Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Transfusion ; 59(11): 3396-3404, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608454

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse events following blood transfusion include allosensitization and generalized immunosuppression, collectively referred to as transfusion-related immune modulation. We evaluated the immunological effects of red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusions on alloantibody responses and on immunoregulatory cells in nonimmunosuppressed patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive standard unmodified (STD), leukoreduced (LR), or leukoreduced and γ-irradiated (LRγ) RBCs. Patients received only apheresis platelets that were in-process LR and were γ-irradiated for the third arm. Nontransfused patients served as controls for the effects of surgery itself on immunologic changes. Antibodies to HLA were assessed with use of solid-phase assays. The effects of transfusion on adaptive and innate immunity were evaluated by assessing T regulatory cells (Tregs) and invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells. RESULTS: LR of blood products reduced the development of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloantibodies, but only in patients without preexisting HLA antibodies. However, if LR blood products were γ-irradiated, HLA antibody production was not reduced. Compared to nontransfused patients, recipients of STD or LR transfusions showed a significant increase in CD4+CD25hi T cells expressing FoxP3 or CTLA4 and also of iNKT cells producing interleukin-4. In contrast, recipients of LRγ blood products showed markedly lower increases in all three cellular assays. CONCLUSION: LR decreased HLA alloantibody production in naïve recipients, but did not reduce the immunosuppressive effects of transfusion. LRγ reduced immunosuppression and was not associated with decreased HLA alloantibody production.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea , Rayos gamma , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Procedimientos de Reducción del Leucocitos , Humanos , Células T Asesinas Naturales/inmunología , Linfocitos T Reguladores/inmunología
2.
Pediatr Transplant ; 14(6): 730-4, 2010 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20598090

RESUMEN

SAB assays have increased the sensitivity and specificity to detect HLA alloantibodies, but there is uncertainty about the clinical relevance of SAB-positive alloantibodies when the FCXM is negative. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical significance of SAB-detected DSA in 82 pediatric recipients of a first kidney transplant between January 2000 and December 2005 who had a negative pretransplant FCXM. Pretransplant sera were evaluated by SAB for DSA. Graft loss and rejection between patients with (DSA+) and without DSA (DSA-) were compared. DSA were detected in 13.9%. Eighty percent of DSA+ subjects were DD transplant recipients vs. 56.9% in the DSA- cohort. The RR of graft loss in DSA+ vs. DSA- was 3.3 (95% CI, 1.4-7.9) and in DD was 4.3 (95% CI 1.4-13.1). By Cox regression, the HR of graft loss in DSA+ vs. DSA- was 2.8 (95% CI 0.7-10.9; p = 0.14) and in DD was 5.1 (95% CI 1-25.6; p = 0.05). Acute rejection occurred in 60% in the DSA+ vs. 44.4% in DSA- (p = 0.5). SAB-detected DSA was associated with impaired renal allograft survival in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Impaired graft survival in pediatric renal transplant recipients with DSA detected by solid-phase assays.


Asunto(s)
Especificidad de Anticuerpos/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
3.
Clin Transpl ; : 171-4, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18642452

RESUMEN

Expanding the pool of potentially compatible donors is one approach to improving access to transplantation for the sensitized candidate. The identification of unacceptable antigens and incorporation into UNet(sm) could form the basis for regional or national sharing. A rational approach using currently available assays can increase donor access for highly sensitized recipients. However, the limitations of the results and interpretations of these assays, and limitations in the types of data that can be entered into UNet(sm), affect the accuracy of predicting crossmatch outcome for highly sensitized candidates. It is possible to stratify UA based on the strength of antibodies in the single-antigen assays. Entering all antibody specificities as UA resulted in accurate prediction of compatible crossmatches. Entering only those UA associated with higher-titered antibodies lowered the accuracy of predicting a compatible crossmatch. However, the combination of assigning fewer UA and performing more crossmatches per candidate provided transplants for sensitized individuals at a higher proportion, compared to assigning more UA that ruled out a larger number of donors.


Asunto(s)
Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Citometría de Flujo , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón , Inmunología del Trasplante , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Estudios de Cohortes , Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda