RESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Is there a circadian variation of serum progesterone (P) on the day of frozen embryo transfer (FET) in a modified natural cycle (mNC)? SUMMARY ANSWER: There is a statistically significant diurnal variation of serum P on the day of a FET in an mNC protocol. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In recent years, the proportion of FET cycles has increased dramatically. To further optimize pregnancy outcomes after FET, recent studies have focused on serum luteal P levels in both natural and artificially prepared FET cycles. Despite the different cut-off values proposed to define low serum P in the NC, it is generally accepted that lower serum P values (<10 ng/ml) around the day of FET are associated with negative reproductive outcomes. However, a single serum P measurement is not reliable given that P levels are prone to diurnal fluctuations and are impacted by patients' characteristics. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a single university-affiliated fertility center, including 22 patients performing a single blastocyst mNC-FET from August 2022 to August 2023. Serum P levels were measured on the day of transfer at 08:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, and 20:00h. Differences between P levels were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The sample size was calculated to detect a difference of 15% between the first and last P measurements with a 5% false-positive rate and a 95% CI. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients with a normal BMI, between 18 and 40 years old, without uterine diseases were eligible. Patients utilizing donated oocytes were excluded. The mNC-FET protocol involved monitoring the normal ovarian cycle and triggering ovulation with an injection of 250 µg of choriogonadotropin alfa when a pre-ovulatory follicle (16-20 mm diameter) was visualized. The blastocyst was transferred seven days later. The patients were not supplemented with exogenous P at any time before the day of the FET. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The mean age and BMI of the study population were 33.6 ± 3.8 years and 22.7 ± 1.8 kg/m2, respectively. Mean P values at 08:00h, 12:00h, 16:00h, and 20:00h were 14.6 ± 4.5, 14.7 ± 4.1, 12.9 ± 3.5, and 14.6 ± 4.3 ng/ml, respectively. The mean P levels at 16:00h were significantly lower compared to all other time points (P < 0.05: P = 0.007 between P at 8:00h and 16:00h; P = 0.003 between P at 12:00h and 16:00h; P = 0.007 between P at 16:00h and 20:00h). No statistically significant difference was observed between P values at the other time points (P > 0.05: P = 0.88 between P at 8:00h and 12:00h; P = 0.96 between P at 8:00h and 20:00h; P = 0.83 between P at 12:00h and 20:00h). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study's limitations include the small sample size that may cause a bias when the results are extrapolated to a larger subfertile population undergoing mNC-FET. Ideally, larger prospective trials including a more heterogeneous patient population would be necessary to validate our findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The current study demonstrates the existence of a diurnal fluctuation of serum P on the day of mNC-FET highlighting the importance of a standardized time point for its measurement. This is especially important for considering clinical actions, such as additional exogenous P supplementation, when encountering P values lower than 10 ng/ml on the day of FET. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was obtained for the study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding the content of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05511272.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The current literature on the impact of different urinary diversions on patients' health related quality of life (HR-QoL) showed a marginally better quality of life scores of orthotopic neobladder (ONB) compared to ileal conduit (IC). The aim of this study was to update the review of all relevant published studies on the comparison between ONB and IC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were identified by searching multiple literature databases, including MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, PubMed Data were synthesized using meta-analytic methods conformed to the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: The current meta-analysis was based on 18 papers that reported a HR-QoL comparison between IC and ONB using at least a validate questionnaire. Pooled effect sizes of combined QoL outcomes for IC versus ONB showed a slight, but not significant, better QoL in patients with ONB (Hedges' g = 0.150; p = 0.066). Patients with ileal ONB showed a significant better QoL than those with IC (Hedges' g = 0.278; p = 0.000); in case series with more than 65% males, ONB group showed a slight significant better QoL than IC (Hedges' g = 0.190; p = 0.024). Pooled effects sizes of all EORTC-QLQ-C30 aspects showed a significant better QoL in patients with ONB (Hedges' g = 0.400; p = 0.0000). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of not-randomized comparative studies on the impact of different types of urinary diversions on HR-QoL showed demonstrated a significant advantage of ileal ONB compared to IC in terms of HR-QoL.
Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Derivación Urinaria/psicología , Reservorios Urinarios Continentes , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/psicología , Derivación Urinaria/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) employs the needs-based model of quality of life (QoL) and was developed in the UK and The Netherlands as an outcome measure for clinical trials. This paper describes the production and psychometric assessment of nine new language versions for Canada (French and English), Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Morocco, Spain and the US. METHODS: Three adaptation stages were employed; production of conceptually equivalent translations, field-test interviews and assessment of reliability and construct validity by survey of patients with major depression. RESULTS: Few problems were experienced with producing conceptually equivalent translations, except in Morocco. Patients in the field-test interviews found the instrument to have appropriate content and to be easy to complete. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent for all language versions and scores were found to relate appropriately to measures of depression severity and health status. LIMITATIONS: Further investigation is required of the ability of the measure to assess individuals at the extremes of the QoL continuum. Data collected with the Arabic QLDS should not be combined with those from other countries. CONCLUSIONS: The QLDS is the first instrument designed to assess QoL in depression based on a coherent model of the construct. Each language version has been shown to be well accepted by respondents and to have excellent psychometric properties. As the instrument is now available in a large number of languages, the QLDS is the QoL instrument of choice for inclusion in clinical trials of interventions for depression.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Lenguaje , Masculino , Psicometría , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
There is increasing interest throughout Europe in measuring health needs in the general population and in the 'quality of life' of patients. This has led to a demand for questionnaires capable of measuring health status in a reliable and valid manner. Most existing measures have, however, been standardised only in the U.S.A. and, to a lesser extent, in the U.K. The issue of translation and retesting of questionnaires prepared in the English language for use in other countries has received surprisingly little attention. This paper describes some of the technical, linguistic and conceptual issues raised by translation and the processes involved in producing acceptable country-specific versions of the Nottingham Health Profile according to a systematic method.
Asunto(s)
Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Indicadores de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Comparación Transcultural , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Lenguaje , Proyectos de Investigación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
This study describes the process of development of a new instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with hospital care in Italy. The self-administered questionnaire included a total of 48 items, -contributing to the construction of 8 scales, each of them describing a specific area of interest such as medical care and nursing, several aspects of organisation, comfort and overall outcome of care. Psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire were in terms of acceptability, validity, reliability and the ability to discriminate different levels of satisfaction in various patient groups. Psychometric analyses resulted in a convincing construct validity and reliability, as described by the Cronbach Alpha coefficient estimates [range 0.73-0.95]. The high compliance obtained (67.3%) can be considered a sign of good acceptability of the questionnaire and of its mode of administration. These analyses demonstrate a good performance of the questionnaire in terms of both validity and reliability, suggesting that this instrument can represent a solid base for future applications.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Satisfacción del Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Relaciones Paciente-Hospital , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
At international level LCA is being increasingly used to objectively evaluate the performances of different Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) management solutions. One of the more important waste management options concerns MSW incineration. LCA is usually applied to existing incineration plants. In this study LCA methodology was applied to a new Italian incineration line, to facilitate the prediction, during the design phase, of its potential environmental impacts in terms of damage to human health, ecosystem quality and consumption of resources. The aim of the study was to analyse three different design alternatives: an incineration system with dry flue gas cleaning (without- and with-energy recovery) and one with wet flue gas cleaning. The last two technological solutions both incorporating facilities for energy recovery were compared. From the results of the study, the system with energy recovery and dry flue gas cleaning revealed lower environmental impacts in relation to the ecosystem quality. As LCA results are greatly affected by uncertainties of different types, the second part of the work provides for an uncertainty analysis aimed at detecting the extent output data from life cycle analysis are influenced by uncertainty of input data, and employs both qualitative (pedigree matrix) and quantitative methods (Monte Carlo analysis).
Asunto(s)
Ambiente , Incineración/métodos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Carbono/química , Carcinógenos/análisis , Ceniza del Carbón , Conservación de los Recursos Energéticos , Electricidad , Contaminación Ambiental/análisis , Eutrofización , Combustibles Fósiles/economía , Incineración/economía , Italia , Minerales/análisis , Minerales/economía , Ozono/análisis , Material Particulado/química , Radiación , Residuos/economíaRESUMEN
Several studies have shown that growth hormone deficiency in adults leads to poor well-being and other clinical consequences, and that these improve when the hormone is replaced. However, the studies employed generic measures of health status that miss important aspects of the patients' experience and that have inadequate reliability and responsiveness. This paper describes the European development and testing of the Quality of Life-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (QoL-AGHDA), a condition-specific quality of life measure for use in clinical trials and for the routine monitoring of patients. The instrument was produced in five languages; English, Swedish, Italian, German and Spanish. Each language version is shown to have good reliability, internal consistency and construct validity. The QoL-AGHDA is currently included in an international database monitoring the long-term efficacy and safety of growth hormone replacement therapy and in clinical trials in a number of countries.
Asunto(s)
Comparación Transcultural , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/deficiencia , Psicometría/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , TraducciónRESUMEN
This paper describes the international development and psychometric testing of the Recurrent Genital Herpes Quality of Life Questionnaire (RGHQoL), a condition-specific quality of life (QoL) instrument. The theoretical foundation for the measure is the needs-based model of QoL and the content of the instrument was derived from in-depth qualitative interviews with relevant patients in the UK. Versions of the RGHQoL were required for the UK, USA, Italy, Germany, France and Denmark for use in international clinical trials. The results indicate that the final 20 item measure has good reliability, internal consistency and validity for all language versions. A small responsiveness study in Denmark suggested that the measure is sensitive to changes in QoL associated with the initiation of suppression treatment for recurrent genital herpes (RGH). It is concluded that the RGHQoL is a valuable instrument for inclusion in clinical trials. The psychometric properties of the instrument are such that it may also be used to monitor the progress of individual patients.
Asunto(s)
Herpes Genital/psicología , Psicometría/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Increasing interest is being given to health-related quality of life in chronic diseases. In cirrhosis, both physical functioning and mental well-being may be altered, but no study has investigated factors associated with a poor perceived health status. METHODS: We measured quality of life by Short Form-36 and Nottingham Health Profile questionnaires in 544 patients with cirrhosis. Data were compared with age- and gender-adjusted values of 2 random samples of the Italian population (more than 2000 subjects). Factors associated with poor perceived health status were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: All domains of health-related quality of life, except pain, were altered in cirrhosis (by 9%-42%), mainly in younger patients. There were minor differences in relation to gender, whereas etiology had no effects. Severity of disease (Child-Pugh score) and, above all, muscle cramps were the factors most closely associated with poor health status perception. Self-rating of disease progression was associated with ascites and pruritus, whereas previous variceal sclerotherapy and the use of disaccharides had a protective effect. Most areas of daily life were affected by perceived health problems; this was mainly true for paid employment and sex life in men and home life and social life in women. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life is variably impaired in cirrhosis, also in uncomplicated patients. Non-life-threatening symptoms, such as muscle cramps, are of major concern. These data are the basis for longitudinal studies measuring the effects of therapy and procedures on patient-derived health outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Cirrosis Hepática/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calambre Muscular/psicología , Prurito/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic or chronically relapsing inflammatory skin condition that can have a considerable impact on those affected. There are a number of instruments available to measure outcome in dermatological conditions but none have been developed specifically for AD. In addition, most measure symptoms and/or daily functioning, which are potential influences on quality of life (QoL) rather than assessments of the construct itself. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to develop a new instrument specifically designed to measure QoL in adults with AD-the Quality of Life Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD). METHODS: The instrument was developed based on the needs-based model of QoL and was produced in several different countries simultaneously. Its content was derived from 65 in-depth interviews with relevant patients in the U.K., Italy and the Netherlands. The initial version of the measure was produced in U.K. English and translations were produced for the Netherlands, Italy, Germany, France and the U.S.A. using a dual translation panel methodology. A Spanish version was developed using the same adaptation process after the instrument was finalized. Field-test interviews were conducted with approximately 20 patients in each country to assess face and content validity. The instrument [in addition to the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Psychological General Well-Being Schedule (PGWB)] was then administered to up to 300 AD patients in each country at two time points to finalize the instrument and test its psychometric properties. RESULTS: The initial version of the QoLIAD had 56 items that reflected the areas of need fulfillment identified in the qualitative interviews as having been affected by AD: mental and emotional stimulation, physical and emotional stability, security, sharing and belonging, self-esteem, personal development and fulfillment. Comments from patients in field-test interviews resulted in the removal of 14 items, to leave a 42-item instrument that was considered relevant and acceptable. The number of patients participating in the survey were 286 in the U.K., 46 in the Netherlands, 213 in France, 187 in Germany, 178 in the U.S.A. and 83 in Spain. Application of the Rasch model to these data identified the final 25-item QoLIAD. Unidimensionality was confirmed, with deviation of the total scale from the Rasch model evident at a single time point in one country only (the U.K.). All language versions, with the exception of the Dutch measure, had test-retest reliability coefficients in excess of 0.85. The test-retest in the Netherlands was 0.80. However, this country had the smallest sample size and the corresponding reliability for the DLQI was only 0.40. The QoLIAD had adequate internal consistency and the initial indications of construct validity were good. The levels of association with the DLQI indicated that the two instruments measure related but distinct constructs. CONCLUSIONS: The QoLIAD is a practical, reliable, valid and culturally applicable instrument for measuring the impact of AD and its treatment on QoL in clinical trials or in routine clinical practice.