Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 12(3): 118-145.e10, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21893302

RESUMEN

As the complexity of analgesic therapies increases, priorities of care must be established to balance aggressive pain management with measures to prevent or minimize adverse events and to ensure high quality and safe care. Opioid analgesia remains the primary pharmacologic intervention for managing pain in hospitalized patients. Unintended advancing sedation and respiratory depression are two of the most serious opioid-related adverse events. Multiple factors, including opioid dosage, route of administration, duration of therapy, patient-specific factors, and desired goals of therapy, can influence the occurrence of these adverse events. Furthermore, there is an urgent need to educate all members of the health care team about the dangers and potential attributes of administration of sedating medications concomitant with opioid analgesia and the importance of initiating rational multimodal analgesic plans to help avoid adverse events. Nurses play an important role in: 1) identifying patients at risk for unintended advancing sedation and respiratory depression from opioid therapy; 2) implementing plans of care to assess and monitor patients; and 3) intervening to prevent the worsening of adverse events. Despite the frequency of opioid-induced sedation, there are no universally accepted guidelines to direct effective and safe assessment and monitoring practices for patients receiving opioid analgesia. Moreover, there is a paucity of information and no consensus about the benefits of technology-supported monitoring, such as pulse oximetry (measuring oxygen saturation) and capnography (measuring end-tidal carbon dioxide), in hospitalized patients receiving opioids for pain therapy. To date, there have not been any randomized clinical trials to establish the value of technologic monitoring in preventing adverse respiratory events. Additionally, the use of technology-supported monitoring is costly, with far-reaching implications for hospital and nursing practices. As a result, there are considerable variations in screening for risk and monitoring practices. All of these factors prompted the American Society for Pain Management Nursing to approve the formation of an expert consensus panel to examine the scientific basis and state of practice for assessment and monitoring practices for adult hospitalized patients receiving opioid analgesics for pain control and to propose recommendations for patient care, education, and systems-level changes that promote quality care and patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/normas , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Dolor/epidemiología , Dolor/enfermería , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/enfermería , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 10(3): 154-64, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19706353

RESUMEN

A descriptive survey-based study was undertaken to test the validity and reliability of three scales that are used to assess sedation during opioid administration for pain management: the Inova Health System Sedation Scale (ISS), the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS), and the Pasero Opioid-Induced Sedation Scale (POSS). The study was conducted in a large (830 beds) suburban level I trauma hospital with a random convenience sample of 96 medical-surgical nurses. The study reports: measures of reliability and validity of each scale and significant findings related to correct nursing score and selected actions; nurses' ratings of each scale in terms of combined ease of use; information provided by the scale to inform clinical decisions; and nursing confidence measures. Both the RASS and the POSS demonstrated adequate measures of reliability and validity for measurement of sedation during opioid administration for pain management. However, the POSS scored higher in combined measures of ease of use, nursing confidence, and usefulness of information provided to make clinical decisions. The POSS also yielded the highest percentage agreement with the correct score and correct nursing actions chosen by the nurse among the three scales tested. Study results have clinical significance for accuracy of clinical assessments and subsequent actions on behalf of patients experiencing advancing sedation during opioid analgesia. The POSS can be recommended as a superior sedation scale for the measurement of sedation during opioid administration for pain management.


Asunto(s)
Sedación Consciente/enfermería , Monitoreo de Drogas/enfermería , Evaluación en Enfermería/métodos , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Trastornos de la Conciencia/inducido químicamente , Trastornos de la Conciencia/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Conciencia/enfermería , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Rol de la Enfermera , Evaluación en Enfermería/normas , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/organización & administración , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/enfermería , Psicometría , Agitación Psicomotora/diagnóstico , Agitación Psicomotora/etiología , Agitación Psicomotora/terapia , Autoeficacia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda