Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Radiology ; 310(3): e231877, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441098

RESUMEN

Background Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is a safe, minimally invasive angiographic procedure that effectively treats benign prostatic hyperplasia; however, PAE-related patient radiation exposure and associated risks are not completely understood. Purpose To quantify radiation dose and assess radiation-related adverse events in patients who underwent PAE at multiple centers. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients undergoing PAE for any indication performed by experienced operators at 10 high-volume international centers from January 2014 to May 2021. Patient characteristics, procedural and radiation dose data, and radiation-related adverse events were collected. Procedural radiation effective doses were calculated by multiplying kerma-area product values by an established conversion factor for abdominopelvic fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Relationships between cumulative air kerma (CAK) or effective dose and patient body mass index (BMI), fluoroscopy time, or radiation field area were assessed with linear regression. Differences in radiation dose stemming from radiopaque prostheses or fluoroscopy unit type were assessed using two-sample t tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results A total of 1476 patients (mean age, 69.9 years ± 9.0 [SD]) were included, of whom 1345 (91.1%) and 131 (8.9%) underwent the procedure with fixed interventional or mobile fluoroscopy units, respectively. Median procedure effective dose was 17.8 mSv for fixed interventional units and 12.3 mSv for mobile units. CAK and effective dose both correlated positively with BMI (R2 = 0.15 and 0.17; P < .001) and fluoroscopy time (R2 = 0.16 and 0.08; P < .001). No radiation-related 90-day adverse events were reported. Patients with radiopaque implants versus those without implants had higher median CAK (1452 mGy [range, 900-2685 mGy] vs 1177 mGy [range, 700-1959 mGy], respectively; P = .01). Median effective dose was lower for mobile than for fixed interventional systems (12.3 mSv [range, 8.5-22.0 mSv] vs 20.4 mSv [range, 13.8-30.6 mSv], respectively; P < .001). Conclusion Patients who underwent PAE performed with fixed interventional or mobile fluoroscopy units were exposed to a median effective radiation dose of 17.8 mSv or 12.3 mSv, respectively. No radiation-related adverse events at 90 days were reported. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Mahesh in this issue.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Hiperplasia Prostática , Exposición a la Radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias/diagnóstico por imagen
2.
Radiology ; 288(3): 774-781, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29737954

RESUMEN

Purpose To determine the frequency of hepatobiliary infections after transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium 90 (90Y) in patients with liver malignancy and a history of biliary intervention. Materials and Methods For this retrospective study, records of all consecutive patients with liver malignancy and history of biliary intervention treated with TARE at 14 centers between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed. Data regarding liver function, 90Y dosimetry, antibiotic prophylaxis, and bowel preparation prophylaxis were collected. Primary outcome was development of hepatobiliary infection. Results One hundred twenty-six patients (84 men, 42 women; mean age, 68.8 years) with primary (n = 39) or metastatic (n = 87) liver malignancy and history of biliary intervention underwent 180 procedures with glass (92 procedures) or resin (88 procedures) microspheres. Hepatobiliary infections (liver abscesses in nine patients, cholangitis in five patients) developed in 10 of the 126 patients (7.9%) after 11 of the 180 procedures (6.1%; nine of those procedures were performed with glass microspheres). All patients required hospitalization (median stay, 12 days; range, 2-113 days). Ten patients required percutaneous abscess drainage, three patients underwent endoscopic stent placement and stone removal, and one patient needed insertion of percutaneous biliary drains. Infections resolved in five patients, four patients died (two from infection and two from cancer progression while infection was being treated), and one patient continued to receive suppressive antibiotics. Use of glass microspheres (P = .02), previous liver resection or ablation (P = .02), and younger age (P = .003) were independently predictive of higher infection risk. Conclusion Infectious complications such as liver abscess and cholangitis are uncommon but serious complications of transarterial radioembolization with 90Y in patients with liver malignancy and a history of biliary intervention.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Colangitis/etiología , Absceso Hepático/etiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Radioisótopos de Itrio/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Femenino , Vidrio , Humanos , Infecciones , Hígado/microbiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Masculino , Microesferas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Radiology ; 282(1): 281-288, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27440733

RESUMEN

Purpose To determine if high lung shunt fraction (LSF) is an independent prognostic indicator of poor survival in patients who undergo yttrium 90 radioembolization for unresectable liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer. Materials and Methods Retrospective data were analyzed from 606 patients (62% men; mean age, 62 years) who underwent radioembolization to treat liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma between July 2002 and December 2011 at 11 U.S. centers. Institutional review board exemptions were granted prior to the collection of data at each site. Overall survival was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier survival and univariate Cox proportional hazards models to examine the effect of LSF on survival and to compare this to other potential prognostic indicators. Multivariate analysis was also performed to determine whether LSF is an independent risk factor for poor survival. Results LSF higher than 10% was predictive of significantly decreased survival (median, 6.9 months vs 10.0 months; hazard ratio, 1.60; P < .001) and demonstrated a mild but significant correlation to serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels and tumor-to-liver volume ratio (Pearson correlation coefficients, 0.105 and 0.113, respectively; P < .05). A progressive decrease in survival was observed as LSF increased from less than 5% to more than 20% (P < .05). LSF did not correlate with the presence of extrahepatic metastases or prior administration of bevacizumab. Conclusion Increased LSF is an independent prognostic indicator of worse survival in patients undergoing radioembolization for liver-dominant metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. High LSF correlates poorly to other potential markers of tumor size, such as tumor-to-liver volume ratio or serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, and does not correlate to the presence of extrahepatic metastases. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Fístula Arteriovenosa/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/radioterapia , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Radioisótopos de Itrio/uso terapéutico , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Angiografía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/irrigación sanguínea , Pulmón/irrigación sanguínea , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Microesferas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 23(4): 1309-19, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26597368

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There is no consensus for the treatment of melanoma metastatic to the liver. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (PHP-Mel) is a method of delivering regional chemotherapy selectively to the liver. In this study, we report the results of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing PHP-Mel with best alternative care (BAC) for patients with ocular or cutaneous melanoma metastatic to the liver. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 93 patients were randomized to PHP-Mel (n = 44) or BAC (n = 49). On the PHP-Mel arm, melphalan was delivered via the hepatic artery, and the hepatic effluent captured and filtered extracorporeally prior to return to the systemic circulation via a venovenous bypass circuit. PHP-Mel was repeatable every 4-8 weeks. The primary endpoint was hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and secondary endpoints included overall PFS (oPFS), overall survival (OS), hepatic objective response (hOR), and safety. RESULTS: hPFS was 7.0 months for PHP-Mel and 1.6 months for BAC (p < 0.0001), while oPFS was 5.4 months for PHP-Mel and 1.6 months for BAC (p < 0.0001). Median OS was not significantly different (PHP-Mel 10.6 months vs. BAC 10.0 months), likely due to crossover to PHP-Mel treatment (57.1 %) from the BAC arm, and the hOR was 36.4 % for PHP-Mel and 2.0 % for BAC (p < 0.001). The majority of adverse events were related to bone marrow suppression. Four deaths were attributed to PHP-Mel, three in the primary PHP-Mel group, and one post-crossover to PHP-Mel from BAC. CONCLUSION: This randomized, phase III study demonstrated the efficacy of the PHP-Mel procedure. hPFS, oPFS, and hOR were significantly improved with PHP-Mel. PHP with melphalan should provide a new treatment option for unresectable metastatic melanoma in the liver.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Ojo/secundario , Arteria Hepática , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Melanoma/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/secundario , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Perfusión , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tasa de Supervivencia
5.
CVIR Endovasc ; 4(1): 63, 2021 Aug 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34374875

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is associated with patients' quality of life improvements and limited side effects compared to surgery. However, this procedure remains technically challenging due to complex vasculature, anatomical variations and small arteries, inducing long procedure times and high radiation exposure levels both to patients and medical staff. Moreover, the risk of non-target embolization can lead to relevant complications. In this context, advanced imaging can constitute a solid ally to address these challenges and deliver good clinical outcomes at acceptable radiation levels. MAIN TEXT: This technical note aims to share the consolidated experience of four institutions detailing their optimized workflow using advanced image guidance, discussing variants, and sharing their best practices to reach a consensus standardized imaging workflow for PAE procedure, as well as pre and post-operative imaging. CONCLUSIONS: This technical note puts forth a consensus optimized imaging workflow and best practices, with the hope of helping drive adoption of the procedure, deliver good clinical outcomes, and minimize radiation dose levels and contrast media injections while making PAE procedures shorter and safer.

6.
Cancer Invest ; 27(6): 682-90, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19219675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ocular melanoma (OM) metastasizes to the liver and is rapidly fatal despite aggressive therapy. Yttrium-90 microspheres (radioembolization) delivered via the hepatic artery is an established and effective approach for primary and metastatic hepatic tumors, although (90)Y use in OM has not been reported previously. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all patients with OM who received radioembolization at 5 centers. RESULTS: 11 patients received 12 treatments with a median activity of 1.55 GBq delivered per treatment. Toxicity was minimal, with PET/CT at 3 months posttreatment showing a response in all patients; 1 patient had a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization can control hepatic metastases of OM with very few side effects.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias del Ojo/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Melanoma/radioterapia , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Radioisótopos de Itrio/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Israel , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/secundario , Microesferas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radiofármacos/administración & dosificación , Radiofármacos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Radioisótopos de Itrio/administración & dosificación , Radioisótopos de Itrio/efectos adversos
7.
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol ; 21(4): 288-294, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30545507

RESUMEN

Prostatic artery embolization can be an extremely challenging procedure often giving the operator the sense of "being in trouble." This feeling can occur during different stages of the procedure including initial identification of the prostatic artery, catheterization of the prostatic artery, and prevention of non-target ischemia via extra-prostatic anastomoses during embolization. This brief guide provides techniques developed from prior experience with these frustrating situations that could potentially help the prostatic artery embolization operator "get out of trouble."


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Próstata/irrigación sanguínea , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Radiografía Intervencional , Angiografía , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Masculino
9.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 69(3): 800-4, 2007 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17524567

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Therapy for patients with unresectable liver metastases from breast cancer that were refractory to multiple treatment regimens was performed using radioactive microspheres. High doses of radiation were delivered to tumors from these permanently implanted yttrium-90 ((90)Y) microspheres, delivered through the hepatic arterial vessels. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women from three institutions were selected for treatment, after screening that demonstrated vascular access to all tumors and after imaging confirmed that microspheres would be implanted only in the liver tumors. All patients were followed with laboratory and imaging studies at regular intervals until death. Toxicities, both acute and late were recorded, and actuarial survival determined. RESULTS: A total of 44 women were treated from April 2002 to April 2005. Median follow-up of these women was 14 months (1-42 months). No treatment-related procedure deaths or radiation related veno-occlusive liver failures were found. Computed tomographic imaging partial response was 47% and positron emission tomographic response 95%. CONCLUSION: In this group of heavily pretreated patients, radioactive microspheres produced an encouraging median survival, with acceptable toxicity and a significant objective response rate, suggesting that further investigation of this approach is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/instrumentación , Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Microesferas , Radioisótopos de Itrio/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
10.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 68(1): 13-23, 2007 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17448867

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To standardize the indications, techniques, multimodality treatment approaches, and dosimetry to be used for yttrium-90 (Y90) microsphere hepatic brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Members of the Radioembolization Brachytherapy Oncology Consortium met as an independent group of experts in interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, medical oncology, and surgical oncology to identify areas of consensus and controversy and to issue clinical guidelines for Y90 microsphere brachytherapy. RESULTS: A total of 14 recommendations are made with category 2A consensus. Key findings include the following. Sufficient evidence exists to support the safety and effectiveness of Y90 microsphere therapy. A meticulous angiographic technique is required to prevent complications. Resin microsphere prescribed activity is best estimated by the body surface area method. By virtue of their training, certification, and contribution to Y90 microsphere treatment programs, the disciplines of radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, and interventional radiology are all qualified to use Y90 microspheres. The panel strongly advocates the creation of a treatment registry with uniform reporting criteria. Initiation of clinical trials is essential to further define the safety and role of Y90 microspheres in the context of currently available therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Yttrium-90 microsphere therapy is a complex procedure that requires multidisciplinary management for safety and success. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use these guidelines to formulate their treatment and dose-reporting policies.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Microesferas , Radioisótopos de Itrio/uso terapéutico , Braquiterapia/normas , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Física Sanitaria/normas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/irrigación sanguínea , Selección de Paciente , Dosificación Radioterapéutica
12.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 8(4): 614-624, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28890810

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases Outcomes after RadioEmbolization (MORE) study was a retrospective analysis of 606 patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated with radioembolization (RE) using 90Y-labeled resin microspheres. The first analysis of this study was completed with a last patient follow-up of 77.7 months. We now provide an updated survival analysis through September 15, 2016, with a last patient follow-up of 125 months. METHODS: 90Y-RE was considered for patients with advanced liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer which was deemed not suitable for surgery, ablation, or systemic therapy, and which had progressed or become refractory to at least one line of systemic therapy. All patients with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer who had received at least 1 RE treatment and 1 follow-up visit were included in the analysis. Patients were treated between July 2002 and December 2011 at one of 11 U.S. tertiary care centers. Data were collected at baseline, on the day of the first 90Y-RE treatment (day 0), and at all subsequent visits or until death. Patient medical charts and/or public records were accessed to obtain dates of death. RESULTS: Dates of death were obtained for 574 out of a total of 606 patients, and overall survival (OS) data analyzed. Updated median OS was 10.0 months (95% CI: 9.2-11.8 months) at a median follow-up of 9.5 months versus the originally reported median OS of 9.6 months (95% CI: 9.0-11.1 months) at a follow-up of 8.6 months in the first MORE analysis. Patients received a median (range) of 2 (0 to 6) lines of chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics and factors significantly associated with patient survival (P<0.01) are consistent with those reported in the first safety analysis of the MORE study. These factors include poor ECOG performance status, markers of advanced disease such as increased extent of tumor-to-target liver involvement, poor baseline liver function, pre-treatment anemia, lung shunt fraction, and number of lines of prior chemotherapy. Patient age did not significantly affect survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up confirms that 90Y-RE treatment offers favorable survival benefits for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, even among patients who received 3 or more prior lines of chemotherapy. Our analysis also supports earlier reported prognostic factors for survival after 90Y-RE. Overall, our updated analysis confirms that 90Y-RE treatment provided a meaningful response and survival advantage for MORE patients across all ages and across diverse community and academic centers in the U.S.

13.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 8(1): 70-80, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28280611

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) often benefit from receiving 90Y-microsphere radioembolization (RE) administered via the hepatic arteries. Prior to delivery of liver-directed radiation, standard laboratory tests may assist in improving outcome by identifying correctable pre-radiation abnormalities. METHODS: A database containing retrospective review of consecutively treated patients of mCRC from July 2002 to December 2011 at 11 US institutions was used. Data collected included background characteristics, prior chemotherapy, surgery/ablation, radiotherapy, vascular procedures, 90Y treatment, subsequent adverse events and survival. Kaplan-Meier estimates compared the survival of patients across lines of chemotherapy. The following values were obtained within 10 days prior to each RE treatment: haemoglobin (HGB), albumin, alkaline phosphatase (Alk phosph), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin and creatinine. Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAEs) 3.0 grade was assigned to each parameter and analysed for impact on survival by line of chemotherapy. Consensus Guidelines were used to categorize the parameter grades as either within or outside guidelines for treatment. RESULTS: A total of 606 patients (370 male; 236 female) were studied with a median follow-up was 8.5 mo. (IQR 4.3-15.6) after RE. Fewer than 11% of patients were treated outside recommended RE guidelines, with albumin being the most common, 10.5% grade 2 (<3-2.0 g/dL) at time of RE. All seven parameters showed statistically significant decreased median survivals with any grade >0 (P<0.001) across all lines of prior chemotherapy. Compared to grade 0, grade 2 albumin decreased overall survival 67%; for grade 2 total bilirubin a 63% drop occurred, and grade 1 HGB resulted in 66% lower median survival. CONCLUSIONS: Review of pre-RE laboratory parameters may aid in improving median survivals if correctable grade >0 values are addressed prior to radiation delivery. HGB <10 g/dL is a well-known negative factor in radiation response and is easily corrected. Improving other parameters is more challenging. These efforts are important in optimizing treatment response to liver radiotherapy.

14.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 65(2): 412-25, 2006 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16690429

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Salvage therapy for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases that were refractory to oxaliplatin and irinotecan was performed via radioactive microspheres. High doses of radiation were delivered to tumors from permanently implanted 90Y microspheres, delivered through the hepatic arterial vessels. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients from 7 institutions were selected for treatment after screening-defined vascular access to all the tumors, and imaging-confirmed microspheres would be implanted only in the liver tumors. All patients were followed with laboratory and imaging studies at regular intervals until death. Toxicities, both acute and late, were recorded, and actuarial survival determined. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were treated from April 2002 to April 2005. Median follow-up of the 129 men and 79 women is 13 months (range, 1-42 months). Median survival is 10.5 months for responders but only 4.5 months in nonresponders. No treatment-related procedure deaths or radiation-related venoocclusive liver failures were found. Computed tomography partial response was 35%; positron emission tomography response of 91% and reduction in carcinoembryonic antigen of 70% were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of heavily pretreated patients, radioactive microspheres produced an encouraging median survival, with acceptable toxicity, and a significant objective response rate, which suggests that further investigation of this approach is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Radioisótopos de Itrio/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Microesferas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia
15.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 22(3): 265-78, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21353979
16.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 15(2): 141-151.e6, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26541321

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effects of advancing age on clinical outcomes after radioembolization (RE) in patients with unresectable liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are largely unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 160 elderly (≥ 70 years) and 446 younger (< 70 years) consecutive patients from 11 US centers who received RE using ytrrium-90 ((90)Y) resin microspheres ((90)Y radioembolization [(90)Y-RE]) between July 2002 and December 2011. A further analysis was conducted in 98 very elderly patients (≥ 75 years). Statistical analyses of safety, tolerability, and overall survival were conducted. RESULTS: Mean ages (± standard deviation) in the younger (< 70 years), elderly (≥ 70 years), and very elderly (≥ 75 years) cohorts were 55.9 ± 9.4 years, 77.2 ± 4.8 years, and 80.2 ± 3.8 years, respectively. Overall survival was similar between elderly and younger patients: 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-12.1) and 9.7 months (95% CI, 9.0-11.4) (P = .335). There were no differences between cohorts for any grade adverse events (P = .433) or grade 3+ events (P = .482). Analysis of patients ≥ 75 years and < 75 years confirmed similar overall survival (median, 9.3 months vs. 9.6 months, respectively; P = .987) and grade 3+ events (P = .398) or any adverse event (P = .158) within 90 days of RE. CONCLUSION: For patients with unresectable liver-dominant mCRC who meet eligibility criteria for RE, (90)Y-RE microspheres appear to be effective and well-tolerated, regardless of age. Criteria for selecting patients for RE should not include age for exclusion from this potentially beneficial intervention.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Microesferas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Radioisótopos de Itrio/uso terapéutico
17.
Liver Cancer ; 4(4): 208-14, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26734576

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Image-guided ablation is used to treat patients with unresectable malignant hepatic tumors that are limited in number and size, especially hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal hepatic metastases. While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been the most popular technique, several alternate options for focal tissue destruction have recently attracted attention. These technologies appear to be able to overcome some specific limitations of RFA. Currently, there is no accepted algorithm for the use of the different techniques for image-guided ablation. SUMMARY: A panel of physicians practicing in North America or Europe met to develop a set of recommendations aimed at providing directions for clinical validation of energy-based, thermal and non-thermal image-guided ablation technologies in the treatment of malignant liver tumors. The recommendations were developed through a critical appraisal of potential advantages and disadvantages of each ablation technology, based on experimental findings and available data, as well as on critical considerations for their clinical validation in hepatic tumor treatment from a Western perspective. KEY MESSAGES: Significant variability appears to exist among the different equipment and devices within each type of technology. A comprehensive understanding of the data and a critical appraisal of the efficacy and safety profile of each ablation system is required. Clinical practice guidelines should include specific information of the recommended techniques and protocols instead of a generic indication of the technology.

18.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 34: 19, 2015 Feb 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25887490

RESUMEN

Colorectal cancers are significant causes of morbidity and mortality and existing therapies often perform poorly for individuals afflicted with advanced disease. Oncolytic virotherapy is an emerging therapeutic modality with great promise for addressing this medical need. Herein we describe the in vivo testing of recombinant variants of the tanapoxvirus (TPV). Recombinant viruses were made ablated for either the 66R gene (encoding a thymidine kinase), the 2L gene (encoding a TNF-binding protein), or both. Some of the recombinants were armed to express mouse chemotactic protein 1 (mCCL2/mMCP-1), mouse granulocyte-monocyte colony stimulating factor (mGM-CSF), or bacterial flagellin (FliC). Tumors were induced in athymic nude mice by implantation of HCT 116 cells and subsequently treated by a single intratumoral injection of one of the recombinant TPVs. Histological examination showed a common neoplastic cell type and a range of immune cell infiltration, necrosis, and tumor cell organization. Significant regression was seen in tumors treated with virus TPV/Δ2L/Δ66R/fliC, and to a lesser extent the recombinants TPV/Δ2L and TPV/Δ66R. Our results suggest that oncolytic recombinants of the TPV armed with activators of the innate immune response may be effective virotherapeutic agents for colorectal cancers in humans and should be explored further to fully realize their potential.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Flagelina/genética , Expresión Génica , Vectores Genéticos/genética , Viroterapia Oncolítica , Virus Oncolíticos/genética , Yatapoxvirus/genética , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Terapia Genética , Vectores Genéticos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Transducción Genética , Transgenes , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
19.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 6(6): 594-604, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26697190

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To assess response and the impact of imaging artifacts following radioembolization with yttrium-90-labeled resin microspheres ((90)Y-RE) based on the findings from a central independent review of patients with liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Patients with mCRC who received (90)Y-RE (SIR-Spheres(®); Sirtex Medical, Sydney, Australia) at nine US institutions between July 2002 and December 2011 were included in the analysis. Tumor response was assessed at baseline and 3 months using either the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0 or 1.1. For each lesion, known artifacts affecting the interpretation of response (peri-tumoral edema and necrosis) were documented. Survivals (Kaplan-Meier analyses) were compared in responders [partial response (PR)] and non-responders [stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD)]. RESULTS: Overall, 195 patients (mean age 62 years) received (90)Y-RE after a median of 2 (range, 1-6) lines of prior chemotherapy. Using RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1, 7.6% and 6.9% of patients were partial responders, 47.3% and 48.1% had SD, and 55.0% and 55.0% PD, respectively. RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 showed excellent agreement {Kappa =0.915 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.856-0.975]}. Peri-tumoral edema was documented in 32.8%, necrosis in 48.1% and both in 57.3% of cases (using RECIST 1.0). Although baseline characteristics were similar in responders and non-responders (P>0.05), responders survived significantly longer in an analysis according to RECIST 1.0: PR median (95% CI) 25.2 (range, 9.2-49.4) months vs. SD 15.8 (range, 9.3-21.1) months vs. PD 7.1 (range, 6.0-9.5) months (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 imaging responses provide equivalent interpretations in the assessment of hepatic tumors following (90)Y-RE. Radiologic lesion responses at 3 months must be interpreted with caution due to the significant proportion of patients with peri-tumoral edema and necrosis, which may lead to an under-estimation of PR/SD. Nevertheless, 3-month radiologic responses were predictive of prolonged survival.

20.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 6(2): 134-42, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25830033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases Outcomes after RadioEmbolization (MORE) was an investigator-initiated case-control study to assess the experience of 11 US centers who treated liver-dominant metastases from colorectal cancer (mCRC) using radioembolization [selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT)] with yttrium-90-((90)Y)-labeled resin microspheres. METHODS: Data from 606 consecutive patients who received radioembolization between July 2002 and December 2011 were collected by an independent research organization. Adverse events (AEs) and survival were compared across lines of treatment using Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier estimates, respectively. RESULTS: Patients received a median of 2 (range, 0-6) lines of prior chemotherapy; 35.1% had limited extrahepatic metastases. Median tumor-to-liver ratio and -activity administered at first procedure were 15% and 1.17 GBq, respectively. Hospital stay was <24 hours in 97.8% cases. Common grade ≥3 AEs over 184 days follow-up were: abdominal pain (6.1%), fatigue (5.5%), hyperbilirubinemia (5.4%), ascites (3.6%) and gastrointestinal ulceration (1.7%). There was no statistical difference in AEs across treatment lines (P>0.05). Median survivals [95% confidence interval (CI)] following radioembolization as a 2(nd)-line, 3(rd)-line, or 4(th)-plus line were 13.0 (range, 10.5-14.6), 9.0 (range, 7.8-11.0), and 8.1 (range, 6.4-9.3) months, respectively; and significantly prolonged in patients with ECOG 0 vs. ≥1 (P=0.009). Statistically significant independent variables for survival at radioembolization were: disease stage [extrahepatic metastases, extent of liver involvement (tumor-to-treated-liver ratio)], liver function (uncontrolled ascites, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase), leukocytes, and prior chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization appears to have a favorable risk/benefit profile, even among mCRC patients who had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda