A microcosting study of microsurgery, LINAC radiosurgery, and gamma knife radiosurgery in meningioma patients.

The aim of the present study is to determine and compare initial treatment costs of microsurgery, linear accelerator (LINAC) radiosurgery, and gamma knife radiosurgery in meningioma patients. Additionally, the follow-up costs in the first year after initial treatment were assessed. Cost analyses were performed at two neurosurgical departments in The Netherlands from the healthcare providers' perspective. A total of 59 patients were included, of whom 18 underwent microsurgery, 15 underwent LINAC radiosurgery, and 26 underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. A standardized microcosting methodology was employed to ensure that the identified cost differences would reflect only actual cost differences. Initial treatment costs, using equipment costs per fraction, were 12,288 for microsurgery, 1,547 for LINAC radiosurgery, and 2,412 for gamma knife radiosurgery. Higher initial treatment costs for microsurgery were predominantly due to inpatient stay (5,321) and indirect costs (4,350). LINAC and gamma knife radiosurgery were equally expensive when equipment was valued per treatment (2,198 and 2,412, respectively). Follow-up costs were slightly, but not significantly, higher for microsurgery compared with LINAC and gamma knife radiosurgery. Even though initial treatment costs were over five times higher for microsurgery compared with both radiosurgical treatments, our study gives indications that the relative cost difference may decrease when follow-up costs occurring during the first year after initial treatment are incorporated. This reinforces the need to consider follow-up costs after initial treatment when examining the relative costs of alternative treatments.

Longitudinal changes in quality of life and costs in long-term survivors of tumors of the oropharynx treated with brachytherapy or surgery.

PURPOSE: Based on earlier studies we were interested in finding out if longitudinal assessment of quality of life (QoL) and costs in long-term survivors of oropharyngeal cancers treated with external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy (BT) or surgery and postoperative radiotherapy showed a change in QoL over the years. Besides, we were curious to know how much the costs per life year and the QALY would be for this patient group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Performance status scales: eating in public, understandability of speech, normalcy of diet, xerostomia and ability to swallow were determined in 2003 and 2005. In 2005, the responses to EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC H&N35, and the Euroqol questionnaire were also measured. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. RESULTS: Eating in public, understandability of speech, and normalcy of diet significantly differed in favor of BT. Surgical patients experienced more speech, teeth, and mouth-opening problems. Mean costs and QALYs for BT were 16,112 euros and 56,060 euros and for surgery 26,590 euros and 93,275 euros, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: QoL scores don't change over time. Due to the number of admission days, surgery is more costly. Difference in costs for QALYs in favor of BT was observed.

Interstitial radiation therapy for early-stage nasal vestibule cancer: a continuing quest for optimal tumor control and cosmesis.

INTRODUCTION: This article reports on the effectiveness, cosmetic outcome, and costs of interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for early-stage cancer of the nasal vestibule (NV) proper and/or columella high-dose-rate (HDR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Tumor control, survival, cosmetic outcome, functional results, and costs were established in 64 T1/T2N0 nasal vestibule cancers treated from 1991-2005 by fractionated interstitial radiation therapy (IRT) only. Total dose is 44 Gy: 2 fractions of 3 Gy per day, 6-hour interval, first and last fraction 4 Gy. Cosmesis is noted in the chart by the medical doctor during follow-up, by the patient (visual analog scale), and by a panel. Finally, full hospital costs are computed. RESULTS: A local relapse-free survival rate of 92% at 5 years was obtained. Four local failures were observed; all four patients were salvaged. The neck was not treated electively; no neck recurrence in follow-up was seen. Excellent cosmetic and functional results were observed. With 10 days admission for full treatment, hospital costs amounted to euro5772 (7044 US dollars). CONCLUSION: Excellent tumor control, cosmesis, and function of nasal airway passage can be achieved when HDR-IRT for T1/T2N0 NV cancers is used. For the more advanced cancers (Wang classification: T3 tumor stage), we elect to treat by local excision followed by a reconstructive procedure. The costs, admission to hospital inclusive, for treatment by HDR-IRT amounts to euro5772 (7044 US dollars). This contrasts substantially with the full hospital costs when NV cancers are treated by plastic reconstructive surgery, being on average threefold as expensive.

Chemotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the management of advanced cancers of the nasopharynx: clinical impact of high technology--is it worth the cost?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to calculate the costs of chemotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in advanced-stage nasopharyngeal cancer. It is argued whether the effect of chemotherapy and this type of high-dose, high-precision radiation therapy is worth the costs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical results of Stage III-IVB nasopharyngeal cancer in patients treated between 1991 and 2000 are reported. Treatment was broken down into five categories: workup, chemotherapy, preparation of radiation therapy, and application of radiation. For each category, costs were computed. Nasopharyngeal cancer treatment costs were compared with costs previously reported on patients treated for cancers of the oral cavity, larynx, and oropharynx. RESULTS: With the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and high cumulative doses of radiation (77-81 Gy) with brachytherapy, disease-free survival increased from 48% to 74% (p=0.002), and overall survival increased from 35% to 72% (p=0.005). The Rotterdam protocol has been implemented stepwise: as of 1991, costs per patient increased from 4521 Euros (US$5023; 2001 exchange rate [December]: 1 Euro approximately 0.88 US$) for conventional external beam radiation therapy to 13,728 Euros (US$15,253) in 2000 for combinations of chemotherapy, conventional external beam radiation therapy, and brachytherapy. In case of stereotactic radiotherapy, the cost was 14,516 Euros (US$16,495). CONCLUSIONS: Costs for cancer in the nasopharynx vary from 14,528 Euros (US$16,509) to 15,316 Euros (US$17,405) in case of brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy, respectively, if follow-up costs are added. The treatment cost for other head and neck sites was 21,858 Euros (US$24,126). Given the improvement in survival, the sparing capabilities of current high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy techniques, and the favorable cost profile compared with other sites, it is argued that costs should not be considered prohibitive for the introduction of chemotherapy and high-technology-based radiotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.

Radical radiotherapy compared with surgery for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue.

PURPOSE: This study reports on T3/T4 base of tongue (BOT) tumors treated at the Erasmus MC (Rotterdam) with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT). Local control, survival, and functional outcome are compared to results obtained in similar patients treated at the Vrije University Medical Center (VUMC, Amsterdam) by surgery and postoperative RT (PORT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: At Rotterdam 46/2 Gy was given to the primary and bilateral neck, followed by an implant using low-dose-rate (LDR 24-35 Gy; median 27 Gy), or fractionated high-dose-rate (fr. HDR 20-28 Gy; median 24 Gy). A neck dissection (ND) was performed in case of N+ disease. 67% of BOT tumors had a T4 cancer. At Amsterdam surgery (S) followed by PORT 40-70 Gy (median 60 Gy) was performed; 26% BOT tumors were T4. Sex, age and nodal distribution were similar. Actuarial local control and survival were computed. Performance Status Scale (PSS) scores were established. Xerostomis was determined on visual analog scales (VAS). RESULTS: Local failure at 5-years was 37% (Rotterdam) vs. 9% (Amsterdam) (p < 0.01). The overall survival was not significantly different (median 2.5 years vs. 2.9 years, respectively [p = 0.47]). The PSS favored brachytherapy. Both groups were equally affected by xerostomia. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year local control was 65% with EBRT and BT. This result is strongly affected by 4 patients with residual disease after implantation. The Rotterdam patients had more advanced BOT tumors (67% vs. 26% T4), explaining the higher local failure rate. Given the organ preservation properties of radiotherapy-only and the better PSS scores, the jury is still out on the optimal treatment for BOT tumors.