Tachyphylaxis of the ECL-cell response to PACAP: receptor desensitization and/or depletion of secretory products.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rat stomach ECL cells secrete histamine and pancreastatin in response to gastrin and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide-27 (PACAP). This study applies microdialysis to explore how ECL cells in situ respond to PACAP and gastrin. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Both peptides were administered by microinfusion into the gastric submucosa. The microdialysate was analysed for histamine and pancreastatin (ECL-cell markers) and for somatostatin (D-cell marker). KEY RESULTS: Microinfusion of PACAP (0.01-0.3 nmol microl(-1)) raised microdialysate histamine and pancreastatin dose-dependently. The response was powerful but short-lived. The response to gastrin was sustained at all doses tested. It is unlikely that the transient nature of the histamine response to PACAP reflects inadequate histamine synthesis, since the pancreastatin response to PACAP was short-lived too, and both gastrin and PACAP activated ECL-cell histidine decarboxylase. Unlike gastrin, PACAP mobilized somatostatin. Co-infusion of somatostatin abolished the histamine-mobilizing effect of PACAP. However, pretreatment with the somatostatin receptor type-2 antagonist (PRL-2903) did not prolong the histamine response to PACAP, suggesting that mobilization of somatostatin does not explain the transient nature of the response. Repeated administration of 0.1 nmol microl(-1) of PACAP (1 h infusions, 1 h intervals) failed to induce a second histamine response. Pretreatment with a low dose of PACAP (0.03 nmol microl(-1)) abolished the response to a subsequent near-maximal PACAP challenge (0.3 nmol microl(-1)). CONCLUSION: The transient nature of the histamine response to PACAP reflects desensitization of the PACAP receptor and/or exhaustion of a specific storage compartment that responds to PACAP but not to gastrin.

Effect of reserpine on the generation of the chromogranin A-derived neuropeptide WE-14 in rat oxyntic mucosa.

WE-14, a post-translational product of the neuroendocrine protein chromogranin A (CgA), is generated in distinct subpopulations of endocrine cells. The objective of this study was to investigate the generation of WE-14 in the endocrine cell types of the oxyntic mucosa of the stomach, after treatment with reserpine, an irreversible inhibitor of vesicular monoamine uptake 2 (VMAT2). Reserpine (10 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously and tissue analysed 1, 3, 5 and 18 h following treatment. The oxyntic mucosa was analysed immunohistochemically employing a site-specific WE-14 antiserum, a region-specific CgA antiserum and an antiserum against histidine decarboxylase (HDC), a marker of the histamine-producing ECL cells in the oxyntic mucosa. The number of oxyntic endocrine cells exhibiting WE-14 immunostaining increased more than 100-fold 18 h after reserpine administration relative to vehicle treated controls. Double immunostaining with HDC revealed that most, but not all, of the WE-14 positive cells were ECL cells. These results suggest that reserpine has the ability to influence the post-translational processing of CgA to generate WE-14 in rat stomach ECL cells, presumably as a consequence of reduced VMAT2-driven accumulation of histamine.

Kick-starting the cancer-immunity cycle by targeting CD40.

Stimulation of CD40 on dendritic cells to expand and activate tumor-specific T cells and generate anticancer immunity is an attractive therapeutic approach. Since CD40 agonists exert their effects upstream of checkpoint inhibitors, including PD-1 or PD-L1 antagonists, they are ideal candidates for combination regimens.

Cell-specific processing of chromogranin A in endocrine cells of the rat stomach.

The rat stomach is rich in endocrine cells. The acid-producing (oxyntic) mucosa contains ECL cells, A-like cells, and somatostatin (D) cells, and the antrum harbours gastrin (G) cells, enterochromaffin (EC) cells and D cells. Although chromogranin A (CgA) occurs in all these cells, its processing appears to differ from one cell type to another. Eleven antisera generated to different regions of rat CgA, two antisera generated to a human (h) CgA sequences, and one to a bovine (b) CgA sequence, respectively, were employed together with antisera directed towards cell-specific markers such as gastrin (G cells), serotonin (EC cells), histidine decarboxylase (ECL cells) and somatostatin (D cells) to characterize the expression of CgA and CgA-derived peptides in the various endocrine cell populations of the rat stomach. In the oxyntic mucosa, antisera raised against CgA(291-319) and CGA(316-321) immunostained D cells exclusively, whereas antisera raised against bCgA(82-91) and CgA(121-128) immunostained A-like cells and D cells. Antisera raised against CgA(318-349) and CgA(437-448) immunostained ECL cells and A-like cells, but not D cells. In the antrum, antisera against CgA(291-319) immunostained D cells, and antisera against CgA(351-356) immunostained G cells. Our observations suggest that each individual endocrine cell type in the rat stomach generates a unique mixture of CgA-derived peptides, probably reflecting cell-specific differences in the post-translational processing of CgA and its peptide products. A panel of antisera that recognize specific domains of CgA may help to identify individual endocrine cell populations.

ECL-cell histamine mobilization in conscious rats: effects of locally applied regulatory peptides, candidate neurotransmitters and inflammatory mediators.

1. The ECL cells control gastric acid secretion by mobilizing histamine in response to circulating gastrin. In addition, the ECL cells are thought to operate under nervous control and to be influenced by local inflammatory processes. 2. The purpose of the present study was to monitor histamine mobilization from ECL cells in conscious rats in response to locally applied regulatory peptides, candidate neurotransmitters and inflammatory mediators. 3. Microdialysis probes were implanted in the submucosa of the acid-producing part of the rat stomach. Three days later, the agents to be tested were administered via the microdialysis probe and their effects on basal (48 h fast) and stimulated (intravenous infusion of gastrin-17, 3 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)) mobilization of ECL-cell histamine was monitored by continuous measurement of histamine in the perfusate (radioimmunoassay). 4. Locally administered gastrin-17 and sulfated cholecystokinin-8 mobilized histamine as did pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide-27, vasoactive intestinal peptide, peptide YY, met-enkephalin, endothelin and noradrenaline, adrenaline and isoprenaline. 5. While gastrin, sulfated-cholecystokinin-8, met-enkephalin and isoprenaline induced a sustained elevation of the submucosal histamine concentration, endothelin, peptide YY, pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, noradrenaline and adrenaline induced a transient elevation. 6. Calcitonin gene-related peptide, galanin, somatostatin and the prostanoid misoprostol inhibited gastrin-stimulated histamine mobilization. 7. The gut hormones neurotensin and secretin and the neuropeptides gastrin-releasing peptide, neuropeptide Y and substance P failed to affect ECL-cell histamine mobilization, while motilin and neuromedin U-25 had weak stimulatory effects. Also acetylcholine, carbachol, serotonin and the amino acid neurotransmitters aspartate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and glycine were inactive or weakly active as was bradykinin. 8. In summary, a range of circulating hormones, local hormones, catecholamines, neuropeptides and inflammatory mediators participate in controlling the activity of rat stomach ECL cells in situ.

Anaesthetic agents inhibit gastrin-stimulated but not basal histamine release from rat stomach ECL cells.

By mobilizing histamine in response to gastrin, the ECL cells in the oxyntic mucosa play a key role in the control of the parietal cells and hence of gastric acid secretion. General anaesthesia suppresses basal and gastrin- and histamine-stimulated acid secretion. The present study examines if the effect of anaesthesia on basal and gastrin-stimulated acid secretion is associated with suppressed ECL-cell histamine secretion. A microdialysis probe was implanted in the submucosa of the ventral aspect of the acid-producing part of the stomach (32 rats). Three days later, ECL-cell histamine mobilization was monitored 2 h before and 4 h after the start of intravenous infusion of gastrin (5 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)). The rats were either conscious or anaesthetized. Four commonly used anaesthetic agents were given 1 h before the start of the experiments by intraperitoneal injection: chloral hydrate (300 mg kg(-1)), pentobarbitone (40 mg kg(-1)), urethane (1.5 g kg(-1)) and a mixture of fluanisone/fentanyl/midazolam (15/0.5/7.5 mg kg(-1)). In a parallel series of experiments, basal- and gastrin-induced acid secretion was monitored in six conscious and 25 anaesthetized (see above) chronic gastric fistula rats. All anaesthetic agents lowered gastrin-stimulated acid secretion; also the basal acid output was reduced (fluanisone/fentanyl/midazolam was an exception). Anaesthesia reduced gastrin-stimulated but not basal histamine release by 55 - 80%. The reduction in gastrin-induced acid response (70 - 95%) was strongly correlated to the reduction in gastrin-induced histamine mobilization. The correlation is in line with the view that the reduced acid response to gastrin reflects impaired histamine mobilization. Rat stomach ECL cells were purified by counter-flow elutriation. Gastrin-evoked histamine mobilization from the isolated ECL cells was determined in the absence or presence of anaesthetic agents in the medium. With the exception of urethane, they inhibited gastrin-evoked histamine secretion dose-dependently, indicating a direct effect on the ECL cells. Anaesthetized rats are widely used to study acid secretion and ECL-cell histamine release. The present results illustrate the short-comings of such an approach in that a number of anaesthetic agents were found to impair not only acid secretion but also the secretion of ECL-cell histamine - some acting in a direct manner.

Mobilization of rat stomach ECL-cell histamine in response to short- or long-term treatment with omeprazole and/or YF 476 studied by gastric submucosal microdialysis in conscious rats.

1. Mobilization of histamine from the ECL cells was monitored by gastric submucosal microdialysis in conscious rats. The ECL cells are known to operate under gastrin control and the purpose of the present study was to examine their in situ response to short-term (12 h) as well as long-term (28 days) hypergastrinaemia, induced by treatment with the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole. 2. Hypergastrinaemia promptly raised the histamine concentration in the microdialysate. The effect was prevented by CCK(2) receptor blockade (YF476). On day 7 of omeprazole treatment the microdialysate histamine concentration reached a peak, five times higher than before treatment. Subsequently (14 and 28 days), less histamine was mobilized. 3. Gastrin infusion (4 h) raised the microdialysate histamine concentration in a dose-dependent manner in fasted rats and freely fed rats and in rats treated with omeprazole for a week. However, while fasted and fed rats responded to low doses of gastrin, the omeprazole-treated rats required large doses of gastrin to respond. 4. When the amount of histamine mobilized was related to the serum gastrin concentration the following EC(50) values could be calculated: fasted rats 2.3 x 10(-10) M, freely fed rats 2.5 x 10(-10) M, omeprazole-treated rats 8.7 x 10(-10) M. The maximal histamine responses in the three groups were 18.4 pmol 4 h(-1)+/-0.8, 21.9 pmol 4 h(-1)+/-1.2 and 68.0 pmol 4 h(-1)+/-3.5, respectively. 5. The results suggest that ECL cells, exposed to a high gastrin concentration for a week, respond with a shift in the receptor-ligand binding affinity from high to low. Apparently, CCK(2) receptors of the ECL cells are subject to dynamic changes with respect to ligand-binding affinity.

Long-lasting cholecystokinin(2) receptor blockade after a single subcutaneous injection of YF476 or YM022.

Histamine-forming ECL cells in the rat stomach operate under the control of gastrin. They represent a convenient target for studying cholecystokinin-B/gastrin (CCK(2)) receptor antagonists in vivo. We examined the effectiveness and duration of action of two CCK(2) antagonists, YM022 and YF476, with respect to their effect on ECL-cell histidine decarboxylase (HDC) activity in the rat. Oral administration of subcutaneous deposition of YF476 or YM022 reduced the HDC activity. The maximum/near-maximum dose for both drugs and for both modes of administration was 300 micromol kg(-1) (effects measured 24 h after dose). At this dose and time the serum concentration of YF476 was 20 - 40 nmol l(-1). The dose 300 micromol kg(-1) was used in all subsequent studies. A single subcutaneous injection of YF476 inhibited the HDC activity for 8 weeks. The circulating concentration of YF476 remained high for the same period of time (>/=15 nmol l(-1)). Subcutaneous YM022 suppressed the HDC activity for 4 weeks. A single oral dose of YF476 or YM022 inhibited the HDC activity for 2 - 3 days. Chronic gastric fistula rats were used to study the effect of subcutaneous YF476 on gastrin-stimulated acid secretion. A single injection of YF476 prevented gastrin from causing an acid response for at least 4 weeks (the longest time studied). We conclude that a single subcutaneous injection of 300 micromol kg(-1) YF476 causes blockade of CCK(2) receptors in the stomach of the rat for 8 weeks thus providing a convenient method for studies of the consequences of long-term CCK(2) receptor inhibition.

Submucosal microinfusion of endothelin and adrenaline mobilizes ECL-cell histamine in rat stomach, and causes mucosal damage: a microdialysis study.

Rat stomach ECL cells release histamine in response to gastrin. Submucosal microinfusion of endothelin or adrenaline, known to cause vasoconstriction and gastric lesions, mobilized striking amounts of histamine. While the histamine response to gastrin is sustainable for hours, that to endothelin and adrenaline was characteristically short-lasting (1-2 h). The aims of this study were to identify the cellular source of histamine mobilized by endothelin and adrenaline, and examine the differences between the histamine-mobilizing effects of gastrin, and of endothelin and adrenaline. Endothelin, adrenaline or gastrin were administered by submucosal microinfusion. Gastric histamine mobilization was monitored by microdialysis. Local pretreatment with the H1-receptor antagonist mepyramine and the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine did not prevent endothelin- or adrenaline-induced mucosal damage. Submucosal microinfusion of histamine did not cause damage. Acid blockade by ranitidine or omeprazole prevented the damage, suggesting that acid back diffusion contributes. Gastrin raised histidine decarboxylase (HDC) activity close to the probe, without affecting the histamine concentration. Endothelin and adrenaline lowered histamine by 50-70%, without activating HDC. Histamine mobilization declined upon repeated administration. Endothelin reduced the number of histamine-immunoreactive ECL cells locally, and reduced the number of secretory vesicles. Thus, unlike gastrin, endothelin (and adrenaline) is capable of exhausting ECL-cell histamine. Microinfusion of alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (known to deplete ECL cells but not mast cells of histamine) reduced the histamine-mobilizing effect of endothelin by 80%, while 1-week pretreatment with omeprazole enhanced it, supporting the involvement of ECL cells. Somatostatin or the prostanoid misoprostol inhibited gastrin-, but not endothelin-stimulated histamine release, suggesting that endothelin and gastrin mobilize histamine via different mechanisms. While gastrin effectively mobilized histamine from ECL cells in primary culture, endothelin had no effect, and adrenaline, a modest effect. Hence, the striking effects of endothelin and adrenaline on ECL cells in situ are probably indirect, possibly a consequence of ischemia.

WE-14, a chromogranin a-derived neuropeptide.

The neuropeptide WE-14 is derived from the posttranslational processing of chromogranin A (CgA). While CgA is expressed in a preponderance of neuroendocrine cells, WE-14 is generated in a distinct subpopulation of CgA-immunopositive cells, most notably in the adrenal, pituitary, and parathyroid glands. Physiological and pharmacological studies have demonstrated that CgA is cleaved to generate WE-14 in the adrenal chromaffin cell population and in the enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells of the oxyntic mucosa. Pathological analyses of neuroendocrine tumors have revealed a heterogeneous pattern of WE-14 immunostaining, with variable concentrations quantified and chromatographically resolved in tissue extracts. Phylogenetic surveys have demonstrated that WE-14 exhibits an ancient lineage, while ontogenetic examination has shown that it is generated at an early stage during fetal development. Putative WE-14 receptor binding sites have been identified in several tissues; however, the physiological role of WE-14 remains enigmatic.

Gastric submucosal microdialysis: a method to study gastrin- and food-evoked mobilization of ECL-cell histamine in conscious rats.

Rat stomach ECL cells are rich in histamine and chromogranin A-derived peptides, such as pancreastatin. Gastrin causes the parietal cells to secrete acid by flooding them with histamine from the ECL cells. In the past, gastric histamine release has been studied using anaesthetized, surgically manipulated animals or isolated gastric mucosa, glands or ECL cells. We monitored gastric histamine mobilization in intact conscious rats by subjecting them to gastric submucosal microdialysis. A microdialysis probe was implanted into the submucosa of the acid-producing part of the stomach (day 1). The rats had access to food and water or were deprived of food (48 h), starting on day 2 after implantation of the probe. On day 4, the rats received food or gastrin (intravenous infusion), and sampling of microdialysate commenced. Samples (flow rate 1.2 microl min(-1)) were collected every 20 or 60 min, and the histamine and pancreastatin concentrations were determined. The serum gastrin concentration was determined in tail vein blood. Exogenous gastrin (4-h infusion) raised microdialysate histamine and pancreastatin dose-dependently. This effect was prevented by gastrin receptor blockade (YM022). Depletion of ECL-cell histamine by alpha-fluoromethylhistidine, an irreversible inhibitor of the histamine-forming enzyme, suppressed the gastrin-evoked release of histamine but not that of pancreastatin. Fasting lowered serum gastrin and microdialysate histamine by 50%, while refeeding raised serum gastrin and microdialysate histamine and pancreastatin 3-fold. We conclude that histamine mobilized by gastrin and food intake derives from ECL cells because: 1) Histamine and pancreastatin were released concomitantly, 2) histamine mobilization following gastrin or food intake was prevented by gastrin receptor blockade, and 3) mobilization of histamine (but not pancreastatin) was abolished by alpha-fluoromethylhistidine. Hence, gastric submucosal microdialysis allows us to monitor the mobilization of ECL-cell histamine in intact conscious rats under various experimental conditions not previously accessible to study. While gastrin receptor blockade lowered post-prandial release of ECL-cell histamine by about 80%, unilateral vagotomy reduced post-prandial mobilization of ECL-cell histamine by about 50%. Hence, both gastrin and vagal excitation contribute to the post-prandial release of ECL-cell histamine.

Novel aspects of gastrin-induced activation of histidine decarboxylase in rat stomach ECL cells.

The ECL cells in the rat stomach respond to gastrin with secretion of histamine and activation of the histamine-forming enzyme histidine decarboxylase (HDC). In the present study, we have investigated factors that influence gastrin-induced activation of HDC. Gastrin-17 was given by continuous intravenous infusion to fasted and freely fed rats in various doses and for various periods of time. We found that: (1) ECL cells in fasted rats displayed one order of magnitude higher sensitivity to gastrin (3 h infusion) than did ECL cells in fed rats (ED50 0.4 versus 4.0 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)), while the maximum response to gastrin was two times greater in fed rats than in fasted rats; (2) HDC in both fasted and fed rats responded to a high gastrin dose (5 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)) in a biphasic manner with peak activity after 8 h in fasted rats and after 16 h in fed rats. In both groups, the activation was followed by a marked decline in the enzyme activity to almost prestimulation levels 24 h after start of the infusion. A low gastrin dose (0.4 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)) did not induce such a biphasic response. Maximum activation of HDC in fed rats occurred 6 days after starting the infusion of the low gastrin dose and was two times higher than the maximum activation observed after the high gastrin dose; (3) In fasted rats the HDC mRNA level rose in response to the high gastrin dose, peaked after 8 h (twofold increase) and then returned to the prestimulation level. In fed rats the increase was slower, reaching a plateau after 24 h that lasted for 6 days (twofold increase); (4) The translation inhibitor cycloheximide blocked the activation of HDC induced by gastrin (4 h infusion of 5 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)), while the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D, which suppressed the increase in HDC mRNA expression, did not.

CCK2 receptor antagonists: pharmacological tools to study the gastrin-ECL cell-parietal cell axis.

Gastrin-recognizing CCK2 receptors are expressed in parietal cells and in so-called ECL cells in the acid-producing part of the stomach. ECL cells are endocrine/paracrine cells that produce and store histamine and chromogranin A (CGA)-derived peptides, such as pancreastatin. The ECL cells are the principal cellular transducer of the gastrin-acid signal. Activation of the CCK2 receptor results in mobilization of histamine (and pancreastatin) from the ECL cells with consequent activation of the parietal cell histamine H2 receptor. Thus, release of ECL-cell histamine is a key event in the process of gastrin-stimulated acid secretion. The oxyntic mucosal histidine decarboxylase (HDC) activity and the serum pancreastatin concentration are useful markers for the activity of the gastrin-ECL cell axis. Powerful and selective CCK2 receptor antagonits have been developed from a series of benzodiazepine compounds. These agents are useful tools to study how gastrin controls the ECL cells. Conversely, the close control of ECL cells by gastrin makes the gastrin-ECL cell axis well suited for evaluating the antagonistic potential of CCK2 receptor antagonists with the ECL-cell HDC activity as a notably sensitive and reliable parameter. The CCK2 receptor antagonists YF476, YM022, RP73870, JB93182 and AG041R were found to cause prompt inhibition of ECL-cell histamine and pancreastatin secretion and synthesis. The circulating pancreastatin concentration is raised, was lowered when the action of gastrin on the ECL cells was blocked by the CCK2 receptor antagonists. These effects were associated with inhibition of gastrin-stimulated acid secretion. In addition, sustained receptor blockade was manifested in permanently decreased oxyntic mucosal HDC activity, histamine concentration and HDC mRNA and CGA mRNA concentrations. CCK2 receptor blockade also induced hypergastrinemia, which probably reflects the impaired gastric acid secretion (no acid feedback inhibition of gastrin release). Upon withdrawal of the CCK2 receptor antagonists, their effects on the ECL cells were readily reversible. In conclusion, gastrin mobilizes histamine from the ECL cells, thereby provoking the parietal cells to secrete acid. While CCK2 receptor blockade prevents gastrin from evoking acid secretion, it is without effect on basal and vagally stimulated acid secretion. We conclude that specific and potent CCK2 receptor antagonists represent powerful tools to explore the functional significance of the ECL cells.

Expression of the chromogranin A-derived peptides pancreastatin and WE14 in rat stomach ECL cells.

The ECL cells constitute the predominant endocrine cell population in the mucosa of the acid-secreting part of the stomach (fundus). They are rich in chromogranin A (CGA), histamine and histidine decarboxylase (HDC). They secrete CGA-derived peptides and histamine in response to gastrin. The objective of this investigation was to examine the expression of pancreastatin (rat CGA266-314) and WE14 (rat CGA343-356) in rat stomach ECL cells. The distribution and cellular localisation of pancreastatin- and WE14-like immunoreactivities (LI) were analysed by radioimmunoassay and immunohistochemistry with antibodies against pancreastatin, WE14 and HDC. The effect of food deprivation on circulating pancreastatin-LI was examined in intact rats and after gastrectomy or fundectomy. Rats received gastrin-17 (5 nmol/kg/h) by continuous intravenous infusion or omeprazole (400 micromol/kg) once daily by the oral route, to induce hypergastrinemia. CGA-derived peptides in the ECL cells were characterised by gel permeation chromatography. The expression of CGA mRNA was examined by Northern blot analysis. Among all of the endocrine cells in the body, the ECL cell population was the richest in pancreastatin-LI, containing 20-25% of the total body content. Food deprivation and/or surgical removal of the ECL cells lowered the level of pancreastatin-LI in serum by about 80%. Activation of the ECL cells by gastrin infusion or omeprazole treatment raised the serum level of pancreastatin-LI, lowered the concentrations of pancreastatin- and WE14-LI in the ECL cells and increased the CGA mRNA concentration. Chromatographic analysis of the various CGA immunoreactive components in the ECL cells of normal and hypergastrinemic rats suggested that these cells respond to gastrin with a preferential release of the low-molecular-mass forms.

Extracts of ECL-cell granules/vesicles and of isolated ECL cells from rat oxyntic mucosa evoke a Ca2+ second messenger response in osteoblastic cells.

Surgical removal of the acid-producing part of the stomach (oxyntic mucosa) reduces bone mass through mechanisms not yet fully understood. The existence of an osteotropic hormone produced by the so-called ECL cells has been suggested. These cells, which are numerous in the oxyntic mucosa, operate under the control of circulating gastrin. Both gastrin and an extract of the oxyntic mucosa decrease blood calcium and stimulate Ca2+ uptake into bone. Conceivably, gastrin lowers blood calcium indirectly by releasing a hypothetical hormone from the ECL cells. The present study investigated, by means of fura-2 fluorometry, the effect of extracts of preparations enriched in ECL cell granules/vesicles from rat oxyntic mucosa on mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ in three osteoblast-like cell lines, UMR-106.01, MC3T3-E1 and Saos-2, and of extracts of isolated ECL cells in UMR-106.01 cells. The extracts were found to induce a dose-related rapid increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations in the osteoblast-like cells. The response was not due to histamine or pancreastatin, known ECL cell constituents, and could be abolished by pre-digesting the extracts with exo-aminopeptidase. The results show that the increase in [Ca2+](i) reflects a mobilization of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum. The observation of an increase in [Ca2+](i) also in murine embryonic fibroblasts show that the response is not limited to osteoblastic cells. The finding that the extracts evoked a typical Ca2+ -mediated second messenger response in osteoblastic cells provides evidence for the existence of a novel osteotropic peptide hormone (gastrocalcin), produced in the ECL cells, and supports the view that gastrectomy-induced osteopathy may reflect a lack of this hormone.

Gastrin-induced gene expression in oxyntic mucosa and ECL cells of rat stomach.

The histamine-producing ECL cells are numerous in the acid-producing (oxyntic) mucosa. They respond to gastrin by secretion of histamine that acts on parietal cells to produce acid. In addition, gastrin has a trophic effect on the oxyntic mucosa which is exerted on stem cells and ECL cells. To elucidate the molecular actions of gastrin on the stomach we attempted to identify genes that are regulated by gastrin in oxyntic mucosa and in isolated ECL cells. Differential display polymerase chain reaction was used to identify mRNAs that are differentially expressed in rats that are hypergastrinemic after treatment with the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole for 48 h compared with rats that are hypogastrinemic after 24 h fasting. Differences in mRNA levels were confirmed by Northern blot analysis (comparing mRNA from fasted rats, omeprazole-treated rats and rats treated with omeprazole + the CCK2 (cholecystokinin) receptor antagonist YF476). The cDNAs were identified by sequencing followed by data base search. Hypergastrinemia induced by omeprazole treatment resulted in overexpression of mRNA for histidine decarboxylase, fetuin, pepsinogen and cytochrome P450 in the oxyntic mucosa. This was prevented by CCK2 receptor blockade. In isolated ECL cells gastrin upregulated mRNAs for histidine decarboxylase and synaptotagmin V as well as one mRNA transcript without known homology.

Histamine depletion does not affect pancreastatin secretion from isolated rat stomach ECL cells.

ECL cells co-secrete histamine and pancreastatin, a chromogranin A-derived peptide, in response to gastrin. The aim of the study was to explore possible ways to deplete ECL cells of histamine without affecting pancreastatin and to examine how histamine depletion affects pancreastatin secretion. Isolated rat stomach ECL cells (80-85% purity), prepared by counter-flow elutriation, were cultured for 48 h in the presence of alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (histidine decarboxylase inhibitor), bafilomycin A(1) (inhibitor of vacuolar-type proton-translocating ATPase) or reserpine (inhibitor of vesicular monoamine transporter). At this stage, the cells were challenged with 10 nM (EC(100)) gastrin-17 for 30 min. Histamine and pancreastatin were determined by radioimmunoassay. Maximally effective concentrations of alpha-fluoromethylhistidine, bafilomycin A(1) and reserpine were found to lower ECL-cell histamine (by 60%, 78% and 80%, respectively) without affecting pancreastatin. Basal histamine secretion was reduced in a dose-dependent manner by all three drugs. Gastrin-evoked histamine secretion was reduced greatly by the three agents, while pancreastatin secretion was unaffected. The results show that histamine can be depleted not only by inhibiting its formation (alpha-fluoromethylhistidine), but also (and more effectively) by inhibiting histamine vesicular uptake, directly (reserpine) or indirectly (bafilomycin A(1)). The results also indicate that although histamine is co-stored with pancreastatin, it is not required for either storage or secretion of pancreastatin.

alpha-fluoromethylhistidine depletes histamine from secreting but not from non-secreting rat stomach ECL cells.

Histamine in the oxyntic mucosa of the rat stomach occurs in mast cells (10%) and ECL cells (90%). Unlike the mast cells, the ECL cells operate under the control of gastrin. alpha-Fluoromethylhistidine, an irreversible inhibitor of the histamine-forming enzyme, histidine decarboxylase depletes ECL-cell but not mast-cell histamine. This report shows that the effectiveness by which histidine decarboxylase inhibition depletes ECL-cell histamine depends on the rate of histamine secretion. Rats received alpha-fluoromethylhistidine by continuous subcutaneous infusion for 24 h. Maximally effective doses (>/=3 mg/kg/h) inhibited histidine decarboxylase and reduced oxyntic mucosal histamine in fed rats by 80-90%. In fasted rats, the reduction was 50%. alpha-Fluoromethylhistidine greatly reduced the number of histamine-immunoreactive ECL cells (immunocytochemistry) and of secretory vesicles in the ECL cells (electron microscopy) in fed but not in fasted rats. The half-life of oxyntic mucosal histamine (determined upon histidine decarboxylase inhibition) was 2.6 h in fed rats and 19.4 h in fasted rats. The amount of histamine secreted in response to gastrin (monitored by gastric submucosal microdialysis) was greatly reduced by alpha-fluoromethylhistidine in fed rats but not in fasted rats. ECL cells were isolated from rat stomach by elutriation (80% purity). Their histamine content was determined after culture, with or without alpha-fluoromethylhistidine, in the presence of varying concentrations of gastrin. In a medium containing 10 nM gastrin, ECL cells responded to a maximally effective concentration of alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (0.1 nM) with 80% reduction in histamine content. In the absence of gastrin, ECL cells responded to alpha-fluoromethylhistidine with 45% reduction of histamine; the releasable histamine pool was unaffected. In conclusion, the combination of histidine decarboxylase inhibition and a high rate of histamine secretion will promptly exhaust the ECL-cell histamine pool, while histidine decarboxylase inhibition and a low secretion rate will affect the histamine pool much less.

Teeth, tooth spaces, and prosthetic appliances in elderly men in Malmö, Sweden.

A group of 483 men, all of whom were 68 or 69 yr old and had lived for a long time in the city of Malmö were examined with regard to number of teeth present, removable dentures, fixed bridges, and tooth spaces. 76.4% had one or more natural teeth remaining, 59.2% had removable dentures, and 0.2% were edentulous and without dentures. The mean number of teeth present in a fixed dentition calculated on dentate subjects was 16.21 +/- 8.02, including teeth replaced by pontics and 15.0 +/- 7.44 when natural teeth only were recorded. The number of bridges was high, 28.8% of natural dentate persons having bridgework. This cohort had fewer remaining teeth than in similar groups in other areas of Sweden, but more fixed bridges. 19.5% had open tooth spaces corresponding to one or more teeth in the visible parts of the dental arches. The availability of dentistry has been extremely good in Malmö and financial support for all types of dental care has been provided for all inhabitants since 1974. In spite of this, a low number of remaining teeth and many untreated tooth spaces in visible part of the dental arches were found, though on the other hand much fixed bridgework was found. It appears from the present study that the population tends to polarize into two groups, namely one group which takes advantage of the dental services and one which does not.

Relationship between general health, social factors and oral health in women at the age of retirement.

Relationships between some medical, psychological, social factors and oral health were analyzed within a comprehensive study of women around the age of retirement. The study was performed in Malmö in 1985-1986 and included 165 women retiring from work between 851201 and 870131. Women in qualified professional positions and with high prosperity indices had an average significantly more remaining teeth and were less often edentulous than the others. The same applied to unmarried women compared to divorcees and widows. There were significant correlations between full blood glucose and serum urate concentrations and number of teeth, DFT and DFS. The mean number of prescribed drugs was negatively related to the number of remaining teeth and high drug consumption was positively related to oral dryness. Women complaining of strain, overwork, restlessness and difficulty in relaxing reported more often problems with oral dryness. Oral dryness was also related to high blood values of calcium, urate and triglycerides, while the serum levels of cholesterol were low. There were no differences between smokers and non-smokers concerning any of the studied tooth-related variables, oral dryness, hypertension or bodyweight. The results indicate a close relationship between general health, social factors and oral health.