Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 52
Filtrar
1.
Circulation ; 148(21): 1665-1676, 2023 11 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37638968

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer is clinically relevant, but the evidence is lacking. The prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 60 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, in a 1-to-1 ratio, to receive either a 12-month or 3-month edoxaban treatment. The primary end point was a composite of a symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death at 12 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 12 months, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that a 12-month edoxaban treatment was superior to a 3-month edoxaban treatment with respect to the primary end point. RESULTS: From April 2019 through June 2022, 604 patients were randomized, and after excluding 3 patients who withdrew consent, 601 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population: 296 patients in the 12-month edoxaban group and 305 patients in the 3-month edoxaban group. The mean age was 70.8 years, 28% of the patients were men, and 20% of the patients had symptoms of deep vein thrombosis at baseline. The primary end point of a symptomatic recurrent VTE event or VTE-related death occurred in 3 of the 296 patients (1.0%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.44). The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 28 of the 296 patients (9.5%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.75-2.41). The prespecified subgroups did not affect the estimates on the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, 12 months was superior to 3 months for an edoxaban treatment with respect to the composite outcome of a symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03895502.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Trombosis , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicaciones , Hemorragia/complicaciones , Trombosis/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Circ J ; 2024 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462535

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with appropriately selected low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) can be treated at home, although it has been controversial whether applies to patients with cancer, who are considered not to be at low risk.Methods and Results: The current predetermined companion report from the ONCO PE trial evaluated the 3-month clinical outcomes of patients with home treatment and those with in-hospital treatment. The ONCO PE trial was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial among 32 institutions in Japan investigating the optimal duration of rivaroxaban treatment in cancer-associated PE patients with a score of 1 using the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). Among 178 study patients, there were 66 (37%) in the home treatment group and 112 (63%) in the in-hospital treatment group. The primary endpoint of a composite of PE-related death, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (4.6% [0.0-9.6%]) in the home treatment group and in 2 patients (1.8% [0.0-4.3%]) in the in-hospital treatment group. In the home treatment group, there were no cases of PE-related death or recurrent VTE, but major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (4.6% [0.0-9.6%]), and 2 patients (3.0% [0.0-7.2%]) required hospitalization due to bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Active cancer patients with PE of sPESI score=1 could be potential candidates for home treatment.

3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762713

RESUMEN

Statins were reported to have a potential effect of primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), although that of secondary prevention remains uncertain. To investigate the association between statins use and recurrent VTE in the current era. The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5,197 consecutive VTE patients among 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020. We divided the entire cohort into 2 groups according to statins use at the time of discharge; the statins (N = 865) and no statins groups (N = 4332). The statins group was older (72.9 vs. 66.7 years, P < 0.001), and less often had active cancer (22.0% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of discontinuation of anticoagulation was significantly lower in the statins group (60.3% vs. 52.6%, Log-rank P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was significantly lower in the statins group (6.8% vs. 10.1%, Log-rank P = 0.01). Even after adjusting for the confounders, the lower risk of the statins group relative to the no statins group remained significant for recurrent VTE (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.91, P = 0.01). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was significantly lower in the statins group (12.2% vs. 14.1%, Log-rank P = 0.04), although, after adjusting for the confounders, the risk of the statins group relative to the no statins group turned to be insignificant (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59-1.00, P = 0.054). In this large real-world VTE registry, statins use was significantly associated with a lower risk for the recurrent VTE in the current era.

4.
Circ J ; 87(3): 448-455, 2023 02 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35786694

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The worsening of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity is a critical issue in current clinical settings and may be associated with the development of thrombosis.Methods and Results: This study used patient data obtained in the CLOT-COVID study, a retrospective multicenter cohort study. The demographics of patients with moderate COVID-19 on admission with and without worsened severity during hospitalization were compared and predictors were identified. Of 927 patients with moderate COVID-19 on admission, 182 (19.6%) had worsened severity during hospitalization. Patients with worsening of severity were older, more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and active cancer, and more likely to use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Patients with worsening of severity had higher D-dimer levels on admission and were more likely to develop thrombosis and major bleeding during hospitalization than those without worsening. Increased age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.03, P=0.005), diabetes (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.11-2.33, P=0.012), D-dimer levels >1.0 µg/mL on admission (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.45-3.03, P<0.001), and thrombosis (OR: 6.28, 95% CI: 2.72-14.53, P<0.001) were independently associated with worsening of COVID-19 severity. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 20% of patients with moderate COVID-19 had worsened severity during hospitalization. Increased age, diabetes, D-dimer levels >1.0 µg/mL on admission, and the development of thrombosis during hospitalization were significantly associated with worsened COVID-19 severity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Trombosis , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios de Cohortes , Anticoagulantes , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno , Hospitalización , Gravedad del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
J Epidemiol ; 33(3): 150-157, 2023 03 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36372435

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reports of mortality-associated risk factors in patients with the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical features that were associated with mortality among patients who died during hospitalization (n = 158) and those who were alive at discharge (n = 2,736) from the large-scale, multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort CLOT-COVID study, which enrolled consecutively hospitalized COVID-19 patients from 16 centers in Japan from April to September 2021. Data from 2,894 hospitalized COVID-19 participants of the CLOT-COVID study were analyzed in this study. RESULTS: Patients who died were older (71.1 years vs 51.6 years, P < 0.001), had higher median D-dimer values on admission (1.7 µg/mL vs 0.8 µg/mL, P < 0.001), and had more comorbidities. On admission, the patients who died had more severe COVID-19 than did those who survived (mild: 16% vs 63%, moderate: 47% vs 31%, and severe: 37% vs 6.2%, P < 0.001). In patients who died, the incidence of thrombosis and major bleeding during hospitalization was significantly higher than that in those who survived (thrombosis: 8.2% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001; major bleeding: 12.7% vs 1.4%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that age >70 years, high D-dimer values on admission, heart disease, active cancer, higher COVID-19 severity on admission, and development of major bleeding during hospitalization were independently associated with a higher mortality risk. CONCLUSION: This large-scale observational study in Japan identified several independent risk factors for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 that could facilitate appropriate risk stratification of patients with COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano , Humanos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Japón/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Circ J ; 86(3): 458-463, 2022 Feb 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35095087

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) among hospitalized psychiatric patients after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remains unclear.Methods and Results:We retrospectively investigated the prevalence of proximal DVT after COVID-19 infection among 50 hospitalized patients in a Japanese psychiatric hospital that in which a COVID-19 cluster developed between August and September 2020. The prevalence of proximal DVT was 10.0%. Patients with proximal DVT had a lower body weight and higher maximum D-dimer levels and International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) VTE scores. CONCLUSIONS: After COVID-19 infection, hospitalized psychiatric patients are at high risk of DVT and should be carefully followed up.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitales Psiquiátricos , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología
7.
Circ J ; 86(7): 1137-1142, 2022 06 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35662177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The potential benefit of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation for critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still controversial.Methods and Results: In the CLOT-COVID study, 225 patients with severe COVID-19 on admission requiring mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were divided into patients with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (N=110) and those with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (N=115). There was no significant difference in the incidence of thrombosis between the groups (9.1% vs. 7.8%, P=0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Among a cohort of critically ill patients with COVID-19, approximately half received therapeutic-dose anticoagulation, although it did not show a potential benefit compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trombosis , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Coagulación Sanguínea , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Humanos , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/prevención & control
8.
Circ J ; 86(10): 1539-1546, 2022 09 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35851559

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) leads to increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, and recent studies reported that even mild-to-moderate AS was associated with poor prognosis in the general population. This study investigated the prognostic impact of mild or moderate AS, defined as 2.0 m/s ≤ peak aortic jet velocity (Vmax) ≤3.9 m/s using echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.Methods and Results: This study enrolled 3,049 AMI patients using data from the Mie ACS registry. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to Vmax: Group 1: Vmax <2.0 m/s and/or visually intact aortic valve in which all 3 leaflets are fully and evenly open; Group 2: 2.0 m/s ≤ Vmax ≤ 3.9 m/s. There were 2,976 patients in Group 1and 73 patients in Group 2. The Group 2 patients were older, had a higher percentage of males and had lower body mass index and Killip ≥2 than the Group 1 patients. Angiographic data, door-to-balloon time, and mechanical support were not different between the 2 groups. The Group 2 patients demonstrated a significantly higher all-cause mortality rate (P<0.01) and composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization (P<0.01), and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the same tendency in propensity score-matched patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed that mild or moderate AS based on Vmax is associated with poor prognosis following AMI.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Pronóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Volumen Sistólico
9.
Thromb J ; 20(1): 53, 2022 Sep 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36127738

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes extensive coagulopathy and a potential benefit of anticoagulation therapy has been documented for prevention of thromboembolic events. Bleeding events has also been reported as a notable complication; whereas, the incidence, risks, and clinical impact of bleeding remain unclear. METHOD: The CLOT-COVID Study was a nationwide, retrospective, multicenter cohort study on consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Japan between April 2021 and September 2021. In this sub-analysis, we compared the characteristics of patients with and without major bleeding; moreover, we examined the risk factors for and clinical impact of bleeding events. RESULTS: Among 2882 patients with COVID-19, 57 (2.0%) had major bleeding. The incidence of major bleeding increased with COVID-19 severity as follows: 0.5%, 2.3%, and 12.3% in patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19, respectively. COVID-19 severity, history of major bleeding, and anticoagulant type/dose were independently and additively associated with the bleeding incidence. Compared with patients without major bleeding, those with major bleeding exhibited a longer duration of hospitalization (9 [6-14] vs 28 [19-43] days, P < 0.001) and higher mortality during hospitalization (4.9% vs. 35.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world clinical practice, the incidence of major bleeding was not uncommon, especially in patients with severe COVID-19. Independent risk factors for major bleeding included history of major bleeding, COVID-19 severity, and anticoagulant use, which could be associated with poor clinical outcomes including higher mortality. Precise recognition of the risks for bleeding may be helpful for an optimal use of anticoagulants and for better outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

10.
Circ J ; 85(12): 2208-2214, 2021 11 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011824

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reportedly causes venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the status of this complication in Japan was unclear.Methods and Results:The VTE and COVID-19 in Japan Study is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study enrolling hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who were evaluated with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examination at 22 centers in Japan between March 2020 and October 2020. Among 1,236 patients with COVID-19, 45 (3.6%) were evaluated with contrast-enhanced CT examination. VTE events occurred in 10 patients (22.2%), and the incidence of VTE in mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 was 0%, 11.8%, and 40.0%, respectively. COVID-19 patients with VTE showed a higher body weight (81.6 vs. 64.0 kg, P=0.005) and body mass index (26.9 vs. 23.2 kg/m2, P=0.04), and a higher proportion had a severe status for COVID-19 compared with those without. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients alive at discharge between patients with and without VTE (80.0% vs. 88.6%, P=0.48). Among 8 pulmonary embolism (PE) patients, all were low-risk PE. CONCLUSIONS: Among a relatively small number of patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT examination in Japanese real-world clinical practice, there were no VTE patients among those with mild COVID-19, but the incidence of VTE seemed to be relatively high among severe COVID-19 patients, although all PE events were low-risk without significant effect on mortality risk.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , COVID-19/complicaciones , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/virología
11.
Int Heart J ; 61(4): 856-858, 2020 Jul 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641637

RESUMEN

Nutcracker syndrome (NCS), which is defined as compression of the left renal vein between the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery, is usually benign and self-limiting. Long-term renal venous retention increases the risk of renal vein thrombosis. However, NCS rarely develops into isolated thrombosis of the left renal vein; the reason for this process remains unknown. We describe a young man with antiphospholipid syndrome, who developed overt pulmonary thromboembolism due to an isolated thrombus in the left renal vein. Complicating antiphospholipid syndrome might trigger acute pulmonary thromboembolism (APTE) in patients with NCS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of APTE arising due to isolated left renal vein thrombosis in patients with NCS.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Síndrome de Cascanueces Renal/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Cascanueces Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto Joven
12.
Circ J ; 82(2): 555-560, 2018 01 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29070745

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the incidence, characteristics and management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Japan during 2011.Methods and Results:A retrospective study assessed responses to a questionnaire regarding treating newly diagnosed VTE at all admitting hospitals throughout Japan during 2011. More individuals were diagnosed with VTE than ever before, with 16,096 cases of diagnosed pulmonary embolism (PE) and 24,538 cases of diagnosed deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Almost half (47.2%) of the PE patients had a relatively mild condition with no right ventricular overload. Similarly, almost half (43.8%) of the DVT patients had a relatively mild condition with isolated calf thrombus. Most of PE patients were treated by anticoagulation, and fewer were treated using thrombolytic agent or inferior vena cava (IVC) filter. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed a remarkable increase in the incidence of VTE in Japan during 2011. Relatively mild conditions such as non-massive PE and isolated calf DVT were frequently diagnosed. Among PE patients, thrombolytic therapy or IVC filter implantation decreased compared with previous surveys. The appropriate management of isolated calf DVT requires further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Pierna/patología , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Terapia Trombolítica , Filtros de Vena Cava , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia
14.
Circ J ; 80(4): 989-97, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26924211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The expression of vasopressin type 2 receptor (V2R) in the lung, and the long-term effects of tolvaptan, a selective V2R antagonist, on pulmonary circulation and right ventricular (RV) remodeling in a pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) rat model were evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected subcutaneously with 20 mg/kg of SU5416 and were exposed to hypoxia for 3 weeks followed by re-exposure to normoxia for 7 weeks. These rats showed signs of RV failure and upregulation of V2R and cAMP in the lung tissue at 10 weeks after SU5416 injection. They were then treated with either 0.05% tolvaptan in diet (SUHx+Tolv) or normal diet (SUHx) during 5-10 weeks of SU5416 injection. Normal control rats (Cont) were also used for comparison. SUHx+Tolv had significantly higher pulmonary arterial pressure, more progressive pulmonary arterial remodeling, and more severe myocyte hypertrophy and interstitial myocardial fibrosis in the right ventricle compared with SUHx despite achieving successful preload reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic vasopressin V2R antagonism may contribute to the worsening of PAH and the development of RV remodeling.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de los Receptores de Hormonas Antidiuréticas/efectos adversos , Hipertensión Pulmonar , Hipoxia , Indoles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Receptores de Vasopresinas/biosíntesis , Remodelación Ventricular/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antagonistas de los Receptores de Hormonas Antidiuréticas/farmacología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Hipertensión Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/metabolismo , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Hipoxia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoxia/metabolismo , Hipoxia/fisiopatología , Indoles/farmacología , Masculino , Pirroles/farmacología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Regulación hacia Arriba/efectos de los fármacos
16.
Circ J ; 78(5): 1234-9, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24583973

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although stent implantation is used worldwide for peripheral arterial disease, there is little data on the safety and long-term patency of stents implanted for venous disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 13 patients with 14 lesions (6 males, 7 females, mean age: 63.2±10.2 years) diagnosed with venous stenosis and who underwent venous stenting. We examined the location of the stenosis, safety of venous stenting, implantation success rate, and long-term stent patency rate. All patients were suffering from venous stenosis in the left common iliac vein because of iliac vein compression syndrome. No major complications occurred during stent implantation. Acute stent occlusion occurred in 1 patient, who was given additional thrombolytic therapy. Of the 13 patients, 10 underwent venography or contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) during mid-term follow-up (mean: 12.9±16.1 months), and only 1 stent was occluded, resulting in a patency rate of 90.0%. The latter patient decided to stop taking warfarin soon after stent implantation. Furthermore, 5 patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT to assess the long-term patency of their stents (mean: 79.6±31.2 months), and none was occluded. CONCLUSIONS: Venous stents display a high long-term patency rate, and hence are a useful tool for treating iliac venous stenosis.


Asunto(s)
Vena Ilíaca/cirugía , Síndrome de May-Thurner/terapia , Trombolisis Mecánica , Stents , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Anciano , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Síndrome de May-Thurner/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen
17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700820

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Dynamic chest radiography using X-ray fluoroscopic video analysis has shown potential for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), but its diagnostic performance remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of fluoroscopic video analysis for diagnosing PE. METHODS: A prospective single-center observational study was conducted between October 2020 and January 2022. Fifty consecutive adult patients, comprising definitive PE, pulmonary hypertension (PH), or suspected PH, were enrolled. The study population was classified into 23 PE and 27 non-PE cases by contrast-enhanced computed tomography, lung scintigraphy, right heart catheterization, and pulmonary angiography. Cineradiographic images of 10-second breath-holds were obtained and analyzed using a fluoroscopic video analysis workstation to generate pulmonary circulation images. Two blinded cardiologists qualitatively assessed the presence or absence of perfusion defects on the pulmonary circulation images. The diagnosis obtained from the fluoroscopic analysis was compared with the definitive diagnosis. The primary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy for diagnosing PE. RESULTS: Perfusion defects were observed in 21 of 23 PE patients and 13 of 27 non-PE patients. The diagnostic performance of fluoroscopic video analysis for diagnosing PE showed a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 52%, positive predictive value of 62%, negative predictive value of 88%, and overall accuracy of 70%. CONCLUSIONS: The high sensitivity of the fluoroscopic video analysis suggests its potential usefulness in ruling out PE without the need for contrast media or radionuclide; however, its specificity and overall accuracy remain limited.

18.
J Cardiol Cases ; 29(2): 55-58, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38362581

RESUMEN

Prompt termination of pregnancy in patients with decompensated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is imperative for improvement of maternal hemodynamics, but such termination may also result in maternal death due to further deterioration of PAH immediately after delivery. However, there have been limited reports on whether implementation of PAH therapy with continuation of pregnancy improves the maternal outcome, especially in treatment-naïve patients with PAH. A 24-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with a chief complaint of dyspnea (WHO functional class IV) at 22 weeks and 3 days of gestation. She was diagnosed with PAH accompanied by right heart failure and low cardiac output. Intensive treatment was initiated with inotropic agents, oxygen therapy, and PAH therapy, resulting in improvement of her hemodynamics. A caesarean section was performed at 23 weeks and 3 days. Although her pulmonary arterial pressure transiently increased with oxygenation deteriorating immediately after delivery, worsening PAH improved without mechanical circulatory support. She continued receiving pulmonary vasodilators without relapse of pulmonary hypertension for three years. The improvement of pulmonary hemodynamics prior to delivery with PAH therapy led to a favorable outcome after delivery. Learning objective: Pulmonary hemodynamics in pregnant patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) can deteriorate with the continuation of pregnancy, while termination can also cause PAH surge immediately after delivery. In treatment-naïve patients with PAH, who are most likely to benefit from PAH therapy, implementation of PAH therapy with continuation, even with a decompensated status, may improve the hemodynamics prior to delivery, resulting in a favorable outcome after delivery.

19.
Thromb Res ; 235: 107-115, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38335565

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial ONCO DVT compared 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and suggested potential benefits of prolonged edoxaban treatment in terms of thrombotic risk. However, the risk-benefit balance of prolonged edoxaban treatment in patients with renal function remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens in patients with cancer-associated isolated distal DVT and different renal functions. METHODS: This pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study included 601 patients divided into subgroups according to renal function using a 50 mL/min creatinine clearance (Ccr) cutoff. The primary endpoint was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related death at 12 months and the major secondary endpoint was major bleeding at 12 months. RESULTS: Among the 601 patients, 131 (21.8 %) comprised the renal dysfunction subgroup. The primary endpoint occurred in 6 (9.7 %) and 1 (1.4 %) patients in the 3-month and 12-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively, and in 16 (6.6 %) and 2 (0.9 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively. The major secondary endpoint occurred in 9 (14.5 %) and 7 (10.1 %) patients in the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, and in 13 (5.3 %) and 21 (9.3 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A 12-month edoxaban regiment was superior to a 3-month treatment in terms of thrombotic risk irrespective of renal function. A higher bleeding risk was not identified in patients with renal dysfunction who received prolonged edoxaban treatment.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Neoplasias , Piridinas , Tiazoles , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Riñón
20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650055

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The ONCO DVT study revealed the superiority of 12-month relative to 3-month edoxaban treatment for cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) regarding the thrombotic risk. METHODS: In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study, we stratified the patients into those with a standard edoxaban dose (60 mg/day; N=151) and those with a reduced edoxaban dose (30 mg/day; N=450) and evaluated the clinical outcomes for the 12-month and 3-month treatments. RESULTS: The cumulative 12-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 12-month than 3-month group for both the 60 mg (1.3% vs. 11.6%, P=0.02; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01-0.97) and 30 mg (1.1% vs. 7.6%, P=0.002; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60) edoxaban subgroups, which was consistent across the edoxaban doses without a significant interaction (P =0.90). The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was higher in the 12-month group than 3-month group for the 60 mg edoxaban subgroup (14.3% vs. 4.4%, P=0.046; OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 0.97-13.52), whereas it did not significantly differ between the two groups for the 30 mg edoxaban subgroup (8.7% vs. 8.6%, P=0.89; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49-1.91), signaling there was a potential interaction (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: A 12-month edoxaban regimen for cancer-associated isolated distal DVT was consistently superior to a 3-month regimen, across the edoxaban doses for the thrombotic risk. However, caution was suggested for the standard dose of edoxaban due to the potential for an increased risk of bleeding with prolonged anticoagulation therapy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda