RESUMEN
Brain-responsive neurostimulation is firmly ensconced among treatment options for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but over a quarter of patients treated with the RNS System do not experience meaningful seizure reduction. Initial titration of RNS therapy is typically similar for all patients, raising the possibility that treatment response might be enhanced by consideration of patient-specific variables. Indeed, small, single-center studies have yielded preliminary evidence that RNS System effectiveness depends on the brain state during which stimulation is applied. The generalizability of these findings remains unclear, however, and it is unknown whether state-dependent effects of responsive neurostimulation are also stratified by location of the seizure onset zone where stimulation is delivered. We aimed to determine whether state-dependent effects of the RNS System are evident in the large, diverse, multi-center cohort of RNS System clinical trial participants and to test whether these effects differ between mesiotemporal and neocortical epilepsies. Eighty-one of 256 patients who were treated with the RNS System across 31 centers during clinical trials met criteria for inclusion in this retrospective study. Risk states were defined in relation to phases of daily and multi-day cycles of interictal epileptiform activity that are thought to determine seizure likelihood. We found that the probabilities of risk state transitions depended on the stimulation parameter being changed, the starting seizure risk state, and the stimulated brain region. Changes in two commonly adjusted stimulation parameters, charge density and stimulation frequency, produced opposite effects on risk state transitions depending on seizure localization. Greater variance in acute risk state transitions was explained by state-dependent responsive neurostimulation for bipolar stimulation for neocortical epilepsies and for monopolar stimulation for mesiotemporal epilepsies. Variability in effectiveness of RNS System therapy across individuals may relate, at least partly, to the fact that current treatment paradigms do not account fully for fluctuations in brain states or locations of simulation sites. State-dependence of electrical brain stimulation may inform development of next-generation closed-loop devices that can detect changes in brain state and deliver adaptive, localization-specific patterns of stimulation to maximize therapeutic effects.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To establish whether earlier treatment using direct brain-responsive neurostimulation for medically intractable focal-onset seizures is associated with better mood and Quality of Life (QoL) compared to later treatment intervention. METHODS: Data were retrospectively analyzed from prospective clinical trials of a direct brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS® System) for treatment of adults with medically intractable focal-onset epilepsy. Participants completed the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) yearly through 9â¯years of follow-up and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) through 2â¯years of follow-up. Changes in each assessment after treatment with responsive neurostimulation were calculated for patients who began treatment within 10â¯years of seizure onset (early) and those who began treatment 20â¯years or more after seizure onset (late). RESULTS: The median duration of epilepsy was 18.3â¯years at enrollment. At 9â¯years, both the early (Nâ¯=â¯51) and late (Nâ¯=â¯109) treatment groups experienced similar and significant reductions in the frequency of disabling seizures (73.4% and 77.8%, respectively). The early treatment patients had significant improvements in QoL and mood. However, the late treatment patients not only failed to show these improvements but also declined in the emotional QoL subscale. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with brain-responsive neurostimulation earlier in the course of their epilepsy show significant improvements in multiple domains of QoL and mood that are not observed in patients treated later in the course of their epilepsy despite similar efficacy in seizure reduction. Even with similar and substantial reductions in seizure frequency, the comorbidities of uncontrolled epilepsy may be less responsive to treatment when too many years have passed. The results of this study suggest that, as with resective and ablative surgery, treatment with brain-responsive neurostimulation should be delivered as early as possible in the course of medically resistant epilepsy to maximize the opportunity for improvements in mood and QoL.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Epilepsia Refractaria/terapia , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe seizure outcomes in patients with medically refractory epilepsy who had evidence of bilateral mesial temporal lobe (MTL) seizure onsets and underwent MTL resection based on chronic ambulatory intracranial EEG (ICEEG) data from a direct brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS) system. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients at 17 epilepsy centers with MTL epilepsy who were treated with the RNS System using bilateral MTL leads, and in whom an MTL resection was subsequently performed. Presumed lateralization based on routine presurgical approaches was compared to lateralization determined by RNS System chronic ambulatory ICEEG recordings. The primary outcome was frequency of disabling seizures at last 3-month follow-up after MTL resection compared to seizure frequency 3 months before MTL resection. RESULTS: We identified 157 patients treated with the RNS System with bilateral MTL leads due to presumed bitemporal epilepsy. Twenty-five patients (16%) subsequently had an MTL resection informed by chronic ambulatory ICEEG (mean = 42 months ICEEG); follow-up was available for 24 patients. After MTL resection, the median reduction in disabling seizures at last follow-up was 100% (mean: 94%; range: 50%-100%). Nine patients (38%) had exclusively unilateral electrographic seizures recorded by chronic ambulatory ICEEG and all were seizure-free at last follow-up after MTL resection; eight of nine continued RNS System treatment. Fifteen patients (62%) had bilateral MTL electrographic seizures, had an MTL resection on the more active side, continued RNS System treatment, and achieved a median clinical seizure reduction of 100% (mean: 90%; range: 50%-100%) at last follow-up, with eight of fifteen seizure-free. For those with more than 1 year of follow-up (N = 21), 15 patients (71%) were seizure-free during the most recent year, including all eight patients with unilateral onsets and 7 of 13 patients (54%) with bilateral onsets. SIGNIFICANCE: Chronic ambulatory ICEEG data provide information about lateralization of MTL seizures and can identify additional patients who may benefit from MTL resection.
Asunto(s)
Lobectomía Temporal Anterior/métodos , Epilepsia Refractaria/cirugía , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Epilepsia Refractaria/fisiopatología , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Electrocorticografía , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantables , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Ambulatorio , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore whether chronic electrocorticographic (ECoG) data recorded by a responsive neurostimulation system could be used to assess clinical responses to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: Antiepileptic drugs initiated and maintained for ≥3â¯months by patients participating in clinical trials of the RNS® System were identified. Such "AED Starts" that produced an additional ≥50% reduction in patient-reported clinical seizure frequency were categorized as clinically beneficial, and the remaining as not beneficial. Electrocorticographic features recorded by the RNS® Neurostimulator were analyzed during three periods: 3â¯months before the AED Start, first month after the AED Start, and the first 3â¯months after the AED Start. RESULTS: The most commonly added medications were clobazam (nâ¯=â¯41), lacosamide (nâ¯=â¯96), levetiracetam (nâ¯=â¯31), and pregabalin (nâ¯=â¯25). Across all four medications, there were sufficient clinical data for 193 AED Starts to be included in the analyses, and 59 AED Starts were considered clinically beneficial. The proportion of AED Starts that qualified as clinically beneficial was higher for clobazam (53.7%) and levetiracetam (51.6%) than for lacosamide (18.8%) and pregabalin (12%). Across all AED Starts for which RNS ECoG detection settings were held constant, the clinically beneficial AED Starts were associated with a significantly greater reduction in the detection of epileptiform activity (pâ¯<â¯0.001) at 1 (nâ¯=â¯33) and 3â¯months (nâ¯=â¯30) compared with AED Starts that were not beneficial at 1 (nâ¯=â¯71) and 3â¯months (nâ¯=â¯60). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in interictal spike rate and spectral power (1-125â¯Hz) associated with a clinically beneficial response to an AED Start at 1 (nâ¯=â¯32) and 3â¯months (nâ¯=â¯35) (pâ¯<â¯0.001). These reductions were not observed at either 1 (nâ¯=â¯59) or 3â¯months (nâ¯=â¯60) for AED Starts that were not clinically beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: Significant quantitative changes in ECoG data recorded by the RNS System were observed in patients who experienced an additional clinical response to a new AED. While there was variability across patients in the changes observed, the results suggest that quantitative ECoG data may provide useful information when assessing whether a patient may have a favorable clinical response to an AED.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Electrocorticografía/efectos de los fármacos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacología , Clobazam/farmacología , Clobazam/uso terapéutico , Electrocorticografía/tendencias , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Lacosamida/farmacología , Lacosamida/uso terapéutico , Levetiracetam/farmacología , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pregabalina/farmacología , Pregabalina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the seizure-reduction response and safety of mesial temporal lobe (MTL) brain-responsive stimulation in adults with medically intractable partial-onset seizures of mesial temporal lobe origin. METHODS: Subjects with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) were identified from prospective clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS System, NeuroPace). The seizure reduction over years 2-6 postimplantation was calculated by assessing the seizure frequency compared to a preimplantation baseline. Safety was assessed based on reported adverse events. RESULTS: There were 111 subjects with MTLE; 72% of subjects had bilateral MTL onsets and 28% had unilateral onsets. Subjects had one to four leads placed; only two leads could be connected to the device. Seventy-six subjects had depth leads only, 29 had both depth and strip leads, and 6 had only strip leads. The mean follow-up was 6.1 ± (standard deviation) 2.2 years. The median percent seizure reduction was 70% (last observation carried forward). Twenty-nine percent of subjects experienced at least one seizure-free period of 6 months or longer, and 15% experienced at least one seizure-free period of 1 year or longer. There was no difference in seizure reduction in subjects with and without mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), bilateral MTL onsets, prior resection, prior intracranial monitoring, and prior vagus nerve stimulation. In addition, seizure reduction was not dependent on the location of depth leads relative to the hippocampus. The most frequent serious device-related adverse event was soft tissue implant-site infection (overall rate, including events categorized as device-related, uncertain, or not device-related: 0.03 per implant year, which is not greater than with other neurostimulation devices). SIGNIFICANCE: Brain-responsive stimulation represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy, including patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior MTL resection.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Epilepsia Refractaria/fisiopatología , Epilepsia Refractaria/terapia , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Electroencefalografía , Epilepsias Parciales/fisiopatología , Epilepsias Parciales/terapia , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Dominancia Cerebral/fisiología , Electrodos Implantados , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the seizure-reduction response and safety of brain-responsive stimulation in adults with medically intractable partial-onset seizures of neocortical origin. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures of neocortical origin were identified from prospective clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS System, NeuroPace). The seizure reduction over years 2-6 postimplantation was calculated by assessing the seizure frequency compared to a preimplantation baseline. Safety was assessed based on reported adverse events. Additional analyses considered safety and seizure reduction according to lobe and functional area (e.g., eloquent cortex) of seizure onset. RESULTS: There were 126 patients with seizures of neocortical onset. The average follow-up was 6.1 implant years. The median percent seizure reduction was 70% in patients with frontal and parietal seizure onsets, 58% in those with temporal neocortical onsets, and 51% in those with multilobar onsets (last observation carried forward [LOCF] analysis). Twenty-six percent of patients experienced at least one seizure-free period of 6 months or longer and 14% experienced at least one seizure-free period of 1 year or longer. Patients with lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 77% reduction, LOCF) and those with normal MRI findings (45% reduction, LOCF) benefitted, although the treatment response was more robust in patients with an MRI lesion (p = 0.02, generalized estimating equation [GEE]). There were no differences in the seizure reduction in patients with and without prior epilepsy surgery or vagus nerve stimulation. Stimulation parameters used for treatment did not cause acute or chronic neurologic deficits, even in eloquent cortical areas. The rates of infection (0.017 per patient implant year) and perioperative hemorrhage (0.8%) were not greater than with other neurostimulation devices. SIGNIFICANCE: Brain-responsive stimulation represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy, including adults with seizures of neocortical onset, and those with onsets from eloquent cortex.
Asunto(s)
Corteza Cerebral/fisiopatología , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Epilepsia Refractaria/fisiopatología , Epilepsia Refractaria/terapia , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Electroencefalografía , Neocórtex/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Mapeo Encefálico , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/instrumentación , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Electrodos Implantados , Epilepsias Parciales/fisiopatología , Epilepsias Parciales/terapia , Epilepsia Parcial Compleja/fisiopatología , Epilepsia Parcial Compleja/terapia , Epilepsia Parcial Motora/fisiopatología , Epilepsia Parcial Motora/terapia , Epilepsia Tónico-Clónica/fisiopatología , Epilepsia Tónico-Clónica/terapia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The RNS® System utilizes a cranially implanted neurostimulator attached to leads placed at the seizure focus to provide brain responsive stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial onset epilepsy. Infection and erosion rates related to the cranial implant site were assessed overall and by neurostimulator procedure to determine whether rates increased with additional procedures. METHODS: Infection and erosion rates were calculated as (1) chance per neurostimulator procedure, (2) incidence per patient implant year, and (3) rates for initial and each subsequent neurostimulator implant (generalized estimating equation). RESULTS: In 256 patients followed for an average of 7 years, the infection rate was 3.7% per neurostimulator procedure (n = 31/840), and the rate of erosions was 0.8% per neurostimulator procedure (n = 7/840). Rates did not increase with subsequent neurostimulator procedures (p = 0.66, infection; p = 0.70, erosion). A prior infection or erosion at the implant site did not significantly increase the risk at a later procedure (p ≥ 0.05 for all combinations). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the risk for infection compares favorably to other neurostimulation devices and suggest that rates of infection and erosion do not increase with subsequent neurostimulator replacements.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria/terapia , Contaminación de Equipos , Neuroestimuladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Neuroestimuladores Implantables/tendencias , Epilepsia Refractaria/epidemiología , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Diseño de Equipo/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantables/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Convulsiones/epidemiología , Convulsiones/terapia , Técnicas Estereotáxicas/efectos adversos , Técnicas Estereotáxicas/instrumentación , Técnicas Estereotáxicas/tendencias , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Responsive neurostimulation decreases the frequency of disabling seizures when used as an adjunctive therapy in patients with medically refractory partial-onset seizures. The effect of long-term responsive neurostimulation on neuropsychological performance has not yet been established. METHODS: Neuropsychological data were collected from subjects participating in the open-label arm of a randomized controlled trial of responsive neurostimulation with the RNS(®) System. Primary cognitive outcomes were the Boston Naming Test (BNT) and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning (AVLT) test. Neuropsychological performance was evaluated at baseline and again following 1 and 2 years of RNS System treatment. Follow-up analyses were conducted in patients with seizure onset restricted to either the mesial temporal lobe or neocortex. RESULTS: No significant cognitive declines were observed for any neuropsychological measure through 2 years. When examined as a function of seizure onset region, a double dissociation was found, with significant improvement in naming across all patients (p < 0.0001), and for patients with neocortical seizure onsets (p < 0.0001) but not in patients with mesial temporal lobe (MTL) seizure onsets (p = 0.679). In contrast, a significant improvement in verbal learning was observed across all patients (p = 0.03), and for patients with MTL seizure onsets (p = 0.005) but not for patients with neocortical onsets (p = 0.403). SIGNIFICANCE: Treatment with the RNS System is not associated with cognitive decline when tested through 2 years. In fact, there were small but significant beneficial treatment effects on naming in patients with neocortical onsets and modest improvements in verbal learning for patients with seizure onsets in MTL structures. These results suggest that there are modest cognitive improvements in some domains that vary as a function of the region from which seizures arise.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Epilepsias Parciales/psicología , Epilepsias Parciales/terapia , Neuroestimuladores Implantables , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/instrumentación , Método Doble Ciego , Epilepsias Parciales/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients with suspected mesial temporal lobe (MTL) epilepsy typically undergo inpatient video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring with scalp and/or intracranial electrodes for 1 to 2 weeks to localize and lateralize the seizure focus or foci. Chronic ambulatory electrocorticography (ECoG) in patients with MTL epilepsy may provide additional information about seizure lateralization. This analysis describes data obtained from chronic ambulatory ECoG in patients with suspected bilateral MTL epilepsy in order to assess the time required to determine the seizure lateralization and whether this information could influence treatment decisions. METHODS: Ambulatory ECoG was reviewed in patients with suspected bilateral MTL epilepsy who were among a larger cohort with intractable epilepsy participating in a randomized controlled trial of responsive neurostimulation. Subjects were implanted with bilateral MTL leads and a cranially implanted neurostimulator programmed to detect abnormal interictal and ictal ECoG activity. ECoG data stored by the neurostimulator were reviewed to determine the lateralization of electrographic seizures and the interval of time until independent bilateral MTL electrographic seizures were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-two subjects were implanted with bilateral MTL leads and followed for 4.7 years on average (median 4.9 years). Independent bilateral MTL electrographic seizures were recorded in 84%. The average time to record bilateral electrographic seizures in the ambulatory setting was 41.6 days (median 13 days, range 0-376 days). Sixteen percent had only unilateral electrographic seizures after an average of 4.6 years of recording. SIGNIFICANCE: About one third of the subjects implanted with bilateral MTL electrodes required >1 month of chronic ambulatory ECoG before the first contralateral MTL electrographic seizure was recorded. Some patients with suspected bilateral MTL seizures had only unilateral electrographic seizures. Chronic ambulatory ECoG in patients with suspected bilateral MTL seizures provides data in a naturalistic setting, may complement data from inpatient video-EEG monitoring, and can contribute to treatment decisions.
Asunto(s)
Ondas Encefálicas/fisiología , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/patología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/fisiopatología , Lateralidad Funcional/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Electrodos Implantados , Femenino , Hipocampo/patología , Hipocampo/fisiopatología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The primary efficacy and safety measures from a trial of responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy were previously published. In this report, the findings from the same study are presented for quality of life, which was a supportive analysis, and for mood, which was assessed as a secondary safety endpoint. METHODS: The study was a multicenter randomized controlled double-blinded trial of responsive neurostimulation in 191 patients with medically resistant focal epilepsy. During a 4-month postimplant blinded period, patients were randomized to receive responsive stimulation or sham stimulation, after which all patients received responsive neurostimulation in open label to complete 2years. Quality of life (QOL) and mood surveys were administered during the baseline period, at the end of the blinded period, and at year 1 and year 2 of the open label period. RESULTS: The treatment and sham groups did not differ at baseline. Compared with baseline, QOL improved in both groups at the end of the blinded period and also at 1year and 2years, when all patients were treated. At 2years, 44% of patients reported meaningful improvements in QOL, and 16% reported declines. There were no overall adverse changes in mood or in suicidality across the study. Findings were not related to changes in seizures and antiepileptic drugs, and patients with mesial temporal seizure onsets and those with neocortical seizure onsets both experienced improvements in QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with targeted responsive neurostimulation does not adversely affect QOL or mood and may be associated with improvements in QOL in patients, including those with seizures of either mesial temporal origin or neocortical origin.
Asunto(s)
Afecto , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Epilepsia Refractaria/terapia , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Neuroestimuladores Implantables , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Afecto/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Método Doble Ciego , Epilepsia Refractaria/diagnóstico , Epilepsia Refractaria/psicología , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of responsive stimulation at the seizure focus as an adjunctive therapy to reduce the frequency of seizures in adults with medically intractable partial onset seizures arising from one or two seizure foci. METHODS: Randomized multicenter double-blinded controlled trial of responsive focal cortical stimulation (RNS System). Subjects with medically intractable partial onset seizures from one or two foci were implanted, and 1 month postimplant were randomized 1:1 to active or sham stimulation. After the fifth postimplant month, all subjects received responsive stimulation in an open label period (OLP) to complete 2 years of postimplant follow-up. RESULTS: All 191 subjects were randomized. The percent change in seizures at the end of the blinded period was -37.9% in the active and -17.3% in the sham stimulation group (p = 0.012, Generalized Estimating Equations). The median percent reduction in seizures in the OLP was 44% at 1 year and 53% at 2 years, which represents a progressive and significant improvement with time (p < 0.0001). The serious adverse event rate was not different between subjects receiving active and sham stimulation. Adverse events were consistent with the known risks of an implanted medical device, seizures, and of other epilepsy treatments. There were no adverse effects on neuropsychological function or mood. SIGNIFICANCE: Responsive stimulation to the seizure focus reduced the frequency of partial-onset seizures acutely, showed improving seizure reduction over time, was well tolerated, and was acceptably safe. The RNS System provides an additional treatment option for patients with medically intractable partial-onset seizures.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/tendencias , Epilepsias Parciales/diagnóstico , Epilepsias Parciales/terapia , Neuroestimuladores Implantables/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Epilepsias Parciales/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This paper outlines the therapeutic rationale and neurosurgical targeting technique for bilateral, closed-loop, thalamocortical stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, a severe form of childhood-onset epilepsy. Thalamic stimulation can be an effective treatment for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, but complete seizure control is rarely achieved. Outcomes may be improved by stimulating areas beyond the thalamus, including cortex, but the optimal targets are unknown. We aimed to identify a cortical target by synthesizing prior neuroimaging studies, and to use this knowledge to advance a dual thalamic (centromedian) and cortical (frontal) approach for closed-loop stimulation. Multi-modal brain network maps from three group-level studies of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome were averaged to define the area of peak overlap: simultaneous EEG-functional MRI of generalized paroxysmal fast activity, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET of cortical hypometabolism and diffusion MRI structural connectivity associated with clinical efficacy in a previous trial of thalamic deep brain stimulation. The resulting 'hotspot' was used as a seed in a normative functional MRI connectivity analysis to identify connected networks. Intracranial electrophysiology was reviewed in the first two trial patients undergoing bilateral implantations guided by this hotspot. Simultaneous recordings from cortex and thalamus were analysed for presence and synchrony of epileptiform activity. The peak overlap was in bilateral premotor cortex/caudal middle frontal gyrus. Functional connectivity of this hotspot revealed a distributed network of frontoparietal cortex resembling the diffuse abnormalities seen on EEG-functional MRI and PET. Intracranial electrophysiology showed characteristic epileptiform activity of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in both the cortical hotspot and thalamus; most detected events occurred first in the cortex before appearing in the thalamus. Premotor frontal cortex shows peak involvement in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and functional connectivity of this region resembles the wider epileptic brain network. Thus, it may be an optimal target for a range of neuromodulation therapies, including thalamocortical stimulation and emerging non-invasive treatments like focused ultrasound or transcranial magnetic stimulation. Compared to thalamus-only approaches, the addition of this cortical target may allow more rapid detections of seizures, more diverse stimulation paradigms and broader modulation of the epileptic network. A prospective, multi-centre trial of closed-loop thalamocortical stimulation for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is currently underway.
RESUMEN
Neuromodulation devices are approved in the United States for the treatment of movement disorders, epilepsy, pain, and depression, and are used off-label for other neurologic indications. By 2035, advances in our understanding of neuroanatomical networks and in the mechanism of action of stimulation, coupled with developments in material science, miniaturization, energy storage, and delivery, will expand the use of neuromodulation devices. Neuromodulation approaches are flexible and modifiable. Stimulation can be targeted to a dysfunctional brain focus, region, or network, and can be delivered as a single treatment, continuously, according to a duty cycle, or in response to physiologic changes. Programming can be titrated and modified based on the clinical response or a physiologic biomarker. In addition to keeping pace with clinical and technological developments, neurologists in 2035 will need to navigate complex ethical and economic considerations to ensure access to neuromodulation technology for a rapidly expanding population of patients. This article provides an overview of systems in use today and those that are anticipated and highlights the opportunities and challenges for the future, some of which are technical, but most of which will be addressed by learning about brain networks, and from rapidly growing experience with neuromodulation devices.
Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Epilepsia , Neurología , Encéfalo/fisiología , Encefalopatías/terapia , Epilepsia/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
Relationships between reproductive hormone levels, bone turnover marker levels, bone mineral density, and rates of bone loss were evaluated in premenopausal women with epilepsy taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs: phenytoin or carbamazepine) or lamotrigine. Calciotropic and reproductive hormone levels, bone turnover marker levels, and bone mineral density were measured at baseline and 1 year. Bone mineral density did not differ between groups. Serum calcium (P<0.001) and estrone (P<0.001) levels were lower in the EIAED group. Sex hormone-binding globulin levels were higher (P<0.001) and percentage free estradiol levels were lower (P<0.001) in the EIAED group. We detected no relationship between bone mineral density change and calciotropic hormone or bone turnover marker levels. Women with higher sex hormone-binding globulin and lower free estradiol levels sustained more bone loss at the total hip (P=0.04 and P=0.02) and a trend toward more bone loss at the lumbar spine (P=0.07 and P=0.08). These findings suggest that lower estrogen levels may contribute to bone loss in premenopausal women with epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Carbamazepina/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/sangre , Estradiol/sangre , Fenitoína/uso terapéutico , Vitamina D/sangre , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacología , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Carbamazepina/farmacología , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Lamotrigina , Fenitoína/farmacología , Triazinas/farmacología , Triazinas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to explore using ECoG spectrogram images for training reliable cross-patient electrographic seizure classifiers, and to characterize the classifiers' test accuracy as a function of amount of training data. ECoG channels in â¼138,000 time-series ECoG records from 113 patients were converted to RGB spectrogram images. Using an unsupervised spectrogram image clustering technique, manual labeling of 138,000 ECoG records (each with up to 4 ECoG channels) was completed in 320 h, which is an estimated 5 times faster than manual labeling without ECoG clustering. For training supervised classifier models, five random folds of data were created; with each fold containing 72, 18, and 23 patients' data for model training, validation and testing respectively. Five convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, including two with residual connections, were trained. Cross-patient classification accuracies and F1 scores improved with model complexity, with the shallowest 6-layer model (with â¼1.5 million trainable parameters) producing a class-balanced seizure/non-seizure classification accuracy of 87.9% on ECoG channels and the deepest ResNet50-based model (with â¼23.5 million trainable parameters) producing a classification accuracy of 95.7%. The trained ResNet50-based model additionally had 93.5% agreement in scores with an independent expert labeller. Visual inspection of gradient-based saliency maps confirmed that the models' classifications were based on relevant portions of the spectrogram images. Further, by repeating training experiments with data from varying number of patients, it was found that ECoG spectrogram images from just 10 patients were sufficient to train ResNet50-based models with 88% cross-patient accuracy, while at least 30 patients' data was required to produce cross-patient classification accuracies of >90%.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Understanding the acute effects of responsive stimulation (AERS) based on intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings in ambulatory patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy, and correlating these with changes in clinical seizure frequency, may help clinicians more efficiently optimize responsive stimulation settings. METHODS: In patients implanted with the NeuroPace® RNS® System, acute changes in iEEG spectral power following active and sham stimulation periods were quantified and compared within individual iEEG channels. Additionally, acute stimulation-induced acute iEEG changes were compared within iEEG channels before and after patients experienced substantial reductions in clinical seizure frequency. RESULTS: Responsive stimulation resulted in a 20.7% relative decrease in spectral power in the 2-4 second window following active stimulation, compared to sham stimulation. On several detection channels, the AERS features changed when clinical outcomes improved but were relatively stable otherwise. AERS change direction associated with clinical improvement was generally consistent within detection channels. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy treated with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation showed an acute stimulation related reduction in iEEG spectral power that was associated with reductions in clinical seizure frequency. SIGNIFICANCE: Identifying favorable stimulation related changes in iEEG activity could help physicians to more rapidly optimize stimulation settings for each patient.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Epilepsia Refractaria/fisiopatología , Epilepsias Parciales/fisiopatología , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of using epileptiform events detected by continuous electrocorticographic monitoring via a brain-responsive neurostimulation system to supplement patient-maintained seizure diaries. METHODS: Data were retrospectively analyzed from a randomized controlled trial of brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS® System) for adjunctive treatment of medically intractable focal onset seizures in 191 subjects. The long-term (≥3 months) correspondence between daily counts of diary-reported seizures and device-recorded "long epileptiform events" (LEs), a proxy for electrographic seizures (ESs), was assessed using cross-correlation and logistic generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: Diary-reported seizures and LEs significantly co-varied across days in 124 patients whose detection settings were held constant, with a significantly higher correlation in 54 patients (44 %) whose LEs were usually ESs (high concordance patients). There were more days in which LEs were detected than days in which patients reported a seizure (positive predictive value (PPV): 34 %). On days when there were no LEs, there were typically no diary-reported seizures (negative predictive value (NPV): 90 %). In patients with a high concordance between LEs and ESs, the PPV and NPV were both slightly higher, 43 % (35-52 %) and 93 % (95 % CI: 86-97 %) respectively. CONCLUSION: Although LEs can substantially outnumber diary reported seizures, the high across-day correlation and strong NPV between LEs and diary seizures suggests that LEs recorded by the RNS® System could potentially supplement seizure diaries by providing an objective biomarker for relative seizure burden.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria/terapia , Electroencefalografía , Neuroestimuladores Implantables , Convulsiones/terapia , Adulto , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Electrocorticografía/métodos , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Loss of control (LOC) is a pervasive feature of binge eating, which contributes significantly to the growing epidemic of obesity; approximately 80 million US adults are obese. Brain-responsive neurostimulation guided by the delta band was previously found to block binge-eating behavior in mice. Following novel preclinical work and a human case study demonstrating an association between the delta band and reward anticipation, the US Food and Drug Administration approved an Investigational Device Exemption for a first-in-human study. OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility, safety, and nonfutility of brain-responsive neurostimulation for LOC eating in treatment-refractory obesity. METHODS: This is a single-site, early feasibility study with a randomized, single-blinded, staggered-onset design. Six subjects will undergo bilateral brain-responsive neurostimulation of the nucleus accumbens for LOC eating using the RNS® System (NeuroPace Inc). Eligible participants must have treatment-refractory obesity with body mass index ≥ 45 kg/m2. Electrophysiological signals of LOC will be characterized using real-time recording capabilities coupled with synchronized video monitoring. Effects on other eating disorder pathology, mood, neuropsychological profile, metabolic syndrome, and nutrition will also be assessed. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: Safety/feasibility of brain-responsive neurostimulation of the nucleus accumbens will be examined. The primary success criterion is a decrease of ≥1 LOC eating episode/week based on a 28-d average in ≥50% of subjects after 6 mo of responsive neurostimulation. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to use brain-responsive neurostimulation for obesity; this approach represents a paradigm shift for intractable mental health disorders.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Animales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Ratones , Núcleo Accumbens , Obesidad/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate development of components of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and PCOS in women with epilepsy initiating valproate or lamotrigine therapy. METHODS: Female individuals with epilepsy and regular menstrual cycles were eligible for this prospective study. Participants were randomized to 12 months of valproate (n = 225) or lamotrigine (n = 222) therapy. Serum androgen levels were measured every 3 months. Urinary pregnanediol glucuronide levels were measured weekly for two 3-month periods. The primary end point was development of PCOS components (ie, hyperandrogenism or ovulatory dysfunction). A post hoc analysis was conducted in women more than 2 years after menarche (177 lamotrigine, (HA) 186 valproate) to exclude OD the confounding effect of puberty. RESULTS: More women in the valproate group than the lamotrigine group developed (OD) in the prospective (54% valproate, 38% lamotrigine; p = 0.010) and the post hoc (HA) analyses (36% valproate, 23% lamotrigine; p = 0.007). More women in the valproate group than the lamotrigine group developed PCOS (9 vs 2%; p = 0.007). Development of HA was more frequent with OD valproate than lamotrigine among those initiating treatment at age younger than 26 years (44% valproate, 23% lamotrigine; p = 0.002) but was similar if treatment was started at age 26 years or older (24% valproate, 22% lamotrigine). INTERPRETATION: Development of HA occurred more frequently with valproate than lamotrigine, especially if medication was started at age younger than 26 years.