Ocular survival after intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma improves with accrual of experience and programmatic evolution.

BACKGROUND: Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for the treatment of intraocular retinoblastoma has gained recognition as a method to improve ocular salvage; however, there is a paucity of evidence supporting treatment factors prognosticating ocular survival. METHODS: All patients with retinoblastoma treated with IAC at a single institution between December 2008 and December 2019 were evaluated. Patient demographics, tumor classification, prior treatments, procedural data, other non-IAC therapies, adverse reactions, procedural complications, ocular outcomes, and overall survival were assessed via retrospective chart review. Factors suggestive of increased ocular survival were identified via univariate and multivariate analyses. The impact of accrued treatment experience was evaluated by grouping eyes by the respective year, IAC treatment was initiated. RESULTS: Forty-nine eyes of 43 patients were treated for retinoblastoma with IAC (256 total procedures). At least grade 3 neutropenia was observed following 19% of IAC procedures. The risk of neutropenia was not statistically different between single or multidrug IAC. Comparing those who received balloon-assisted intra-arterial chemotherapy (bIAC) in more than two-thirds of cycles to those who did not, the risk of arterial access site complications was not statistically different. Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly lower risk of enucleation associated with treatment era in years (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52-1.00, p < .05) and laser therapies (HR = 0.02-0.60, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Ocular survival rates in patients treated with IAC for retinoblastoma at our institution have increased over time. Accrued treatment experience and programmatic changes have likely contributed. Larger, prospective series may lead to a better understanding of factors that consistently contribute to better ocular salvage.

Health disparities in ocular oncology.

Social determinants of health (SDH) play a crucial role in shaping health outcomes. Few studies have explored the impact of SDH in ocular oncology, looking at differences in disease presentation, treatment choices, and outcomes based on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance status. Retinoblastoma exhibits disparities in survival, with lower-income countries experiencing substantially lower rates compared to high-income countries. In the U.S., racial and SES disparities exist, impacting treatment choices and outcomes in children with retinoblastoma. Disparities in treatment modalities based on race and SES have been reported in uveal melanoma, with non-White and economically disadvantaged patients more likely to undergo primary enucleation. Ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) exhibits racial and socioeconomic disparities in treatment outcomes. Black patients with OSSN face higher mortality, independent of tumor size, eye laterality, or tumor behavior. Given the rarity, there is no data on disparities in vitreoretinal lymphoma management. When using primary central nervous system lymphoma as a surrogate, management and survival outcomes vary based on factors such as race, socioeconomic status, and insurance status. This article aims to review current literature on disparities in ocular oncology, highlighting the need for granular data to better understand existing gaps in care within ocular oncology.