RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In emergency departments (EDs), the staff continually face stressful situations requiring staff to adopt various coping strategies. AIMS: The study aimed to assess work-related stress in ED during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHOD: The study was a monocentric investigation based on a questionnaire survey that elicits general information and uses the Karasek model to analyse the data. FINDINGS: A total of 117 forms were collected for analysis. The score for decision latitude (or autonomy and skills at work) was 70 (IQR: 64-74) and the score for psychological demand was 25 (IQR: 23-27). The score for social support by the management team was 11 (IQR: 9-12) and the score for social support by colleagues 12 (IQR: 10-12). Of the total number of respondents, job strain was assessed as affecting 24.8%. CONCLUSION: The study shows high levels of stress among the ED workforce. The findings indicate that it is imperative to develop simple management tools that are capable of measuring the internal causes of stress in order to develop an adapted wellness programme in ED.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Brotes de Enfermedades , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Estrés Laboral , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/enfermería , Guyana Francesa/epidemiología , Humanos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During primary survey of trauma patients, missed injuries and delayed diagnosis can be a potential source of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To assess type and frequency of missed injuries in prehospital care in trauma patients and to analyze their contributing factors and implications. METHODS: It is a descriptive and analytic prospective study. It was performed over six months which had included 200 trauma patients. The initial assessment made by the out-of hospital team of Sousse was compared to the second survey made in the emergency room and intensive care unit after the radiological assessment. RESULTS: Sixty seven (67) missed injuries were discovered in 51 patients, so 25.5% missed injuries incidence. These injuries were avoidable in 35.82% of cases. Twenty (20) injuries (29.85%) had clinically significant outcomes. Injuries are missed in the abdomen in 62.5% of cases, in the pelvis in 61.11% of cases, in the chest in 41.66% of cases, in the spine in 38.06 % of cases and in 20% of cases in the limbs. Multiple contributing factors were assigned, the most important were: the hemodynamic instability (Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg), the tachycardia and the low RTS. Altered level of consciousness (GCS of twelve or lower), multiple and violence of the trauma were observed but not retained as predictive factors of missing injuries. CONCLUSION: Our study showed higher rates of severe missed injuries mainly in abdomen and pelvis. Circulatory instability and low RTS were assigned as significant factors predicting of this obviousness. Various solutions are proposed to prevent missed during the first assessment in prehospital care.
Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adulto , Ambulancias , Diagnóstico Tardío/efectos adversos , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores Diagnósticos/efectos adversos , Errores Diagnósticos/mortalidad , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Triaje/normas , Túnez/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Kounis syndrome corresponds to the occurrence of myocardial injury following an allergic insult. This syndrome is infrequent, and is not well known. In consequence, it is usually misdiagnosed leading to inappropriate treatment. The current literature is limited to case studies and there are no international recommendations concerning this topic. CASE PRESENTATION: We discussed, through two case reports, the clinical presentation and the management of a 60-year-old North African man and a 45-year-old North African man presenting with chest pain suggesting acute coronary syndrome following anaphylactic reaction. Triggering factors were a drug in the first case and herbal dermal exposure in the second. A clinical examination and electrocardiogram revealed anaphylactic reaction associated with myocardial infarction. Appropriate management of these two life-threatening conditions allowed an improvement in our patients' condition and their transfer to specialized units. CONCLUSIONS: Although Kounis syndrome is a rare phenomenon, physicians should be aware of its physiopathological mechanisms in order to treat it appropriately. The difficulty lies in the fact that the treatment of either of the two associated entities may worsen the other injury.