Surrogacy Wars: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Reproduction.

State regulation of reproductive practices secure the heterosexual infrastructure of kinship through means that include elitization, institutional hostility, and plain criminalization. This article draws on personal experiences of gay fathers through transnational gestational surrogacy in Spain to show the extent to which that is the case even in those contexts where some gay and lesbian kinship rights are available. Public and academic debates on the possible regulation of gestational surrogacy will be analyzed through the lens of Gayle Rubin's intervention in the sex wars that divided feminism in the 1980s, with which contemporary anti-surrogacy movements show crucial genealogical links. In addition, in order to unearth some gendered assumptions on the ahistorical link between surrogacy and motherhood, the role of the gestational carrier will be read in relation to the figure of the "bad mother."

[Comparison of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) with lung function, levels of exhaled nitric oxide and control according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)]. / Relación del test de control del asma (ACT) con la función pulmonar, niveles de óxido nítrico exhalado y grados de control según la Iniciativa Global para el Asma (GINA).

INTRODUCTION: The current goal of asthma treatment is to achieve and maintain control. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the ACT (Asthma Control Test) questionnaire and the levels of control according to GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) to establish the cut-off points for the ACT and evaluate its relationship with lung function and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide level (FeNO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multi-centre prospective study including 441 patients followed up in an outpatient Chest Clinic. A clinical protocol was followed, and FeNO, spirometry and ACT performed. Disease was classified according to levels of control using GINA. The study analysed sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (ROC), and the ACT cut-off points. We studied the differences between the functional parameters and FeNO between levels of control. RESULTS: For controlled asthma the cut-off obtained was ACT> or =21 (area under the curve 0.791) and for uncontrolled < or =18 (AUC 0.774). We found significant differences in FeNO levels and pulmonary function among ACT> or =21 and ACT< or =18, although only 26.3% of patients with ACT< or =18 had a FEV1 <80% and 40% higher FeNO (> or =35 ppb). We found a correlation between baseline FEV1 and ACT (r=0.19, P<0.01) and between ACT and FeNO (r=-0.16, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The cut-off points would be, for controlled asthma ACT> or =21, partly controlled asthma ACT=19-20 and uncontrolled asthma ACT< or =18. A more complete assessment would require including monitoring operating parameters and FeNO.

Relación del test de control del asma (ACT) con la función pulmonar, niveles de óxido nítrico exhalado y grados de control según la Iniciativa Global para el Asma (GINA) / Comparison of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) with Lung Function, Levels of Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Control According to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)

Introducción. El objetivo actual en el tratamiento del asma es conseguir y mantener el control. Este estudio tiene como objetivos estudiar la relación entre el cuestionario ACT (Asthma Control Test) y los niveles de control según Global Initiative for Asthma para establecer los puntos de corte del ACT y evaluar su relación con la función pulmonar y la Fracción exhalada de óxido nítrico (FeNO). Pacientes y métodos. Estudio prospectivo multicéntrico con inclusión de 441 pacientes seguidos en consultas externas de neumología. Se realizó protocolo clínico, FeNO, espirometría forzada y ACT. Se clasificó la enfermedad según los niveles de control de la Global Initiative for Asthma. Se realizó estudio de sensiblidad, especificidad y área bajo la curva (ROC), estimándose los puntos de corte de ACT. Se estudiaron las diferencias entre los parámetros funcionales y FeNO entre los niveles de control. Resultados. Para el asma controlada el punto de corte obtenido fue ACT≥21 (área bajo la curva 0,791) y para el no controlada fue ≤18 (área bajo la curva 0,774). Encontramos diferencias significativas en niveles de FeNO y función pulmonar entre ACT≥21 y ACT≤18, aunque solo el 26,3% de pacientes con ACT≤18 presentaron un FEV1<80% y el 40% FeNO elevado (≥35 ppb). Encontramos correlación entre FEV1 basal y ACT (r=0,19, p<0,01), así como entre ACT y FeNO (r=−0,16, p<0,01). Conclusiones. Los puntos de corte para el asma controlada serían ACT≥21, para el asma parcialmente controlada ACT=19–20 y para el asma no controlada ACT≤18. Una valoración más completa del control requeriría incluir parámetros funcionales y FeNO.(AU)

Introduction. The current goal of asthma treatment is to achieve and maintain control. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the ACT (Asthma Control Test) questionnaire and the levels of control according to GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) to establish the cut-off points for the ACT and evaluate its relationship with lung function and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide level (FeNO). Patients and methods. A multi-centre prospective study including 441 patients followed up in an outpatient Chest Clinic. A clinical protocol was followed, and FeNO, spirometry and ACT performed. Disease was classified according to levels of control using GINA. The study analysed sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (ROC), and the ACT cut-off points. We studied the differences between the functional parameters and FeNO between levels of control. Results. For controlled asthma the cut-off obtained was ACT≥21 (area under the curve 0.791) and for uncontrolled ≤18 (AUC 0.774). We found significant differences in FeNO levels and pulmonary function among ACT≥21 and ACT≤18, although only 26.3% of patients with ACT≤18 had a FEV1 <80% and 40% higher FeNO (≥35 ppb). We found a correlation between baseline FEV1 and ACT (r=0.19, P<0.01) and between ACT and FeNO (r=−0.16, P<0.01). Conclusions. The cut-off points would be, for controlled asthma ACT≥21, partly controlled asthma ACT=19–20 and uncontrolled asthma ACT≤18. A more complete assessment would require including monitoring operating parameters and FeNO. (AU)