Early screening of sleep disordered breathing in hospitalized stroke patients high-resolution pulse oximetry as prognostic and early intervention tools in patients with acute stroke and sleep apnea (HOPES TRIAL).

INTRODUCTION: Sleep Disordered Breathing (SDB) has been shown to increase the risk of stroke and despite recommendations, routine evaluation for SDB in acute stroke is not consistent across institutions. The necessary logistics and expertise required to conduct sleep studies in hospitalized patients remain a significant barrier. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of high-resolution pulse-oximetry (HRPO) for the screening of SDB in acute stroke. Secondarily, considering impact of SDB on acute stroke, we investigated whether SDB at acute stroke predicts functional outcome at discharge and at 3 months post-stroke. METHODS: Patients with acute mild to moderate ischemic stroke underwent an overnight HRPO within 48 h of admission. Patients were divided into SDB and no-SDB groups based on oxygen desaturations index(ODI > 10/h). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the relevant predictors of functional outcome (favorable [mRS 1-2 points] versus unfavorable [mrS > = 3 points]). RESULTS: Of the 142 consecutively screened patients, 96 were included in the analysis. Of these, 33/96 (34%) were identified as having SDB and were more likely to have unfavorable mRS scores as compared to those without SDB (odds ratio = 2.70, p-value = 0.032). CONCLUSION: HRPO may be a low-cost and easily administered screening method to detect SDB among patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke. Patients with SDB (as defined by ODI) have a higher burden of neurological deficits as compared to those without SDB during hospitalization.

Perception versus reality: analysis of time spent on bedside rounds in an academic ICU (Intensive Care Unit).

BACKGROUND: Despite its importance, teaching at the bedside is declining over time. This purported decline has not been quantified. Quantifying bedside teaching is challenging, and we found only one study quantifying bedside teaching on a hospitalist service. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study to understand the prevalence of bedside teaching in our medical intensive care unit. METHODS: We conducted a single-center single-unit study in the medical intensive care unit of an academic tertiary care institution. We used a survey tool to assess perceived time spent on bedside teaching, quality of teaching, and total rounding time. In parallel, independent observers objectively measured time spent on rounds and on bedside teaching. Residents were asked to complete the survey once a week. Independent observers collected data daily and weekly averages were obtained. RESULTS: 43 responses were collected over a 4-month period. Most respondents (73%) reported a total rounding time of either 90-120 min or greater than 120 min. Median reported bedside teaching time was 16-20 min with 16 respondents (37%) reporting less than 15 min and 27 respondents (63%) reporting 16 min or more. The amount of time spent on bedside teaching was reported as adequate or more than adequate by 77% (33) of respondents with 58% (25) reporting that bedside teaching was very or extremely effective in helping them learn. Mean census reported by the independent observers was 12.75 patients per team. Bedside teaching represented an average of 12% of total rounding time, 16.85 min per day. While total rounding time increased with increasing census, there was no decline in bedside teaching time. CONCLUSION: It is reported that bedside teaching has decreased over time. Our study has demonstrated that bedside teaching occurs in our Medical ICU, and though it represents a minority of the time spent on rounds, residents still reported teaching in the ICU to be adequate.