Surgical options and clinical outcomes for high myopia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Higher degrees of myopia are currently being treated with refractive surgery. However, there is limited characterization and outcomes data for this cohort. This article aims to review the literature on highly myopic patients who had refractive surgery and present a retrospective analysis of 149 patients (270 eyes) with high to extreme myopia (≤-5.0D SE) who underwent refractive surgery [laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), or implantable collamer lense (ICL)] at a single practice. RECENT FINDINGS: There is substantial literature on the efficacy of LASIK, PRK, and phakic intraocular lenses for refractive error correction, but a dearth of studies on patients with high to extreme myopia undergoing different types of refractive surgery. Our study reveals that this cohort of patients has excellent outcomes with minimal complications. SUMMARY: Our study reveals that the average preoperative myopia was highest in ICL patients (-10.03D), followed by PRK (-7.21D), and LASIK (-7.04D) patients. Not surprisingly, eyes with high myopia and thin corneas were offered and elected ICLs for their procedure. Highly myopic patients achieved outcomes consistent with data reported in the literature- average postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 for LASIK and ICL eyes and 20/25 for PRK eyes.

Refractive lens exchange - who is getting it, what are they getting, how are they doing?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the literature on refractive lens exchange and present a retrospective analysis of 55 patients who underwent refractive lens exchange at a single practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Our study substantiates refractive lens exchange as an important option for presbyopic patients, hyperopic patients or patients with extremely high refractive error who desire spectacle independence. SUMMARY: Our study reveals that the refractive lens exchange population is younger than the average cataract population and their primary motivations are to resolve hyperopic or myopic refractive errors, gain spectacle independence, and address near vision loss. A variety of presbyopia-addressing intraocular lens options are available and we present our experience with multifocal, extended depth-of-focus, light-adjustable, and monofocal lenses.

What Should I Use? Impact of Adhesion Barriers on Postoperative Abdominal Complications: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Adhesions are a feared complication of abdominal surgery. There have been many new adhesion barriers developed and tested; however, there is no recent systematic review analyzing all the published literature. To address this, we aimed to analyze the different types of adhesion barriers, and determine their effects on postoperative outcomes in patients. METHODS: A total of 14,038 articles utilizing adhesion barriers in abdominal surgery were retrieved from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were: patients undergoing abdominal surgery, patients receiving an adhesion barrier, and reported postoperative outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles using Covidence. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Study protocol: Prospero CRD42023458230. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies, with no overall high risk of bias, with 171,792 patients were included. Most studies showed an equivocal benefit for adhesion barriers, with no singular adhesion barrier type that had definitive superior outcomes compared to the others. Bioresorbable barriers emerged as the most extensively researched adhesion barrier type, exhibiting promising results in colorectal surgery. Starch-based adhesion barriers also exhibited a reduction in overall postoperative bowel obstructions and may be beneficial for stoma sites and port closures. On the other hand, many studies raised concerns regarding complications, including risk of abscess formation, fistula development, peritonitis, and anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Adhesion barriers should be considered on a case-by-case basis, however, they should not be utilized prophylactically in all abdominal surgeries due to their risk of complications.

An Uncommon Presentation of Cervical Myelopathy.

Cervical myelopathy is a compressive spinal cord disease usually affecting individuals 55 and older. Involvement of C5-C7 is typical and classically presents with hand clumsiness, wide-based gait, and paresis. We present the case of a 38-year-old man with a pertinent history of a previous motor vehicle accident who presented to the emergency department for progressive numbness, weakness, and severe spasms in both lower extremities, and eventually developed bowel and bladder incontinence. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed moderate L3-L4/L5-S1 degenerative spinal changes; however, cervical MRI demonstrated severe C6-C7 spinal stenosis. The patient did not present with any upper extremity neurological changes. Given the relatively mild changes in the lumbar spine, the patient was concluded to have lower extremity and autonomic neurological issues due to severe cervical spinal stenosis. In this report, we present a relatively common case of cervical myelopathy and myelomalacia in a patient unusually presenting with no upper extremity signs and only lower extremity signs of progressive bilateral leg weakness and neurogenic urinary incontinence. This case emphasizes the importance of considering cervical spine workup in addition to thoracic and lumbar spine and conducting a comprehensive clinical neurological examination in the setting of lower extremity symptoms with progressive bilateral leg weakness and urinary incontinence.