External Correlates of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form across a National Sample of Veterans.

This study examines the convergent validity of the substantive scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in the Veteran Affairs (VA) population. The sample includes test protocols drawn from all administrations of the MMPI-2-RF or MMPI-2 entered into the electronic medical record system between January 1, 2008 and May 31, 2015 at any VA across the United States. After excluding invalid protocols, substantive scale scores were correlated with external measures of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder if they were administered within |14| days of the MMPI-2/-RF. Results supported the convergent validity of the MMPI-2-RF emotional dysfunction domain scores. Discriminant validity for the remaining MMPI-2-RF substantive scale scores was also adequate. Limitations and implications of these findings are discussed.

Comparing MMPI-2-Restructured Form Scores by Service Era for Veterans Assessed Within the Veteran Affairs Healthcare System.

This study compares profiles of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scale scores from 1492 VA test-takers who served during the Vietnam or Gulf War service eras. The sample includes all such cases collected at any VA posttraumatic stress disorder Clinical Teams across the United States between January 1, 2008 and May 31, 2015 using the MMPI-2 or MMPI-2-RF (via the VA Mental Health Assistant suite). Associations between gender and score differences were also examined. In contrast to past research using the MMPI-2, results of this study suggest that veterans are generally homogeneous in their MMPI-2-RF profiles across different periods of service. Specifically, the magnitudes of mean differences are small and not clinically significant. Thus, responses on the MMPI-2-RF do not appear influenced by service era. Implications for the clinical use of, and research with, the MMPI-2-RF are discussed within the VA healthcare system.

Daily Drinking Is Associated with Increased Mortality.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that low-level alcohol use, drinking 1 to 2 drinks on occasion, is protective for cardiovascular disease, but increases the risk of cancer. Synthesizing the overall impact of low-level alcohol use on health is therefore complex. The objective of this paper was to examine the association between frequency of low-level drinking and mortality. METHODS: Two data sets with self-reported alcohol use and mortality follow-up were analyzed: 340,668 individuals from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and 93,653 individuals from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) outpatient medical records. Survival analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between low-level drinking frequency and mortality. RESULTS: The minimum risk drinking frequency among those who drink 1 to 2 drinks per occasion was found to be 3.2 times weekly in the NHIS data, based on a continuous measure of drinking frequency, and 2 to 3 times weekly in the VA data. Relative to these individuals with minimum risk, individuals who drink 7 times weekly had an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality of 1.23 (p < 0.0001) in the NHIS data, and individuals who drink 4 to 7 times weekly in the VA data also had an adjusted HR of 1.23 (p = 0.01). Secondary analyses in the NHIS data showed that the minimum risk was drinking 4 times weekly for cardiovascular mortality, and drinking monthly or less for cancer mortality. The associations were consistent in stratified analyses of men, women, and never smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The minimum risk of low-level drinking frequency for all-cause mortality appears to be approximately 3 occasions weekly. The robustness of this finding is highlighted in 2 distinctly different data sets: a large epidemiological data set and a data set of veterans sampled from an outpatient clinic. Daily drinking, even at low levels, is detrimental to one's health.

Design and methods of the Longitudinal Eating Disorders Assessment Project research consortium for veterans.

INTRODUCTION: Military service members must maintain a certain body mass index and body fat percentage. Due to weight-loss pressures, some service members may resort to unhealthy behaviors that place them at risk for the development of an eating disorder (ED). OBJECTIVES: To understand the scope and impact of EDs in military service members and veterans, we formed the Longitudinal Eating Disorders Assessment Project (LEAP) Consortium. LEAP aims to develop novel screening, assessment, classification, and treatment tools for veterans and military members with a focus on EDs and internalizing psychopathology. METHODS: We recruited two independent nationally representative samples of post-9/11 veterans who were separated from service within the past year. Study 1 was a four-wave longitudinal survey and Study 2 was a mixed-methods study that included surveys, structured-clinical interviews, and qualitative interviews. RESULTS: Recruitment samples were representative of the full population of recently separated veterans. Sample weights were created to adjust for sources of non-response bias to the baseline survey. Attrition was low relative to past studies of this population, with only (younger) age predicting attrition at 1-week follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We expect that the LEAP Consortium data will contribute to improved information about EDs in veterans, a serious and understudied problem.

Psychometric properties of the Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder based on veterans' period of service.

The Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (M-PTSD) is a 35-item screening instrument for combat-related PTSD (Keane, Caddell, & Taylor, 1988) that has been normed largely on veterans from the Vietnam era. Research on its psychometric properties with veterans across different periods of service (POS) remains limited; however, this is an important research endeavor because of the uniqueness in experiences across eras which may influence PTSD rates, symptom expression/complaints, and treatment completion/outcomes. In this study, our objective was to examine the instrument's properties, replicating Keane et al.'s (1988) methodologies, with veterans from World War II, Korean, Vietnam, post-Vietnam, and Persian Gulf (pre- and post-9/11) eras. This retrospective cohort study involved the examination of medical records of 29,280 veterans receiving care across Veterans Affairs medical outpatient centers nationwide. The data revealed significant differences across POS in terms of M-PTSD total scores, F(4, 29,275) = 55.01, p = .000; therefore, analyses were conducted with the entire sample and with each POS. The instrument demonstrated high internal consistency with our sample (α = .92) and across POS (.91 to .92). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified cut-scores ranging from 86 to 112 across the POS with acceptable-to-good sensitivity (68% to 81%) and fair-to-acceptable specificity (61% to 70%), with lower scores among World War II and Korean era veterans compared with veterans from more recent conflicts. In terms of clinical implications, the M-PTSD is a brief, easily accessible, valuable screening tool for combat-related PTSD in veterans across a range of POS. Future studies should consider the methodologies utilized to diagnose PTSD and how this potentially impacts the instrument's properties. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Patterns of MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scale scores observed across Veteran Affairs settings.

The purpose of this investigation is to provide descriptive information on veteran response styles for a variety of VA referral types using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), which has well-supported protocol validity scales. The sample included 17,640 veterans who were administered the MMPI-2-RF between when it was introduced to the VA system in 2013 until May 31, 2015 at any VA in the United States. This study examines frequencies of protocol invalidity based on the MMPI-2-RF's validity scales and provides comprehensive descriptive findings on validity scale scores within the VA. Three distinct trends can be seen. First, a majority of the sample did not elevate any of the validity scales beyond their recommended interpretive cut-scores, indicating that scores on the substantive scales would be deemed valid and interpretable in those cases. Second, elevation rates are higher for the overreporting scales in comparison to the underreporting and non-content-based invalid responding scales. Lastly, a majority of those with an elevation on one overreporting validity indicator also had an elevation on at least one other overreporting scale. Implications for practice and the utility of the MMPI-2-RF within the VA are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

A preliminary review of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) in veterans: Are new norms and cut scores needed?

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is used within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to measure depression symptom severity. This naturalistic study aimed to examine VHA-specific BDI-II use and establish normative data and psychometric properties. Initial BDI-II data for 152,260 individual veterans were extracted from preexisting medical records using the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. BDI-II scores were compared against Beck, Steer, and Brown (1996)'s original sample, as well as across veteran subgroups. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted. Similar to Beck et al.'s (1996) sample, the BDI-II was most frequently administered in outpatient psychiatric VHA settings, although it was also used in inpatient and medical settings. Veterans scored significantly higher on the BDI-II than the original comparison groups. This was true across diagnostic categories. The largest discrepancy was seen between nondepressed veterans and corresponding patients from the original sample (Cohen's d = 1.34). Older veterans endorsed less severe levels of depression symptomatology. Additionally, a 2-factor model similar to Beck et al.'s (1996) original solution provided the best fit to the data. Veterans reported higher levels of somatic-affective symptoms than cognitive symptoms. Although potentially useful, the BDI-II requires further investigation in veterans. Standard cut scores are not recommended for use in this population when evaluating severity of depression. A cut score of 27 or higher best differentiated between veterans with and without mood disorders in the current sample. Treatment providers should also consider using BDI-II factor scores, rather than the total score, to measure depressive symptom change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Measurement-based care and psychological assessment: Using measurement to enhance psychological treatment.

This special issue highlights new research in psychological assessment and measurement-based care. Psychological assessment has historically been central to the field of psychology. Measurement-based care, considered an evidence-based practice, is a special type of applied psychological assessment in which patient-reported outcome measures are used to track progress in care as part of a clinical process. We discuss how the knowledge from these two distinct but related fields can synergistically advance mental health treatment. The articles in this special issue demonstrate ways to practically implement measurement-based care, the application of measurement-based care in special populations, as well as feature advances in psychological assessment that support the practice of measurement-based care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Demographic Profile and Service-Connection Trends of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury in US Veterans Pre- and Post-9/11.

INTRODUCTION: This study seeks to understand the demographic changes in the active-duty service member profile, both prior to and following September 11, 2001 (9/11). The study analyzed diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) and measures of severity of those diagnoses as recorded in service-connection ratings (percent disability). METHODS: A retrospective cohort-study of military veterans who received care at Veterans Health Administration medical centers between December 1998 and May 2014 was conducted based on clinical data recorded and stored within the Corporate Data Warehouse. RESULTS: A cohort of 1,339,937 veterans received an inpatient or outpatient diagnosis of PTSD and/or TBI. The cohort was divided into 4 service period groups and 3 diagnosis categories. The service periods included pre-9/11 (n = 1,030,806; 77%), post-9/11 (n = 204,083; 15%), overlap-9/11 (n = 89,953; 7%), and reentered post-9/11 (n = 15,095; 1%). The diagnosis categories included PTSD alone (n = 1,132,356; 85%), TBI alone (n = 100,789; 7%) and PTSD+TBI (n = 106,792; 8%). Results of the post-9/11 group revealed significant changes, including (1) increase of veterans with PTSD+TBI; (2) increase of female veterans with PTSD+TBI; and (3) increase of severity level of diagnosed PTSD/TBI as evidenced by higher service-connected disability pensions at younger age in the post-9/11 group. Additionally, data revealed unequal distribution of veterans with PTSD+TBI across geographic areas. CONCLUSIONS: The veteran of the post-9/11 service period does not mirror the veteran of the pre-9/11 service period. Findings are valuable for policy making, allocation of resources, and for reconsidering the prevailing paradigm for treating veterans with PTSD and/or TBI.

Measurement-based care: Use of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in a veteran population.

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is widely used within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), both as an assessment tool and as a part of measurement-based care practices. However, there is preliminary evidence that the BAI may perform uniquely in veteran samples, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive investigation of the BAI in this population. The present study compared the normative data reported by Beck and Steer (1993) to secondary data generated by a nationwide sample of U.S. military veterans receiving treatment through the VHA. Secondary data, including initial BAI scores, demographic characteristics, treatment location, and diagnoses originally recorded during the course of usual VHA care over a 5-year period for 57,088 individual veterans, were extracted through the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. BAI scores were compared across samples and various veteran subgroups. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted. Results revealed that the BAI performed similarly across veteran and normative samples. Male and older veterans were found to have lower BAI scores than their respective counterparts. Factor analyses indicated that a three-factor model best fit the veteran data. Additionally, a cut score of 18 best differentiated between veterans with and without anxiety and related disorders. This study helps support the use of the BAI as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing anxiety symptoms in veterans. Additional research is recommended to better guide BAI interpretation across age groups and sexes/genders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).