G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely preventable with routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy; however, interval cancers arising from precancerous lesions missed by standard colonoscopy still occur. An increased adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been found to be inversely associated with interval cancers. The G-EYE device includes a reusable balloon integrated at the distal tip of a standard colonoscope, which flattens haustral folds, centralizes the colonoscope's optics, and reduces bowel slippage. The insufflated balloon also aims to enhance visualization of the colon during withdrawal, thereby increasing the ADR. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, international, multicenter study (11 centers), patients (aged ≥50 years) referred to colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or changes in bowel habits were randomized to undergo either balloon-assisted colonoscopy by using an insufflated balloon during withdrawal or standard high-definition colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was the ADR. RESULTS: One thousand patients were enrolled between May 2014 and September 2016 to undergo colonoscopy by experienced endoscopists; 803 were finally analyzed (standard colonoscopy n = 396; balloon-assisted colonoscopy n = 407). Baseline parameters were similar in both groups. Balloon-assisted colonoscopy provided a 48.0% ADR compared with 37.5% in the standard colonoscopy group (28% increase; P = .0027). Additionally, balloon-assisted colonoscopy provided for a significant increase in detection of advanced (P = .0033) flat adenomas (P < .0001) and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (P = .0026). CONCLUSION: Balloon-assisted colonoscopy yielded a higher ADR and increased the detection of advanced, flat, and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps when compared with standard colonoscopy. Improved detection by the G-EYE device could impact the quality of CRC screening by reducing miss rates and consequently reducing interval cancer incidence. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01917513.).

The APC I1307K allele conveys a significant increased risk for cancer.

This study is the first attempt to evaluate the association between the APC I1307K variant and overall cancer risk. It is unique in both its large sample size and in the reliability of data in the control group. The findings described in this article have major implications in terms of identifying asymptomatic individuals who are at increased risk to harbor cancer and therefore targeted to be enrolled in specific early detection and prevention programs. The prevalence of the APC I1307K missense mutation among Ashkenazi Jews is ∼ 6%. Carriers are at an increased risk for colorectal neoplasia. In this study, we examined the association of this variant with non-colorectal cancers. Consecutive 13,013 healthy subjects who underwent screening at the Integrated Cancer Prevention Center between 2006 and 2014 were enrolled. This population was supplemented with 1,611 cancer patients from the same institution. Demographics, medical history, and pathological data were recorded. Mortality data were obtained from the Ministry of Health's registry. The prevalence of APC I1307K in cancer patients and healthy subjects was compared. The APC I1307K variant was detected in 189 (11.8%) cancer patients compared to 614 (4.7%) healthy subjects, reflecting an adjusted age and sex odds ratio (OR) of 2.53 (p < 0.0001). History of two or more cancer types was associated with a positive carrier prevalence (OR = 4.38 p < 0.0001). Males had significantly increased carrier prevalence in lung, urologic, pancreatic, and skin cancers. The carrier prevalence among females was significantly higher only in breast and skin cancers. Female carriers developed cancer at a significantly older age compared to non-carriers (average 62.7 years vs. 57.8, respectively, p = 0.027), had better survival rates (HR = 0.58, p = 0.022) and overall increased longevity (average age of death 78.8 vs. 70.4 years, respectively, p = 0.003). In conclusion, the APC I1307K variant is a reliable marker for overall cancer risk (OR 2.53). Further studies are needed to evaluate its use for specific cancer types-particularly in males. Female carriers have better prognosis and increased lifespan.

Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Although colonoscopy is the "gold standard" for colorectal cancer screening, a significant number of adenomas are still missed during standard colonoscopy, often because they are hidden behind colonic folds and flexures. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of a novel balloon colonoscope (G-EYE endoscope; Smart Medical Systems, Ra'anana, Israel) to increase adenoma detection and reduce the miss rate compared with standard colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled study in patients (age ≥ 40 years) undergoing colonoscopy for screening or diagnostic work-up (including surveillance). Patients underwent same-day, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy. Patients in Group A underwent standard colonoscopy followed by balloon colonoscopy, and patients in Group B underwent balloon colonoscopy followed by the standard technique. The adenoma detection and miss rates were compared between the two colonoscopy procedures. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were enrolled and randomized into Group A (n = 60) or Group B (n = 66). The adenoma miss rate of balloon colonoscopy was significantly lower than that of standard colonoscopy (7.5 % vs. 44.7 %; P = 0.0002). The detection of additional adenomas by balloon colonoscopy was significant (81.0 %; P = 0.0002), in particular, the relative amount of adenomas detected in the ascending colon by balloon colonoscopy was 41 % versus 14 % for standard colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: A novel balloon colonoscopy technique detected significantly more adenomas than standard colonoscopy, and missed fewer adenomas. Balloon colonoscopy has the potential to increase the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance colonoscopy.

Data From a One-Stop-Shop Comprehensive Cancer Screening Center.

PURPOSE: Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally. However, by implementing evidence-based prevention strategies, 30%-50% of cancers can be detected early with improved outcomes. At the integrated cancer prevention center (ICPC), we aimed to increase early detection by screening for multiple cancers during one visit. METHODS: Self-referred asymptomatic individuals, age 20-80 years, were included prospectively. Clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological data were obtained by multiple specialists, and further testing was obtained based on symptoms, family history, individual risk factors, and abnormalities identified during the visit. Follow-up recommendations and diagnoses were given as appropriate. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2019, 8,618 men and 8,486 women, average age 47.11 ± 11.71 years, were screened. Of 259 cancers detected through the ICPC, 49 (19.8%) were stage 0, 113 (45.6%) stage I, 30 (12.1%) stage II, 25 (10.1%) stage III, and 31(12.5%) stage IV. Seventeen cancers were missed, six of which were within the scope of the ICPC. Compared with the Israeli registry, at the ICPC, less cancers were diagnosed at a metastatic stage for breast (none v 3.7%), lung (6.7% v 11.4%), colon (20.0% v 46.2%), prostate (5.6% v 10.5%), and cervical/uterine (none v 8.5%) cancers. When compared with the average stage of detection in the United States, detection was earlier for breast, lung, prostate, and female reproductive cancers. Patient satisfaction rate was 8.35 ± 1.85 (scale 1-10). CONCLUSION: We present a proof of concept study for a one-stop-shop approach to cancer screening in a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. We successfully detected cancers at an early stage, which has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality as well as offer substantial cost savings.[Media: see text].

Small bowel polyposis syndromes.

Intestinal polyposis syndromes are relatively rare. However, it is important for clinicians to recognize the potential risks of these syndromes. Based on histology, these syndromes can be classified mainly into hamartomatous polyposis syndromes and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), which affects mainly the large intestine. This review discusses the clinical manifestations and underlying genetics of the most common small intestinal polyposis syndromes: Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), juvenile polyposis (JP), PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS), and the small intestinal implications of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

[Surveillance of patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia].

The position paper recommends specific guidelines for surveillance of patients with atrophic gastritis, gastric intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia. Although gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia are recognized as premalignant conditions, there is insufficient data to recommend routine endoscopic surveillance. However, when endoscopy is performed, it should include topographic mapping for biopsies of the entire stomach, particularly the lesser curvature. Patients with confirmed high grade dysplasia should be considered for gastrectomy or local endoscopic resection because of high probability for development of adenocarcinoma.

[The Israeli recommendations for diagnosis, management, follow-up and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) in familial adenomatous polyposis].

Approximately 30% of colorectal cancers exhibit familial clustering. We recognize different types of polyps and polyposis syndromes that are classified according to the histological diagnosis. We differentiate between adenomas, hyperplastic, and hamartomatous polyps as well as between syndromes that are manifested by 10-100 or above 100 polyps. Only about 1% of colorectaL cancers (CRCs) are due to adenomatous polyposis syndrome. It is essential to distinguish between these syndromes as each has a different mode of presentation, spectrum of signs and symptoms and cancer risk. With the knowledge that is accumulating we now have the tools to lower the risk of cancer by performing specific screening programs that are tailored to each syndrome specifically. We present the Israeli guidelines for management of adenomatous polyposis, based on the American and European experience and consensus. We outline the importance of mutti-sectorial team work that includes the family practitioner, gastroenterologist, pathologist, genetic counselor, surgeon and social worker.

[Surveillance of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases].

This position paper of the Section of Gastrointestinal Oncology of the Israeli Gastroenterological Association recommends specific guidelines for colorectal cancer surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a severe complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), generally developing into a longstanding disease. The Lifetime prevalence of CRC in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients is estimated to be 2% after 10 years, 8% after 20 years, and even 18% after 30 years of extensive disease. Screening colonoscopy should be initiated 8-10 years after onset of symptoms in extensive UC patients (pancolitis), and after 15 years in patients with left-sided colitis (UC or Crohn's). Surveillance should continue periodically at an interval of every 1 to 2 years. Surveillance colonoscopies should be performed in combination with an extensive biopsy protocol. High-grade dysplasia (HGD) in flat mucosa or a dysplasia associated Lesion or mass (DALM) is considered an indication for colectomy when the pathological findings are confirmed by a second experienced pathologist. Further research is directed toward improving detection of dysplasia during colonoscopy through the use of novel endoscopic imaging techniques which are hoped to impact the approach to cancer prevention in patients with IBD.

[Surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus].

Barret's esophagus (BE) is defined as a situation in which the distal esophageal squamous epithelium was replaced by columnar epithelium, with or without goblet cells. BE is considered a significant risk factor for the development of esophageal cancer, however, screening is recommended only for high risk patients. The new guidelines determine the proper terminology of the endoscopic appearance of BE and the way that biopsies should be taken. After BE is confirmed, surveillance is extremely important as its performance has been shown to prevent cancer and death. The surveillance is based on the endoscopic and pathological findings, highlighting the importance of advanced endoscopy and specialized pathology expertise. The guidelines determine the place of the endoscopic ablative technology and specialized surgery in these patients.

[Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, surveillance and prevention of cancer in patients with familial non-adenomatous polyposis].

Approximately 30% of colorectal cancers exhibit familial clustering. Currently, we recognize a number of different types of polyps and polyposis syndromes that are classified according to the histology of the typical polyp. We differentiate between adenomas, hyperplastic, and hamartomatous polyps as well as between syndromes that are manifested by 10-100 or above 100 polyps. It is essential to distinguish between these syndromes as each has a different mode of presentation, spectrum of signs and symptoms and cancer risk associated with them. With the knowledge accumulating, we now have the tools to lower the risk of cancer by performing specific screening programs that are tailored to each syndrome. In these guidelines we focus on the non-adenomatous polyps, hyperplastic and hamartomatous polyposis syndromes. We outline the importance of multi-sector team work that includes the family practitioner, gastroenterologist, pathologist, genetic counselor, surgeon, and social worker.

[Management of hereditary non-polyposis syndrome (Lynch syndrome)].

Genetic background is suspected in about 20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, in which either genetic polymorphisms or Mendelian heritable factors are involved. Currently known CRC syndromes include various polyposis syndromes (<1% of total CRC cases) and Lynch syndrome (LS), previously termed hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, comprises 3-5% of all CRC cases). LS is caused by dominantly inherited mutations in the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2, and results in a very high lifetime risk (approximately 80%) for CRC and significantly increased risk for extracolonic tumors in regions such as the endometrium, ovary, urinary tract, lymphoma, stomach, pancreas small bowel and brain. Carriers are advised to undergo specific medical and intense endoscopic surveillance. Diagnosis of carriers is mandatory for providing appropriate recommendations for surveillance, which was shown to decrease morbidity, mortality and health costs. Diagnosis of LS dictates preventive surgical procedures for the colon endometrium and ovaries, and assists in decisions regarding CRC chemotherapy. Family members' screening and surveillance is determined by mutation testing. Diagnosis is performed, based on the clinical selection criteria of Amsterdam and Bethesda and according to typical histology of tumor tissue. Initially, tumor testing is performed by either microsatellite instability (MSI), immunohistochemistry (IHC) or both. Certain Jewish ethnical subgroups may undergo founder mutation testing. Ultimate identification of the mutation by sequencing and MLPA is performed according to the IHC results. In families with hereditary CRC criteria, in which workup for LS is negative, the surveillance protocol will be determined by an experienced multidisciplinary team, including a formal genetic consultation.

First report of screening an asymptomatic population for cancer: the yield of an integrated cancer prevention center.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. The most effective way to combat cancer is by prevention and early detection. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome of screening an asymptomatic population for the presence of benign and neoplastic lesions. METHODS: Routine screening tests for prevention and/or early detection of 11 common cancers were conducted in 300 consecutive asymptomatic apparently healthy adults aged 25-77 years. Other tests were performed as indicated. RESULTS: Malignant and benign lesions were found in 3.3% and 5% of the screenees, respectively, compared to 1.7% in the general population. The most common lesions were in the gastrointestinal tract followed by skin, urogenital tract and breast. Advanced age and a family history of a malignancy were associated with increased risk for cancer with an odds ratio of 9 and 3.5, respectively (95% confidence interval 1.1-71 and 0.9-13, respectively). Moreover, high serum C-reactive protein levels and polymorphisms in the APC and CD24 genes indicated high cancer risk. When two of the polymorphisms existed in an individual, the risk for a malignant lesion was extremely high (23.1%; OR 14, 95% CI 2.5-78). CONCLUSIONS: Screening asymptomatic subjects identifies a significant number of neoplastic lesions at an early stage. Incorporating data on genetic polymorphisms in the APC and CD24 genes can further identify individuals who are at increased risk for cancer. Cancer can be prevented and/or diagnosed at an early stage using the screening facilities of a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic.

[Surveillance of patients after colonoscopic polypectomy and curative resection of colorectal cancer].

The position paper of the GastrointestinaL Oncology Section of the Israeli Gastroenterological Association recommends specific guidelines for surveillance after polypectomy and curative resection of colorectal cancer. Periodic colonoscopy is necessary for early detection of metachronous lesions or cancer recurrence. After polypectomy of a simple hyperplasic polyp, colonoscopy is repeated in 10 years. Small adenoma dictates colonoscopy after 5-10 years. In the case of advanced adenoma, repeat coLonoscopy is to be conducted after 3 years. The personal impression of the colonoscopists may advance procedures to an earlier colonoscopy, especially after piecemeal polypectomy of a large sessile polyp. Fecal occult blood test or any other screening procedures are not needed after polypectomy. Colonoscopy, carcinoembrionic antigen examination (CEA) and liver imaging are necessary for surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer, and improve survival. Total colonoscopy should be performed before the operation or in cases with obstructive carcinoma, colonic imaging should be completed with virtual colonoscopy. Total colonoscopy should be performed 3-6 months after surgery if not conducted previously. The next follow-up is needed 3 and 5 years after the operation. After low anterior resection, the recurrence rate may be high and patients who have not undergone radiation therapy nor mesorectal resection should undergo sigmoidoscopy every 3-6 months for 2-3 years after surgery.

Malignant transformation of normal enterocytes following downregulation of Bak expression.

Bak is a pro-apoptotic gene, which plays an important role in the multi-step process of gastrointestinal tumorigenesis. We hypothesized that downregulation of Bak expression in normal enterocytes will result in a transformed phenotype. The nontumorigenic intestinal epithelial cell line (IEC18) was transfected with the vector pMV12-AS-bak (encoding anti-sense bak). Three clones, with Bak protein levels similar to those seen in colon cancer cell lines and significantly lower than those found in the parental cells, were further evaluated. The three clones proliferated faster, demonstrated anchorage-independent growth in soft agar and a higher saturation density and plating efficiency. Furthermore, when injected into nude mice, these cells generated tumors after approximately 2-3 weeks. The cells were more resistant to the induction of apoptosis by sulindac sulfide and sulindac sulfone but more sensitive to COX 2 inhibitors (celecoxib and nimesulide). The levels of p16, cyclin D1 and COX 2 were higher in the three transformed clones. In summary,downregulation of Bak expression in normal enterocytes contributes to abnormal growth and tumorigenesis. COX 2 inhibitors may serve as important agents in the prevention and treatment of CRC as they only inhibit the growth of malignant cells.

No association between Helicobacter pylori infection or CagA-bearing strains and glaucoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accumulating evidence indicates that a variety of infections contribute to the pathogenesis of glaucoma. The role of Helicobacter pylori infection in glaucoma is controversial. DESIGN: Prospective, population-based study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with various types of glaucoma and a control group of patients with cataract. METHODS: We evaluated seropositivity to H. pylori and to its cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) product in patients with various types of glaucoma and compared the findings to those of a control group of patients with cataract. RESULTS: H. pylori infection and CagA seropositivity were detected in 31/51 (60.8%) and 26/51 (51%) glaucoma patients compared with 22/36 (61.1%) and 19/36 (52%) control patients, respectively (P=0.88, 0.67, not significant). Similar rates of H. pylori infection and CagA-positive strain were found in all glaucoma subgroups, and none of them was statistically different from those of controls. CONCLUSIONS: Neither H. pylori infection nor seropositivity for virulent CagA-bearing H. pylori strains have significant association with the occurrence of glaucoma of any type.

Of mice and men: a novel dietary supplement for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Curcumin, green tea polyphenols and selenium possess anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties. Individually they have demonstrated some efficacy in animal models and human subjects with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Coltect [Curcumin (500 mg), green tea (250 mg) and selenium (100 µg)] in vivo and in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Each component was compared to placebo in a DSS mice colitis model. The efficacy was validated in a 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) rat colitis model. Twenty patients with mild-to-moderate UC received two Coltect tablets twice daily for 8 weeks. Enrollees underwent sigmoidoscopy at study entrance and closure, and physical and laboratory evaluation at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: Coltect showed a synergistic therapeutic effect in the DSS and TNBS models. Disease activity was significantly higher in the placebo versus the treated group (p < 0.05). Selenium was the more active component. The contribution of green tea was minor. In the TNBS model, the Wallace scores for macroscopic lesions were 4.8 ± 1.5 (treatment) and 8.2 ± 0.5 (placebo) (p = 0.01). In humans, Coltect was well tolerated and effective. Fourteen subjects (70%) improved: nine (45%) went into complete remission, four (20%) experienced marked improvement and one (5%) experienced moderate improvement at the end of the trial. Clinical activity index decreased significantly at 4 and 8 weeks (p < 0.001). Two patients had no change in their symptoms, and one withdrew after 4 weeks. Flare-up in four subjects caused three to withdraw from the study after less than 4 weeks. Endoscopic improvement was observed in 11 (69%) patients, and four patients (25%) achieved complete remission. CONCLUSIONS: Coltect may serve as a first-line or add-on therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate UC.

[Symptom evaluation as an efficient diagnostic tool for upper abdominal diseases].

INTRODUCTION: GERD and dyspepsia are common conditions, affecting approximately 25-40% of the general population. In the absence of alarm symptoms, the current recommended policy in young dyspeptic patients is a "test and treat" strategy for H. pylori. On the other hand, in GERD patients, a therapeutic trial with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is the treatment of choice. AIM: This study aimed to create short and simple clinical algorithms, for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with upper gastrointestinal complaints. METHODS: Data mining models and algorithms (neural networks, decision trees and logistic regression) were used to create a diagnostic symptom questionnaire to classify the patients into one of two diagnostic groups: GERD vs. non-GERD. The questionnaire was validated against endoscopic and clinical diagnoses of 132 patients in a cross-sectional study, and was designed to yield a "GERD score". The clinical and economical benefits of the new algorithm were evaluated in primary care clinics in Israel. RESULTS: The symptoms chosen for the diagnostic questionnaire were heartburn, acid regurgitation, sour oral taste, aggravation of symptoms after heavy meals, relief of symptoms by antacids, and nocturnal reflux. The use of the algorithm by primary care physicians improved clinical outcomes and reduced health resources consumption. CONCLUSIONS: This new short algorithm was found to be useful and easy to apply in clinical practice. The questionnaire can be also implemented in computerized medical systems.