RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The reason why some multiple sclerosis (MS) patients show disease activity after alemtuzumab (ALM) is still unclear, but ocrelizumab (OCR) could represent an interesting sequential therapeutic approach. OBJECTIVES: To investigate safety and efficacy of OCR in MS patients with disease activity after two ALM courses. METHODS: Observational retrospective multi-centers Italian cohort study. RESULTS: Seventy-two subjects were included. Mean follow-up (FU) was 2.4 (±1) years. Forty-five patients (62.5%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with infections accounting for 96.7% of cases. A reduction in total lymphocytes was observed between OCR start and 6 months FU, driven by BCD19+ lymphocytes depletion (p < 0.001). Immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels decreased between OCR start and 6 months FU (p < 0.001). At 2-year FU, relapse, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and disability worsening-free survival were 92.1%, 90.8%, and 89.2%. The evidence of inflammatory activity between the two ALM courses was associated with higher risk of relapse, MRI activity, and NEDA-3 status loss in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS; p = 0.02, p = 0.05, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OCR after two ALM courses seemed to be safe and effective. Early IgM hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in a high proportion of patients. The evidence of inflammatory activity between ALM courses seemed to increase the risk of MS re-activation on OCR treatment.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Multiple sclerosis clinicians are continuously challenged to be innovative in delivering therapies and there is ongoing pressure to maximize day-hospital vacancies. We describe our single-center experience with ocrelizumab (OCR) rapid infusion (OCR-RI) in patients with MS (pwMS). METHODS: For pwMS with prior exposure to OCR standard infusion (OCR-SI) for at least one year/two cycles, infusion time was reduced from 3.5 to 2.0 h. A comparative analysis between OCR-RI vs OCR-SI patients was conducted. RESULTS: 283 (76.7%) out of 369 OCR-treated pwMS performed OCR-RI; 86 subjects did not start OCR-RI due to infusion-related reactions (IRR) occurring with OCR-SI (n = 13) or OCR-treatment duration shorter than one year (n = 73). Disease duration was longer in OCR-RI (p < 0.001). Median numbers of overall-OCR and OCR-RI cycles were 7 (IQR = 5-8) and 4 (IQR = 2-5) (p < 0.001). Overall, 38 (10.3%) IRR were reported, 25 (8.8%) in OCR-RI and 13 (15.1%) in OCR-SI group. IRR frequency did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.106). IRR included throat irritation, rash, hypotension, fever and gastrointestinal symptoms. IRR severity was mild (81.6%) or moderate (18.4%), all resolved and did not differ in distribution between the two groups. When IRR occurred, infusions were temporarily stopped, hydration and/or symptomatic medications were given and infusions were subsequently resumed at standard velocity. OCR-RI was not a risk factor for IRR (OR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.27-1.13, p = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, IRR frequency, severity and management were comparable to literature. No severe IRR were observed. RI protocols represent a strategy to optimize patients' management in the clinic.