-healing assay. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report showing the correlation of expression of S100A14, S100A16, and co-expression of these proteins with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. In addition, our findings indicate that S100A14 and S100A16 can promote invasive activity of breast cancer cells via an interaction with cytoskeletal dynamics. S100A14 and S100A16 might be prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for breast cancer.

Identification of S100A14 as a metastasis-promoting molecule in a murine organotropic metastasis model.

Cancer metastasis shows great diversity in target organs, routes and molecular mechanisms depending on the type of cancer and even on the individual patients. To identify key molecules involved in metastasis, we constructed a murine model system including multiple sublines with different organotropism and pathways of metastasis. We selected metastatic sublines from a murine mammary tumor cell line MCH66. Using this model, we extracted metastasis-related molecules by gene expression screening methods and verified their metastasis-promoting effects by gene knockdown or overexpression experiments. For the candidates promoting metastasis, we analyzed molecular functions involved in metastasis: cell growth, motility and invasive activity. We established a metastasis model including low metastatic sublines (66C8, 66LM, 66-4) and highly metastatic counterparts with various organotropism, such as to the lung (66Lu10), liver (HM-KAN5) and general organs (66HM and its clones: HM1-6 and HM1-7). The sublines basically exhibited the invasion-independent metastasis pathway characterized by endothelial cell-covered tumor emboli, whereas 66HM and HM-KAN5 showed an alternative metastasis pathway based on invasion in part and in whole, respectively. Comprehensive gene analysis extracted several molecular candidates responsible for metastasis. S100A14 was identified as one of the promissing candidates promoting lung-metastasis, which was verified by gene knockdown experiments in vivo. In addition, in vivo and in vitro functional analyses demonstrated that S100A14 enhanced scattering, motility and invasiveness of mouse tumor cells. Our model system may be adaptable to the diversity of metastasis in human cancers and useful for exploring the molecular mechanism responsible for metastasis.

Uteroglobin-related protein 1 expression suppresses allergic airway inflammation in mice.

RATIONALE: Uteroglobin-related protein (UGRP) 1, which is highly expressed in the epithelial cells of the airways, has been suggested to play a role in lung inflammation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of study was to understand the effect of overexpressed UGRP1 on lung inflammation in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation. METHODS: Ovalbumin-sensitized and -challenged mice, a model for allergic airway inflammation, were used in conjunction with recombinant adenovirus expressing UGRP1. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We demonstrated that intranasal administration of adeno-UGRP1 successfully delivered UGRP1 to the epithelial cells of airways and markedly reduced the number of infiltrating inflammatory cells, particularly eosinophils, in lung tissue as well as the level of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids. The healed phase of inflammation was clearly seen in the peripheral areas of adeno-UGRP1-treated mouse lungs. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that UGRP1 can suppress inflammation in the mouse model of allergic airway inflammation. Based on this result, we propose UGRP1 as a novel therapeutic candidate for treating lung inflammation such as is found in asthma.