Factors of importance for the development of evidence-based practice amongst radiographers in public healthcare.

INTRODUCTION: Research evidence suggests that radiographers often rely on previous training, traditional practices, work experience and protocols developed within the department rather than up-to-date research-based evidence in their daily practice. The aim of the study was to investigate factors that might impact the development of evidence-based practice amongst radiographers in clinical public settings in the Nordic countries. METHODS: An online survey was performed amongst 640 radiographers in four Nordic countries. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the odds ratio (OR) of facilitators for and barriers to radiographers' development of evidence-based practice. RESULTS: A reflective approach in everyday practice and being aware of the current research evidence were significant facilitators for radiographers' development of evidence-based practice (OR ≥ 3.10, p < 0.001). Discussing research with colleagues and managers was associated with engagement in the utilisation of evidence (OR 7.21, p < 0.001). Difficulties in evaluating research evidence represented the only significant barrier (OR 1.84, p 0.009). CONCLUSION: A critical approach amongst radiographers in their performance of healthcare in diagnostic imaging, and the development of their academic skills to improve awareness of the available research evidence are important factors for developing evidence-based practice in radiography. Leadership is crucial for the engagement of radiographers in the development of evidence-based practice. Management should facilitate the development of a learning culture within diagnostic imaging. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results provide suggestions for the development of a learning culture, proactive and person-centred leadership, and strategic management for the provision of research infrastructure, all of which contribute to the further integration of evidence-based practice in radiography. Also, the study results suggest the importance of shared responsibility for creating a critical fellowship in diagnostic imaging.

Virtual reality simulation for mastery learning of wrist radiograph technique.

INTRODUCTION: Virtual reality (VR) simulation is a technology that empowers students and radiographers to practice radiography in a virtual environment that resembles real-life clinical scenarios. The purpose of this randomised study was to examine the relationship between clinical specialty and the ability to assess and obtain a lateral wrist radiograph using a VR simulator. METHODS: Radiographers and radiography students were recruited from the EFRS Research Hub at the 2024 European Congress of Radiology. After completing a background questionnaire, participants entered a VR simulator where they assessed lateral wrist radiographs and, if necessary, attempted a retake. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the relationship between specialties and participants' ability to assess positioning and perform retakes. Rank-biserial correlation estimated the relationship between participants' ability to reposition the VR patient and their VR experience and self-perceived confidence in wrist radiograph positioning. RESULTS: The cohort included 173 participants from 14 specialties across 21 countries. There was a borderline significant trend between clinical specialty and correct positioning assessment (p = 0.052) and between self-perceived confidence in acquiring wrist radiographs and repositioning for a retake (p = 0.052). Neither clinical specialty (p = 0.480) nor previous VR experience (p = 0.409) correlated with ability to reposition for a retake. CONCLUSION: While results indicated a potential correlation between participants' ability to position a VR patient and both clinical specialty and confidence in wrist radiography, these trends were not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that VR holds promise for radiography training, though further research is necessary to explore the factors that influence performance and learning. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The incorporation of VR technology into standard radiography training programs could potentially improve patient outcomes by ensuring that radiography students are more skilled at acquiring quality radiographs prior to their first clinical practice. It should be noted though, that knowledge on positioning criteria and anatomy is an advantage when practicing correct positioning in a VR simulator.

Patient involvement and expectations during CT scans. Tinkering to involve patients and offer care in radiographic practice.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated how patients expected and experienced to be put first and cared for in diagnostic imaging settings and how putting the patient first was operationalized in practice. METHODS: A qualitative field study was conducted in two Danish hospitals to investigate patients' expectations and experiences of care and involvement during CT examinations. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews and participant observations of five examination cases. Three Computed Tomography (CT) guided lung biopsy intervention studies and two conventional CT studies of the chest of patients being investigated for lung cancer in Fast Track Cancer Referral Programs (FTCRP) were included. RESULTS: Patients reported low expectations of receiving care and being involved during examinations. Perceptions of receiving care predominantly consisted of being received in a kind, personalized manner. Expectations of involvement in the procedure were reported in terms of readiness to do as they were told, complying with requests put to each patient. Concepts of care and involvement were challenged in their formal meanings and found to be entangled in complex interactions within sociotechnical boundaries. CONCLUSION: Patient's expectations of receiving care and being involved in the diagnostic imaging procedures, were expressed in noncommittal terms, and were overshadowed by patients' focus on getting through the examination, in order to get an answer to their tentative diagnose. The concepts of care and patient involvement were negotiated and reconceptualized within the sociotechnical framework of the diagnostic imaging situation of the individual patient. The concept of "tinkering" is suggested as a means of understanding how patientcare is performed during diagnostic imaging procedures. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Issues were identified that may help professionals to put "the patient first", thus, improving patient centered care.

The lateral wrist radiograph - To retake or not to retake.

INTRODUCTION: Patient positioning may impact diagnostic quality when obtaining radiographs of the musculoskeletal (MSK) system. Hence, knowledge on patient positioning, as seen in the radiograph, followed by informed adjusted retake if appropriate, is key when undertaking MSK radiographs. Forearm positioning is particularly important in lateral wrist radiographs where rotation impacts anatomic measurements. The purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of MSK and non-MSK radiographers' immediate assessments of wrist positioning including need for retake. METHODS: A questionnaire including images of 18 lateral wrist radiographs and questions regarding positioning, i.e. forearm rotation and flexion of the wrist, were developed and distributed to radiographers worldwide via the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) and the Research Hub at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR) 2021. Demographic data such as area of expertise, years of experience etc. were collected. RESULTS: In total, 156 replies were included in the analyses. The inter-observer agreement of radiographers' assessment of the need for a retake was 47% (kappa = .25) and the intra-observer agreement was 81% (kappa = .62). Radiographers working with MSK radiography had more correct positioning assessments than radiographers who did not routinely obtain radiographs of the MSK system (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Results indicated that MSK radiographers are more consistent in assessment of the need for a retake in lateral wrist radiographs and more able to correctly judge positioning compared to non-MSK radiographers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Constant focus on image quality may lead to increased awareness and adherence to image criteria. Improved image quality will in turn improve the diagnostic value for the benefit of the patients potentially leading to better outcomes.

Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI in the clinical setting - correlation with dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in the post-treatment imaging of adult glioma patients at 3T.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the correlation between amide proton transfer-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (APTw MRI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion in order to assess the potential of APTw MRI as an alternative to DSC in adult brain tumor (glioma) imaging. METHODS: After Ethical Committee approval, forty adult patients, treated for histopathologically confirmed glioma (World Health Organization (WHO) grade II-IV), were prospectively imaged at 3 Tesla (3 T) with DSC perfusion and a commercially available three-dimensional (3D) APTw sequence. Two consultant neuroradiologists independently performed region of interest (ROI) measurements on relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and APTw maps, co-registered with anatomical images. The correlation APTw MRI-DSC perfusion was assessed using Spearman's rank-order test. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman (BA) plots. RESULTS: A statistically significant moderately strong positive correlation was observed between maximum rCBV (rCBVmax) and maximum APTw (APTwmax) values (observer 1: r = 0.73; p < 0.01; observer 2: r = 0.62; p < 0.01). We found good inter-observer agreement for APTwmax (ICC = 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.90), with somewhat broad outer 95% CI for the BA Limits of Agreement (LoA) (-1.6 to 1.9). ICC for APTwmax was higher than ICC for rCBVmax (ICC = 0.74; 95%; CI 0.50-0.86), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: APTwmax values correlate positively with rCBVmax in patients treated for brain glioma. APTw imaging is a reproducible technique, with some observer dependence. Results need to be confirmed by a larger population analysis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: APTw MRI can be a useful addition to glioma follow-up imaging and a potential alternative to DSC perfusion, especially in patients where contrast agent is contraindicated.

Facilitators for and barriers to radiography research in public healthcare in Nordic countries.

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that the future of diagnostic imaging relies on engagement in research and evidence-based practice. This implies a role transition from a clinical radiographer to a clinical radiographer-researcher. Clinical radiographers' stimuli for engaging in research in Nordic countries are unknown. This study aimed to address this gap. METHODS: Cross-sectional data collection via an online questionnaire on facilitators for and barriers to participation in radiography research was carried out among 507 clinical radiographers in public healthcare in the Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. RESULTS: Support from colleagues (odds ratio [OR] 2.62) and other professionals (OR 2.74), and self-esteem in research skills (OR ≥ 2.21), were facilitators for radiography research. Lack of knowledge and skills to conduct research (OR 2.48) was revealed to hinder radiographers' participation in research. The absence of a radiography research culture in the workplace explained non-participation in research (OR 1.75). CONCLUSION: This study revealed significant factors for clinical radiographers' participation in research. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A strategy for establishing a radiography research culture in healthcare is proposed that is novel for the context. Management support for knowledge development and activity leading to inter-professional research projects across knowledge fields, provision of a radiography research lead and acknowledgement of radiography research among colleagues signify the establishment of the culture. These prerequisites might provide a paradigm change towards not only the symbiosis of a clinical radiographer and an autonomous researcher but also a partner who adds radiography research to evidence-based practice in diagnostic imaging.

There's nothing plain about projection radiography! A discussion paper.

OBJECTIVES: Unlike the technological advances in cross-sectional imaging, the adoption of CR and DR has been relatively overlooked in terms of the additional radiographer skills and competences required for optimal practice. Furthermore, projection radiography is often referred to as basic, plain or other words suggesting simplicity or entry-level skill requirements. Radiographers' professional identity is connected with the discourse expressed via the language used in daily practice and consequently, if the perception of projection radiography is regarded as simple practice not requiring much reflection or complex decision-making, apathy and carelessness may arise. The purpose of this narrative review was to raise projection radiography from its longstanding lowly place and re-position it as a specialist imaging field. KEY FINDINGS: Danish pre-registration radiography curricula contain little mention of projection radiography and a low proportion (n = 17/144; 11.8%) of Danish radiography students chose to focus on projection radiography within publicly available BSc. theses between 2016 and 2020 as compared to topics related to CT and MRI (n = 60/144; 41.7%). CONCLUSION: By changing how we as the profession perceive the role and position of projection radiography, we can start to rebuild its lost prestige and demand a greater, more detailed and clinically relevant educational offering from academic partners. For this to commence, the language and terminology we use to describe ourselves and tasks undertaken must reflect the complexity of the profession. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Regardless of imaging modality, every patient should be assured that a radiographer with expertise in acquiring images of diagnostic quality undertakes their examination. Reclaiming the prestige of projection radiography may lead students and radiographers to recognize projection radiography as a demanding specialist field for the benefit of the patients.

Radiographers' involvement in research activities and opinions on radiography research: A Nordic survey.

INTRODUCTION: Radiographers' engagement in research is important for the development of evidence-based practice in radiography; however, radiographers' interest in research has rarely been reported. This study sought to ascertain radiographers' opinions about radiography research and investigate their involvement in research activities in four Nordic countries. METHODS: This study was conducted in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. A study-specific questionnaire was developed in English and adapted to each language of the study sample, and the content and face validity of the adaptations were evaluated. An online tool was used to collect the study data. The questionnaire link was distributed in September 2019 to radiographers working in clinical settings in four Nordic countries (n = 4572). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 14% (n = 662/4572). Research involvement was reported by 33% of the respondents; data collection was the main type of contribution. Radiographers who contributed to research were more likely to be male, have longer work experience, hold a master's or doctoral degree, work as managers and be employed in university hospitals. Nearly all agreed that radiography research is needed to promote the radiography profession and provide the evidence base for radiographic practice. However, only 14% were aware of the current research evidence regarding their professional field of specialisation, and 19% indicated that they developed current practices based on research evidence. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that, although radiographers had positive attitudes towards radiography research, their involvement in research and utilisation of research evidence in practice is low. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Strategies should be developed to improve knowledge and skills related to evidence-based practice and stimulate radiographers' engagement in research.

Organ-based tube current modulation in chest CT. A comparison of three vendors.

INTRODUCTION: Organ-based tube current modulation (OBTCM) is designed for anterior dose reduction in Computed Tomography (CT). The purpose was to assess dose reduction capability in chest CT using three organ dose modulation systems at different kVp settings. Furthermore, noise, diagnostic image quality and tumour detection was assessed. METHODS: A Lungman phantom was scanned with and without OBTCM at 80-135/140 kVp using three CT scanners; Canon Aquillion Prime, GE Revolution CT and Siemens Somatom Flash. Thermo-luminescent dosimeters were attached to the phantom surface and all scans were repeated five times. Image noise was measured in three ROIs at the level of the carina. Three observers visually scored the images using a fivestep scale. A Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used for statistical analysis of differences. RESULTS: Using the GE revolution CT scanner, dose reductions between 1.10 mSv (12%) and 1.56 mSv (24%) (p < 0.01) were found in the anterior segment and no differences posteriorly and laterally. Total dose reductions between 0.64 (8%) and 0.91 mSv (13%) were found across kVp levels (p < 0.00001). Maximum noise increase with OBTCM was 0.8 HU. With the Canon system, anterior dose reductions of 6-10% and total dose reduction of 0.74-0.76 mSv across kVp levels (p < 0.001) were found with a maximum noise increase of 1.1 HU. For the Siemens system, dose increased by 22-51% anteriorly; except at 100 kVp where no dose difference was found. Noise decreased by 1 to 1.5 HU. CONCLUSION: Organ based tube current modulation is capable of anterior and total dose reduction with minimal loss of image quality in vendors that do not increase posterior dose. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This research highlights the importance of being familiar with dose reduction technologies.